1
|
Cochrane AB, Veasey TM. Is tacrolimus by any generic name as sweet? J Heart Lung Transplant 2021; 40:573-574. [PMID: 34030973 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tara M Veasey
- Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Report from the 2018 consensus conference on immunomodulating agents in thoracic transplantation: Access, formulations, generics, therapeutic drug monitoring, and special populations. J Heart Lung Transplant 2020; 39:1050-1069. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
|
3
|
Kahn J, Pregartner G, Schemmer P. Immunosuppression with generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplantation-systematic review and meta-analysis on biopsy-proven acute rejection and bioequivalence. Transpl Int 2020; 33:356-372. [PMID: 31971288 PMCID: PMC7154701 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
While rejection prevention with innovator tacrolimus (Tac) is one of the key factors for long-lasting graft function, the use of generic Tac is still under debate. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide an overview on the current body of evidence for the effect of generic Tac in adult liver (LT) and kidney transplantation (KT) with focus on both biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and bioequivalence. A systematic literature search for trials comparing generic versus innovator Tac was conducted accordingly. Seventeen studies (5 LT, 11 KT, 1 LT/KT) including 1412 patients were identified. About 92.9% (13/14; 5/5 LT, 8/9 KT) of studies reported the same or lower BPAR with generics (pooled RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.65-1.09); however, de novo studies showed a significantly lower risk with generic Tac (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.90), whereas conversion studies showed increased risk (RR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.00-3.70). Bioequivalence was demonstrated primarily in studies on conversion. The current evidence is mostly based on observational data and studies showing some risk of bias. In conclusion, whereas overall there was no significant difference in terms of BPAR, there is some evidence suggesting lower BPAR risk with generic Tac for de novo use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Kahn
- General, Visceral, and Transplant SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
- Transplant Center GrazMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Gudrun Pregartner
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and DocumentationMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Peter Schemmer
- General, Visceral, and Transplant SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
- Transplant Center GrazMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lichvar A, Tremblay S, Naik D, Lipscomb J, King E, Vinks AA, Christians U, Alloway RR. Evaluation of Clinical and Safety Outcomes Following Uncontrolled Tacrolimus Conversion in Adult Transplant Recipients. Pharmacotherapy 2019; 39:564-575. [PMID: 30892704 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare clinical and safety outcomes of transplant recipients converted between different tacrolimus formulations to those patients who remained on a single formulation in an outpatient environment. METHODOLOGY This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study at a large tertiary care medical center with an associated institutional outpatient pharmacy system. Adult transplant recipients with institutional pharmacy refill from August 1, 2009, to May 31, 2016, were assessed. Patients were allocated into four separate groups: Group (A) innovator tacrolimus (no conversion), Group (B) generic tacrolimus (no conversion), Group (C) single conversion (from innovator to single generic or from generic to innovator tacrolimus), and Group (D) multiple conversions. Index date was either the date of first tacrolimus product conversion (Groups C and D) or a pre-specified post-transplant time (Groups A and B). RESULTS Overall, 100 patients were included in the analysis, 63% were male, 62% were Caucasian, and 59% were renal transplant recipients. When compared between groups, linear trends in dose-normalized tacrolimus levels were similar in the pre-index date period (p=0.52) and in the post-index date period (p=0.08). When groups were compared individually, linear trends in dose-normalized tacrolimus levels were significantly different pre- versus post-index date for Group B (p=0.008). There were no differences in the linear trends of dose-normalized tacrolimus levels across the other groups (p>0.05 for all). After the index date, 43% of patients across all groups required tacrolimus dose modification with no differences by group (p=0.32). Allograft function and hospitalizations were similar across all groups. CONCLUSIONS Conversion between tacrolimus generic formulations has been suggested to be unsafe. This study demonstrates that switching tacrolimus products in post-transplant recipients does not alter dose-normalized tacrolimus trough concentrations, renal or hepatic function, pathology, or hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Lichvar
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Simon Tremblay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.,Department of Environmental Health, Division of Epidemiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Devanshi Naik
- University of Cincinnati, James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jessi Lipscomb
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Eileen King
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Alexander A Vinks
- Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Uwe Christians
