Improving the gastrointestinal tolerability of aspirin in older people

Resveratrol: a potential medication for the prevention and treatment of varicella zoster virus-induced ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Infection rate of varicella zoster virus (VZV) is 95% in humans, and VZV infection is strongly associated with ischemic stroke (IS). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of VZV-induced IS are still unclear, and there are no effective agents to treat and prevent VZV-induced IS.

OBJECTIVE

By integrating bioinformatics, this study explored the interactions between VZV and IS and potential medication to treat and prevent VZV-induced IS.

METHODS

In this study, the VZV and IS datasets from the GEO database were used to specify the common genes. Then, bioinformatics analysis including Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia Genes Genomes and Protein-Protein Interaction network analysis was performed. Further, the hub genes, transcription factor (TF) gene interactions, TF-miRNA co-regulatory network and potential drug were obtained. Finally, validation was performed using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations.

RESULTS

The potential molecular mechanisms of VZV-induced IS were studied using multiple bioinformatics tools. Ten hub genes were COL1A2, DCN, PDGFRB, ACTA2, etc. TF genes and miRNAs included JUN, FOS, CREB, BRCA1, PPARG, STAT3, miR-29, etc. A series of mechanism may be involved, such as inflammation, oxidative stress, blood-brain barrier disruption, foam cell generation and among others. Finally, we proposed resveratrol as a potential therapeutic medicine for the prevention and treatment of VZV-induced IS. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics results showed that resveratrol and hub genes exhibited strong binding score.

CONCLUSIONS

Resveratrol could be an alternative for the prevention and treatment of VZV-IS. More in vivo and in vitro studies are needed in the future to fully explore the molecular mechanisms between VZV and IS and for medication development.

Enteric-Coated Aspirin and the Risk of Gastrointestinal Side Effects: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Aspirin appeared as a medicine to deal with aches and inflammation, but due to its antiplatelet properties, it has evolved into a drug mainly used to avert cardiovascular disease. Regardless of its therapeutic uses, the limiting aspect for aspirin use has been its affiliation with gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, classifying from acute mucosal damage to GI problems and death.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review is to address the question regarding the ECA effect on the gastric mucosa.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in the PubMed electronic databases from April 10th to April 23rd, 2020. Eligibility has been set, and based on those criteria, initially a total of 637 results were obtained, from these 58 of them were not written in English. Then, 168 articles which were free from duplication were screened and all the included articles were RCTs published after 2000. Based on these, final number of articles included on this review was 6.

Results

Data were obtained from 6 published articles which reported on 15,621 participants. The reports were from 3 different countries. Most of the studies revealed that enteric-coated aspirin (ECA) treatment was not an effective mechanism against GI protection. ECA administration with omeprazole can hugely reduce the incidence of endoscopic GI damage compared to the impact of ECA used alone. Even short-term administration of a low dose of ECA was significantly associated with an apparent small bowel injury.

Conclusion

ECA treatment is not an effective mechanism against GI protection, and it is highly associated with small bowel injury. So the coating does not reduce risk of GI complications.

Gaps in translation from trials to practice: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

Worldwide there is a tremendous need for affordable anticoagulants that do not require monitoring. The advent of the non-warfarin oral anticoagulant drugs represents a major advance for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). The objectives of this review are to 1) identify gaps in our current knowledge regarding use of these single target anticoagulant drugs; 2) outline the potential implications of these gaps for clinical practice, and thereby, 3) highlight areas of research to further optimise their use for stroke prevention in AF.

The role of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent disease that is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The progression of normal mucosa through adenomatous polyps to overt cancer can span for 10 - 15 years, making early detection, as well as the use of chemopreventive agents such as aspirin, an attractive option. The effects of aspirin in reducing CRC incidence and mortality have consistently been demonstrated in a number of studies. However, a greater understanding of how aspirin exerts its anti-cancer effects is warranted.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this non-systematic review, which was developed using published randomized and epidemiological studies, as well as key references known to the authors, was to consider the role of aspirin in CRC prevention. Areas covered include the effects of aspirin on cardiovascular disease, CRC and colorectal adenoma (CRA) prevention, mode of action of aspirin and the benefit-to-risk of aspirin in disease prevention.

EXPERT OPINION

Incorporating CRC and CRA benefits into coronary heart disease (CHD) risk scores would be particularly useful for determining the benefit-to-risk ratio for aspirin use in borderline cases. For instance, patients with an annual CHD risk around 0.7 - 1.4%, but with a high risk of colorectal neoplasm may benefit from aspirin. The strong association between CRC and age may also be useful for re-examining the benefit-to-risk ratio for aspirin use in older patients. However, it has to be noted that a cancer prevention indication for aspirin is not approved regulatory-wise anywhere.