Distribution and Characterization of Keratins in the Epidermis of the Tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus; Lepidosauria, Reptilia)

Scales of non-avian reptiles and their derivatives contain corneous beta proteins coded from genes localized in the Epidermal Differentiation Complex

The evolution of modern reptiles from basic reptilian ancestors gave rise to scaled vertebrates. Scales are of different types, and their corneous layer can shed frequently during the year in lepidosaurians (lizards, snakes), 1-2 times per year in the tuatara and in some freshwater turtle, irregularly in different parts of the body in crocodilians, or simply wore superficially in marine and terrestrial turtles. Lepidosaurians possess tuberculate, non-overlapped or variably overlapped scales with inter-scale (hinge) regions. The latter are hidden underneath the outer scale surface or may be more exposed in specific body areas. Hinge regions allow stretching during growth and movement so that the skin remains mechanically functional. Crocodilian and turtles feature flat and shield scales (scutes) with narrow inter-scale regions for stretching and growth. The epidermis of non-avian reptilian hinge regions is much thinner than the exposed outer surface of scales and is less cornified. Despite the thickness of the epidermis, scales are mainly composed of variably amount of Corneous Beta Proteins (CBPs) that are coded in a gene cluster known as EDC (Epidermal Differentiation Complex). These are small proteins, 100-200 amino acid long of 8-25 kDa, rich in glycine and cysteine but also in serine, proline and valine that participate to the formation of beta-sheets in the internal part of the protein, the beta-region. This region determines the further polymerization of CBPs in filamentous proteins that, together a network of Intermediate Filament Keratins (IFKs) and other minor epidermal proteins from the EDC make the variable pliable or inflexible corneous material of reptilian scales, claws and of turtle beak. The acquisition of scales and skin derivatives with different mechanical and material properties, mainly due to the evolution of reptile CBPs, is essential for the life and different adaptations of these vertebrates.

Keratin intermediate filament chains in the European common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) and a potential keratin filament crosslinker

On the basis of sequence homology with mammalian α-keratins, and on the criteria that the coiled-coil segments and central linker in the rod domain of these molecules must have conserved lengths if they are to assemble into viable intermediate filaments, a total of 28 Type I and Type II keratin intermediate filament chains (KIF) have been identified from the genome of the European common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis). Using the same criteria this number may be compared to 33 found here in the green anole lizard (Anole carolinensis) and 25 in the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). The Type I and Type II KIF genes in the wall lizard fall in clusters on chromosomes 13 and 2 respectively. Although some differences occur in the terminal domains in the KIF chains of the two lizards and tuatara, the similarities between key indicator residues - cysteine, glycine and proline - are significant. The terminal domains of the KIF chains in the wall lizard also contain sequence repeats commonly based on glycine and large apolar residues and would permit the fine tuning of physical properties when incorporated within the intermediate filaments. The H1 domain in the Type II chain is conserved across the lizards, tuatara and mammals, and has been related to its role in assembly at the 2-4 molecule level. A KIF-like chain (K80) with an extensive tail domain comprised of multiple tandem repeats has been identified as having a potential filament-crosslinking role.

Structures of the ß-Keratin Filaments and Keratin Intermediate Filaments in the Epidermal Appendages of Birds and Reptiles (Sauropsids)

The epidermal appendages of birds and reptiles (the sauropsids) include claws, scales, and feathers. Each has specialized physical properties that facilitate movement, thermal insulation, defence mechanisms, and/or the catching of prey. The mechanical attributes of each of these appendages originate from its fibril-matrix texture, where the two filamentous structures present, i.e., the corneous ß-proteins (CBP or ß-keratins) that form 3.4 nm diameter filaments and the α-fibrous molecules that form the 7-10 nm diameter keratin intermediate filaments (KIF), provide much of the required tensile properties. The matrix, which is composed of the terminal domains of the KIF molecules and the proteins of the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) (and which include the terminal domains of the CBP), provides the appendages, with their ability to resist compression and torsion. Only by knowing the detailed structures of the individual components and the manner in which they interact with one another will a full understanding be gained of the physical properties of the tissues as a whole. Towards that end, newly-derived aspects of the detailed conformations of the two filamentous structures will be discussed and then placed in the context of former knowledge.