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado
| | - Rita R Alloway
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones-Hughes T, Snowsill T, Haasova M, Coelho H, Crathorne L, Cooper C, Mujica-Mota R, Peters J, Varley-Campbell J, Huxley N, Moore J, Allwood M, Lowe J, Hyde C, Hoyle M, Bond M, Anderson R. Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-594. [PMID: 27578428 DOI: 10.3310/hta20620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring renal replacement therapy: kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (induction and maintenance therapy) to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival. OBJECTIVES To review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin(®), Sanofi) as induction therapy, and immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) (Adoport(®), Sandoz; Capexion(®), Mylan; Modigraf(®), Astellas Pharma; Perixis(®), Accord Healthcare; Prograf(®), Astellas Pharma; Tacni(®), Teva; Vivadex(®), Dexcel Pharma), prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) Astellas Pharma), belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arzip(®), Zentiva; CellCept(®), Roche Products; Myfenax(®), Teva), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (Myfortic(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd), sirolimus (SRL) (Rapamune(®), Pfizer) and everolimus (EVL) (Certican(®), Novartis) as maintenance therapy in adult renal transplantation. METHODS Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science (via ISI), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and the American Economic Association's electronic bibliography (via EconLit, EBSCOhost). Included studies were selected according to predefined methods and criteria. A random-effects model was used to analyse clinical effectiveness data (odds ratios for binary data and mean differences for continuous data). Network meta-analyses were undertaken within a Bayesian framework. A new discrete time-state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed, with acute rejection, graft function (GRF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death. RESULTS Eighty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of variable quality, were included. For induction therapy, no treatment appeared more effective than another in reducing graft loss or mortality. Compared with placebo/no induction, rATG and BAS appeared more effective in reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and BAS appeared more effective at improving GRF. For maintenance therapy, no treatment was better for all outcomes and no treatment appeared most effective at reducing graft loss. BEL + MMF appeared more effective than TAC + MMF and SRL + MMF at reducing mortality. MMF + CSA (ciclosporin), TAC + MMF, SRL + TAC, TAC + AZA (azathioprine) and EVL + CSA appeared more effective than CSA + AZA and EVL + MPS at reducing BPAR. SRL + AZA, TAC + AZA, TAC + MMF and BEL + MMF appeared to improve GRF compared with CSA + AZA and MMF + CSA. In the base-case deterministic and probabilistic analyses, BAS, MMF and TAC were predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). When comparing all regimens, only BAS + TAC + MMF was cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS For included trials, there was substantial methodological heterogeneity, few trials reported follow-up beyond 1 year, and there were insufficient data to perform subgroup analysis. Treatment discontinuation and switching were not modelled. FUTURE WORK High-quality, better-reported, longer-term RCTs are needed. Ideally, these would be sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis and include health-related quality of life as an outcome. CONCLUSION Only a regimen of BAS induction followed by maintenance with TAC and MMF is likely to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013189. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Jones-Hughes
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Marcela Haasova
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Coelho
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Louise Crathorne
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Cooper
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ruben Mujica-Mota
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jaime Peters
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Varley-Campbell
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicola Huxley
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jason Moore
- Exeter Kidney Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Matt Allwood
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jenny Lowe
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Chris Hyde
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Martin Hoyle
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Mary Bond
