Implementation of targeted interventions to decrease antiretroviral-related errors in hospitalized patients

Antiretroviral Stewardship: Top 10 Questions Encountered by Stewardship Teams and Solutions to Optimize Therapy

PURPOSE

Infectious disease pharmacists and physicians overseeing antimicrobial stewardship programs possess expertise and often advanced certification in management of antiretrovirals to treat HIV. Stewardship programs are responsible for managing facility formularies and must stay up to date with the latest antiretrovirals, including once daily formulations and depot injectables. Furthermore, stewardship program members need to understand drug-interactions, short-, and long-term toxicities of these regimens, including dyslipidemia and cardiovascular effects. Patients receiving chronic antiretroviral therapy may present to the acute care, ambulatory care, and long-term care settings. Like other antimicrobials, audit-and-feedback, drug monitoring, and dose-optimization are often required to prevent antiretroviral associated medication errors and minimize resistance.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted on antiretroviral stewardship, addressing common clinical questions encountered by stewardship teams and best practices to optimize antiretroviral therapy and reduce the risk for treatment interruptions, resistance, drug interactions, long term toxicities, and other adverse effects.

FINDINGS

People living with HIV are often hospitalized and treated by medical teams without formal HIV training. For this reason, these patients are at greater risk for medication errors during hospitalization and between transitions of care. Many opportunities are present for antiretroviral stewardship to mitigate these errors. Frequent updates to simplify HIV regimen, maintain select patients on fixed-dose combination tablets, and strategies to minimize drug interactions make it difficult for even the seasoned clinician to keep up regularly.

IMPLICATIONS

Despite the availability of free online HIV resources and progress made in HIV management, significant opportunities for antiretroviral stewardship remain. Implementing electronic order entry updates, formulary upgrades, and formal pharmacy renal dose adjustments to optimize antiretroviral therapy will help clinicians harness these opportunities. Dedicated time and expertise for antiretroviral stewardship as part of local antimicrobial stewardship programs are needed.

Designing an electronic medical record alert to identify hospitalised patients with HIV: successes and challenges

Objectives

Electronic medical record (EMR) tools can identify specific populations among hospitalised patients, allowing targeted interventions to improve care quality and safety. We created an EMR alert using readily available data elements to identify hospitalised people with HIV (PWH) to facilitate a quality improvement study intended to address two quality/safety concerns (connecting hospitalised PWH to outpatient HIV care and reducing medication errors). Here, we describe the design and implementation of the alert and analyse its accuracy of identifying PWH.

Methods

The EMR alert was designed to trigger for at least one of four criteria: (1) an HIV ICD-10-CM code in a problem list, (2) HIV antiretroviral medication(s) on medication lists, (3) an HIV-1 RNA assay ordered or (4) a positive HIV-antibody result. We used manual chart reviews and an EMR database search to determine the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the overall alert and its individual criteria.

Results

Over a 24-month period, the alert functioned as intended, notifying an intervention team and a data abstraction team about admissions of PWH. Manual review of 1634 hospitalisations identified 18 PWH hospitalisations, all captured by the alert (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI 82.4% to 100.0%). Over the 24 months, the alert triggered for 1191 hospitalisations. Of these, 1004 were PWH hospitalisations, PPV=84.3% (95% CI 82.2% to 86.4%). Using fewer criteria (eg, using only ICD-10-CM codes) identified fewer PWH but increased PPV.

Conclusion

An EMR alert effectively identified hospitalised PWH for a quality improvement intervention. Similar alerts might be adapted as tools to facilitate interventions for other chronic diseases.

Implementation of a pharmacist-led ARVSP in an academic hospital to reduce ART errors

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare the percentage of Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) uncorrected errors during hospital admission before and after the implementation of an Antiretroviral Stewardship Program (ARVSP).

PRACTICE DESCRIPTION

This was a 2-year single-center, pre-post quality improvement study. Included in the study were admitted patients at least 18 years of age, diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and taking at least 1 antiretroviral. The baseline percentage of uncorrected ARV errors was retrospectively determined during the first year. The second year consisted of implementing an ARVSP that prospectively audited ART orders. The ARVSP consisted of a pharmacy resident, a medical resident, an infectious disease, HIV trained pharmacist, an infectious disease physician, and ancillary health care providers. The impact of the ARVSP was assessed by comparing the percentage of uncorrected errors between the 2 time periods.