Keratin intermediate filament chains in tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus): A comparison of tuatara and human sequences

Determination of the sequences of the keratin intermediate filament chains in tuatara has shown that these are closely akin to the α-keratins in human and other vertebrates, especially in the central, coiled-coil rod region. The domain lengths within the rod are preserved exactly, both Type I and Type II chains have been recognised, and sequence identity/homology exists between their respective chains. Nonetheless, there are characteristic differences in amino acid composition and sequence between their respective head (N-terminal) domains and their tail (C-terminal) domains, though some similarities are retained. Further, there is evidence of tandem repeats of a variety of lengths in the tuatara heads and tails indicative of sequence duplication events. These are not evident in human α-keratins and would therefore have implications for the physical attributes of the tissues in the two species. Multiple families of keratin-associated proteins that are ultra-high cysteine-rich or glycine + tyrosine-rich in human and other species do not have direct equivalents in the tuatara. Although high-sulphur proteins are present in tuatara the cysteine residue contents are significantly lower than in human. Further, no sequence homologies between the HS proteins in the two species have been found, thereby casting considerable doubt as to whether any matrix-forming high-sulphur proteins exist in tuatara. These observations may be correlated with the numerous cysteine-rich β-keratins (corneous β-proteins) that are present in tuatara, but which are conspicuously absent in mammals.

Identification of epidermal differentiation genes of the tuatara provides insights into the early evolution of lepidosaurian skin

The tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) is the phylogenetically closest relative of squamates (including lizards and snakes) from which it diverged around 250 million years ago. Together, they constitute the clade Lepidosauria. Fully terrestrial vertebrates (amniotes) form their skin barrier to the environment under the control of a gene cluster, termed the epidermal differentiation complex (EDC). Here we identified EDC genes in the genome of the tuatara and compared them to those of other amniotes. The organization of the EDC and proteins encoded by EDC genes are most similar in the tuatara and squamates. A subcluster of lepidosaurian EDC genes encodes corneous beta-proteins (CBPs) of which three different types are conserved in the tuatara. Small proline-rich proteins have undergone independent expansions in the tuatara and some, but not all subgroups of squamates. Two genes encoding S100 filaggrin-type proteins (SFTPs) are expressed during embryonic skin development of the tuatara whereas SFTP numbers vary between 1 and 3 in squamates. Our comparative analysis of the EDC in the tuatara genome suggests that many molecular features of the skin that were previously identified in squamates have evolved prior to their divergence from the lineage leading to the tuatara.

Cross-immunoreactivity between the LH1 antibody and cytokeratin epitopes in the differentiating epidermis of embryos of the grass snake Natrix natrix L. during the end stages of embryogenesis

The monoclonal anti-cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) antibody recognizing K1/K10 keratin epitopes that characterizes a keratinized epidermis of mammals cross-reacts with the beta and Oberhäutchen layers covering the scales and gastrosteges of grass snake embryos during the final period of epidermis differentiation. The immunolocalization of the anti-cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) antibody appears in the beta layer of the epidermis, covering the outer surface of the gastrosteges at the beginning of developmental stage XI, and in the beta layer of the epidermis, covering the outer surface of the scales at the end of developmental stage XI. This antibody cross-reacts with the Oberhäutchen layers in the epidermis covering the outer surface of both scales and gastrosteges at developmental stages XI and XII just before its fusion with the beta layers. After fusion of the Oberhäutchen and beta layers, LH1 immunolabeling is weaker than before. This might suggest that alpha-keratins in these layers of the epidermis are masked by beta-keratins, modified, or degraded. The anti-cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) antibody stains the Oberhäutchen layer in the epidermis covering the inner surface of the gastrosteges and the hinge regions between gastrosteges at the end of developmental stage XI. However, the Oberhäutchen of the epidermis covering the inner surfaces of the scales and the hinge regions between scales does not show cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) immunolabeling until hatching. This cross-reactivity suggests that the beta and Oberhäutchen layers probably contain some alpha-keratins that react with the LH1 antibody. It is possible that these alpha-keratins create specific scaffolding for the latest beta-keratin deposition. It is also possible that the LH1 antibody cross-reacts with other epidermal proteins such as filament-associated proteins, i.e., filaggrin-like. The anti-cytokeratin 1/10 (LH1) antibody does not stain the alpha and mesos layers until hatching. We suppose that the differentiation of these layers will begin just after the first postnatal sloughing.

