High expression of RUVBL1 and HNRNPU is associated with poor overall survival in stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer patients

The present study aimed to investigate expression levels and prognostic significance of RUVBL1 and HNRNPU in stage I and II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Therefore, we evaluated immunohistochemical staining of RUVBL1 and HNRNPU, as well as RNA-seq data from public sources, and the results were evaluated concerning overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological features. We found that RUVBL1 and HNRNPU proteins and mRNA levels were higher in tumor tissues as compared to adjacent/normal tissues. RUVBL1 (p = 0.013) and HNRNPU (p = 0.021) high protein levels were independent prognostic factors for poor OS. Also, the multivariate analysis in the TCGA dataset revealed that high RUVBL1 (p = 0.064) and HNRNPU (p = 0.181) mRNA levels were not significantly associated with prognosis. However, the co-expression status of these markers (R + H +) was independently associated with poor OS both in the TCGA dataset (p = 0.027) and in our cohort (p = 0.001). In conclusion, combined and individual expression of RUVBL1 and HNRNPU proteins, as well as R + H + mRNA status, may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers for NSCLC. This study adds to the previous observations that RUVBL1 and HNRNPU might be novel and promising therapeutic targets and markers for prognostic evaluation.

Tumor Cell-Induced Platelet Aggregation as an Emerging Therapeutic Target for Cancer Therapy

Tumor cells have the ability to induce platelet activation and aggregation. This has been documented to be involved in tumor progression in several types of cancers, such as lung, colon, breast, pancreatic, ovarian, and brain. During the process, platelets protect circulating tumor cells from the deleterious effects of shear forces, shield tumor cells from the immune system, and provide growth factors, facilitating metastatic spread and tumor growth at the original site as well as at the site of metastasis. Herein, we present a wider view on the induction of platelet aggregation by specific factors primarily developed by cancer, including coagulation factors, adhesion receptors, growth factors, cysteine proteases, matrix metalloproteinases, glycoproteins, soluble mediators, and selectins. These factors may be presented on the surface of tumor cells as well as in their microenvironment, and some may trigger more than just one simple receptor–ligand mechanism. For a better understanding, we briefly discuss the physiological role of the factors in the platelet activation process, and subsequently, we provide scientific evidence and discuss their potential role in the progression of specific cancers. Targeting tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation (TCIPA) by antiplatelet drugs may open ways to develop new treatment modalities. On the one hand, it may affect patients’ prognosis by enhancing known therapies in advanced-stage tumors. On the other hand, the use of drugs that are mostly easily accessible and widely used in general practice may be an opportunity to propose an unparalleled antitumor prophylaxis. In this review, we present the recent discoveries of mechanisms by which cancer cells activate platelets, and discuss new platelet-targeted therapeutic strategies.

Prognostic significance of MATR3 in stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

Matrin 3 (MATR3) is a nuclear matrix protein involved in mRNA stabilization, nuclear retention of hyper-edited RNAs, and RNA splicing. The role of MATR3 in cancer is still unclear. The present study aimed to investigate expression levels and prognostic significance of MATR3 in stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We examined MATR3 protein immunohistochemically in tumoral and non-tumoral tissue sections from n = 67 NSCLC patients treated at hospital, and MATR3 mRNA from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort with respect to valid prognostic and predictive features, as well as treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Significantly higher immunohistochemical levels of MATR3 protein were found in tumor-adjacent tissue compared to cancer (p = 0.049). A decrease in MATR3 protein expression was found to be a significant independent adverse prognostic factor for patients overall survival (p = 0.007). By contrast, we observed higher MATR3 mRNA levels in tumoral tissue compared to control lung tissues (p < 0.001). Based on the TCGA dataset, we reported that high MATR3 mRNA level was significantly associated with worse OS of NSCLC patients (p < 0.001); however, it was not an independent prognostic marker (p = 0.156). The discrepancies in prognostic significance of MATR3 gene mRNA and protein levels imply a need for further investigation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the present study warrants further investigation into the biological and prognostic value of MATR3 as a potential prognostic marker in early-stage NSCLC patients.

