Comparison of Healthcare Resource Utilization Between Patients Who Engaged or Did Not Engage With a Prescription Digital Therapeutic for Opioid Use Disorder

Relationship between medication adherence for opioid use disorder and health care costs and health care events in a claims dataset

INTRODUCTION

Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has well-documented benefits for treating OUD, though its efficacy depends on patient adherence. We know little about outcomes of MOUD nonadherence compared to treatment regimens without MOUD, and this article aims to address the gap. This analysis focused on office-based MOUD treatment (buprenorphine and naltrexone) to evaluate the long-term impact of adherence on subsequent health care costs and health care events.

METHODS

With claims data from 2017 to 2019, we used propensity score (PS) weighting to create three comparable cohorts of patients: 1) Adherent: filled MOUD prescription & ≧80 % of days covered by MOUD (N = 1045); 2) Nonadherent: filled MOUD & < 80 % of days covered (N = 1116), 3) did not fill MOUD (N = 16,784). The study defined three time intervals based on a patient's most recent MOUD episode: A 6-month baseline period before initiation of MOUD or random index date for those with MOUD; a 6-month treatment period, during which adherence or nonadherence was established; and a 12-month follow-up period to evaluate outcome measures. The study used generalized PS methodology to examine the effect of proportion of days covered (PDC) as a continuous measure of adherence.

RESULTS

Among patients who filled MOUD, adherence to MOUD was significantly predicted by having less severe OUD, being older, having fewer inpatient visits and lower outpatient costs before the start of treatment. Adherent patients displayed significantly lower health care costs in the follow-up period compared to nonadherent MOUD patients, and lower odds of experiencing health care events. The nonadherent MOUD group displayed significantly higher odds of health care events compared to patients who had no evidence of receiving MOUD in claims data (NO-MOUD). Among patients prescribed MOUD, each 10 % increase in PDC was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient/outpatient costs and in odds of health care events.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis aligns with previous findings about the importance of maintaining long-term adherence to MOUD in supporting patient outcomes. The results also suggest a novel finding that despite confounder control via PS methods, nonadherent patients display poorer outcomes compared to similar NO-MOUD patients.

Economic Evaluation Associated With Clinical-Grade Mobile App-Based Digital Therapeutic Interventions: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Digital therapeutics (DTx), a class of software-based clinical interventions, are promising new technologies that can potentially prevent, manage, or treat a spectrum of medical disorders and diseases as well as deliver unprecedented portability for patients and scalability for health care providers. Their adoption and implementation were accelerated by the need for remote care during the COVID-19 pandemic, and awareness about their utility has rapidly grown among providers, payers, and regulators. Despite this, relatively little is known about the capacity of DTx to provide economic value in care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically review and summarize the published evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of clinical-grade mobile app-based DTx and explore the factors affecting such evaluations.

METHODS

A systematic review of economic evaluations of clinical-grade mobile app-based DTx was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Major electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched for eligible studies published from inception to October 28, 2022. Two independent reviewers evaluated the eligibility of all the retrieved articles for inclusion in the review. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed for each included study.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies were included in this review. Of the 18 studies, 7 (39%) were nonrandomized study-based economic evaluations, 6 (33%) were model-based evaluations, and 5 (28%) were randomized clinical trial-based evaluations. The DTx intervention subject to assessment was found to be cost-effective in 12 (67%) studies, cost saving in 5 (28%) studies, and cost-effective in 1 (6%) study in only 1 of the 3 countries where it was being deployed in the final study. Qualitative deficiencies in methodology and substantial potential for bias, including risks of performance bias and selection bias in participant recruitment, were identified in several included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review supports the thesis that DTx interventions offer potential economic benefits. However, DTx economic analyses conducted to date exhibit important methodological shortcomings that must be addressed in future evaluations to reduce the uncertainty surrounding the widespread adoption of DTx interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022358616; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022358616.

Rewarding recovery: the time is now for contingency management for opioid use disorder

Contingency management (i.e. rewarding people, often with money, for achieving their recovery goals) is backed by decades of empirical support yet remains highly underutilized. Rewards are rarely used in real-world clinical practice due to a number of concerns, including most notably, the apparent lack of innovation, as well as moral, philosophical, ethical, and economic concerns, and even federal rules meant to prevent illegal inducements in health care. Still, other opponents argue that some patients will try to "game" the system by simply doing whatever it takes to earn monetary rewards. This paper provides a succinct, up-to-date overview of the current evidence base for contingency management for opioid use disorder. Common barriers and solutions to implementation, as well as implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed. Although important, greater uptake of contingency management interventions is about more than legislation and regulations; it's about recognizing stigma, shaping attitudes, and increasing awareness. Provider involvement in advocacy efforts at all levels and collaboration involving academic-industry partnerships is necessary to advance the burgeoning digital health care space and improve outcomes for people with opioid use disorder. Key MessagesContingency management is highly effective but highly underutilized.Low uptake is largely attributed to a lack of innovation and moral, ethical, and economic concerns, among other barriers.Technology-enabled solutions and academic-industry partnerships are critical to advance opioid use disorder care.

