Effectiveness and safety of different amifostine regimens: Preliminary results of a phase II multicenter randomized controlled trial

Advances of Amifostine in Radiation Protection: Administration and Delivery

Amifostine (AMF, also known as WR-2721) is the only approved broad-spectrum small-molecule radiation protection agent that can combat hematopoietic damage caused by ionizing radiation and is used as an antitumor adjuvant and cell protector in cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Amifostine is usually injected intravenously before chemotherapy or radiotherapy and has been used in the treatment of head and neck cancer. However, the inconvenient intravenous administration and its toxic side effects such as hypotension have severely limited its further application in clinic. In order to reduce the toxic and side effects, scientists are trying to develop a variety of drug administration methods and are devoted to developing a wide application of amifostine in radiation protection. This paper reviews the research progress of amifostine for radiation protection in recent years, discusses its mechanism of action, clinical application, and other aspects, with focus on summarizing the most widely studied amifostine injection administration and drug delivery systems, and explored the correlation between various administrations and drug efficacies.

Radioprotective countermeasures for radiation injury (Review)

A series of physiological and pathological changes occur after radiotherapy and accidental exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). These changes cause serious damage to human tissues and can lead to death. Radioprotective countermeasures are radioprotective agents that prevent and reduce IR injury or have therapeutic effects. Based on a good understanding of radiobiology, a number of protective agents have achieved positive results in early clinical trials. The present review grouped known radioprotective agents according to biochemical categories and potential clinical use, and reviewed radiation countermeasures, i.e., radioprotectors, radiation mitigators and radiotherapeutic agents, with an emphasis on their current status and research progress. The aim of the present review is to facilitate the selection and application of suitable radioprotectors for clinicians and researchers, to prevent or reduce IR injury.

Impact on xerostomia for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with superficial parotid lobe-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SPLS-IMRT): A prospective phase II randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of xerostomia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with superficial parotid lobe-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SPLS-IMRT) and conventional IMRT (C-IMRT).

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed NPC who met the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to receive either SPLS-IMRT or C-IMRT. The primary endpoint was the incidence of xerostomia at 12 months post-IMRT. The secondary endpoints included the xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) score, unstimulated salivary flow rate (USFR), stimulated salivary flow rate (SSFR), and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled. Eighty-two patients were included for xerostomia analysis (42 in the SPLS-IMRT group and 40 in the C-IMRT group). At 12 months post-IMRT, the incidence of xerostomia in the SPLS-IMRT group was significantly lower than that in the C-IMRT group (83.4% vs 95.0%; P = 0.007), especially the grade 3 xerostomia (0% vs 12.5%; P < 0.001). The median change in XQ score was similar between the two groups (11.9 points vs 14.1 points; P = 0.194). There was a significantly higher median fractional USFR (0.67 vs 0.35; P = 0.024) and SSFR (0.66 vs 0.32; P = 0.021) in the SPLS-IMRT group than the C-IMRT group. The 3-year LRRFS, DMFS, and OS in the SPLS-IMRT and C-IMRT groups were 92.5% vs 90.9%, 83.8% vs 81.7%, and 88.9% vs 88.2% (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SPLS-IMRT significantly reduced the incidence of xerostomia at 12 months post-IMRT in NPC by recovering parotid gland function earlier than C-IMRT, without compromising survivals. Phase III clinical trials are warranted. (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05020067).

Serum Calcium Levels Before Antitumour Therapy Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The prognostic value of serum calcium levels in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of serum calcium levels in patients with NPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2094 patients diagnosed with NPC between April 2009 and September 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. The median follow-up time was 96.3 months (range: 4.1-120.0 months). Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify significant and independent prognostic predictors of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and relapse-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

Overall, low serum calcium levels were detected in 1109/2094 (53.00%) patients and tended to be more frequently detected in older (P<0.001) and female (P=0.001) patients. Patients with low serum calcium levels had poorer OS (P=0.011), DFS (P=0.012) and DMFS (P=0.004) than those with high serum calcium levels, but serum calcium levels had no significant effect on RFS (P=0.376). In univariate and multivariable analyses, low serum calcium levels were a statistically significant and independent prognostic factor for OS, DFS, and DMFS but had no prognostic value for RFS.

