1
|
Spinnewijn L, Scheele F, Braat D, Aarts J. Assessing the educational quality of shared decision-making interventions for residents: A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 123:108187. [PMID: 38355382 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many studies on educational interventions to enhance residents' shared decision-making (SDM) skills show limited improvement in SDM skills and clinical outcomes. One plausible explanation for these suboptimal results is the insufficient emphasis on the educational quality of training interventions. METHODS This review evaluates interventions' educational quality using an evaluation framework based on a previous study on effective skills transfer and a well-known SDM model. A systematic review was conducted, searching three databases until December 13, 2022. We assessed study quality by calculating MERSQI scores, examined the levels of study effects based on Kirkpatrick's model, and applied our evaluation framework to assess the interventions' educational quality. Given the heterogeneity among the studies, a meta-analysis was not feasible. RESULTS Twenty-six studies were included. Role-play and feedback were common training characteristics (65% and 54% of interventions). Only four studies (15%) met our framework's high educational quality threshold. No correlation was found between MERSQI scores and educational quality. CONCLUSIONS This review is a valuable attempt to assess the educational quality of SDM interventions beyond measuring study outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Future evaluation frameworks should consider study results, training characteristics, and training content. Our framework offers a sound basis for such an evaluation framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Spinnewijn
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; VU University, Athena Institute for Trans-Disciplinary Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Fedde Scheele
- VU University, Athena Institute for Trans-Disciplinary Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; OLVG hospital, Department of Healthcare Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Didi Braat
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna Aarts
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zagt AC, Bos N, Bakker M, de Boer D, Friele RD, de Jong JD. A scoping review into the explanations for differences in the degrees of shared decision making experienced by patients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 118:108030. [PMID: 37897867 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In order to improve the degree of shared decision making (SDM) experienced by patients, it is necessary to gain insight into the explanations for the differences in these degrees. METHODS A scoping review of the literature on the explanations for differences in the degree of SDM experienced by patients was conducted. We assessed 21,329 references. Ultimately, 308 studies were included. The explanations were divided into micro, meso, and macro levels. RESULTS The explanations are mainly related to the micro level. They include explanations related to the patient and healthcare professionals, the relationship between the patient and the physician, and the involvement of the patient's relatives. On the macro level, explanations are related to restrictions within the healthcare system such as time constraints, and adequate information about treatment options. On the meso level, explanations are related to the continuity of care and the involvement of other healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS SDM is not an isolated process between the physician and patient. Explanations are connected to the macro, meso, and micro levels. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This scoping review suggests that there could be more focus on explanations related to the macro and meso levels, and on how explanations at different levels are interrelated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C Zagt
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Nanne Bos
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Max Bakker
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dolf de Boer
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Roland D Friele
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands; Tranzo Scientifc Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- Nivel, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, the Netherlands; CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pel-Littel RE, Buurman BM, van de Pol MH, Twisk JWR, Tulner LR, Minkman MM, Scholte Op Reimer WJM, van Weert JCM. Effects of a shared decision making intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: the DICO study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:42. [PMID: 36859287 PMCID: PMC9976432 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02099-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the effects of a shared decision making (SDM) intervention for older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). METHODS A pragmatic trial evaluated the effects of the SDMMCC intervention, existing of SDM training for nine geriatricians in two hospitals and a preparatory tool for patients. A prospective pre-intervention post-intervention multi-center clinical study was conducted in which an usual care group of older patients with MCC and their informal caregivers was included before the implementation of the intervention and a new cohort of patients and informal caregivers after the implementation of the intervention. SDM was observed using the OPTIONMCC during video-recorded consultations. Patient- and caregivers reported outcomes regarding their role in SDM, involvement, perceived SDM and decisional conflict were measured. The differences between groups regarding the level of observed SDM (OPTIONMCC) were analyzed with a mixed model analysis. Dichotomous patient-reported outcomes were analyzed with a logistic mixed model. RESULTS From two outpatient geriatric clinics 216 patients with MCCs participated. The mean age was 77.3 years, and 56.3% of patients were female. No significant