RESULTS

The number of uncorrected errors were 64.1% versus 31.1% before and after ARVSP implementation, respectively (P < 0.05). Delay in therapy errors were statistically significantly reduced (30.1% vs. 22.2%; P < 0.05). The time to overall correction of any error before ARVSP was 3.1 days, and after ARVSP, it was 1.8 days (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an ARVSP reduces the number of uncorrected antiretroviral-related errors. Because health care resources are finite and focused on the acute care of hospitalized patients, this multidisciplinary practice model may provide a practical approach for similar institutions to improve antiretroviral stewardship surveillance in the inpatient setting.

Implementation of a comprehensive intervention focused on hospitalized patients with HIV by an existing stewardship program: successes and lessons learned

Background:

Several national organizations have advocated for inpatient antiretroviral stewardship to prevent the consequences of medication-related errors. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a stewardship initiative on outcomes in people with HIV (PWH).

Methods:

A pharmacist-led audit and review of adult patients admitted with an ICD-10 code for HIV was implemented to an existing antimicrobial stewardship program. A quasi-experimental, retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing PWH admitted during pre- and post-intervention periods. Rates of antiretroviral therapy (ART)-related errors and infectious diseases (ID) consultation with linkage to care were evaluated through selection of a random sample of patients receiving ART in each period. Length of stay (LOS) and mortality were assessed by analyzing all admissions in the post-intervention period. Clinical outcomes including LOS, 30-day all-cause hospital readmission, and in-hospital and 30-day mortality in the post-intervention group were stratified by patients not on ART, on ART at admission, and started on ART as a result of the intervention.

Results:

A total of 100 patients in the pre-intervention period and 103 patients in the post-intervention period were included to assess ART-related errors and linkage to care. A reduction in errors (70.0 versus 25.7%, p < 0.001) and increased linkage to care (19.0 versus 39.6%, p < 0.01) were demonstrated. Of 389 admissions during the post-intervention period, 30-day mortality rates were similar between PWH on ART at admission and those initiated on ART during admission (5% versus 8%, respectively), but less than those not on ART (21%). A longer LOS was observed in the patients started on ART during admission (5 days if ART started during admission versus 3 days if not started during admission, p < 0.01).

Conclusions:

This interdisciplinary intervention was successful in reducing inpatient ART-related errors and increasing ID consultation with linkage to care among PWH.

Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: a systematic review

Background and Aims:

Medication errors occur at any point of the medication management process, and are a major cause of death and harm globally. The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of different interventions in reducing prescribing, dispensing and administration medication errors in acute medical and surgical settings.

Methods:

The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019124587). The library databases, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to February 2019. Studies were included if they involved testing of an intervention aimed at reducing medication errors in adult, acute medical or surgical settings. Meta-analyses were performed to examine the effectiveness of intervention types.

Results:

A total of 34 articles were included with 12 intervention types identified. Meta-analysis showed that prescribing errors were reduced by pharmacist-led medication reconciliation, computerised medication reconciliation, pharmacist partnership, prescriber education, medication reconciliation by trained mentors and computerised physician order entry (CPOE) as single interventions. Medication administration errors were reduced by CPOE and the use of an automated drug distribution system as single interventions. Combined interventions were also found to be effective in reducing prescribing or administration medication errors. No interventions were found to reduce dispensing error rates. Most studies were conducted at single-site hospitals, with chart review being the most common method for collecting medication error data. Clinical significance of interventions was examined in 21 studies. Since many studies were conducted in a pre–post format, future studies should include a concurrent control group.

Conclusion:

The systematic review identified a number of single and combined intervention types that were effective in reducing medication errors, which clinicians and policymakers could consider for implementation in medical and surgical settings. New directions for future research should examine interdisciplinary collaborative approaches comprising physicians, pharmacists and nurses.

Lay summary

Activities to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical hospital areas

Introduction:

Medication errors or mistakes may happen at any time in hospital, and they are a major reason for death and harm around the world.

Objective:

To compare the effectiveness of different activities in reducing medication errors occurring with prescribing, giving and supplying medications in adult medical and surgical settings in hospital.

Methods:

Six library databases were examined from the time they were developed to February 2019. Studies were included if they involved testing of an activity aimed at reducing medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings in hospital. Statistical analysis was used to look at the success of different types of activities.

