Dabigatran potentiates gemcitabine-induced growth inhibition of pancreatic cancer in mice

The Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Gastric Mucosa and Helicobacter Pylori Prevalence in Dyspeptic Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background and aim Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used and their side effects related to bleeding at various body sites have been well studied in the literature, less is known about their local impact on gastric mucosa. Some studies suggest that the higher risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with DOACs may be due to their direct local anticoagulant effects on the gastric mucosa. In this study, we aim to evaluate whether this potential local effect has a favorable outcome on the gastric mucosa and the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (HP).  Materials and methods A total of 125 patients with dyspepsia were included in the study. Sixty patients who had been using a DOAC for at least one month were classified as the "DOAC group," while 65 patients who had not used DOACs were designated as the "control group." Demographic, laboratory, and pathological findings for these patients were retrospectively analyzed from their medical files. Results Patients in the DOAC group were significantly less likely to have antral gastritis (AnG) (p = 0.028), while the frequencies of HP and atrophic gastritis (AtG) were similar between the two groups. Although not statistically significant, the DOAC group showed fewer instances of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and a higher number of upper GI ulcers. Patients who had been using DOACs for more than 12 months had increased incidences of IM, upper GI ulcers, AnG, and HP compared to those who had been using DOACs for 12 months or less. The Rivaroxaban subgroup showed significantly lower HP positivity compared to patients using other DOACs (p = 0.042). Among all subgroups, the Rivaroxaban group had the lowest frequency of AnG (p = 0.024). Conclusion While DOACs seem to prevent AnG, HP, and IM at their early use stages, unfavorable gastric mucosa manifestations might increase with prolonged use. Higher upper GI ulcer prevalence is another controversial result of this issue. Rivaroxaban shines amongst other DOACs with its lesser HP and AnG association. These exciting findings should be supported by randomized controlled trials with large patient populations.

Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Effects of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Malignancy

Optimizing the anticoagulation therapy is of pivotal importance in patients with a malignant tumor, as venous thromboembolism (VTE) has become the second-leading cause of death in this population. Cancer can highly increase the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Consequently, the management of cancer-associated VTE is complex. In recent years, translational research has intensified, and several studies have highlighted the role of inflammatory cytokines in cancer growth and progression. Simultaneously, the pleiotropic effects of anticoagulants currently recommended for VTE have emerged. In this review, we describe the anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects of both direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LWMHs).

Microparticle Phosphatidylserine Mediates Coagulation: Involvement in Tumor Progression and Metastasis

Tumor progression and cancer metastasis has been linked to the release of microparticles (MPs), which are shed upon cell activation or apoptosis and display parental cell antigens, phospholipids such as phosphatidylserine (PS), and nucleic acids on their external surfaces. In this review, we highlight the biogenesis of MPs as well as the pathophysiological processes of PS externalization and its involvement in coagulation activation. We review the available evidence, suggesting that coagulation factors (mainly tissue factor, thrombin, and fibrin) assist in multiple steps of tumor dissemination, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition, extracellular matrix remodeling, immune escape, and tumor angiogenesis to support the formation of the pre-metastatic niche. Platelets are not just bystander cells in circulation but are functional players in primary tumor growth and metastasis. Tumor-induced platelet aggregation protects circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from the blood flow shear forces and immune cell attack while also promoting the binding of CTCs to endothelial cells and extravasation, which activates tumor invasion and sustains metastasis. Finally, in terms of therapy, lactadherin can inhibit coagulation by competing effectively with coagulation factors for PS binding sites and may similarly delay tumor progression. Furthermore, we also investigate the therapeutic potential of coagulation factor inhibitors within the context of cancer treatment. The development of multiple therapies targeting platelet activation and platelet-tumor cell interactions may not only reduce the lethal consequences of thrombosis but also impede tumor growth and spread.

Tumor Cell-Induced Platelet Aggregation as an Emerging Therapeutic Target for Cancer Therapy

Tumor cells have the ability to induce platelet activation and aggregation. This has been documented to be involved in tumor progression in several types of cancers, such as lung, colon, breast, pancreatic, ovarian, and brain. During the process, platelets protect circulating tumor cells from the deleterious effects of shear forces, shield tumor cells from the immune system, and provide growth factors, facilitating metastatic spread and tumor growth at the original site as well as at the site of metastasis. Herein, we present a wider view on the induction of platelet aggregation by specific factors primarily developed by cancer, including coagulation factors, adhesion receptors, growth factors, cysteine proteases, matrix metalloproteinases, glycoproteins, soluble mediators, and selectins. These factors may be presented on the surface of tumor cells as well as in their microenvironment, and some may trigger more than just one simple receptor–ligand mechanism. For a better understanding, we briefly discuss the physiological role of the factors in the platelet activation process, and subsequently, we provide scientific evidence and discuss their potential role in the progression of specific cancers. Targeting tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation (TCIPA) by antiplatelet drugs may open ways to develop new treatment modalities. On the one hand, it may affect patients’ prognosis by enhancing known therapies in advanced-stage tumors. On the other hand, the use of drugs that are mostly easily accessible and widely used in general practice may be an opportunity to propose an unparalleled antitumor prophylaxis. In this review, we present the recent discoveries of mechanisms by which cancer cells activate platelets, and discuss new platelet-targeted therapeutic strategies.