Evolution of hard proteins in the sauropsid integument in relation to the cornification of skin derivatives in amniotes

Hard skin appendages in amniotes comprise scales, feathers and hairs. The cell organization of these appendages probably derived from the localization of specialized areas of dermal-epidermal interaction in the integument. The horny scales and the other derivatives were formed from large areas of dermal-epidermal interaction. The evolution of these skin appendages was characterized by the production of specific coiled-coil keratins and associated proteins in the inter-filament matrix. Unlike mammalian keratin-associated proteins, those of sauropsids contain a double beta-folded sequence of about 20 amino acids, known as the core-box. The core-box shows 60%-95% sequence identity with known reptilian and avian proteins. The core-box determines the polymerization of these proteins into filaments indicated as beta-keratin filaments. The nucleotide and derived amino acid sequences for these sauropsid keratin-associated proteins are presented in conjunction with a hypothesis about their evolution in reptiles-birds compared to mammalian keratin-associated proteins. It is suggested that genes coding for ancestral glycine-serine-rich sequences of alpha-keratins produced a new class of small matrix proteins. In sauropsids, matrix proteins may have originated after mutation and enrichment in proline, probably in a central region of the ancestral protein. This mutation gave rise to the core-box, and other regions of the original protein evolved differently in the various reptilians orders. In lepidosaurians, two main groups, the high glycine proline and the high cysteine proline proteins, were formed. In archosaurians and chelonians two main groups later diversified into the high glycine proline tyrosine, non-feather proteins, and into the glycine-tyrosine-poor group of feather proteins, which evolved in birds. The latter proteins were particularly suited for making the elongated barb/barbule cells of feathers. In therapsids-mammals, mutations of the ancestral proteins formed the high glycine-tyrosine or the high cysteine proteins but no core-box was produced in the matrix proteins of the hard corneous material of mammalian derivatives.

beta-Keratins in crocodiles reveal amino acid homology with avian keratins

The DNA sequences encoding beta-keratin have been obtained from Marsh Mugger (Crocodylus palustris) and Orinoco Crocodiles (Crocodylus intermedius). Through the deduced amino acid sequence, these proteins are rich in glycine, proline and serine. The central region of the proteins are composed of two beta-folded regions and show a high degree of identity with beta-keratins of aves and squamates. This central part is thought to be the site of polymerization to build the framework of beta-keratin filaments. It is believed that the beta-keratins in reptiles and birds share a common ancestry. Near the C-terminal, these beta-keratins contain a peptide rich in glycine-X and glycine-X-X, and the distinctive feature of the region is some 12-amino acid repeats, which are similar to the 13-amino acid repeats in chick scale keratin but absent from avian feather keratin. From our phylogenetic analysis, the beta-keratins in crocodile have a closer relationship with avian keratins than the other keratins in reptiles.

Characterization of keratins and associated proteins involved in the corneification of crocodilian epidermis