Results:

A total of 34 studies were included with 12 activity types identified. Statistical analysis showed that prescribing errors were reduced by pharmacists matching medications, computers matching medications, partnerships with pharmacists, prescriber education, medication matching by trained physicians, and computerised physician order entry (CPOE). Medication-giving errors were reduced by the use of CPOE and an automated medication distribution system. The combination of different activity types were also shown to be successful in reducing prescribing or medication-giving errors. No activities were found to be successful in reducing errors relating to supplying medications. Most studies were conducted at one hospital with reviewing patient charts being the most common way for collecting information about medication errors. In 21 out of 34 articles, researchers examined the effect of activity types on patient harm caused by medication errors. Many studies did not involve the use of a control group that does not receive the activity.

Conclusion:

A number of activity types were shown to be successful in reducing prescribing and medication-giving errors. New directions for future research should examine activities comprising health professionals working together.

A Call to Action: The Role of Antiretroviral Stewardship in Inpatient Practice, a Joint Policy Paper of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, HIV Medicine Association, and American Academy of HIV Medicine

Persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and others receiving antiretrovirals are at risk for medication errors during hospitalization and at transitions of care. These errors may result in adverse effects or viral resistance, limiting future treatment options. A range of interventions is described in the literature to decrease the occurrence or duration of medication errors, including review of electronic health records, clinical checklists at care transitions, and daily review of medication lists. To reduce the risk of medication-related errors, antiretroviral stewardship programs (ARVSPs) are needed to enhance patient safety. This call to action, endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the HIV Medicine Association, and the American Academy of HIV Medicine, is modeled upon the success of antimicrobial stewardship programs now mandated by the Joint Commission. Herein, we propose definitions of ARVSPs, suggest resources for ARVSP leadership, and provide a summary of published, successful strategies for ARVSP that healthcare facilities may use to develop locally appropriate programs.

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Team on Reducing Antiretroviral Medication Errors

Background: Numerous interventions have been used to reduce medication errors related to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy for hospitalized patients with HIV. Objective: This study assessed the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) team intervention on reducing the rate of ARV therapy errors in patients admitted to an academic medical center. Methods: This observational, retrospective study included patients who received ARV therapy from June 2016 to December 2017. The primary outcome was evaluation of ASP team performance in detecting ARV medication errors in the inpatient setting. Errors were further categorized by type (interaction, dosing, regimen). The Mann-Whitney U test and χ² tests were utilized to analyze continuous and categorical data, respectively. Results: Medication errors occurred in 51% of patients in the preintervention group (n = 152) and 48% of patients in the postintervention group (n = 203; P = 0.43). The most frequent medication error type was drug interactions in both groups, involving integrase strand transfer inhibitors and polyvalent cations (64% vs 67%). There was a significant difference between preintervention and postintervention groups regarding number of errors detected (13 vs 106, P < 0.001), corrected (12 vs 86, P < 0.001), and persisting at discharge (106 vs 18, P < 0.001). Conclusion and Relevance: Review of ARV regimens by an ASP team significantly decreased medication errors. Drug interactions are the most common medication error found in HIV-positive patients admitted to our academic center.

An Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Inpatient HIV-Related Medication Errors

Background: Inpatient HIV-related medication errors occur in up to 86% of patients. Objective: To evaluate the number of antiretroviral therapy (ART)- and opportunistic infection (OI)-related medication errors following the implementation of pharmacist-directed interventions. Methods: This quasi-experiment assessed adult patients with HIV who received ART, OI prophylaxis, or both from December 1, 2014, to February 28, 2017 (pre-intervention) or December 1, 2017, to February 28, 2018 (post-intervention). Pre-intervention patients were assessed retrospectively; verbal and written education were provided (intervention); prospective audit and feedback was conducted for post-intervention patients. The primary outcome was rate of ART errors between groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of OI errors, time to resolution of ART and OI errors, types of errors, and rate of recommendation acceptance. Results: Sixty-seven patients were included in each group. ART errors occurred in 44.8% and 32.8% (P = .156), respectively. OI prophylaxis errors occurred in 11.9% versus 9% (P = .572), respectively. Medication omission decreased significantly in the post-intervention group (31.3% vs 11.9%; P = .006). Pharmacist-based interventions increased in the post-intervention group (6.3% vs 52.9%; P = .001). No statistical difference was found in time to error resolution (72 vs 48 hours; P = .123), but errors resolved during admission significantly increased (50% vs 86.8%; P < .001). No difference was found in rate of intervention acceptance (100% vs 97%). Conclusion and Relevance: ART and OI prophylaxis errors resolved a day faster in the pharmacist-led, post-intervention period, and there was a trend toward error reduction. Future interventions should target prescribing errors on admission using follow-up education and evaluation of medication reconciliation practices in HIV-infected patients.