Commonly Prescribed Anticoagulants Exert Anticancer Effects in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells In Vitro

Simple Summary

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide with 840,000 new cases and 420,000 deaths in 2020. Anticoagulants are widely prescribed medications routinely administered to help prevent blood clots. Despite the great relevance of these two topics, there is complete lack of knowledge regarding the potential effects that these drugs could exert on oral cancer patients. In this in vitro study, we comprehensively investigated the effect of anticoagulants on OSCC activity. This includes the effect of these drugs on cancer cell ability to survive, migrate to colonise distant sites, and resist treatment with conventional chemotherapy. We have demonstrated for the first time that various anticoagulants have anticancer effects on OSCC. Moreover, some of the anticoagulants tested were able to reduce the migratory ability of cancer cells. Finally, the great majority of anticoagulants studied reduced the effectiveness of the tested chemotherapeutic agent, allowing an increase in cancer cell proliferation. Our results highlight the need for urgent further research in the field, to improve the anticoagulant strategies in patients with oral cancer, and in turn their prognosis.

Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common head and neck cancer. With anticoagulant usage on the rise, it is important to elucidate their potential effects on tumour biology and interactions with chemotherapeutics. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of anticoagulants on OSCC cell lines and their interactions with the drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Cell proliferation was assessed using an MTS in vitro assay in two human OSCC cell lines (H357/H400) and in normal oral keratinocytes (OKF6) treated with the 5-FU (0.2/1/5/10 μg/mL), conventional anticoagulants warfarin (1/5/10/20 μM) and heparin (5/20/80 U), as well as four new oral anticoagulants, dabigatran (5/10/20 μM), rivaroxaban (5/10/20 μM), apixaban (0.1/1/5 μg/mL), and edoxaban (5/10/20 μM). Cell migration was assessed at 3 h intervals up to18 h using a wound healing assay. Our results clearly demonstrate, for the first time, that commonly prescribed anticoagulants exert in vitro antiproliferative effects on OSCC cells. Furthermore, treatment with some anticoagulants reduced the migration of OSCC cell lines. Nevertheless, most of the anticoagulants tested reduced the effectiveness of the chemotherapeutic agent tested, 5-FU, highlighting potential flaws in the current pharmacological management of these patients. Our findings showed the need for the immediate translation of this research to preclinical animal models.

Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Compromises Pulmonary Endothelial Integrity in a Murine Model of Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Lungs; the Role of Platelets and Inflammation-Associated Haemostasis

Activation of the coagulation cascade favours metastatic spread, but antithrombotic therapy might also have detrimental effects on cancer progression. In this study, we characterized the effects of dabigatran, a direct reversible thrombin inhibitor, on the pulmonary endothelial barrier and metastatic spread in a murine model of breast cancer metastasis. Dabigatran etexilate (100 mg kg−1) was administered to mice twice daily by oral gavage. Pulmonary metastasis, pulmonary endothelium permeability in vivo, and platelet reactivity were evaluated after intravenous injection of 4T1 breast cancer cells into BALB/c mice. The effect of dabigatran on platelet-dependent protection of pulmonary endothelial barrier in the presence of an inflammatory stimulus was also verified in vitro using human lung microvascular endothelial cell (HLMVEC) cultures. Dabigatran-treated mice harbored more metastases in their lungs and displayed increased pulmonary endothelium permeability after cancer cell injection. It was not associated with altered lung fibrin deposition, changes in INFγ, or complement activation. In the in vitro model of the pulmonary endothelial barrier, dabigatran inhibited platelet-mediated protection of pulmonary endothelium. In a murine model of breast cancer metastasis, dabigatran treatment promoted pulmonary metastasis by the inhibition of platelet-dependent protection of pulmonary endothelial barrier integrity.