Crocodilian keratinocytes accumulate keratin and form a corneous cell envelope of which the composition is poorly known. The present immunological study characterizes the molecular weight, isoelectric point (pI) and the protein pattern of alpha- and beta-keratins in the epidermis of crocodilians. Some acidic alpha-keratins of 47-68 kDa are present. Cross-reactive bands for loricrin (70, 66, 55 kDa), sciellin (66, 55-57 kDa), and filaggrin-AE2-positive keratins (67, 55 kDa) are detected while caveolin is absent. These proteins may participate in the formation of the cornified cell membranes, especially in hinge regions among scales. Beta-keratins of 17-20 kDa and of prevalent basic pI (7.0-8.4) are also present. Acidic beta-keratins of 10-16 kDa are scarce and may represent altered forms of the original basic proteins. Crocodilian beta-keratins are not recognized by a lizard beta-keratin antibody (A68B), and by a turtle beta-keratin antibody (A685). This result indicates that these antibodies recognize specific epitopes in different reptiles. Conversely, crocodilian beta-keratins cross-react with the Beta-universal antibody indicating they share a specific 20 amino acid epitope with avian beta-keratins. Although crocodilian beta-keratins are larger proteins than those present in birds our results indicate presence of shared epitopes between avian and crocodilian beta-keratins which give good indication for the future determination of the sequence of these proteins.

Hard (Beta-)keratins in the epidermis of reptiles: composition, sequence, and molecular organization

Beta-keratins form the hard corneous material of reptilian scales. In the present review, the distribution and molecular characteristics of beta-keratins in reptiles are presented. In lepidosaurians immunoreactive, protein bands at 12-18 kDa are generally present with less frequent proteins at higher molecular weight. In chelonians, bands at 13-18 and 22-24 kDa are detected. In crocodilians, bands at 14-20 kDa and weaker bands at 30-32 kDa are seen. Protein bands above 25 kDa are probably polymerized beta-keratins or aggregates. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis shows that beta-keratins are mainly basic and that acidic-neutral keratins may derive from post-translational modifications. Beta-keratins comprise glycine-proline-rich and cystein-proline-rich proteins of 13-19 kDa. Beta-keratin genes may or may not contain introns and are present in multiple copies with a linear organization as in avian beta-keratin genes. Despite amino acid differences toward N- and C-terminals all beta-keratins share high homology in their central, beta-folded region of 20 amino acids, indicated as core-box. This region is implicated in the formation of beta-keratin filaments of scales, claws, and feathers. The homology of the core-box suggests that these proteins evolved from a progenitor sequence present in the stem of reptiles. Beta-keratins have diversified in their amino acid sequences producing secondary (and tertiary) conformations that suited them for their mechanical role in scales. In birds, a small beta-keratin has allowed the formation of feathers. It is suggested that beta-keratins represent the reptilian counterpart of keratin associated or matrix proteins present in mammalian hairs, claws, and horns.

Epidermal differentiation in embryos of the tuatara Sphenodon punctatus (Reptilia, Sphenodontidae) in comparison with the epidermis of other reptiles

Studying the epidermis in primitive reptiles can provide clues regarding evolution of the epidermis during land adaptation in vertebrates. With this aim, the development of the skin of the relatively primitive reptile Sphenodon punctatus in representative embryonic stages was studied by light and electron microscopy and compared with that of other reptiles previously studied. The dermis organizes into a superficial and deep portion when the epidermis starts to form the first layers. At embryonic stages comparable with those of lizards, only one layer of the inner periderm is formed beneath the outer periderm. This also occurs in lizards and snakes so far studied. The outer and inner periderm form the embryonic epidermis and accumulate thick, coarse filaments (25-30 nm thick) and sparse alpha-keratin filaments as in other reptiles. Beneath the embryonic epidermis an oberhautchen and beta-cells form small horny tips that represent overlapping borders along the margin of beta-cells that overlap other beta-cells (in a tile-like arrangement). The tips resemble those of agamine lizards but at a small scale, forming a lamellate-spinulated pattern as previously described in adult epidermis. The embryonic epidermis matures by the dispersion of coarse filaments among keratin at the end of embryonic development and is shed around hatching. The presence of these matrix organelles in the embryonic epidermis of this primitive reptile further indicates that amniote epidermis acquired interkeratin matrix proteins early for land adaptation. Unlike the condition in lizards and snakes, a shedding complex is not formed in the epidermis of embryonic S. punctatus that is like that of the adult. Therefore, as in chelonians and crocodilians, the epidermis of S. punctatus also represents an initial stage that preceded the evolution of the shedding complex for moulting.