Impact of an HIV-trained clinical pharmacist intervention on error rates of antiretroviral and opportunistic infection medications in the inpatient setting

Background:

Based on a retrospective study performed at our institution, 38% of inpatients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were found to have a medication error involving their anti-retroviral (ARV) and/or opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis medications.

Objective:

To determine the impact of a dedicated HIV-trained clinical pharmacist on the ARV and OI prophylaxis medication error rates at our institution.

Methods:

A prospective quality improvement project was conducted over a six month period to assess the impact of a dedicated HIV-trained clinical pharmacist on the ARV and OI prophylaxis medication error rates. IRB approval received.

Results:

There were 144 patients included in this analysis, who experienced a combined 76 medication errors. Compared to historical control study conducted at our institution, the percent of patients who experienced a medication error remained stable (38% vs. 39%, respectively) and the error rate per patient was similar (1.44 vs. 1.36, p=NS). The percent of medication errors that were corrected prior to discharge increased from 24% to 70% and the median time to error correction decreased from 42 hours to 11.5 hours (p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

Errors relating to ARV or OI prophylaxis medications remain frequent in inpatient people living with HIV/AIDS. After multiple interventions were implemented, ARV and OI prophylaxis medication errors were corrected faster and with greater frequency prior to discharge, however, similar rates of errors for patients existed. Dedicated HIV clinicians with adequate training and credentialing are necessary to manage this specialized disease state and to reduce the overall number of medication errors associated with HIV/AIDS.

Impact of an Antiretroviral Stewardship Team on the Care of Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Admitted to an Academic Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Interdisciplinary antiretroviral stewardship teams, comprising a human immunodeficiency virus pharmacist specialist, an infectious diseases physician, and associated learners, have the ability to assist in identification and correction of inpatient antiretroviral-related errors.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of patients with antiretroviral orders admitted to our hospital were evaluated for the number of interventions made by the stewardship team, number of admissions with errors identified, risk factors for occurrence of errors, and cost savings. Risk factors were analyzed by means of multivariable logistic regression. Cost savings were estimated by the documentation system Clinical Measures.

RESULTS

A total of 567 admissions were included for analysis in a 1-year study period. Forty-three percent of admissions (245 of 567) had ≥1 intervention, with 336 interventions in total. The following were identified as risk factors for error: multitablet inpatient regimen (odds ratio, 1.834; 95% confidence interval, 1.160-2.899; P = .009), admission to the intensive care unit (2.803; 1.280-6.136; P = .01), care provided by a surgery service (1.762; 1.082-2.868; P = .02), increased number of days reviewed (1.061; 1.008-1.117; P = .02), and noninstitutional outpatient provider (1.375; .972-1.946; P = .07). The 1-year cost savings were estimated to be $263 428.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiretroviral stewardship teams optimize patient care through identification and correction of antiretroviral-related errors. Errors may be more common in patients with multitablet inpatient regimens, admission to the intensive care unit, care provided by a surgery service, and increased number of hospital days reviewed. Once antiretroviral-related errors are identified, the ability to correct them provides cost savings.

Accuracy of Antiretroviral Prescribing in a Community Teaching Hospital: A Medication Use Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Medication errors account for nearly 250 000 deaths in the United States annually, with approximately 60% of errors occurring during transitions of care. Previous studies demonstrated that almost 80% of participants with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have experienced a medication error related to their antiretroviral therapy (ART).

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective chart review examines propensity and type of ART-related errors and further seeks to identify risk factors associated with higher error rates.

METHODS

Participants were identified as hospitalized adults ≥18 years old with preexisting HIV diagnosis receiving home ART from July 2015 to June 2017. Medication error categories included delays in therapy, dosing errors, scheduling conflicts, and miscellaneous errors. Logistic regression was used to examine risk factors for medication errors.

