Phase I study of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in Chinese patients with CD20-positive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

A multi-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled phase II study comparing pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics and safety of ripertamab (SCT400) to rituximab (MabThera®) in patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Objective

This multi-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled phase II study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety profile of ripertamab (SCT400), a recombinant anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, to rituximab (MabThera^®) in patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Methods

Patients with CD20-positive B-cell NHL who achieved complete remission or unconfirmed complete remission after standard treatment were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of ripertamab (375 mg/m²) or rituximab (MabThera^®, 375 mg/m²). PK was evaluated using area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to d 85 (AUC_{0-85 d}), AUC from time 0 to week 1 (AUC_{0-1 w}), AUC from time 0 to week 2 (AUC_{0-2 w}), AUC from time 0 to week 3 (AUC_{0-3 w}), AUC from time 0 to week 8 (AUC_{0-8 w}), maximum serum concentration (C_max), terminal half-life (T_1/2), time to maximum serum concentration (T_max) and clearance (CL). Bioequivalence was confirmed if the 90% confidence interval (90% CI) of the geometric mean ratio of ripertamab/rituximab was within the pre-defined bioequivalence range of 80.0%-125.0%. PD, immunogenicity, and safety were also evaluated.

Results

From December 30, 2014 to November 24, 2015, a total of 84 patients were randomized (ripertamab, n=42; rituximab, n=42) and the PK analysis was performed on 76 patients (ripertamab, n=38; rituximab, n=38). The geometric mean ratios of ripertamab/rituximab for AUC_{0-85 d}, AUC_0-inf, and C_max were 96.1% (90% CI: 87.6%-105.5%), 95.9% (90% CI: 86.5%-106.4%) and 97.4% (90% CI: 91.6%-103.6%), respectively. All PK parameters met the pre-defined bioequivalence range of 80.0%-125.0%. For PD and safety evaluation, there was no statistical difference in peripheral CD19-positive B-cell counts and CD20-positive B-cell counts at each visit, and no difference in the incidence of anti-drug antibodies was observed between the two groups. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were also comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions

In this study, the PK, PD, immunogenicity, and safety profile of ripertamab (SCT400) were similar to rituximab (MabThera^®) in Chinese patients with CD20-positive B-cell NHL.

Antibodies to watch in 2022

In this 13th annual installment of the annual 'Antibodies to Watch' article series, we discuss key events in commercial antibody therapeutics development that occurred in 2021 and forecast events that might occur in 2022. Regulatory review of antibody therapeutics that target the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus proceeded at an unprecedented pace in 2021, resulting in both emergency use authorizations and full approvals for sotrovimab, regdanvimab, REGEN-COV2, as well as others, in numerous countries. As of November 1, a total of 11 antibody therapeutics had been granted first approvals in either the United States or European Union in 2021 (evinacumab, dostarlimab loncastuximab tesirine, amivantamab, aducanumab, tralokinumab, anifrolumab, bimekizumab, tisotumab vedotin, regdanvimab, REGEN-COV2). The first global approvals of seven products, however, were granted elsewhere, including Japan (pabinafusp alfa), China (disitamab vedotin, penpulimab, zimberelimab), Australia (sotrovimab, REGEN-COV2), or the Republic of Korea (regdanvimab). Globally, at least 27 novel antibody therapeutics are undergoing review by regulatory agencies. First actions by the Food and Drug Administration on the biologics license applications for faricimab, sutimlimab, tebentafusp, relatlimab, sintilimab, ublituximab and tezepelumab are expected in the first quarter of 2022. Finally, our data show that, with antibodies for COVID-19 excluded, the late-stage commercial clinical pipeline of antibody therapeutics grew by over 30% in the past year. Of those in late-stage development, marketing applications for at least 22 may occur by the end of 2022.

Phase 1 studies comparing safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of HLX01 (a rituximab biosimilar) to reference rituximab in Chinese patients with CD20-positive B-cell lymphoma

Objective

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of HLX01 (a rituximab biosimilar) and reference rituximab sourced from China (MabThera^®; rituximab-CN).