difference was found in the overall level of SDM as measured with the OPTIONMCC or in patient-reported outcomes. However, at item level the items discussing 'goals', 'options', and 'decision making' significantly improved after the intervention. The items discussing 'partnership' and 'evaluating the decision-making process' showed a significant decrease. Fifty-two percent of the patients completed the preparatory tool, but the results were only discussed in 12% of the consultations. CONCLUSION This study provides scope for improvement of SDM in geriatrics. Engaging older adults with MCCs and informal caregivers in the decision making process should be an essential part of SDM training for geriatricians, beyond the SDM steps of explaining options, benefits and harms. More attention should be paid to the integration of preparatory work in the consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth E Pel-Littel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Vilans, Center of Expertise for Long-Term Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Bianca M Buurman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- ACHIEVE, Center of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein H van de Pol
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jos W R Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda R Tulner
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirella M Minkman
- Vilans, Center of Expertise for Long-Term Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- TIAS School for Business and Society, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer
- ACHIEVE, Center of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15791, 1001 NG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Weijden T, van der Kraan J, Brand PLP, van Veenendaal H, Drenthen T, Schoon Y, Tuyn E, van der Weele G, Stalmeier P, Damman OC, Stiggelbout A. Shared decision-making in the Netherlands: Progress is made, but not for all. Time to become inclusive to patients. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 171:98-104. [PMID: 35613990 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Dutch initiatives targeting shared decision-making (SDM) are still growing, supported by the government, the Federation of Patients' Organisations, professional bodies and healthcare insurers. The large majority of patients prefers the SDM model. The Dutch are working hard to realise improvement in the application of SDM in daily clinical practice, resulting in glimpses of success with objectified improvement on observed behavior. Nevertheless, the culture shift is still ongoing. Large-scale uptake of SDM behavior is still a challenge. We haven't yet fully reached the patients' needs, given disappointing research data on patients' experiences and professional behavior. In all Dutch implementation projects, early adopters, believers or higher-educated persons have been overrepresented, while patients with limited health literacy have been underrepresented. This is a huge problem as 25% of the Dutch adult population have limited health literacy. To further enhance SDM there are issues to be addressed: We need to make physicians conscious about their limited application of SDM in daily practice, especially regarding preference and decision talk. We need to reward clinicians for the extra work that comes with SDM. We need to be inclusive to patients with limited health literacy, who are less often actually involved in decision-making and at the same time more likely to regret their chosen treatment compared to patients with higher health literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Paul L P Brand
- Isala Women's and Children's Hospital, Zwolle, and UMCG Postgraduate School of Medicine, University Medical Centre and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Haske van Veenendaal
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ton Drenthen
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Schoon
- Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Tuyn
- Program manager health care innovation, CZ Health Care Insurance, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peep Stalmeier
- Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Olga C Damman
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Stiggelbout
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam and Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoot TS, Perry M, Hilbrands LB, van Marum RJ, Kerckhoffs APM. Kidney transplantation or dialysis in older adults-an interview study on the decision-making process. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6577232. [PMID: 35511744 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In older patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), the choice between kidney transplantation (KT) and dialysis may be more complex than in younger patients because of a higher prevalence of comorbidities and frailty. This study aims to provide greater insight into the current decision-making process by exploring the expectations, experiences and health outcome priorities of all stakeholders. METHODS We performed semi-structured interviews with patients ≥65 years with ESKD (eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73m2, KT recipient or treated with dialysis), patients' relatives and healthcare professionals (nephrologists, nurses and medical social workers). Interviews were conducted until data saturation and thematically analysed. RESULTS We performed 36 interviews (patients n = 18, relatives n = 5, healthcare professionals n = 13). Thematic analysis revealed five themes. Older patients' health outcome priorities were mostly related to quality of life (QOL). Individual older patients showed marked differences in the preferred level of engagement during the decision-making process (varying from 'wants to be in the lead' to 'follows the nephrologist') and in informational needs (varying from evidence-based to experience-based). On the contrary, healthcare professionals were quite unanimous on all aspects. They focused on determining eligibility for KT as start of the decision-making process, on clear and extensive information provision and on classical, medical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The decision-making process could benefit from early identification of older patients' values, needs and health outcome priorities, in parallel with assessment of KT eligibility and before discussing the treatment options, and the explicit use of this information in further steps of the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa S Schoot
