1
|
Peralta G, Sánchez-Santiago B. Navigating the challenges of clinical trial professionals in the healthcare sector. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1400585. [PMID: 38887672 PMCID: PMC11181308 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1400585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials (CTs) are essential for medical advancements but face significant challenges, particularly in professional training and role clarity. Principal investigators, clinical research coordinators (CRCs), nurses, clinical trial pharmacists, and monitors are key players. Each faces unique challenges, such as maintaining protocol compliance, managing investigational products, and ensuring data integrity. Clinical trials' complexity and evolving nature demand specialized and ongoing training for these professionals. Addressing these challenges requires clear role delineation, continuous professional development, and supportive workplace environments to improve retention and trial outcomes. Enhanced training programs and a collaborative approach are essential for the successful conduct of clinical trials and the advancement of medical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galo Peralta
- Central Support Unit, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Blanca Sánchez-Santiago
- Clinical Pharmacology Service, Clinical Trials Unit, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brünn R, Basten J, Lemke D, Piotrowski A, Söling S, Surmann B, Greiner W, Grandt D, Kellermann-Mühlhoff P, Harder S, Glasziou P, Perera R, Köberlein-Neu J, Ihle P, van den Akker M, Timmesfeld N, Muth C. Digital Medication Management in Polypharmacy. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2024; 121:243-250. [PMID: 38377330 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate drug prescriptions for patients with polypharmacy can have avoidable adverse consequences. We studied the effects of a clinical decision-support system (CDSS) for medication management on hospitalizations and mortality. METHODS This stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial involved an open cohort of adult patients with polypharmacy in primary care practices (=clusters) in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. During the period of the intervention, their medication lists were checked annually using the CDSS. The CDSS warns against inappropriate prescriptions on the basis of patient-related health insurance data. The combined primary endpoint consisted of overall mortality and hospitalization for any reason. The secondary endpoints were mortality, hospitalizations, and high-risk prescription. We analyzed the quarterly health insurance data of the intention- to-treat population with a mixed logistic model taking account of clustering and repeated measurements. Sensitivity analyses addressed effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and other effects. RESULTS 688 primary care practices were randomized, and data were obtained on 42 700 patients over 391 994 quarter years. No significant reduction was found in either the primary endpoint (odds ratio [OR] 1.00; 95% confidence interval [0.95; 1.04]; p = 0.8716) or the secondary endpoints (hospitalizations: OR 1.00 [0.95; 1.05]; mortality: OR 1.04 [0.92; 1.17]; high-risk prescription: OR 0.98 [0.92; 1.04]). CONCLUSION The planned analyses did not reveal any significant effect of the intervention. Pandemicadjusted analyses yielded evidence that the mortality of adult patients with polypharmacy might potentially be lowered by the CDSS. Controlled trials with appropriate follow-up are needed to prove that a CDSS has significant effects on mortality in patients with polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Brünn
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main; Pharmacy of University Hospital Frankfurt; Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum; Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum; Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main; Working Group General and Family Medicine, Medical Faculty East Westphalia-Lippe, University of Bielefeld; Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main; Bergisch Competence Center for Health Economics and Health Services Research, Bergische University Wuppertal; Chair of General Medicine II and Patient Orientation in Primary Care, Institute of General Medicine and Ambulatory Health Care (iamag), University Witten/Herdecke; Working Group for Health Economics and Health Management, Faculty of ; Health Sciences, Bielefeld University; Chairman of the Drug Therapy Management and Drug Therapy Safety Commission, German Society for Internal Medicine (DGIM); Barmer, Wuppertal; Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main; Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, 4229, Australia; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK; PMV Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne; Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main; Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wien K, Thern J, Neubert A, Matthiessen BL, Borgwardt S. Reduced prevalence of drug-related problems in psychiatric inpatients after implementation of a pharmacist-supported computerized physician order entry system - a retrospective cohort study. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1304844. [PMID: 38654729 PMCID: PMC11035719 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1304844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In 2021, a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system with an integrated clinical decision support system (CDSS) was implemented at a tertiary care center for the treatment of mental health conditions in Lübeck, Germany. To date, no study has been reported on the types and prevalence of drug-related problems (DRPs) before and after CPOE implementation in a psychiatric inpatient setting. The aim of this retrospective before-and-after cohort study was to investigate whether the implementation of a CPOE system with CDSS accompanied by the introduction of regular medication plausibility checks by a pharmacist led to a decrease of DRPs during hospitalization and unsolved DRPs at discharge in psychiatric inpatients. Methods Medication charts and electronic patient records of 54 patients before (cohort I) and 65 patients after (cohort II) CPOE implementation were reviewed retrospectively by a clinical pharmacist. All identified DRPs were collected and classified based on 'The PCNE Classification V9.1', the German database DokuPIK, and the 'NCC MERP Taxonomy of Medication Errors'. Results 325 DRPs were identified in 54 patients with a mean of 6 DRPs per patient and 151.9 DRPs per 1000 patient days in cohort I. In cohort II, 214 DRPs were identified in 65 patients with a mean of 3.3 DRPs per patient and 81.3 DRPs per 1000 patient days. The odds of having a DRP were significantly lower in cohort II (OR=0.545, 95% CI 0.412-0.721, p<0.001). The most frequent DRP in cohort I was an erroneous prescription (n=113, 34.8%), which was significantly reduced in cohort II (n=12, 5.6%, p<0.001). During the retrospective in-depth review, more DRPs were identified than during the daily plausibility analyses. At hospital discharge, patients had significantly less unsolved DRPs in cohort II than in cohort I. Discussion The implementation of a CPOE system with an integrated CDSS reduced the overall prevalence of DRPs, especially of prescription errors, and led to a smaller rate of unsolved DRPs in psychiatric inpatients at hospital discharge. Not all DRPs were found by plausibility analyses based on the medication charts. A more interactive and interdisciplinary patient-oriented approach might result in the resolution of more DRPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Wien