Platelets Contribution to Thrombin Generation in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: The "Circulating Wound" Model

Current cytoreductive and antithrombotic strategies in MPNs are mostly based on cell counts and on patient's demographic and clinical history. Despite the numerous studies conducted on platelet function and on the role of plasma factors, an accurate and reliable method to dynamically quantify the hypercoagulability states of these conditions is not yet part of clinical practice. Starting from our experience, and after having sifted through the literature, we propose an in-depth narrative report on the contribution of the clonal platelets of MPNs-rich in tissue factor (TF)-in promoting a perpetual procoagulant mechanism. The whole process results in an unbalanced generation of thrombin and is self-maintained by Protease Activated Receptors (PARs). We chose to define this model as a "circulating wound", as it indisputably links the coagulation, inflammation, and fibrotic progression of the disease, in analogy with what happens in some solid tumours. The platelet contribution to thrombin generation results in triggering a vicious circle supported by the PARs/TGF-beta axis. PAR antagonists could therefore be a good option for target therapy, both to contain the risk of vascular events and to slow the progression of the disease towards end-stage forms. Both the new and old strategies, however, will require tools capable of measuring procoagulant or prohaemorrhagic states in a more extensive and dynamic way to favour a less empirical management of MPNs and their potential clinical complications.

Thrombin contributes to cancer immune evasion via proteolysis of platelet-bound GARP to activate LTGF-β

Cancer-associated thrombocytosis and high concentrations of circulating transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) are frequently observed in patients with progressive cancers. Using genetic and pharmacological approaches, we show a direct link between thrombin catalytic activity and release of mature TGF-β1 from platelets. We found that thrombin cleaves glycoprotein A repetitions predominant (GARP), a cell surface docking receptor for latent TGF-β1 (LTGF-β1) on platelets, resulting in liberation of active TGF-β1 from the GARP-LTGF-β1 complex. Furthermore, systemic inhibition of thrombin obliterates TGF-β1 maturation in platelet releasate and rewires the tumor microenvironment toward favorable antitumor immunity, which translates into efficient cancer control either alone or in combination with programmed cell death 1-based immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Last, we demonstrate that soluble GARP and GARP-LTGF-β1 complex are present in the circulation of patients with cancer. Together, our data reveal a mechanism of cancer immune evasion that involves thrombin-mediated GARP cleavage and the subsequent TGF-β1 release from platelets. We propose that blockade of GARP cleavage is a valuable therapeutic strategy to overcome cancer's resistance to immunotherapy.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer Patients. Time for a Change in Paradigm

Thrombosis is a more common occurrence in cancer patients compared to the general population and is one of the main causes of death in these patients. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the recognized standard treatment for more than a decade, both in cancer-related thrombosis and in its prevention. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a new option for anticoagulation therapy. Recently published results of large randomized clinical trials have confirmed that DOAC may be a reasonable alternative to LMWH in cancer patients. The following review summarizes the current evidence on the safety and efficacy of DOAC in the treatment and prevention of cancer-related thrombosis. It also draws attention to the limitations of this group of drugs, knowledge of which will facilitate the selection of optimal therapy.

A systematic review on the effects of direct oral anticoagulants on cancer growth and metastasis in animal models

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the first choice thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients who do not have a high risk of bleeding. In addition to the anticoagulant effects, potential anti-tumor effects of DOACs have also been studied in animal cancer models. In this study, we summarize the effects of DOACs on cancer growth and metastasis in animal models through a systematic review with a qualitative analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were systematically searched for original studies that describe animal models of cancer in which one of the experimental groups received DOAC monotherapy, and which reported quantitatively on primary tumor or metastases.

RESULTS

Nine studies - reporting a total of 19 animal experiments - met the inclusion criteria. These 19 experiments included spontaneous cancer (n = 2), carcinogenicity (n = 2), xenograft (n = 7) and syngeneic (n = 8) models, encompassing orthotopic (n = 7), subcutaneous (n = 5), intraperitoneal (n = 1) and intravenous (n = 2) injection of cancer cells and included treatments with the DOACs ximelagatran (n = 4), dabigatran etexilate (n = 6) and/or rivaroxaban (n = 11). DOAC treatment decreased tumor growth at implanted and metastatic site in 18.8% (3/16) and 20.0% (3/15) of the experiments, respectively. Conversely, DOACs increased tumor growth at implanted and metastatic site in 6.3% (1/16) and 20.0% (3/15) of the experiments, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DOAC monotherapy resulted in neoplastic changes in a rat carcinogenicity study, showed a lack of effect in mouse xenograft models, while the effect on cancer growth and metastasis in mouse syngeneic models depended on the timing of DOAC treatment and type of cancer model used.

