Er:YAG pre-treatment for bonding of orthodontic bracket: 1 year of in vitro treatment

Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel pretreated with Er,Cr:YSGG LASER and CPP-ACP

Background

Increased risk of enamel demineralization during and after orthodontic treatment raises the demand for better preventive measures including combinations of laser, CPP-ACP, and fluoride. The combination of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with CPP-ACP was proved to have a synergetic effect compared to each of them alone. Shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to the enamel surface after being treated with preventive measures is critical. The aim of this study was to compare the SBS and failure mode of metallic brackets bonded to teeth with no pretreatment and pretreated enamel surface, either with Er,Cr:YSGG laser alone or combined with CPP-ACP.

Methods

Sixty sound extracted human premolar teeth were allocated randomly to 3 groups: In Group 1 (control), teeth were etched and bonded directly; in Group 2, laser pretreatment of the enamel surface was done followed by etching and bonding as in the control group; in Group 3, the enamel surface was lased then CPP-ACP was applied according to the manufacturer instructions, etched and bonded. SBS and Adhesive remnant index (ARI) were evaluated.

Results

No significant differences were found between the 3 groups neither in the SBS nor in the ARI scores.

Conclusions

The use of combined Er,Cr:YSGG laser with CPP-ACP as a preventive measure before bonding orthodontic brackets does not endanger the bracket’s bonding strength.

Assessment of microcracks and shear bond strength after debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets on enamel priorly etched by different Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG laser settings without acid application: An in vitro study

BACKGROUND DATA

Enamel microcrack formation has a high incidence after mechanical debonding of ceramic brackets. This may be due to high delivered shear bond strength values when enamel is priorly etched by phosphoric acid. It is still not well elucidated in the literature if laser etching affects enamel the same way. The aim of the research was to analyze different Er,Cr:YSGG and Er:YAG laser etching settings as an alternative to phosphoric acid, in an attempt to prevent enamel microcrack formation during laser etching and mechanical debonding, while reducing the shear bond strength to the minimal clinical acceptable value.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-three teeth were randomly divided into 7 experimental groups according to their etching modalities. Settings used for enamel etching were in Er,Cr:YSGG groups: Er,Cr:YSGG (1.5Watt, W/20Hertz, Hz); Er,Cr:YSGG (1.5W/15Hz) and Er,Cr:YSGG (2W/20Hz) and settings used for enamel etching in Er:YAG groups were: Er:YAG (60 millijoules, mJ), Er:YAG (80mJ) and Er:YAG (100mJ). Group C etched with 37% phosphoric acid served as control. Microscopic analysis was performed to assess presence of enamel microcracks. Shear bond strength was evaluated after thermocycling using Weibull survival analysis.

RESULTS

All groups showed a reduction in additional microcracks after debonding when compared to control, but only group Er:YAG (60mJ) exhibited a statistically significant difference. Groups Er:YAG (80mJ), control and Er:YAG (100mJ) showed respectively the highest probability of survival at various stress levels followed by groups Er:YAG (60mJ); Er,Cr:YSGG (1.5W/15Hz); Er,Cr:YSGG (2W/20Hz) and Er,Cr:YSGG (1.5W/20Hz) that presented a relatively considerable risk of failure, even at low stress levels.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering reduction of enamel microcrack formation and clinical acceptable shear bond strength, none of the groups succeeded both. Etching by Er:YAG (60mJ) and Er,Cr:YSGG (1.5W/15Hz), showed the least overall microcrack incidence between groups, but Er:YAG (60mJ) displayed significant reduction compared to phosphoric acid. However, etching by Er:YAG (80mJ) had the most predictable results in term of shear bond strength.

Predicting the bracket bond failure rate in orthodontic patients: A retrospective cohort study

The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with orthodontic bracket bond failure and to develop a prediction equation for orthodontic bracket bond failure rate using the risk factors. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted on a sample of 690 brackets in orthodontic patients aged 10 to 28 years old (mean age 17.97±5.11 years old) visiting a dental hospital. The effect of various parameters of orthodontic bond strength was assessed on bracket failure rate using survival analysis. Parametric (exponential) regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with bracket failure and a prediction equation was formulated to predict the bracket failure rate. The overall mean survival time for the brackets was 3.04 (2.9-3.17) years. The univariate analysis showed a statistically significant (P<0.05) association of bracket material, site, overjet, overbite, incisor and molar classification and age. The multivariate analysis showed a significant interaction between site and side along with bracket material, jaw, overjet and overbite in the model. The risk of bracket failure on the right posterior region is 7.7 times that in the right anterior region when adjusted for all other variables in the model (HR: 7.7; 95% CI: 4.3-13.6). The model including bracket material, jaw, overjet, overbite and interaction between site and side can be used as a predictor of hazard rate for orthodontic bracket failure. Care should be taken in bonding brackets in the posterior region, as their debonding rate is higher as compared to anterior region.

Effect of Er: YAG laser etching on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of Erbium laser etched enamel to acid etched and to detect morphological changes on laser etched enamel surface using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Moreover, Laser induced caries resistance is advantageous in Orthodontics.

METHODS

This is an Ex vivo study between January 2016 and December 2017, which comprises a total of 50 human premolars, extracted for orthodontic purpose, were used in this study. The samples were randomly divided into 2 groups of 25 each. The first group was etched using 37% phosphoric for 30 seconds. As for the second group, enamel was treated by Er: YAG laser operating at wavelength 2.94µm, power 1.5W and repetition rate 15Hz. Five teeth from each group were selected for SEM evaluation and the study were continued on 20 teeth from each group.Teeth were subjected to shear bond strength test.

RESULTS

It showed, no-significant difference between the mean of shear bond strength and of the etched groups (p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that, laser etched group (1.5W/15Hz) resulted in clinically accepted bond strength and could be an alternative to conventional acid etching.

Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Luted with RMGIC After Er:YAG Laser Etching with Two Pulse Modes Using a Digitally Controlled "X-Runner" Handpiece

OBJECTIVE

To compare the shear bond strength (SBS) values of orthodontic brackets luted using a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) on enamel surfaces etched using either an Er:YAG laser in two different working modes, or a conventional etching protocol, including phosphoric acid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty healthy human premolars were randomly allocated to three experimental groups (n = 20) and etched with: Group 1: Er:YAG laser in super-short pulse (SSP) mode (100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W); Group 2: Er:YAG laser in quantum square pulse mode (120 mJ, 10 Hz, 1.2 W) using a digitally controlled handpiece ("X-Runner"); Group 3 (control): 5.25% sodium hypochlorite pretreatment, then 37% phosphoric acid for 15 sec. Stainless steel brackets were bonded using light-curing RMGIC for orthodontic bonding. After term cycling (1800 cycles), SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine. After debonding, both enamel and bracket surfaces were examined to determine the amount of RMGIC still present on the surfaces.

RESULTS

Group 3 surfaces gave the lowest mean SBS (10.6104 ± 2.66196 MPa), whereas Group 1 provided the highest 1 (13.1795 ± 3.37904 MPa), which was significantly different from the control (Group 3, p = 0.0226). Group 2 provided intermediate values (11.8486 ± 0.59832 MPa) nonsignificantly different from the control or from SSP (p = 0.4215 and p = 0.3082, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Er:YAG laser treatment in SSP mode of enamel surfaces for orthodontic bonding provided higher SBS and a shear behavior of the luting material similar to the conventional acid-etching procedures, making it a viable alternative to acid etching.