RESULTS

Mean age was 49 years, 76.5% were men, and 72.1% used hospital-supplied medication. For the primary outcome, 60.3% (41/68) of participants had at least 1 error, with 31.3% attributed to delays in therapy. Logistic regression demonstrated multiple tablet regimens (odds ratio [OR]: 3.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-9.48, P = .019) and serum creatinine (SCr) ≥1.5 mg/dL (OR: 8.87, 95% CI: 1.07-73.45, P = .043) were predictive for risk of medication errors. Regimens with significant drug-drug interactions (eg, cobicistat-containing regimens) were not significantly associated with increased risk of medication errors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

ART-related medication error rates remain prevalent and exceeded 60%. Independent risk factors for medication errors include use of multiple tablet regimens and SCr ≥1.5 mg/dL.

Reducing medication errors involving antiretroviral therapy with targeted electronic medical record modifications

Medication errors are common among HIV-infected patients on anti-retroviral therapy (ART), especially when transitioning to the inpatient setting. In previous studies, medication error rates among hospitalized patients on ART have been reported to exceed 50%. When patients receiving ART are admitted to the hospital, medication errors can be prevented through optimization of administration instructions and dosing defaults in order-entry screens in the electronic medical record (EMR). We sought to evaluate the impact of EMR modifications (defaulted doses, frequencies, and administration instructions) implemented to improve the order-entry process and reduce errors. All adult patients admitted between 10/1/2010-3/31/2012 (pre-EMR modification) and 10/1/2013-3/31/2014 (post-EMR modification) that continued on ART upon admission were included. The primary outcome was the overall rate of medication errors identified through review by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). We also characterized the types of medication errors identified during the two time periods. Following EMR modifications, the medication error rate identified through ASP review was reduced from 50.2% to 28.2% (P < 0.01). The number of medication related errors relating to dosage (regimens requiring dose optimization, renal dose adjustment, and dose timing) were reduced by 22% (P < 0.01). Modifications at the anti-retroviral medication order-entry screens in the EMR significantly reduced medication errors, particularly with respect to dosing and dose timing.

Impact of an antiretroviral stewardship strategy on medication error rates

PURPOSE

The impact of an antiretroviral stewardship strategy on medication error rates was evaluated.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, comparative cohort study included patients at least 18 years of age infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were receiving antiretrovirals and admitted to the hospital. A multicomponent approach was developed and implemented and included modifications to the order-entry and verification system, pharmacist education, and a pharmacist-led antiretroviral therapy checklist. Pharmacists performed prospective audits using the checklist at the time of order verification. To assess the impact of the intervention, a retrospective review was performed before and after implementation to assess antiretroviral errors.

RESULTS

Totals of 208 and 24 errors were identified before and after the intervention, respectively, resulting in a significant reduction in the overall error rate (p < 0.001). In the postintervention group, significantly lower medication error rates were found in both patient admissions containing at least 1 medication error (p < 0.001) and those with 2 or more errors (p < 0.001). Significant reductions were also identified in each error type, including incorrect/incomplete medication regimen, incorrect dosing regimen, incorrect renal dose adjustment, incorrect administration, and the presence of a major drug-drug interaction. A regression tree selected ritonavir as the only specific medication that best predicted more errors preintervention (p < 0.001); however, no antiretrovirals reliably predicted errors postintervention.

CONCLUSION

An antiretroviral stewardship strategy for hospitalized HIV patients including prospective audit by staff pharmacists through use of an antiretroviral medication therapy checklist at the time of order verification decreased error rates.

HIV Pharmacist's Impact on Inpatient Antiretroviral Errors

OBJECTIVES

Transitions in care between out-patient and in-patient settings provide ample opportunity for medication errors to occur in HIV-infected patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an HIV pharmacist monitoring service in decreasing antiretroviral medication errors in a large south central teaching hospital in the USA.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was conducted to examine the frequency of antiretroviral medication errors in HIV-seropositive patients with hospital admissions between 1 September 2011 and 30 September 2013 at a single tertiary care centre in Oklahoma. Patient assignment to the 12-month pre-intervention and intervention study periods was determined by admission date. Demographic, laboratory, and in-patient medication data were collected. Bivariate analyses were conducted using χ² analysis with the Yates correction factor for continuity to examine frequencies in specific antiretroviral classes and error categories. A multivariable Poisson regression was employed to examine the frequency of medication errors before and after initiation of the pharmacist service.