The direct oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban and dabigatran do not inhibit orthotopic growth and metastasis of human breast cancer in mice

Essentials Factor Xa (FXa)-targeting direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce venous thromboembolism (VTE) The effects of FXa-targeting DOACs on cancer progression remain to be studied In xenograft models, a FXa-targeting DOAC did not inhibit breast cancer growth and metastasis A thrombin-targeting DOAC, dabigatran, also did not inhibit breast cancer growth and metastasis ABSTRACT: Background Factor Xa-targeting DOACs were recently found to reduce recurrent VTE efficiently in cancer patients when compared to the standard treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). While the anticancer effects of LMWHs have been extensively studied in preclinical cancer models, the effects of FXa-targeting DOACs on cancer progression remain to be studied. Objective We investigated whether the FXa-targeting DOAC rivaroxaban and the thrombin-targeting DOAC dabigatran etexilate (DE) affected human breast cancer growth and metastasis in orthotopic xenograft models. Methods/results Mice that were put on a custom-made chow diet supplemented with rivaroxaban (0.4 or 1.0 mg/g diet) or dabigatran etexilate (DE) (10 mg/g diet) showed prolonged ex vivo coagulation times (prothrombin time [PT] and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] assay, respectively). However, rivaroxaban and DE did not inhibit MDA-MB-231 tumor growth and metastasis formation in lungs or livers of 7-week-old fully immunodeficient NOD/SCID/ƴC-/- (NSG) mice. Comparable data were obtained for rivaroxaban-treated mice when using NOD-SCID mice. Rivaroxaban and DE treatment also did not significantly inhibit tumor growth and metastasis formation when using another human triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line (HCC1806) in NOD-SCID mice. The FXa and thrombin-induced gene expression of the downstream target CXCL8 in both cell lines, but FXa and thrombin, did not significantly stimulate migration, proliferation, or stemness in vitro. Conclusion Although effectively inhibiting coagulation, the DOACs rivaroxaban and DE did not inhibit orthotopic growth and metastasis of human TNBC. It remains to be investigated whether DOACs exert antitumorigenic effects in other types of cancer.

Endothelial Protein C Receptor (EPCR), Protease Activated Receptor-1 (PAR-1) and Their Interplay in Cancer Growth and Metastatic Dissemination

Endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and protease activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) by themselves play important role in cancer growth and dissemination. Moreover, interactions between the two receptors are essential for tumor progression. EPCR is a cell surface transmembrane glycoprotein localized predominantly on endothelial cells (ECs). It is a vital component of the activated protein C (APC)—mediated anticoagulant and cytoprotective signaling cascade. PAR-1, which belongs to a family of G protein–coupled cell surface receptors, is also widely distributed on endothelial and blood cells, where it plays a critical role in hemostasis. Both EPCR and PAR-1, generally considered coagulation-related receptors, are implicated in carcinogenesis and dissemination of diverse tumor types, and their expression correlates with clinical outcome of cancer patients. Existing data explain some mechanisms by which EPCR/PAR-1 affects cancer growth and metastasis; however, the exact molecular basis of cancer invasion associated with the signaling is still obscure. Here, we discuss the role of EPCR and PAR-1 reciprocal interactions in cancer progression as well as potential therapeutic options targeted specifically to interact with EPCR/PAR-1-induced signaling in cancer patients.

PAR1 signaling on tumor cells limits tumor growth by maintaining a mesenchymal phenotype in pancreatic cancer

Protease activated receptor-1 (PAR1) expression is associated with disease progression and overall survival in a variety of cancers. However, the importance of tumor cell PAR1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) remains unexplored. Utilizing orthotopic models with wild type and PAR1-targeted PDAC cells, we show that tumor cell PAR1 negatively affects PDAC growth, yet promotes metastasis. Mechanistically, we show that tumor cell-specific PAR1 expression correlates with mesenchymal signatures in PDAC and that PAR1 is linked to the maintenance of a partial mesenchymal cell state. Indeed, loss of PAR1 expression results in well-differentiated pancreatic tumors in vivo, with enhanced epithelial characteristics both in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, we have identified a novel growth inhibitory role of PAR1 in PDAC, which is linked to the induction, and maintenance of a mesenchymal-like phenotype. The recognition that PAR1 actively limits pancreatic cancer cell growth suggest that the contributions of PAR1 to tumor growth differ between cancers of epithelial origin and that its targeting should be applied with care.

Antiplatelet agents for cancer treatment: a real perspective or just an echo from the past?

The association between coagulation and cancer development has been observed for centuries. However, the connection between inflammation and malignancy is also well-recognized. The plethora of evidence indicates that among multiple hemostasis components, platelets play major roles in cancer progression by providing surface and granular contents for several interactions as well as behaving like immune cells. Therefore, the anticancer potential of anti-platelet therapy has been intensively investigated for many years. Anti-platelet agents may prevent cancer, decrease tumor growth, and metastatic potential, as well as improve survival of cancer patients. On the other hand, there are suggestions that antiplatelet treatment may promote solid tumor development in a phenomenon described as "cancers follow bleeding." The controversies around antiplatelet agents justify insight into the subject to establish what, if any, role platelet-directed therapy has in the continuum of anticancer management.