Trends in intensive care in patients over 90 years of age

Frailty as a Prognostic Indicator in Intensive Care

BACKGROUND

The percentage of patients in intensive care who are 80 years old or older is continually increasing. Such patients already made up more than 20% of all patients in intensive care in Germany in the years 2007-2011. Meanwhile, effective treatments that support the organs of the body and keep severely ill patients alive are also being continually developed and refined. Frailty is a key prognostic parameter. The scientifically based assessment of frailty can be highly useful in intensive care medicine with regard to consented decision-making, individualized prognostication, treatment planning, and aftercare.

METHODS

Pertinent publications were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed database. On the basis of the literature assessment, a variety of screening instruments were used to assess frailty and its significance for very old, critically ill patients in German intensive care units.

RESULTS

Only a small number of screening instruments are suitable for routine use in German intensive care units. The scores vary in diagnostic precision. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) enables highly accurate prognostication; it considers the patient in relation to his or her social environment, and to the reference population. Categorization is achieved by means of pictograms that are supplemented with brief written descriptions. The CFS can be used prospectively and is easy to learn. Its interrater reliability is high (weighted Cohen's κ: 0.85 [0.84; 0.87]), and it has been validated for routine use in intensive care units in Germany.

CONCLUSION

None of the available scores enable perfect prognostication. In Germany, frailty in intensive-care patients is currently best assessed on a simple visual scale (CFS).

[Geriatric intensive care : Consensus paper of DGIIN, DIVI, DGAI, DGGG, ÖGGG, ÖGIAIN, DGP, DGEM, DGD, DGNI, DGIM, DGKliPha and DGG]

The proportion of elderly, frail, and multimorbid people has increased dramatically in recent decades resulting from demographic changes and will further increase, which will impact acute medical care. Prospective, randomized studies on geriatric intensive care are still lacking. There are also no international or national recommendations regarding the management of critically ill elderly patients. Based on an expert opinion, this consensus paper provides 16 statements that should be considered when dealing with geriatric critical care patients.

[Geriatric intensive care : Consensus paper of DGIIN, DIVI, DGAI, DGGG, ÖGGG, ÖGIAIN, DGP, DGEM, DGD, DGNI, DGIM, DGKliPha and DGG]

The proportion of elderly, frail, and multimorbid people has increased dramatically in recent decades resulting from demographic changes and will further increase, which will impact acute medical care. Prospective, randomized studies on geriatric intensive care are still lacking. There are also no international or national recommendations regarding the management of critically ill elderly patients. Based on an expert opinion, this consensus paper provides 16 statements that should be considered when dealing with geriatric critical care patients.

Cardiovascular profile in critically ill elderly medical patients: prevalence, mortality and length of stay

PURPOSE

Data are demonstrating the increase in utilization of critical care by the elderly. Around 11% of ICU patients are ≥80years-old.

METHODS

An observational retrospective study was conducted between 2003 and 2011, including elderly patients (≥80years old) admitted from medical services to the intensive care unit (ICU) in a tertiary university hospital. The final sample size was N=202.

RESULTS

Mortality rates were: ICU 34.1%, in-hospital 44% and 1-year cumulative mortality 55.4% (20.4% for hospital survivors). Multivariate analysis showed that APACHE II score: OR 1.10, 95% CI (1.03-1.18), SAPS II score: OR 1.03, 95% CI (1.01-1.06), a score <3 on the Cruz Roja Hospital mental scale: 0.51 OR, 95% CI (0.01-0.57) and ICU admission for cardiovascular disease: OR 5.05, 95% CI (1.98-12.84) were independently associated with mortality ICU. Factors independently associated with 1-year mortality were: dyslipidemia OR 7.25 (1.47-35.60), chronic kidney failure OR 13.23, 95% CI (2.28-76.6), stroke OR 10.44, 95% CI (2.26-48.25) and antihypertensive treatment OR 0.08, 95% CI (0.01-0.48). In multiple linear regression, ICU length of stay was associated with mechanical ventilation B coefficient 6.41, 95% CI (1.18-11.64) and in-hospital length of stay was related to age: B coefficient -2.17, 95% CI (-4.02 to -0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease was high, and basal cardiovascular treatment was underused. Primary diagnosis for cardiovascular disease at ICU admission should be assessed as predictor of ICU mortality. Intensifying cardiovascular basal treatment could decrease 1-year mortality. Cardiovascular profile did not show an effect on in-hospital mortality and length of stay.

Outcomes of older people receiving intensive care in Victoria

OBJECTIVE To assess trends in service use and outcome of critically ill older people (aged ≥ 65 years) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND SETTING

Retrospective cohort analysis of administrative data on older patients discharged from ICUs at all 23 adult public hospitals with onsite ICUs in Victoria between 1 July 1999 and 30 June 2011. Subgroups examined included those aged ≥ 80 years, major diagnosis categories, and those receiving mechanical ventilation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Resource use and hospital survival; also length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination trends.

RESULTS

Over 12 years, 108,171 people aged ≥ 65 years were admitted to ICUs; of these, 49,912 (46.1%) received mechanical ventilation and 17,772 (16.4%) died. Despite an increase in the older age population (2.5% per annum) and acute care admissions (7.3% per annum) over the period studied, there was a net reversal in prevalence trends for ICU admissions (- 1.7% per annum; P = 0.04) and admissions of patients requiring mechanical ventilation (- 1.6% per annum) in the 8 years since 2004. Annual risk-adjusted mortality fell (odds ratio, 0.97 per year; 95% CI, 0.96-0.97 per year; P < 0.001) without prolongation of hospital or ICU LOS (P = 0.49) or discharge to residential aged care (RAC). Similar trends were noted in all a priori subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved hospital survival without an increase in demand for ICU admission or RAC or an increase in LOS suggests there has been improvement in the care of the older age population.