Methods

Here we report the results of two phase 1 studies. In the phase 1a, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT03218072, CTR20140400), eligible patients received 250, 375 and 500 mg/m² HLX01 sequentially at 7-day intervals, after confirming no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). In the phase 1b, double-blind study (NCT02584920, CTR20140764), eligible patients were given a single dose of 375 mg/m² HLX01 or rituximab-CN. The primary endpoints included safety and tolerability parameters for the phase 1a and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to day 91 (AUC_{0−91 d}) for the phase 1b study. Equivalence was concluded if 90% confidence interval (90% CI) for the geometric least squares mean ratio (GLSMR) fell in the pre-specified equivalence criteria (80%−125%).

Results

Between June 20, 2014 and January 5, 2015, 12 patients were enrolled in the phase 1a study. The pharmacokinetics of HLX01 showed dose proportionality and accumulation to steady state. HLX01 was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (AEs), discontinuations or DLTs. Between November 8, 2014 and August 13, 2015, 87 eligible patients were enrolled in the phase 1b study, including 43 who received HLX01 and 44 who were treated with rituximab-CN. The equivalence endpoint was met with GLSMR for AUC_{0−91 d} being 89.6% (90% CI: 80.4%−99.8%). AEs, anti-drug antibodies, and CD19+ and CD20+ B lymphocyte counts were similar between the HLX01 and rituximab-CN treatment groups.

Conclusions

Treatment with HLX01 was safe and well tolerated in Chinese patients with B-cell lymphoma. HLX01 and rituximab-CN have similar pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles.

Current status and progress of lymphoma management in China

Lymphoma is a large group of lymphoid hematopoietic malignancies including Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The various subtypes of lymphoma are different in clinical features, response to treatment and prognoses. The relative frequency of specific subtypes of lymphoma varies geographically. The mature T cell lymphoma is much more common in East Asia compared with Western countries. Chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of lymphoma. With advances in understanding the biology and genetics of lymphoma, many new agents are used in the treatment of lymphoma. In mainland China, some new agents and new combination chemotherapy regimens showed high efficacy and good tolerability. Chidamide, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma by the China Food and Drug Administration. Anti-programmed death 1 antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells have been explored for lymphoma immunotherapy in Chinese patients. Advances in the treatment have substantially increased the likelihood of cure for patients with lymphoma.

Enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy by Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells Engineered to Secrete Checkpoint Inhibitors

Purpose: Despite favorable responses of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T-cell therapy in patients with hematologic malignancies, the outcome has been far from satisfactory in the treatment of solid tumors, partially owing to the development of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. To overcome this limitation, we engineered CAR T cells secreting checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) targeting PD-1 (CAR.αPD1-T) and evaluated their efficacy in a human lung carcinoma xenograft mouse model.Experimental Design: To evaluate the effector function and expansion capacity of CAR.αPD1-T cells in vitro, we measured the production of IFNγ and T-cell proliferation following antigen-specific stimulation. Furthermore, the antitumor efficacy of CAR.αPD1-T cells, CAR T cells, and CAR T cells combined with anti-PD-1 antibody was determined using a xenograft mouse model. Finally, the underlying mechanism was investigated by analyzing the expansion and functional capacity of TILs.Results: Human anti-PD-1 CPIs secreted by CAR.αPD1-T cells efficiently bound to PD-1 and reversed the inhibitory effect of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on T-cell function. PD-1 blockade by continuously secreted anti-PD-1 attenuated the inhibitory T-cell signaling and enhanced T-cell expansion and effector function both in vitro and in vivo In the xenograft mouse model, we demonstrated that the secretion of anti-PD-1 enhanced the antitumor activity of CAR T cells and prolonged overall survival.Conclusions: With constitutive anti-PD-1 secretion, CAR.αPD1-T cells are more functional and expandable, and more efficient at tumor eradication than parental CAR T cells. Collectively, our study presents an important and novel strategy that enables CAR T cells to achieve better antitumor immunity, especially in the treatment of solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 23(22); 6982-92. ©2017 AACR.