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rob Anderson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ericson JE, Zimmerman KO, Gonzalez D, Melloni C, Guptill JT, Hill KD, Wu H, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. A Systematic Literature Review Approach to Estimate the Therapeutic Index of Selected Immunosuppressant Drugs After Renal Transplantation. Ther Drug Monit 2017; 39:13-20. [PMID: 28081041 PMCID: PMC5235278 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drugs that exhibit close margins between therapeutic and toxic blood concentrations are considered to have a narrow therapeutic index (NTI). The Food and Drug Administration has proposed that NTI drugs should have more stringent bioequivalence standards for approval of generic formulations. However, many immunosuppressant drugs do not have a well-defined therapeutic index (TI). METHODS We sought to determine whether safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic data obtained from the medical literature through a comprehensive literature search could be used to estimate the TI of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus. In this analysis, we considered TI ≤2 as a criterion to define a drug as having an NTI. RESULTS Published literature indicates that cyclosporine has a TI of 2-3, which falls just short of our criteria to be classified as having an NTI. We found sirolimus and tacrolimus to have a therapeutic range of 5-12 ng/mL and of 5-20 ng/mL, respectively, but were unable to calculate the TI. CONCLUSIONS Although the current literature does not provide a clear indication that these drugs have an NTI, the routine use of therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice suggests that more stringent testing of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties should be performed before the approval of generic formulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica E. Ericson
- Departments of Pediatrics, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel Gonzalez
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Kevin D. Hill
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Huali Wu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Molnar AO, Fergusson D, Tsampalieros AK, Bennett A, Fergusson N, Ramsay T, Knoll GA. Generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015; 350:h3163. [PMID: 26101226 PMCID: PMC4476317 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical efficacy and bioequivalence of generic immunosuppressive drugs in patients with solid organ transplants. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies comparing generic with innovator immunosuppressive drugs. DATA SOURCES Medline and Embase from 1980 to September 2014. REVIEW METHODS A literature search was performed for all studies comparing a generic to an innovator immunosuppressive drug in solid organ transplantation. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed quality of studies. Meta-analyses of prespecified outcomes were performed when deemed appropriate. Outcomes included patient survival, allograft survival, acute rejection, adverse events and bioequivalence. RESULTS 1679 citations were screened, of which 50 studies met eligibility criteria (17 randomized trials, 15 non-randomized interventional studies, and 18 observational studies). Generics were compared with Neoral (cyclosporine) (32 studies), Prograf (tacrolimus) (12 studies), and Cellcept (mycophenolate mofetil) (six studies). Pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with kidney transplants that reported bioequivalence criteria showed that Neoral (two studies) and Prograf (three studies) were not bioequivalent with generic preparations according to criteria of the European Medicines Agency. The single Cellcept trial also did not meet bioequivalence. Acute rejection was rare but did not differ between groups. For Neoral, the pooled Peto odds ratio was 1.23 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 2.36) for kidney randomized controlled trials and 0.66 (0.40 to 1.08) for observational studies. For kidney observational studies, the pooled Peto odds ratios were 0.98 (0.37 to 2.60) for Prograf and 0.49 (0.09 to 2.56) for Cellcept. Meta-analyses for non-renal solid organ transplants were not performed because of a lack of data.There were insufficient data reported on patient or graft survival. Pooling of results was limited by inconsistent study methods and reporting of outcomes. Many studies did not report standard criteria used to determine bioequivalence. While rates of acute rejection seemed similar and were relatively rare, few studies were designed to properly compare clinical outcomes. Most studies had short follow-up times and included stable patients without a history of rejection. CONCLUSIONS High quality data showing bioequivalence and clinical efficacy of generic immunosuppressive drugs in patients with transplants are lacking. Given the serious consequences of rejection and allograft failure, well designed studies on bioequivalence and safety of generic immunosuppression in transplant recipients are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber O Molnar
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6 Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6
| | - Dean Fergusson
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6 Division of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L1
| | - Anne K Tsampalieros
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6 Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6
| | - Alexandria Bennett
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6 Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6
| | - Nicholas Fergusson
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6 Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6
| | - Timothy Ramsay
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6
| | - Greg A Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, Kidney Research Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada, K1H 8L6