CONCLUSION

Serum calcium levels can serve as a prognostic predictor and guide more individualized treatment for NPC patients.

Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Five Years Literature Review

Backround: Radiation-induced oral mucositis consists of a series of relatively frequent side effects after head and neck cancer radiotherapy and has an adverse impact on both regular treatment process and the quality of life of patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present review is to optimize the current management of radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

PubMed database research was performed on articles published since 2015 that demonstrated efficacy in the management of radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. The study selection included observational, prospective, comparative, randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled or uncontrolled, and retrospective studies, as well as systematic reviews and metanalyses.

RESULTS

From the 931 citations obtained from the search, only 94 articles met the inclusion criteria, including mucosal protectants, anti-inflammatory agents, growth factors, and various miscellaneous and natural agents. Several methods, including both pharmacological and natural agents, have been proposed for the management of oral mucositis. In addition to the already known interventions with strong evidence, according to the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and he International Society of Oral Oncology guidelines, further agents have been used. However, a great number of them lack clear evidence, which surely requires the design of more controlled clinical trials for a better assessment of the ideal methods.

CONCLUSION

The management of oral mucositis constitutes an active area of research. In light of these results, it is aimed to illustrate those treatment strategies that are most effective regarding the treatment approach of oral mucositis.

Honey Against Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses of the Literature

Backround: Oral mucositis (OM) consists of a major side effect of radiotherapy (RT) in head and neck (H-N) cancer patients and natural honey is gaining more and more scientific interest due to its beneficial effects in tissue repair.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to better clarify the preventive/therapeutic role of honey in the management of OM in patients with H-N cancer undergoing RT with or without chemotherapy (CT).

METHODS

We used the PubMed database to retrieve journal articles and the inclusion criteria were only reviews and meta-analyses that illustrated the effective use of honey for either the prevention or treatment of OM in H-N cancer patients receiving either RT alone or in combination with CT.

RESULTS

Our search resulted in 92 citations, of which 12 eventually fulfilled the inclusion criteria of our study. Decreased incidence and severity of OM, extended time of occurrence of mucositis, less weight loss and less treatment interruptions were occasionally documented with conventional honey use in the included reviews and meta-analyses. In contrast to conventional honey, manuka honey proved to be weak in improving OM management in the small number of included reviews in our search.

CONCLUSION

Conventional honey might constitute a highly promising natural product against OM attracting much scientific interest due to its easy accessibility and low financial cost. Hence, the lack of studies with high evidence requires further advanced research to enhance the existing knowledge about the potential value of honey in radiation-induced OM in H-N cancer patients.

Osthole sensitizes with radiotherapy to suppress tumorigenesis of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma in vitro and in vivo

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy is one of the most comment and useful treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the radioresistance remains a major obstacle. Osthole, a natural coumarin derivative, has been shown to have anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory activity. However, the relationship between osthole and NPC treatment, especially for radiotherapy, is still elusive.

METHODS

Osthole with or without X ray radiotherapy treated with CNE2 cells, a human EC cell line. Cell viability, proliferation, migration and apoptosis were measured by MTT, colony formation, Annexin V/PI double staining, Transwell assay, respectively. NPC tumor models were established on BALB/c nude mice by subcutaneously injection of CNE2 cells and the effect of osthole and radiotherapy on tumor growth in vivo was studied.

RESULTS

We found that in a dose-dependent manner, osthole could individually, and synergistically with radiotherapy, reduce NPC cell (CNE2) viability, proliferation, migration, and invasion, and induce apoptosis, respectively. This effect of anti-tumor growth and induction of apoptosis was further confirmed in mice induced by subcutaneously injection with CNE2 cells and following treated with osthole or/and radiation.

CONCLUSION

Osthole increases the effect of radiotherapy on anti-human nasopharyngeal cancer.