Acceptability and Usability of a Reward-Based Mobile App for Opioid Treatment Settings: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Contingency management is an evidence-based yet underutilized approach for opioid use disorder (OUD). Reasons for limited adoption in real-world practice include ethical, moral, and philosophical concerns regarding use of monetary incentives, and lack of technological innovation. In light of surging opioid overdose deaths, there is a need for development of technology-enabled solutions leveraging the power of contingency management in a way that is viewed by both patients and providers as acceptable and feasible.

OBJECTIVE

This mixed methods pilot study sought to determine the perceived acceptability and usability of PROCare Recovery, a reward-based, technology-enabled recovery monitoring smartphone app designed to automate contingency management by immediately delivering micropayments to patients for achieving recovery goals via smart debit card with blocking capabilities.

METHODS

Participants included patients receiving buprenorphine for OUD (n=10) and licensed prescribers (n=5). Qualitative interviews were conducted by 2 PhD-level researchers via video conferencing to explore a priori hypotheses. Thematic analysis of interviews was conducted and synthesized into major themes.

RESULTS

Participants were overwhelmingly in favor of microrewards (eg, US $1) to incentivize treatment participation (up to US $150 monthly). Participants reported high acceptability of the planned debit card spending restrictions (blocking cash withdrawals and purchases at bars or liquor stores, casinos or online gambling). Quantitative data revealed a high level of perceived usability of the PROCare Recovery app.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and providers alike appear receptive to microfinancial incentives in standard OUD treatment practices. Further pilot testing of PROCare is underway to determine acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness in a rigorous randomized controlled trial.

Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated with Improvements in Quality of Life for Participants with Opioid Use Disorder

Background: The Houston Emergency Opioid Engagement System was established to create an access pathway into long-term recovery for individuals with opioid use disorder. The program determines effectiveness across multiple dimensions, one of which is by measuring the participant’s reported quality of life (QoL) at the beginning of the program and at successive intervals. Methods: A visual analog scale was used to measure the change in QoL among participants after joining the program. We then identified sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with changes in QoL. Results: 71% of the participants (n = 494) experienced an increase in their QoL scores, with an average improvement of 15.8 ± 29 points out of a hundred. We identified 10 factors associated with a significant change in QoL. Participants who relapsed during treatment experienced minor increases in QoL, and participants who attended professional counseling experienced the largest increases in QoL compared with those who did not. Conclusions: Insight into significant factors associated with increases in QoL may inform programs on areas of focus. The inclusion of counseling and other services that address factors such as psychological distress were found to increase participants’ QoL and success in recovery.

The Rise of Prescription Digital Therapeutics in Behavioral Health

Medicine is evolving to incorporate digital technologies of all kinds-technologies that may improve patient health, reduce clinician workload, lower costs, reduce health disparities, and expand access to needed treatments. Prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) are an emerging technology with particular potential. These are software-based treatments delivered on mobile devices that address the behavioral dimensions of many diseases and conditions. Unlike health and wellness apps, PDTs are rigorously evaluated for safety and effectiveness and are authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nine PDTs are currently authorized to treat conditions such as substance use disorders, attention-deficit disorder, and chronic insomnia. The findings reported in two recent research papers published by Advances in Therapy related to use of PDTs for substance use disorder and opioid use disorder provide real-world evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness, strengthening the evidence base for these technologies and suggesting a role for these technologies in the efforts to help patients recover from these often-chronic and deadly conditions.

Reduced Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder in the 12 Months After Initiation of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

reSET-O, an FDA-authorized prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) delivering cognitive behavioral therapy and contingency management to patients with opioid u^®se disorder (OUD), may help improve clinical outcomes. One-year differences in healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs post-PDT initiation were evaluated.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of healthcare claims data compared all-cause HCRU (across hospital facility encounters [sum of inpatient stays, treat-and-release emergency department [ED] visits, partial hospitalizations, and hospital outpatient department visits] and clinician services [procedure categories]) after PDT initiation (index) between reSET-O patients and controls. Overall and Medicaid-specific differences in HCRU, costs, and buprenorphine adherence were evaluated.

FINDINGS

Cohorts included 901 reSET-O patients (median age 36 years, 62.4% female, 73.9% Medicaid) and 978 controls (median age 38 years, 51.1% female, 65.4% Medicaid). Compared to the control group, the reSET-O group experienced 12% fewer total unique hospital encounters (non-significant), driven by 28% fewer inpatient stays (IRR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55-0.96; P = 0.02), 56% fewer hospital readmissions [IRR 0.44; 95% CI 0.20-0.93; P = 0.033]), and 7% fewer ED visits (IRR 0.93; 95% CI 0.79-1.09; P = 0.386). Total clinician services increased by 1391 events versus controls. Differences were greater among the Medicaid patients. Adjustment for concomitant baseline substance use and mental health disorders resulted in similar HCRU incidence rate ratios. Changes in all-cause HCRU drove per-patient per-year cost differences of - $2791 versus controls (- $3832 versus Medicaid controls). Adjusted mean medication possession ratio was 0.848 (SE 0.0118) at 12 months for reSET-O patients, which was significantly higher than controls (0.761 [SE 0.0108]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of reSET-O is associated with significant and durable real-world reductions in ED and inpatient (including readmissions) utilization, reduced net costs, and increased clinician services and buprenorphine adherence. Differences in costs versus controls were greatest among Medicaid patients. INFOGRAPHIC.