RESULTS

Medication errors were examined in a total of 330 patient admissions during the 2-year study period. A multivariable-adjusted decrease of 73.9% in the number of errors was observed between the pre-intervention and intervention periods (P < 0.001). Patients on protease inhibitor regimens or with impaired renal function had 2.6-fold and 2.8-fold higher numbers of errors, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV pharmacist monitoring can decrease medication errors in HIV-infected patients as they transition between out-patient and in-patient care. Patients receiving protease inhibitor-based therapy or with renal insufficiency are at higher risk for medication errors upon admission.

Antiretroviral Stewardship in a Pediatric HIV Clinic: Development, Implementation and Improved Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral (ARV) management in pediatrics is a challenging process in which multiple barriers to optimal therapy can lead to poor clinical outcomes. In a pediatric HIV clinic, we implemented a systematic ARV stewardship program to evaluate ARV regimens and make recommendations for optimization when indicated.

METHODS

A comprehensive assessment tool was used to screen for issues related to genotypic resistance, virologic/immunologic response, drug-drug interactions, side effects and potential for regimen simplification. The ARV stewardship team (AST) made recommendations to the HIV clinic provider, and followed patients prospectively to assess clinical outcomes at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The most common interventions made by the AST included regimen optimization in patients on suboptimal regimens based on resistance mutations (35.4%), switching to safer ARVs (33.3%) and averting significant drug-drug interactions (10.4%). In patients anticipated to have a change in viral load (VL) as a result of the AST recommendations, we identified a significant benefit in virologic outcomes at 6 and 12 months when recommendations were implemented within 6 months of ARV review. Patients who had recommendations implemented within 6 months had a 7-fold higher probability of achieving a 0.7 log10 reduction in VL by 6 months, and this benefit remained significant after controlling for adherence [adjusted odds ratio: 6.8 (95% confidence interval: 1.03-44.9; P <0.05)].

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic ARV stewardship program implemented at a pediatric HIV clinic significantly improved clinical outcomes. ARV stewardship programs can be considered a core strategy for continuous quality improvement in the management of HIV-infected children and adolescents.

Evaluating the Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Antiretroviral Stewardship Program on Reducing Drug Interactions in HIV-Infected Patients

PURPOSE

To compare the number of antiretroviral-related clinically significant drug-drug interactions (CSDDIs) occurring in hospitalized patients that were intervened upon before and after Antiretroviral Stewardship Program (ARVSP) expansion and to classify the interventions made to prevent errors.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of adult patients treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) and who were hospitalized from September 2012 to February 2013. A CSDDI was defined as requiring an alternative therapy, dose adjustment, or schedule modification. Findings were compared to a prior study.

RESULTS

A total of 185 admissions were included and 76 CSDDIs were identified, 19 (25%) occurred after ART approval. The percentages of CSDDIs that occurred after ART approval and were intervened upon before and after ARVSP expansion were 43% and 95%, respectively (P<.001). An additional 80 other interventions were made by the ARVSP.

CONCLUSION

An ARVSP is critical in the prevention of CSDDIs and errors to improve safety in HIV-infected patients.

Customized order-entry sets can prevent antiretroviral prescribing errors: a novel opportunity for antimicrobial stewardship

BACKGROUND

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on antiretroviral (ARV) therapy are at increased risk for medication errors during transitions of care between the outpatient and inpatient settings. This can lead to treatment failure or toxicity. Previous studies have emphasized the prevalence of medication errors in such patients, but few have reported initiatives to prevent errors from occurring.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a 1,400-bed health care center with a state-designated Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Center in the Bronx, New York. The antimicrobial stewardship team and HIV specialists developed customized order-entry sets (COES) to guide ARV prescribing and retrospectively reviewed their effect on error rates of initial ARV orders for inpatients before reconciliation. Patient records were reviewed in six-month periods before and after intervention. The student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables; chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 723 and 661 admissions were included in the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods, respectively. Overall, error rates decreased by 35% (38.0% to 24.8%, P < 0.01) with COES. Wrong doses and drug interactions decreased by more than 40% (P < 0.005). Error reductions were observed in protease inhibitor (PI)-based (43.6% versus 28.7%, P < 0.01) and non-PI-based (38.0% versus 24.4%, P = 0.02) regimens with COES. A shift in predominant drug-class errors was observed as there was a trend toward increased usage of non-PI regimens post-intervention. Admission in the pre-intervention period (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.31) and use of PI-based regimens (AOR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.53-2.70) remained significantly associated with ARV prescribing errors after controlling for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

Detailed COES improved ARV prescribing habits, reduced the potential for prescribing incorrect regimens, and can prove useful and cost-effective where HIV-specific medication reconciliation is unavailable.