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Jeroen Bosch Hospital , the Netherlands
| | - Marieke Perry
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Rob J van Marum
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Jeroen Bosch Hospital , the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Jeroen Bosch Hospital , the Netherlands
- Department of Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center , the Netherlands
| | - Angèle P M Kerckhoffs
- Department of Nephrology, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Jeroen Bosch Hospital , the Netherlands
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Jeroen Bosch Hospital , the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schoot TS, Goto NA, van Marum RJ, Hilbrands LB, Kerckhoffs APM. Dialysis or kidney transplantation in older adults? A systematic review summarizing functional, psychological, and quality of life-related outcomes after start of kidney replacement therapy. Int Urol Nephrol 2022; 54:2891-2900. [PMID: 35513758 PMCID: PMC9534800 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03208-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background In older patients, the choice between kidney transplantation (KT) and dialysis may be complicated because of a high prevalence of comorbidities and geriatric syndromes. Ideally, this decision-making process focusses on older patients’ outcome priorities, which frequently include functional, psychological, and quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes. Purpose This systematic review aims to summarize functional, psychological (including cognition), and QOL-related outcomes after start of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in older adults. Methods We searched PubMed and Embase for research that investigated change in these variables after start of KRT in patients aged ≥ 60 years. Data were extracted using the summary measures reported in the individual studies. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool. Results Sixteen observational studies (prospective n = 9, retrospective n = 7; KT-recipients n = 3, dialysis patients n = 13) were included. The results show that QOL improves in the majority of the older KT recipients. After start of dialysis, QOL improved or remained stable for most patients, but this seems less prevalent than after KT. Functional status decreases in a substantial part of the older dialysis patients. Furthermore, the incidence of serious fall injuries increases after start of dialysis. Nutritional status seems to improve after start of dialysis. Conclusion The interpretability and comparability of the included studies are limited by the heterogeneity in study designs and significant risk of bias in most studies. Despite this, our overview of functional, psychological (including cognition), and QOL-related outcomes is useful for older adults and their clinicians facing the decision between KT and dialysis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11255-022-03208-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa S Schoot
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. .,Department of Nephrology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
| | - Namiko A Goto
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob J van Marum
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.,Department of Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Angèle P M Kerckhoffs
- Department of Nephrology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.,Department of Geriatric Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shared Decision Making Conceptual Models for Physiotherapy: A Theory Analysis. Physiotherapy 2022; 115:111-118. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
8
|
Gong N, Du Q, Lou H, Zhang Y, Fang H, Zhang X, Wu X, Meng Y, Zhang M. Treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: A qualitative study. Nurs Ethics 2020; 28:242-252. [PMID: 32909913 DOI: 10.1177/0969733020945752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Independent decision-making is one of the basic rights of patients. However, in clinical practice, most older cancer patients' treatment decisions are made by family members. OBJECTIVE This study attempted to analyze the treatment decision-making process and formation mechanism for older cancer patients within the special cultural context of Chinese medical practice. METHOD A qualitative study was conducted. With the sample saturation principle, data collected by in-depth interviews with 17 family members and 12 patients were subjected to thematic analysis. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS The study was approved by the ethics committees of Sun Yat-sen University. All participants provided verbal informed consent after being told their rights of confidentiality, anonymity, and voluntary participation. They had the right to refuse to answer questions and could withdraw at any time. RESULTS Three themes emerged: (1) complex process; (2) transformation of family decision-making power; and (3) individual compromise. Family members inevitably had different opinions during the long process of treatment decision-making for older cancer patients. The direction of this process could be regarded as an extension of the family power relationship. The patient usually compromised the decision to survive, which was made by family members. CONCLUSION This study describes the treatment decision-making process of older cancer patients in the context of Chinese culture. The reasons underlying this process are related to the views on life and death and family values. An individual is a part of the family, which is often seen as the minimal interpersonal unit in Chinese society. It is significant that while emphasizing patient autonomy in the decision-making process, health professionals should also pay attention to the important roles of culture and family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ni Gong