Prognostic Significance of TLR2, SMAD3 and Localization-dependent SATB1 in Stage I and II Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of SATB1, SMAD3, and TLR2 expression in non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients with clinical stages I-II. To investigate, we evaluated immunohistochemical staining to each of these markers using tissue sections from 69 patients from our cohort and gene expression data for The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. We found that, in our cohort, high expression levels of nuclear SATB1ⁿ and SMAD3 were independent prognostic markers for better overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients. Interestingly, expression of cytoplasmic SATB1^c exhibited a significant but inverse association with survival rate, and it was an independent predictor of unfavorable prognosis. Likewise, TLR2 was a negative outcome biomarker for NSCLC even when adjusting for covariates. Importantly, stratification of NSCLCs with respect to combined expression of the three biomarkers allowed us to identify subgroups of patients with the greatest difference in duration of survival. Specifically, expression profile of SATB1^n-high/SMAD3^high/TLR2^low was associated with the best OS, and it was superior to each single protein alone in predicting patient prognosis. Furthermore, based on the TCGA dataset, we found that overexpression of SATB1 mRNA was significantly associated with better OS, whereas high mRNA levels of SMAD3 and TLR2 with poor OS. In conclusion, the present study identified a set of proteins that may play a significant role in predicting prognosis of NSCLC patients with clinical stages I-II.

Expression of zinc finger transcription factors (ZNF143 and ZNF281) in serous borderline ovarian tumors and low-grade ovarian cancers

Low-grade ovarian cancers represent up to 8% of all epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOCs). Recent studies demonstrated that epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is crucial for the progression of EOCs. EMT plays a key role in cancer invasion, metastasis formation and chemotherapy resistance. An array of novel EMT transcription factors from the zinc finger protein family have been described recently, among them zinc finger protein 143 (ZNF143) and zinc finger protein 281 (ZNF281). The study included tissue specimens from 42 patients. Based on histopathological examination of surgical specimens, eight lesions were classified as serous borderline ovarian tumors (sBOTs) and 34 as low-grade EOCs. The proportions of the ovarian tumors that tested positively for ZNF143 and ZNF281 were 90 and 57%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the expressions of ZNF143 and ZNF281 transcription factors in SBOTs and low-grade EOCs. Considering the expression patterns for ZNF143 and ZNF281 identified in this study, both sBOTs and low-grade EOCs might undergo a dynamic epithelial-mesenchymal interconversion. The lack of statistically significant differences in the expressions of the zinc finger proteins in sBOTs and low-grade serous EOCs might constitute an evidence for common origin of these two tumor types.

Expression of selected epithelial-mesenchymal transition transcription factors in serous borderline ovarian tumors and type I ovarian cancers

Epithelial ovarian neoplasms are a heterogeneous group including tumor subsets with distinct clinicopathologic and molecular features. Recent evidence from molecular and genomic studies suggests that whereas low-grade serous carcinomas and high-grade serous carcinomas likely develop on two separate pathways, the low-grade serous carcinomas and serous borderline ovarian tumors may represent various stages of the same developmental continuum. The transformation of borderline ovarian tumors into an invasive neoplasm is associated with an array of molecular changes, inter alia controlled by p53 and PI3K/Akt pathway, as well as with a decrease in E-cadherin expression. The latter implies that epithelial-mesenchymal transition is a critical determinant of borderline ovarian tumor invasiveness. The aim of this study was to analyze the expression of transcription factors involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition: SNAIL, SLUG, TWIST 1, TWIST 2, ZEB 1, and ZEB 2 in borderline tumors and type I ovarian cancers. The study included tissue specimens from 42 patients with histopathologically verified ovarian masses. The expressions for SLUG, TWIST 1, ZEB1, and ZEB 2 were scored based on the nuclear staining, and the expressions of SNAIL and TWIST 2 based on the cytoplasmic and/or nuclear staining. The proportions of ovarian tumors with the immunoexpression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition transcription factors were 85.7% for SNAIL, 100% for SLUG, 9.5% for TWIST 1, 95.2% for TWIST 2, 23.8% for ZEB 1, and 0% for ZEB 2. The expression patterns of SNAIL, SLUG, TWIST, and ZEB identified in this study suggest that both serous borderline ovarian tumors and type I ovarian cancers undergo dynamic epithelial-mesenchymal interconversions. Our findings obtained in the two groups of tumors which shared some etiopathogenic pathways imply that the expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition transcription factors may be activated at early stages of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and thus these molecules may play a pivotal role in the development of both serous borderline ovarian tumors and type I ovarian cancer.