Health care utilization and costs following amplified versus non-amplified molecular probe testing for symptomatic patients with suspected vulvovaginitis: a US commercial payer population

Treatment patterns and economic burden of bacterial vaginosis among commercially insured women in the USA

Aim: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common vaginal dysbiosis associated with adverse clinical sequelae, most notably, increased risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of BV recurrence, treatment patterns, other gynecological (GYN) conditions, and the associated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among commercially insured patients in the USA. Patients & methods: Female patients aged 12-49 years with an incident vaginitis diagnosis and ≥1 pharmacy claim for a BV medication (fungal treatment only excluded) were selected from the Merative™ MarketScan commercial database (2017-2020). During a minimum 12-month follow-up, additional treatment courses, treatment patterns, frequency of other GYN conditions, and HCRU and costs were assessed. Generalized linear models were used to identify baseline predictors of total all-cause healthcare costs and number of treatment courses. Results: The study population included 140,826 patients (mean age: 31.5 years) with an incident vaginitis diagnosis and ≥1 BV medication claim. During the follow-up, 64.2% had 1 treatment course, 22.0% had 2, 8.1% had 3, and 5.8% had ≥4; 35.8% had a BV recurrence (≥2 BV medication claims). The most commonly prescribed BV medication was oral metronidazole (73.6%). Approximately 12% (n = 16,619) of patients had a new diagnosis of another GYN condition in the follow-up; 8.2% had a new STI, which were more common among patients with ≥4 treatment courses (12.9%). During follow-up, total all-cause healthcare costs averaged $8987 per patient per year (PPPY) of which $470 was BV-related. BV-related healthcare costs increased from $403 PPPY among those with 1 treatment course to $806 PPPY among those with ≥4 with nearly half the costs attributed to outpatient office visits. Conclusion: BV recurrence among this population represented a substantial clinical and healthcare economic burden warranting improvements in women's healthcare.

Optimizing Vaginitis Diagnosis to Reduce Health Care Costs in Nonpregnant Women Utilizing Molecular Diagnostics

Vaginitis is a common condition that affects women of reproductive age. Early and accurate diagnosis and identification of the causative agents (ie, fungi, protozoa, bacterial species, etc.) help to avoid incorrect treatment and subsequent visits that add costs and therapies, which increase overall health care utilization. A prior study by Kong et al presented a cost analysis demonstrating that women who received a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) on the day of their vaginitis diagnosis had significantly lower 12-month follow-up costs than women who received a direct probe (DP) test or women who received clinical evaluation without the use of a molecular test. This prior analysis included pregnant women, which may have influenced the findings. The objective of this analysis is to determine whether the exclusion of pregnant women from the study cohort impacts the previously observed NAAT cost-savings results. The current analysis adds evidence that nonpregnant women diagnosed with NAAT at their initial visit have significantly lower 12-month overall health care costs than women evaluated through DP or other clinical methods.

Diagnostic Testing of Vaginitis: Improving the Value of Care

Vaginitis is one of the most common reasons women access health care in the United States. Despite its prevalence and disruptive impact, it is frequently misdiagnosed and untreated, resulting in unnecessary patient discomfort, follow-up visits, and health care costs. This study presents a costs analysis of diagnostic testing technologies to demonstrate the potential of molecular tests to improve the value of care for women with vaginitis. This study tracks health care spending among women diagnosed with vaginitis and finds that nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are cost-effective for the diagnosis of vaginal symptoms. Women who receive a NAAT on the day of their diagnosis have significantly lower 12-month follow-up costs compared to women who receive a direct probe test or those women who are clinically evaluated without the use of a molecular test. However, despite Food and Drug Administration approval, widely available molecular diagnostics have not been incorporated into clinical guidelines, and many payer policies fail to cover these tests. Greater utilization of NAAT for the diagnosis of vaginitis has the potential to improve the care of women seeking treatment for this prevalent condition and facilitate sexually transmitted infection testing without additional visits.

Cost-effectiveness of nucleic acid amplification testing to guide treatment for vaginitis: a decision-modeling analysis

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of test-and-treat scenarios for vaginitis, scenarios based on clinical and microscopic examination (CME), nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), or nonamplified nucleic acid probe (probe) testing. The symptom resolution outcome and the payer cost of diagnosis and treatment were estimated in decision analytical models in a hypothetical patient population. Compared with probe testing, NAAT resulted in symptom resolution in more patients (615 versus 475 per 1000 tested) at a cost of $210 per incremental symptom resolution, a cost lower than the willingness to pay for symptom resolution ($871) implied by payer coverage for probe testing. Following a negative CME, the NAAT scenario resulted in symptom resolution in more patients (650 per 1000 patients tested) than did either CME (525) or the CME probe testing-based scenario (602) at incremental cost-effectiveness ratios lower than the willingness to pay implied by coverage for CME. Therefore, NAAT is likely to cost-effectively improve health outcomes for patients with vaginitis.

Improving the Diagnosis of Vulvovaginitis: Perspectives to Align Practice, Guidelines, and Awareness

Vulvovaginitis is a frequent reason for women to see a health care provider and has been linked to adverse reproductive and psychosocial consequences. Accurate diagnosis is a cornerstone of effective treatment, yet misdiagnosis of this condition approaches 50%, raising the risk of recurrence. The past 3 decades have seen few improvements over the traditional means of diagnosing the 3 main causes of vaginitis: bacterial vaginosis, Candida infections, and trichomoniasis. Newer molecular tests, which are both more sensitive and specific, have introduced the potential to transform the diagnosis of vaginitis—ensuring more accurate diagnoses and timely interventions, while reducing health care costs and enhancing patients' quality of life. Clinical approaches and professional guidelines should be updated to reflect advances in molecular testing and improve the diagnosis and management of acute and recurrent vulvovaginitis.