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Julia Thern
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Anika Neubert
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Britta-Lena Matthiessen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Integrative Psychiatry, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stefan Borgwardt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Integrative Psychiatry, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kopanz J, Lichtenegger K, Schwarz C, Wimmer M, Kamolz LP, Pieber T, Sendlhofer G, Mader J, Hoffmann M. Risks in the analogue and digitally-supported medication process and potential solutions to increase patient safety in the hospital: A mixed methods study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297491. [PMID: 38412194 PMCID: PMC10898776 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In hospital medication errors are common. Our aim was to investigate risks of the analogue and digitally-supported medication process and any potential solutions. METHODS A mixed methods study including a structured literature search and online questionnaires based on the Delphi method was conducted. First, all risks were structured into main and sub-risks and second, risks were grouped into risk clusters. Third, healthcare experts assessed risk clusters regarding their likelihood of occurrence their possible impact on patient safety. Experts were also asked to estimate the potential for digital solutions and solutions that strengthen the competence of healthcare professionals. RESULTS Overall, 160 main risks and 542 sub-risks were identified. Main risks were grouped into 43 risk clusters. 33 healthcare experts (56% female, 50% with >20 years professional-experience) ranked the likelihood of occurrence and the impact on patient safety in the top 15 risk clusters regarding the process steps: admission (n = 4), prescribing (n = 3), verifying (n = 1), preparing/dispensing (n = 3), administering (n = 1), discharge (n = 1), healthcare professional competence (n = 1), and patient adherence (n = 1). 28 healthcare experts (64% female, 43% with >20 years professional-experience) mostly suggested awareness building and training, strengthened networking, and involvement of pharmacists at point-of-care as likely solutions to strengthen healthcare professional competence. For digital solutions they primarily suggested a digital medication list, digital warning systems, barcode-technology, and digital support in integrated care. CONCLUSIONS The medication process holds a multitude of potential risks, in both the analogue and the digital medication process. Different solutions to strengthen healthcare professional competence and in the area of digitalization were identified that could help increase patient safety and minimize possible errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Kopanz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Katharina Lichtenegger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Christine Schwarz
- Department of Quality and Risk Management, University Hospital of Graz, Styria, Austria
- Department for Surgery, c/o Division for Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Research Unit for Safety and Sustainability in Healthcare, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Melanie Wimmer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Lars Peter Kamolz
- Department for Surgery, c/o Division for Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Research Unit for Safety and Sustainability in Healthcare, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Thomas Pieber
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Gerald Sendlhofer
- Department of Quality and Risk Management, University Hospital of Graz, Styria, Austria
- Department for Surgery, c/o Division for Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Research Unit for Safety and Sustainability in Healthcare, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Julia Mader
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Magdalena Hoffmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
- Department of Quality and Risk Management, University Hospital of Graz, Styria, Austria
- Department for Surgery, c/o Division for Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Research Unit for Safety and Sustainability in Healthcare, Medical University of Graz, Styria, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arab A, Sheikh-Germchi Z, Habibzadeh S, Sadeghiye-Ahari S, Mostafalou S. Frequency, Predictors, and Outcomes of the Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in the ICUs of Teaching Hospitals in Ardabil, Northwest of Iran During 2019-2020. Hosp Pharm 2023; 58:484-490. [PMID: 37711413 PMCID: PMC10498974 DOI: 10.1177/00185787231153613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can reduce therapeutic efficacy and increase the duration and cost of hospitalization so that patients are sometimes exposed to significant complications and even death. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at higher risk of DDIs for a variety of reasons, including impaired absorption, decreased metabolism, and renal failure. The main objective of this study was to evaluate frequency, clinical ranking and risk factors of potential DDIs in the ICUs of 3 teaching hospitals in Ardabil. Methods: In this descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study, drug prescriptions 355 patients admitted to the ICUs were studied. Patient information including age, sex, diagnosis, number of prescribers, number of drugs, length of stay, and status of patients' discharge (recovery or death) were recorded and checked using the online software up to date and the book Drug Interaction Facts. Finally, the data were statistically analyzed using the SPSS software. Results: The number of patients studied was 355. The mean age of the patients were 51.88 ± 23.22 years, and on average, 8.45 drugs had been prescribed for each patient. The total number of DDIs was 1597 among which class X was 1.4%, class D was 26.2%, and class C was 67.7%. Four hundred ninety-seven unique pairs of DDIs were identified. Age, number of prescribed drugs and length of stay in ICU were associated with prevalence of DDIs. Age and number of drugs were also identified as the risk factors of patients' discharge caused by death. Conclusion: DDIs can complicate health state of patients in ICUs and may increase the length of hospital stay. Setting up computerized systems to alert drug interactions in hospital wards and pharmacotherapeutic intervention by clinical pharmacist can minimize DDIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Arab
- Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang T, Gephart SM, Subbian V, Boyce RD, Villa-Zapata L, Tan MS, Horn J, Gomez-Lumbreras A, Romero AV, Malone DC. Barriers to Adoption of Tailored Drug-Drug Interaction Clinical Decision Support. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14:779-788. [PMID: 37793617 PMCID: PMC10550365 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite the benefits of the tailored drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts and the broad dissemination strategy, the uptake of our tailored DDI alert algorithms that are enhanced with patient-specific and context-specific factors has been limited. The goal of the study was to examine barriers and health care system dynamics related to implementing tailored DDI alerts and identify the factors that would drive optimization and improvement of DDI alerts. METHODS We employed a qualitative research approach, conducting interviews with a participant interview guide framed based on Proctor's taxonomy of implementation outcomes and informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Participants included pharmacists with informatics roles within hospitals, chief medical informatics officers, and associate medical informatics directors/officers. Our data analysis was informed by the technique used in grounded theory analysis, and the reporting of open coding results was based on a modified version of the Safety-Related Electronic Health Record Research Reporting Framework. RESULTS Our analysis generated 15 barriers, and we mapped the interconnections of these barriers, which clustered around three entities (i.e., users, organizations, and technical stakeholders). Our findings revealed that misaligned interests regarding DDI alert performance and misaligned expectations regarding DDI alert optimizations among these entities within health care organizations could result in system inertia in implementing tailored DDI alerts. CONCLUSION Health care organizations primarily determine the implementation and optimization of DDI alerts, and it is essential to identify and demonstrate value metrics that health care organizations prioritize to enable tailored DDI alert implementation. This could be achieved via a multifaceted approach, such as partnering with health care organizations that have the capacity to adopt tailored DDI alerts and identifying specialists who know users' needs, liaise with organizations and vendors, and facilitate technical stakeholders' work. In the future, researchers can adopt the systematic approach to study tailored DDI implementation problems from other system perspectives (e.g., the vendors' system).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyi Zhang
- Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Sheila M. Gephart
- Advanced Nursing Practice and Science Division, College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Vignesh Subbian
- Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Richard D. Boyce
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Lorenzo Villa-Zapata
- Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Malinda S. Tan
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - John Horn
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Daniel C. Malone
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heider AK, Mang H. Effects of Non-monetary Incentives in Physician Groups-A Systematic Review. Am J Health Behav 2023; 47:458-470. [PMID: 37596755 DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.47.3.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Healthcare expenditures in western countries have been rising for many years. This leads many countries to develop and test new reimbursement systems. A systematic review about monetary incentives in group settings indicated that a sole focus on monetary aspects does not necessarily result in better care at lower costs. Hence, this systematic review aims to describe the effects of non- monetary incentives in physician groups. Methods: We searched the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit, and ISI Web of Science. Grey literature search, reference lists, and authors' personal collection provided additional sources. Results: Overall, we included 36 studies. We identified 4 categories of interventions related to non-monetary incentives. In particular, the category of decision support achieved promising results. However, design features vary among different decision support systems. To enable effective design, we provide an overview of the features applied by the studies included. Conclusions: Not every type of non-monetary incentive has a positive impact on quality of care in physician group settings. Thus, creating awareness among decision-makers regarding this matter and extending research on this topic can contribute to preventing implementation of ineffective incentives, and consequently, allocate resources towards tools that add value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Kathrin Heider
- Faculty of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Harald Mang
- Master Program Medical Process Management, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hilgarth H, Waydhas C, Dörje F, Sommer J, Kluge S, Ittner KP. [Drug therapy safety supported by interprofessional collaboration between ICU physicians and clinical pharmacists in critical care units in Germany : Results of a survey]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2023; 118:141-148. [PMID: 35258694 PMCID: PMC9992023 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-022-00898-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critically ill patients are particularly susceptible to adverse drug events. International studies show that pharmaceutical care has a positive impact on patient and drug therapy safety. Nationally, the integration of pharmacists into the multidisciplinary team and participation in ward rounds is required. The aim of this work is to assess the scope and extent of pharmaceutical care in intensive care units (ICU) in Germany. METHOD In a literature and database search, 13 relevant pharmaceutical activities were identified. Based on this, an online survey with 27 questions on the implementation of pharmaceutical care in ICU was prepared by a panel of experts. The survey was sent to heads of German ICUs. RESULTS Of the participants, 35.3% (59/167) have established regular pharmaceutical care. Drug information (89.7% [52/58]), pharmaceutical interventions with change of therapy (e.g., ward rounds; 67,2% [39/58]), regular evaluation of prescriptions (medication analysis; 65.5% [38/58]) as well as the monitoring of medication (e.g., side effects, effectiveness, costs; 63.8% [37/58]) were most frequently mentioned. The participants with pharmaceutical care (58/168) graded 7 of 13 but those without (104/168) only two activities as 'essential/indispensable'. CONCLUSION Only a few ICU in Germany have already integrated ward pharmacists into the multidisciplinary team. Once a pharmaceutical service has been established, a greater role/importance is assigned to several pharmaceutical activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Hilgarth
- Klinikapotheke und Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
- Ausschuss für Intensivmedizin und klinische Ernährung, ADKA - Bundesverband Deutscher Krankenhausapotheker e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
- Sektionsgruppe Qualitätsverbesserung und Informationstechnologie, Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Christian Waydhas
- Sektionsgruppe Qualitätsverbesserung und Informationstechnologie, Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI), Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Deutschland
- Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Frank Dörje
- Ausschuss für Intensivmedizin und klinische Ernährung, ADKA - Bundesverband Deutscher Krankenhausapotheker e. V., Berlin, Deutschland
- Apotheke des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Julia Sommer
- Apotheke des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
- Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Karl Peter Ittner
- Sektionsgruppe Qualitätsverbesserung und Informationstechnologie, Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI), Berlin, Deutschland.