MSM and drug use: A latent class analysis of drug use and related sexual risk behaviors

This study examined patterns of drug use among gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM) to identify sub-categories of men whose drug use and sexual behavior place them at especially high risk for HIV. A latent class analysis of a sample of MSM yielded a four-class model with two distinct high drug use sub-groups: one whose drug use concentrated on "sex-drugs" (SDU); and a distinct polydrug use class that showed higher probabilities of using all other drugs assessed. Comparative follow-up analyses indicated the SDU group was also more likely to engage in particular potentially high-risk sexual behaviors, be older, and to be HIV positive. Implications of distinguishing between patterns of drug use for HIV-risk prevention efforts with MSM are discussed.

Antiretroviral and Medication Errors in Hospitalized HIV-Positive Patients

Objective: To summarize the literature regarding antiretroviral and other medication errors in hospitalized HIV-positive patients and to discuss potential interventions and solutions that have been studied to minimize drug error. Data Sources: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE (2000-April 2014) was conducted. Search terms included HIV/AIDS, HAART, hospitalization, patient admission, inpatient, patient transfer, medication error, inappropriate prescribing, drug interaction, drug omission, drug toxicity, and contraindication. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language research articles, case reports, conference abstracts, and letters to the editor were reviewed. Data Synthesis: A high overall medication error rate was reported in HIV-positive inpatients. Errors occurred mainly at the time of prescribing on admission but were also detected throughout hospitalization and at discharge. Errors in the antiretroviral regimen, dosing, scheduling, and drug-drug and drug-food interactions were the most common. The most successful interventions involved a clinical pharmacist, who specializes in infectious diseases and/or HIV, completing medication reconciliation on admission, reviewing orders daily, and screening for errors at discharge. Conclusions: Although studies varied greatly in methodology, overall, a large number of medication errors occurred in this patient population. This underscores the important role the pharmacist has in optimizing care to hospitalized HIV-positive patients and provides further insights into the types of medication errors that occur and proposed solutions to reduce these errors. Because medication errors are multifactorial, ongoing initiatives to improve the quality of medication reconciliation processes, educate the health care team on antiretroviral medications, and improve the drug distribution system are required.

Antimicrobial stewardship program to reduce antiretroviral medication errors in hospitalized patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate antimicrobial stewardship interventions targeted to reduce highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)- or opportunistic infection (OI)-related medication errors and increase error resolution.

DESIGN

Retrospective before-after study.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Inpatients who were prescribed antiretroviral therapy before the intervention (January 1, 2011, to October 31, 2011) and after the intervention (July 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012). Patients treated with lamivudine or tenofovir monotherapy for hepatitis B were excluded.

METHODS

Antimicrobial stewardship interventions included education, modification of electronic medication records, collaboration with the infectious diseases (ID) department, and prospective audit and review of HAART and OI regimens by an ID clinical pharmacist.

RESULTS

Data for 162 admissions from the preintervention period and 110 admissions from the postintervention period were included. The number of admissions with a medication error was significantly reduced after the intervention (81 [50%] of 162 admissions vs 37 (34%) of 110 admissions; P < .00)1. A total of 124 errors occurred in the preintervention group (mean no. of errors, 1.5 per admission), and 43 errors occurred in the postintervention group (mean no. of errors, 1.2 per admission). The most common error types were major drug interactions and dosing in the preintervention group and renal adjustment and OI-related errors in the postintervention group. A significantly higher error resolution rate was observed in the postintervention group (36% vs 74%; P < .001). After adjustment for potential confounders with logistic regression, admission in the postintervention group was independently associated with fewer medication errors (odds ratio, 0.4 [95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.77]; P = .005). Overall, presence of an ID consultant demonstrated a higher error resolution rate (32% without a consultation vs 68% with a consultation; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Multifaceted, multidisciplinary stewardship efforts reduced the rate and increased the overall resolution of HAART-related medication errors.

