A case of atypical progressive supranuclear palsy

Behind the Mask of Parkinsonism: A Case Report and Literature Review on Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a neurodegenerative condition that typically emerges in adulthood and does not exhibit any familial inheritance pattern. PSP is characterized by gradual stiffness in the central body, an inability to move the gaze upward voluntarily, postural instability, and a decline in cognitive function linked to frontal lobe dysfunction. Clinical assessment reveals a variety of findings, and cases of PSP frequently go unnoticed or are incorrectly diagnosed as other conditions. Notably, prominent neurotransmitter-related changes in PSP involve damage to the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway and cholinergic impairment in multiple regions. We hereby present a case of a 71-year-old female patient whose medical journey unfolds as a perplexing riddle. Despite the collective expertise of several physicians, she found herself bearing the weight of a misdiagnosis ascribed to Parkinson's Disease (PD) erroneously. She initially presented with recurring falls due to postural instability and bradykinesia, which progressed such that she became dependent on a walking aid. A comprehensive physical examination revealed indicators consistent with PSP.

Clinical Progression in Four Cases of Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech

PURPOSE

This case series details the clinical progression of patients with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) to illustrate, using several methods and supplemental material examples, the changes that occur in speech and language functioning in this patient population.

METHOD

Four patients who presented with PPAOS were followed between 5 and 6 years. Two patients had predominant articulatory abnormalities (termed phonetic PPAOS), 1 had predominant prosodic abnormalities (prosodic PPAOS), and 1 had relatively equal articulatory and prosodic abnormalities (mixed PPAOS). Detailed speech (including acoustics), language, neurologic, and neuropsychological data were collected.

RESULTS

At initial exam, the patients ranged from 60 to 77 years old, with presenting disease duration of 1.5-10 years. Although all patients presented with an isolated apraxia of speech, all developed varying degrees of aphasia and dysarthria. Patients with phonetic PPAOS developed relatively more severe aphasia than the other 2 patients. All patients eventually had severe functional communication limitations and required alternative or augmentative means of communication, although at varying times postonset of their initial speech problem. Two patients developed dysphagia, 3 showed mild-moderate Parkinsonism, and 2 developed depression. For all patients, simple temporal acoustic measurements documented slowed speech rate over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series demonstrates that patients who initially present with PPAOS may develop aphasia and dysarthria, cognitive and behavioral changes, and other neurologic signs. Whether these changes can be predicted by the perceptual characteristics of the apraxia of speech is yet to be determined. The detailed longitudinal profiles provide valuable clinical insight into the progression of disease in people with PPAOS.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7051616.

Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: phenotypic comparisons with other movement disorders

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to review the typical cognitive and motor impairments seen in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), essential tremor (ET), Parkinson disease (PD), spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) in order to enhance diagnosis of FXTAS patients.

METHODS

We compared the cognitive and motor phenotypes of FXTAS with each of these other movement disorders. Relevant neuropathological and neuroimaging findings are also reviewed. Finally, we describe the differences in age of onset, disease severity, progression rates, and average lifespan in FXTAS compared to ET, PD, SCAs, MSA, and PSP. We conclude with a flow chart algorithm to guide the clinician in the differential diagnosis of FXTAS.

RESULTS

By comparing the cognitive and motor phenotypes of FXTAS with the phenotypes of ET, PD, SCAs, MSA, and PSP we have clarified potential symptom overlap while elucidating factors that make these disorders unique from one another. In summary, the clinician should consider a FXTAS diagnosis and testing for the Fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene premutation if a patient over the age of 50 (1) presents with cerebellar ataxia and/or intention tremor with mild parkinsonism, (2) has the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) sign, global cerebellar and cerebral atrophy, and/or subcortical white matter lesions on MRI, or (3) has a family history of fragile X related disorders, intellectual disability, autism, premature ovarian failure and has neurological signs consistent with FXTAS. Peripheral neuropathy, executive function deficits, anxiety, or depression are supportive of the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct profiles in the cognitive and motor domains between these movement disorders may guide practitioners in the differential diagnosis process and ultimately lead to better medical management of FXTAS patients.