- Lehr- und Forschungseinheit Pharmakologie, Fakultät für Medizin, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Acosta-García H, Ferrer-López I, Ruano-Ruiz J, Santos-Ramos B, Molina-López T. Computerized clinical decision support systems for prescribing in primary care: main characteristics and implementation impact-protocol of an evidence and gap map. Syst Rev 2022; 11:283. [PMID: 36578097 PMCID: PMC9798565 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02161-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computerized clinical decision support systems are used by clinicians at the point of care to improve quality of healthcare processes (prescribing error prevention, adherence to clinical guidelines, etc.) and clinical outcomes (preventive, therapeutic, and diagnostics). Attempts to summarize results of computerized clinical decision support systems to support prescription in primary care have been challenging, and most systematic reviews and meta-analyses failed due to an extremely high degree of heterogeneity present among the included primary studies. The aim of our study will be to synthesize the evidence, considering all methodological factors that could explain these differences, and build an evidence and gap map to identify important remaining research questions. METHODS A literature search will be conducted from January 2010 onwards in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full text, and abstract data. The study methodological quality and risk of bias will be appraised using appropriate tools if applicable. A flow diagram with the screened studies will be presented, and all included studies will be displayed using interactive evidence and gap maps. Results will be reported in accordance with recommendations from the Campbell Collaboration on the development of evidence and gap maps. DISCUSSION Evidence behind computerized clinical decision support systems to support prescription use in primary care has so far been difficult to be synthesized. Evidence and gap maps represent an innovative approach that has emerged and is increasingly being used to address a broader research question, where multiple types of intervention and outcomes reported may be evaluated. Broad inclusion criteria have been chosen with regard to study designs, in order to collect all available information. Regarding the limitations, we will only include English and Spanish language studies from the last 10 years, we will not perform a grey literature search, and we will not carry out a meta-analysis due to the predictable heterogeneity of available studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION This study is registered in Open Science Framework https://bit.ly/2RqKrWp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ingrid Ferrer-López
- Primary Care Pharmacist Service, Sevilla Primary Care District, Seville, Spain
| | - Juan Ruano-Ruiz
- Dermatology Service, IMIBIC/Reina Sofía University Hospital/University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Molina-López
- Primary Care Pharmacist Service, Sevilla Primary Care District, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berger V, Sommer C, Boje P, Hollmann J, Hummelt J, König C, Lezius S, van der Linde A, Marhenke C, Melzer S, Michalowski N, Baehr M, Langebrake C. The impact of pharmacists' interventions within the Closed Loop Medication Management process on medication safety: An analysis in a German university hospital. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1030406. [PMID: 36452222 PMCID: PMC9704051 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1030406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Single elements of the Closed Loop Medication Management process (CLMM), including electronic prescribing, involvement of clinical pharmacists (CPs), patient individual logistics and digital administration/documentation, have shown to improve medication safety and patient health outcomes. The impact of the complete CLMM on patient safety, as reflected in pharmacists' interventions (PIs), is largely unknown. Aim: To evaluate the extent and characterization of routine PIs performed by hospital-wide CPs at a university hospital with an implemented CLMM. Methods: This single-center study included all interventions documented by CPs on five self-chosen working days within 1 month using the validated online-database DokuPIK (Documentation of Pharmacists' Interventions in the Hospital). Based on different workflows, two groups of CPs were compared. One group operated as a part of the CLMM, the "Closed Loop Clinical Pharmacists" (CL-CPs), while the other group worked less dependent of the CLMM, the "Process Detached Clinical Pharmacists" (PD-CPs). The professional experience and the number of medication reviews were entered in an online survey. Combined pseudonymized datasets were analyzed descriptively after anonymization. Results: A total of 1,329 PIs were documented by nine CPs. Overall CPs intervened in every fifth medication review. The acceptance rate of PIs was 91.9%. The most common reasons were the categories "drugs" (e.g., indication, choice of formulation/drug and documentation/transcription) with 42.7%, followed by "dose" with 29.6%. One-quarter of PIs referred to the therapeutic subgroup "J01 antibacterials for systemic use." Of the 1,329 underlying PIs, 1,295 were classified as medication errors (MEs) and their vast majority (81.5%) was rated as "error, no harm" (NCC MERP categories B-D). Among PIs performed by CL-CPs (n = 1,125), the highest proportion of errors was categorized as B (56.5%), while in the group of PIs from PD-CPs (n = 170) errors categorized as C (68.2%) dominated (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study shows that a structured CLMM enables CPs to perform a high number of medication reviews while detecting and solving MEs at an early stage before they can cause harm to the patient. Based on key quality indicators for medication safety, the complete CLMM provides a suitable framework for the efficient medication management of inpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivien Berger
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Sommer
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peggy Boje
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Josef Hollmann
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julia Hummelt
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina König
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Lezius
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annika van der Linde
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Corinna Marhenke
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simone Melzer
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nina Michalowski
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Baehr
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Langebrake
- Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ahsani-Estahbanati E, Sergeevich Gordeev V, Doshmangir L. Interventions to reduce the incidence of medical error and its financial burden in health care systems: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:875426. [PMID: 35966854 PMCID: PMC9363709 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.875426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aim Improving health care quality and ensuring patient safety is impossible without addressing medical errors that adversely affect patient outcomes. Therefore, it is essential to correctly estimate the incidence rates and implement the most appropriate solutions to control and reduce medical errors. We identified such interventions. Methods We conducted a systematic review of systematic reviews by searching four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Embase) until January 2021 to elicit interventions that have the potential to decrease medical errors. Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction and analyses. Results Seventysix systematic review papers were included in the study. We identified eight types of interventions based on medical error type classification: overall medical error, medication error, diagnostic error, patients fall, healthcare-associated infections, transfusion and testing errors, surgical error, and patient suicide. Most studies focused on medication error (66%) and were conducted in hospital settings (74%). Conclusions Despite a plethora of suggested interventions, patient safety has not significantly improved. Therefore, policymakers need to focus more on the implementation considerations of selected interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehsan Ahsani-Estahbanati
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Vladimir Sergeevich Gordeev
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Leila Doshmangir
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- *Correspondence: Leila Doshmangir
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Van De Sijpe G, Quintens C, Walgraeve K, Van Laer E, Penny J, De Vlieger G, Schrijvers R, De Munter P, Foulon V, Casteels M, Van der Linden L, Spriet I. Overall performance of a drug-drug interaction clinical decision support system: quantitative evaluation and end-user survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:48. [PMID: 35193547 PMCID: PMC8864797 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01783-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical decision support systems are implemented in many hospitals to prevent medication errors and associated harm. They are however associated with a high burden of false positive alerts and alert fatigue. The aim of this study was to evaluate a drug-drug interaction (DDI) clinical decision support system in terms of its performance, uptake and user satisfaction and to identify barriers and opportunities for improvement. METHODS A quantitative evaluation and end-user survey were performed in a large teaching hospital. First, very severe DDI alerts generated between 2019 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Data collection comprised alert burden, override rates, the number of alert overrides reviewed by pharmacists and the resulting pharmacist recommendations as well as their acceptance rate. Second, an e-survey was carried out among prescribers to assess satisfaction, usefulness and relevance of DDI alerts as well as reasons for overriding. RESULTS A total of 38,409 very severe DDI alerts were generated, of which 88.2% were overridden by the prescriber. In 3.2% of reviewed overrides, a recommendation by the pharmacist was provided, of which 79.2% was accepted. False positive alerts were caused by a too broad screening interval and lack of incorporation of patient-specific characteristics, such as QTc values. Co-prescribing of a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant and a low molecular weight heparin accounted for 49.8% of alerts, of which 92.2% were overridden. In 88 (1.1%) of these overridden alerts, concurrent therapy was still present. Despite the high override rate, the e-survey revealed that the DDI clinical decision support system was found useful by prescribers. CONCLUSIONS Identified barriers were the lack of DDI-specific screening intervals and inclusion of patient-specific characteristics, both leading to a high number of false positive alerts and risk for alert fatigue. Despite these barriers, the added value of the DDI clinical decision support system was recognized by prescribers. Hence, integration of DDI-specific screening intervals and patient-specific characteristics is warranted to improve the performance of the DDI software.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greet Van De Sijpe
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. .,Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Charlotte Quintens
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Eva Van Laer
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jens Penny
- Department of Information Technology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Greet De Vlieger
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Schrijvers
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul De Munter
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Minne Casteels
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lorenz Van der Linden
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabel Spriet
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ciapponi A, Fernandez Nievas SE, Seijo M, Rodríguez MB, Vietto V, García-Perdomo HA, Virgilio S, Fajreldines AV, Tost J, Rose CJ, Garcia-Elorrio E. Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11:CD009985. [PMID: 34822165 PMCID: PMC8614640 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009985.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication errors are preventable events that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm while the medication is in the control of the healthcare professional or patient. Medication errors in hospitalised adults may cause harm, additional costs, and even death. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of interventions to reduce medication errors in adults in hospital settings. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases and two trials registers on 16 January 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and interrupted time series (ITS) studies investigating interventions aimed at reducing medication errors in hospitalised adults, compared with usual care or other interventions. Outcome measures included adverse drug events (ADEs), potential ADEs, preventable ADEs, medication errors, mortality, morbidity, length of stay, quality of life and identified/solved discrepancies. We included any hospital setting, such as inpatient care units, outpatient care settings, and accident and emergency departments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. Where necessary, we extracted and reanalysed ITS study data using piecewise linear regression, corrected for autocorrelation and seasonality, where possible. MAIN RESULTS: We included 65 studies: 51 RCTs and 14 ITS studies, involving 110,875 participants. About half of trials gave rise to 'some concerns' for risk of bias during the randomisation process and one-third lacked blinding of outcome assessment. Most ITS studies presented low risk of bias. Most studies came from high-income