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu Y, Teerenstra S, Neef C, Burger D, Maliepaard M. Investigation into the interchangeability of generic formulations using immunosuppressants and a broad selection of medicines. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 71:979-90. [PMID: 26062932 PMCID: PMC4500859 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-015-1878-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2014] [Accepted: 05/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To date, the interchangeability of generic drugs has only been investigated for a limited number of medicines. The objective of this study was to investigate generic-generic drug interchangeability in a large subset of generic formulations in order to cover a broad spectrum of drugs. Methods Orally administered drugs for investigation in this study were selected using strict, predefined criteria, with the purpose to avoid bias. This selection procedure yielded atorvastatin, bicalutamide, naratriptan, olanzapine, perindopril, and venlafaxine. Further, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil were investigated as test immunosuppressants. Adjusted indirect comparisons were conducted between generic drugs containing the same active substance, and the 90 % confidence interval (CI) for AUC and Cmax was calculated. Results In total, 120 bioequivalence studies were identified in the Dutch medicine regulatory agency’s database, allowing 292 indirect comparisons between generic drugs. The indirect comparison results indicated that in the vast majority of cases, i.e., 80.5 %, the 90 % CIs for both AUCt and Cmax fell within the bioequivalence criteria (in 90.1 and 87.0 % for AUCt and Cmax, respectively). In 1 % of the 292 indirect comparison for AUCt and 3 % for Cmax, a wider range of 75–133 % (or 80–125 %) was exceeded. Conclusions Overall, our study suggests that exposure-related risks associated with the exchange of different generic drugs in clinical practice are not increased to a relevant extent compared to the situation in which a generic is exchanged with the innovator. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1878-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yu
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Söderlund C, Rådegran G. Safety and efficacy of the switch to generic mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in heart transplant patients. Clin Transplant 2015; 29:619-28. [PMID: 25981927 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generic immunosuppressants may offer economic advantages, but their use is still controversial. At our center, 55 heart transplant patients were switched from CellCept(®) to Myfenax Teva(®) (MT) (n = 51, 18% female, 8.1 ± 6.6 yr post-transplantation) and/or Prograf(®) to Tacrolimus Sandoz(®) (TS) (n = 17, 41% female, 6.6 ± 5.8 yr post-transplantation). METHODS We conducted an acute monitoring and a retrospective follow-up with regard to safety and efficacy. Acute cellular rejections (ACRs) on endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) four wk after the MT switch were specifically compared to a matched retrospective control group. RESULTS Tacrolimus C0 levels (TS switch) as well as hemoglobin, leukocytes, and thrombocytes (MT switch) did not change (p = NS) during the three wk after each respective switch (8.7 ± 2.9 vs. 8.4 ± 1.9 μg/L, 129.1 ± 12.6 vs. 130.1 ± 12.8 g/L, 6.3 vs. 6.2 × 10(9) /L, and 217.4 ± 56.6 vs. 219.3 ± 61.8 × 10(9) /L, respectively). 0% of the EMBs in the MT switch vs. 3% of the EMBs in the control group showed ACR>grade 1R (p = NS). After six months, survival was 96% (MT switch) and 100% (TS switch), and the frequency of severe ACR was low. Safety parameters measured at the next annual follow-up were also stable following each switch. CONCLUSION Switching to MT and/or TS several years after heart transplantation appeared safe in the short-term perspective, showing no detectable changes in tacrolimus C0 levels, safety or efficacy, during an average follow-up of six months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Söderlund
- The Haemodynamic Lab, The Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, The Clinic for Heart and Lung Disease, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Göran Rådegran
- The Haemodynamic Lab, The Section for Heart Failure and Valvular Disease, The Clinic for Heart and Lung Disease, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
El Hajj S, Kim M, Phillips K, Gabardi S. Generic immunosuppression in transplantation: current evidence and controversial issues. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2015; 11:659-72. [DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2015.1026895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
11
|
Tichy EM, Pilch NA, Smith LD, Maldonado AQ, Taber DJ. Building a business plan to support a transplantation pharmacy practice model. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2014; 71:751-7. [PMID: 24733139 DOI: 10.2146/ajhp130555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Eric M Tichy
- Eric M. Tichy, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Senior Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Solid Organ Transplant, and Director, Postgraduate Year 2 Pharmacy Residency-Transplant, Department of Pharmacy, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT. Nicole A. Pilch, Pharm.D., M.S.C.R., BCPS, is Clinical Specialist, Solid Organ Transplantation, and Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy and Clinical Sciences, South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. Lonnie D. Smith, Pharm.D., is Manager, Department of Solid Organ Transplant, and Director, Postgraduate Year 2 Pharmacy Residency-Transplant, University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics, Salt Lake City. Angela Q. Maldonado, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist-Transplant Services, Vidant Medical Center, Greenville, NC. David J. Taber, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Director, Clinical Research, and Assistant Professor of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|