- 26469Sun Yat-sen University, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ya Meng
- 26469Sun Yat-sen University, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xu J, Prince AER. Shared decision-making in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70:1711-1715. [PMID: 31068265 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ideally, patients' decision-making regarding surgical options should reflect myriad implicit values. The informed consent process is meant to ensure that patients' values mirror clinical decisions regarding expectations for outcomes, such as quality of life, life expectancy, and subsequent pain and suffering. However, surgeons are not always equipped to discuss patients' values. METHODS Shared decision-making is a method that could help surgeons elicit patients' values and subsequently improve the patient's knowledge and satisfaction, among other important outcomes. Yet, several barriers hinder implementation of shared decision-making in the clinic, such as time, interpersonal characteristics, and trust. To address concerns, several tools and approaches have been developed to increase shared decision-making in the clinic. This article highlights two strategies: the three-talk model and decision aids. CONCLUSIONS Shared decision-making is a tool that could be especially valuable in discussions regarding elective surgery. Further research is needed to determine how best to implement shared decision-making in the surgical setting. Without full integration of patients' values into discussions of surgical options, there will continue to be a disconnect between the surgical procedures, outcomes, and patients' values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Xu
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Geessink NH, Ofstad EH, Olde Rikkert MGM, van Goor H, Kasper J, Schoon Y. Shared decision-making in older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: Determinants of patients' and observers' perceptions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:1767-1774. [PMID: 29933924 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify determinants of older patients' perceptions of involvement in decision-making on colorectal (CRC) or pancreatic cancer (PC) treatment, and to compare these with determinants of observers' perceptions. METHODS Patients' perceptions of involvement were constructed by the 9-item SDM questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and a Visual Analogue Scale for Involvement (VAS-I). Observers' perceptions were constructed by the OPTION5, OPTION12, and MAPPIN'SDM. Convergent validities were calculated between the patient-sided and observer instruments using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Linear regression was used to identify determinants per criterion. RESULTS 58 CRC and 22 PC patients were included (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.2 years, 45.0% female). No significant correlations were found between the patient-sided and observer instruments. Patients' impression of involvement was influenced by patient characteristics such as quality of life and satisfaction, while observers' perceptions mainly referred to encounter characteristics such as the mean duration of consultations and general communication skills. CONCLUSION Due to evident differences in determinants, older CRC/PC patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement should both be collected in evaluating the quality of medical decision-making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS General communication skills should be integrated in SDM training interventions. New SDM measurement tools for patients are needed to sufficiently discriminate between the constructs of involvement and satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noralie H Geessink
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Eirik H Ofstad
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway
| | - Marcel G M Olde Rikkert
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Harry van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jürgen Kasper
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department Health and Caring Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Medical Clinics, University Medical Center, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Yvonne Schoon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shahrokni A, Alexander K, Wildes TM, Puts MTE. Preventing Treatment-Related Functional Decline: Strategies to Maximize Resilience. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:415-431. [PMID: 30231361 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_200427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The majority of patients with cancer are older adults. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) will help the clinical team identify underlying medical and functional status issues that can affect cancer treatment delivery, cancer prognosis, and treatment tolerability. The CGA, as well as more abbreviated assessments and geriatric screening tools, can aid in the treatment decision-making process through improved individualized prediction of mortality, toxicity of cancer therapy, and postoperative complications and can also help clinicians develop an integrated care plan for the older adult with cancer. In this article, we will review the latest evidence with regard to the use of CGA in oncology. In addition, we will describe the benefits of conducting a CGA and the types of interventions that can be taken by the interprofessional team to improve the treatment outcomes and well-being of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Shahrokni
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Koshy Alexander
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tanya M Wildes
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Martine T E Puts
- From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis MO; Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|