countries or high-resource settings. Medication reconciliation -the process of comparing a patient's medication orders to the medications that the patient has been taking- was the most common type of intervention studied. Electronic prescribing systems, barcoding for correct administering of medications, organisational changes, feedback on medication errors, education of professionals and improved medication dispensing systems were other interventions studied. Medication reconciliation Low-certainty evidence suggests that medication reconciliation (MR) versus no-MR may reduce medication errors (odds ratio [OR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 1.74; 3 studies; n=379). Compared to no-MR, MR probably reduces ADEs (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.80; 3 studies, n=1336 ; moderate-certainty evidence), but has little to no effect on length of stay (mean difference (MD) -0.30 days, 95%CI -1.93 to 1.33 days; 3 studies, n=527) and quality of life (MD -1.51, 95%CI -10.04 to 7.02; 1 study, n=131). Low-certainty evidence suggests that, compared to MR by other professionals, MR by pharmacists may reduce medication errors (OR 0.21, 95%CI 0.09 to 0.48; 8 studies, n=2648) and may increase ADEs (OR 1.34, 95%CI 0.73 to 2.44; 3 studies, n=2873). Compared to MR by other professionals, MR by pharmacists may have little to no effect on length of stay (MD -0.25, 95%CI -1.05 to 0.56; 6 studies, 3983). Moderate-certainty evidence shows that this intervention probably has little to no effect on mortality during hospitalisation (risk ratio (RR) 0.99, 95%CI 0.57 to 1.7; 2 studies, n=1000), and on readmissions at one month (RR 0.93, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.14; 2 studies, n=997); and low-certainty evidence suggests that the intervention may have little to no effect on quality of life (MD 0.00, 95%CI -14.09 to 14.09; 1 study, n=724). Low-certainty evidence suggests that database-assisted MR conducted by pharmacists, versus unassisted MR conducted by pharmacists, may reduce potential ADEs (OR 0.26, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.64; 2 studies, n=3326), and may have no effect on length of stay (MD 1.00, 95%CI -0.17 to 2.17; 1 study, n=311). Low-certainty evidence suggests that MR performed by trained pharmacist technicians, versus pharmacists, may have little to no difference on length of stay (MD -0.30, 95%CI -2.12 to 1.52; 1 study, n=183). However, the CI is compatible with important beneficial and detrimental effects. Low-certainty evidence suggests that MR before admission may increase the identification of discrepancies compared with MR after admission (MD 1.27, 95%CI 0.46 to 2.08; 1 study, n=307). However, the CI is compatible with important beneficial and detrimental effects. Moderate-certainty evidence shows that multimodal interventions probably increase discrepancy resolutions compared to usual care (RR 2.14, 95%CI 1.81 to 2.53; 1 study, n=487). Computerised physician order entry (CPOE)/clinical decision support systems (CDSS) Moderate-certainty evidence shows that CPOE/CDSS probably reduce medication errors compared to paper-based systems (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.31 to 1.79; 2 studies, n=88). Moderate-certainty evidence shows that, compared with standard CPOE/CDSS, improved CPOE/CDSS probably reduce medication errors (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.74 to 0.97; 2 studies, n=630). Low-certainty evidence suggests that prioritised alerts provided by CPOE/CDSS may prevent ADEs compared to non-prioritised (inconsequential) alerts (MD 1.98, 95%CI 1.65 to 2.31; 1 study; participant numbers unavailable). Barcode identification of participants/medications Low-certainty evidence suggests that barcoding may reduce medication errors (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.59 to 0.79; 2 studies, n=50,545). Reduced working hours Low-certainty evidence suggests that reduced working hours may reduce serious medication errors (RR 0.83, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.09; 1 study, n=634). However, the CI is compatible with important beneficial and detrimental effects. Feedback on prescribing errors Low-certainty evidence suggests that feedback on prescribing errors may reduce medication errors (OR 0.47, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.67; 4 studies, n=384). Dispensing system Low-certainty evidence suggests that dispensing systems in surgical wards may reduce medication errors (OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.79; 2 studies, n=1775). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggests that, compared to usual care, medication reconciliation, CPOE/CDSS, barcoding, feedback and dispensing systems in surgical wards may reduce medication errors and ADEs. However, the results are imprecise for some outcomes related to medication reconciliation and CPOE/CDSS. The evidence for other interventions is very uncertain. Powered and methodologically sound studies are needed to address the identified evidence gaps. Innovative, synergistic strategies -including those that involve patients- should also be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustín Ciapponi
- Argentine Cochrane Centre, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Simon E Fernandez Nievas
- Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mariana Seijo
- Quality of Health Care and Patient Safety, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Belén Rodríguez
- Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Valeria Vietto
- Family and Community Medicine Service, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Sacha Virgilio
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ana V Fajreldines
- Quality and Patient Safety, Austral University Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Josep Tost
- Urgencias � Calidad y Seguridad de pacientes, Consorcio Sanitario de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ezequiel Garcia-Elorrio
- Quality and Safety in Health Care, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen und Medikationsfehler – was Akut- und Notfallmediziner wissen sollten. Notf Rett Med 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s10049-021-00896-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Bachhuber MA, Nash D, Southern WN, Heo M, Berger M, Schepis M, Thakral M, Cunningham CO. Effect of Changing Electronic Health Record Opioid Analgesic Dispense Quantity Defaults on the Quantity Prescribed: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e217481. [PMID: 33885773 PMCID: PMC8063068 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Interventions to improve judicious prescribing of opioid analgesics for acute pain are needed owing to the risks of diversion, misuse, and overdose. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of modifying opioid analgesic prescribing defaults in the electronic health record (EHR) on prescribing and health service use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cluster randomized clinical trial with 2 parallel arms was conducted between June 13, 2016, and June 13, 2018, in a large urban health care system comprising 32 primary care and 4 emergency department (ED) sites in the Bronx, New York. Data were analyzed using a difference-in-differences method from 6 months before implementation through 18 months after implementation. Data were analyzed from January 2019 to February 2020. INTERVENTIONS A default dispense quantity for new opioid analgesic prescriptions of 10 tablets (intervention) vs no change (control) in the EHR. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the quantity of opioid analgesics prescribed with the new default prescription. Secondary outcomes were opioid analgesic reorders and health service use within 30 days after the new prescription. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. RESULTS Overall, 21 331 patients received a new opioid analgesic prescription from 490 prescribers. Comparing the intervention and control arms, site, prescriber, and patient characteristics were similar. For the new prescription, compared with the control arm, patients in the intervention arm had significantly more prescriptions for 10 tablets or fewer (7.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.1-9.2 percentage points), a lower number of tablets prescribed (-2.1 tablets; 95% CI, -3.3 to -0.9 tablets), and lower morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed (-14.6 MME; 95% CI, -22.6 to -6.6 MME). Within 30 days after the new prescription, significant differences remained in the number of tablets prescribed (-2.7 tablets; 95% CI, -4.8 to -0.6 tablets), but not MME (-15.8 MME; 95% CI, -33.8 to 2.2 MME). Within this 30-day period, there were no significant differences between the arms in health service use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, implementation of a uniform reduced default dispense quantity of 10 tablets for opioid analgesic prescriptions led to a modest reduction in the quantity prescribed initially, without significantly increasing health service use. However, during 30 days after implementation, the influence on prescribing was mixed. Reducing EHR default dispense quantities for opioid analgesics is a feasible strategy that can be widely disseminated and may modestly reduce prescribing. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03003832.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus A. Bachhuber
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
- Now with Section of Community and Population Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center–New Orleans
| | - Denis Nash
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York
- Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York, New York, New York
| | - William N. Southern
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Moonseong Heo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
- Now with College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina
| | - Matthew Berger
- Montefiore Information Technology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Mark Schepis
- Montefiore Information Technology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Manu Thakral
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston
| | - Chinazo O. Cunningham
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Srinivasamurthy SK, Ashokkumar R, Kodidela S, Howard SC, Samer CF, Chakradhara Rao US. Impact of computerised physician order entry (CPOE) on the incidence of chemotherapy-related medication errors: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 77:1123-1131. [PMID: 33624119 PMCID: PMC8275496 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03099-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Computerised prescriber (or physician) order entry (CPOE) implementation is one of the strategies to reduce medication errors. The extent to which CPOE influences the incidence of chemotherapy-related medication errors (CMEs) was not previously collated and systematically reviewed. Hence, this study was designed to collect, collate, and systematically review studies to evaluate the effect of CPOE on the incidence of CMEs. Methods A search was performed of four databases from 1 January 1995 until 1 August 2019. English-language studies evaluating the effect of CPOE on CMEs were selected as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. The total CMEs normalised to total prescriptions pre- and post-CPOE were extracted and collated to perform a meta-analysis using the ‘meta’ package in R. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO CRD42018104220. Results The database search identified 1621 studies. After screening, 19 studies were selected for full-text review, of which 11 studies fulfilled the selection criteria. The meta-analysis of eight studies with a random effects model showed a risk ratio of 0.19 (95% confidence interval: 0.08–0.44) favouring CPOE (I2 = 99%). Conclusion The studies have shown consistent reduction in CMEs after CPOE implementation, except one study that showed an increase in CMEs. The random effects model in the meta-analysis of eight studies showed that CPOE implementation reduced CMEs by 81%. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-021-03099-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suresh Kumar Srinivasamurthy
- Department of Pharmacology, Ras Al Khaimah College of Medical Sciences, Ras Al Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ramkumar Ashokkumar
- Cancer Services Business Informatics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sunitha Kodidela
- The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Scott C Howard
- Department of Acute and Critical Care, College of Nursing, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Caroline Flora Samer
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hilgarth H, Baehr M, Kluge S, König C. [Pharmacological/pharmaceutical counseling in intensive care medicine]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2021; 116:173-184. [PMID: 33528630 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-020-00767-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Adequate pharmacotherapy in critically ill patients is challenging for many clinicians. Disease-related pathophysiological changes often lead to complex therapy strategies including many intensive care treatments (e.g. invasive ventilation, renal replacement therapy). These measures often influence drug prescribing and dosing. Therefore, in organ dysfunction such as renal and liver impairment reduced drug elimination has to be considered by adapting drug dosing towards elimination rates. Moreover, as intensive care medicine often includes the use of multiple drugs the risk for drug-drug interactions increases. The current article gives an overview about the complexity of individual pharmacotherapy in intensive care units whilst providing information for its clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Hilgarth
- Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland. .,Klinikapotheke, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| | - M Baehr
- Klinikapotheke, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - S Kluge
- Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - C König
- Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.,Klinikapotheke, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shen L, Wright A, Lee LS, Jajoo K, Nayor J, Landman A. Clinical decision support system, using expert consensus-derived logic and natural language processing, decreased sedation-type order errors for patients undergoing endoscopy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:95-103. [PMID: 33175157 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determination of appropriate endoscopy sedation strategy is an important preprocedural consideration. To address manual workflow gaps that lead to sedation-type order errors at our institution, we designed and implemented a clinical decision support system (CDSS) to review orders for patients undergoing outpatient endoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The CDSS was developed and implemented by an expert panel using an agile approach. The CDSS queried patient-specific historical endoscopy records and applied expert consensus-derived logic and natural language processing to identify possible sedation order errors for human review. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate impact, comparing 4-month pre-pilot and 12-month pilot periods. RESULTS 22 755 endoscopy cases were included (pre-pilot 6434 cases, pilot 16 321 cases). The CDSS decreased the sedation-type order error rate on day of endoscopy (pre-pilot 0.39%, pilot 0.037%, Odds Ratio = 0.094, P-value < 1e-8). There was no difference in background prevalence of erroneous orders (pre-pilot 0.39%, pilot 0.34%, P = .54). DISCUSSION At our institution, low prevalence and high volume of cases prevented routine manual review to verify sedation order appropriateness. Using a cohort-enrichment strategy, a CDSS was able to reduce number of chart reviews needed per sedation-order error from 296.7 to 3.5, allowing for integration into the existing workflow to intercept rare but important ordering errors. CONCLUSION A workflow-integrated CDSS with expert consensus-derived logic rules and natural language processing significantly reduced endoscopy sedation-type order errors on day of endoscopy at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Shen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adam Wright
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Linda S Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kunal Jajoo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer Nayor
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology, Emerson Hospital, Concord, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adam Landman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vest TA, Gazda NP, Schenkat DH, Eckel SF. Practice-enhancing publications about the medication-use process in 2018. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2020; 77:759-770. [PMID: 32378716 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This article identifies, prioritizes, and summarizes published literature on the medication-use process (MUP) from calendar year 2018 that can impact health-system pharmacy daily practice. The MUP is the foundational system that provides the framework for safe medication utilization within the healthcare environment. The MUP is defined in this article as having the following steps: prescribing/transcribing, dispensing, administration, and monitoring. Articles that evaluated one of the steps were gauged for their usefulness toward daily practice change. SUMMARY A PubMed search was conducted in February 2019 for articles published in calendar year 2018 using targeted Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords, targeted non-MeSH keywords, and the table of contents of selected pharmacy journals, providing a total of 43,977 articles. A thorough review identified 62 potentially significant articles: 9 for prescribing/transcribing, 12 for dispensing, 13 for administration, and 28 for monitoring. Ranking of the articles for importance by peers led to the selection of key articles from each category. The highest-ranked articles are briefly summarized, with a mention of why they are important within health-system pharmacy. The other articles are listed for further review and evaluation. CONCLUSION It is important to routinely review the published literature and to incorporate significant findings into daily practice. This article assists in identifying and summarizing recent impactful contributions to the MUP literature. Health-system pharmacists have an active role in improving the MUP in their institution, and awareness of significant published studies can assist in changing practice at the institutional level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler A Vest
- Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Stephen F Eckel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, and University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Falciglia GH, Murthy K, Holl JL, Palac HL, Woods DM, Robinson DT. Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2020; 40:497-503. [PMID: 31813935 PMCID: PMC7042157 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-019-0546-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical decision support (CDS) improves nutrition delivery for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), however, the prevalence of CDS to support nutrition is unknown. METHODS Online surveys, with telephone and email validation of responses, were administered to NICU clinicians in the Children's Hospital Neonatal Consortium (CHNC). We determined and compared the availability of CDS to calculate calories and fluid received in the prior 24 h, stratified by enteral and parenteral intake, using McNemar's test. RESULTS Clinicians at all 34 CHNC hospitals responded with 98 of 108 (91%) surveys completed. NICUs have considerably less CDS to calculate enteral calories received than enteral fluid received (32% vs. 82%, p < 0.001) and less CDS to calculate parenteral calories received than parenteral fluid received (29% vs. 82%, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION Most CHNC NICUs are unable to reliably and consistently monitor caloric intake delivered to critically ill infants at risk for growth failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustave H. Falciglia
- 0000 0001 2299 3507grid.16753.36Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA ,0000 0004 0388 2248grid.413808.6Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Karna Murthy
- 0000 0001 2299 3507grid.16753.36Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA ,0000 0004 0388 2248grid.413808.6Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA ,Children’s Hospital Neonatal Consortium, Kansas City, MO USA
| | - Jane L. Holl
- 0000 0004 0388 2248grid.413808.6Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA ,0000 0001 2299 3507grid.16753.36Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | | | - Donna M. Woods
- 0000 0001 2299 3507grid.16753.36Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA ,0000 0001 2299 3507grid.16753.36Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Daniel T. Robinson
- 0000 0001 2299 3507grid.16753.36Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA ,0000 0004 0388 2248grid.413808.6Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|