Evaluation of a strategy aimed at reducing errors in antiretroviral prescriptions for hospitalized HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVES

Errors are frequently made in the prescription of antiretroviral medication for hospitalized HIV-infected patients. We had for aim to evaluate the prescription of antiretroviral drug regimens at hospital admission and the impact of a strategy implemented to prevent errors.

METHODS

HIV-infected patients managed by our hospital as outpatients and admitted between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010 (first period) and between February 1, 2011, and January 31, 2012 (second period) were included in the study. We retrospectively identified errors made in the prescription of antiretrovirals by comparing the drugs prescribed during hospitalization and the treatment documented in the outpatient file. During the second period, we implemented a strategy involving the pharmacist and the infectious disease specialist to reduce the number of errors.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were treated during the first period for 56 admissions, and 43 patients for 77 admissions during the second one. We identified 39% of medication-related errors during the first period and 42% during the second one. The most common errors were drug omission, inappropriate dosage, or failure to adjust dosage for renal insufficiency. Our intervention, during the second period, allowed correcting 36% of errors.

CONCLUSION

In our study, errors made in the prescription of antiretroviral medication were frequent and our intervention allowed correcting 36% of errors. Other strategies, such as consulting a clinical pharmacist on admission, or training prescribers should be considered.

Medication errors in HIV-infected hospitalized patients: a pharmacist's impact

BACKGROUND

Treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) decreases morbidity and mortality associated with HIV infection. Unfortunately, HAART medication errors are prevalent in hospitalized patients with HIV infection. Appropriate regimen administration and adherence are essential for treatment success.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of pharmacist interventions on the rate of medication errors in HIV-infected hospitalized patients who had been prescribed HAART in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients aged 18 years or older receiving HAART and/or opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis were screened for inclusion. Data collection for each enrolled patient included demographic information, pertinent laboratory results, and inpatient and outpatient medication regimens. Patient medication profiles were reviewed within 72 hours of admission. HAART and/or OI prophylaxis errors were classified by type and frequency. Following the pharmacist intervention, prescribers' responses to each recommendation and the estimated time per intervention were recorded.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were included in this investigation and 210 HAART and OI prophylaxis errors were documented. Of patients receiving HAART and/or OI prophylaxis, 54.7% had at least 1 medication error on admission. An average of 2.4 errors per patient was identified. Dose omission (45.5%) was the most common error type among combined HAART and OI prophylaxis regimens, followed by incorrect regimen (17.1%) and incorrect dose (15.1%). Prescribers accepted 90% of pharmacist recommendations. A pharmacist was able to amend 94.7% of correctable HAART errors, as well as 89.9% of correctable combined HAART and OI prophylaxis errors. An estimated 18.5 minutes of pharmacist time were spent per patient requiring an intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical pharmacist's targeted review of outpatient-prescribed HAART and/or OI primary prophylaxis regimens of hospitalized HIV-infected patients can reduce most medication errors during hospitalization.

Impact of pharmacy technician-centered medication reconciliation on optimization of antiretroviral therapy and opportunistic infection prophylaxis in hospitalized patients with HIV/AIDS

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the role of a pharmacy technician-centered medication reconciliation (PTMR) program in optimization of medication therapy in hospitalized patients with HIV/AIDS.

METHODS

A chart review was conducted for all inpatients that had a medication reconciliation performed by the PTMR program. Adult patients with HIV and antiretroviral therapy (ART) and/or the opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis listed on the medication reconciliation form were included. The primary objective is to describe the (1) number and types of medication errors and (2) the percentage of patients who received appropriate ART. The secondary objective is a comparison of the number of medication errors between standard mediation reconciliation and a pharmacy-led program.

RESULTS

In the PTMR period, 55 admissions were evaluated. In all, 50% of the patients received appropriate ART. In 27of the 55 admissions, there were 49 combined ART and OI-related errors. The most common ART-related errors were drug-drug interactions. The incidence of ART-related medication errors that included drug-drug interactions and renal dosing adjustments were similar between the pre-PTMR and PTMR groups (P = .0868). Of the 49 errors in the PTMR group, 18 were intervened by a medication reconciliation pharmacist.

CONCLUSION

A PTMR program has a positive impact on optimizing ART and OI prophylaxis in patients with HIV/AIDS.