1
|
Goldberg C, Greenberg MR, Noveihed A, Agrawal L, Omene C, Toppmeyer D, George MA. Ovarian Suppression: Early Menopause, Late Effects. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:427-438. [PMID: 38305992 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01491-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pre-menopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor (HR) breast cancer are candidates for prolonged hypoestrogenism to improve cancer outcomes. However, the disease benefit eclipses the toxicities associated with ovarian function suppression (OFS), which are often under-reported. RECENT FINDINGS Increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease, bone disorders, and metabolic disorders is well reported in women with no history of cancer, after surgical oophorectomy or premature ovarian failure. Vasomotor symptoms, urogenital atrophy, weight gain, sexual dysfunction, cognitive decline, and sleep disturbances contribute to the increased non-compliance associated with OFS, especially in younger women. Balancing the toxicities of prolonged OFS with its benefits should be critically analyzed by providers when making recommendations for their patients. Supportive care to manage multi-system toxicities and to counteract the long-term impact on all-cause mortality should be emphasized by every cancer program. Future studies with OFS should incorporate patient outcomes and strategies for symptom management in addition to focusing on improving disease outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaya Goldberg
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Coral Omene
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Deborah Toppmeyer
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Mridula A George
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
- The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
An Updated Review on Recent Advances in the Usage of Novel Therapeutic Peptides for Breast Cancer Treatment. Int J Pept Res Ther 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s10989-023-10503-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
3
|
Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Partridge AH, Abulkhair O, Azim HA, Bianchi-Micheli G, Cardoso MJ, Curigliano G, Gelmon KA, Gentilini O, Harbeck N, Kaufman B, Kim SB, Liu Q, Merschdorf J, Poortmans P, Pruneri G, Senkus E, Sirohi B, Spanic T, Sulosaari V, Peccatori F, Pagani O. ESO-ESMO fifth international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY5). Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1097-1118. [PMID: 35934170 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
We dedicate this manuscript in memory of a dear friend and colleague Bella Kaufman. The fifth International Consensus Symposium for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY5) took place virtually in October 2020, organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO). Consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer in young women were updated from BCY4 with incorporation of new evidence to inform the guidelines. Areas of research priorities as well as specificities in different geographic and minority populations were identified. This manuscript summarizes the ESO-ESMO international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Paluch-Shimon
- Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - F Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - O Abulkhair
- King Abdulaziz Medical City for National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | | | - M J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - K A Gelmon
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of OB&GYN and CCCMunich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - B Kaufman
- Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - S B Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Q Liu
- Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - P Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk, Department of Radiation Oncology & University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - G Pruneri
- National Cancer Institute, IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - E Senkus
- Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - B Sirohi
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi and Gurgaon, India
| | - T Spanic
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - V Sulosaari
- European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
| | - F Peccatori
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan; European Institute of Oncology IRCCS & European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - O Pagani
- Interdisciplinary Cancer Service Hospital Riviera-Chablais Rennaz, Vaud, Geneva University Hospitals, Lugano University, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fleming L, Agnew S, Peddie N, Crawford M, Dixon D, MacPherson I. The impact of medication side effects on adherence and persistence to hormone therapy in breast cancer survivors: A quantitative systematic review. Breast 2022; 64:63-84. [PMID: 35609380 PMCID: PMC9130570 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hormone Therapy (HT) is recommended for most women with HR-positive primary breast cancer. When taken as intended, HT reduces breast cancer recurrence by 40% and mortality by one-third. The recommended duration of treatment ranges from 5 to 10 years depending on risk of recurrence and the specific HT regimen. However, recent data indicates that rates of HT non-adherence are high and research suggests this may be due to the impact of HT side effects. The contribution of side effects to non-adherence and non-persistence behaviours has rarely been systematically explored, thereby hindering the implementation of targeted intervention strategies. Our aim is to identify, evaluate and summarise the relationship between HT side effects and patterns of adherence and persistence. METHODS Electronic searches were conducted from inception and were completed by September 2021, utilising Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases. Searches included a combination of terms related to breast cancer, adherence, hormone therapy and side effects. RESULTS Sixty-two eligible papers were identified and study quality varied by study type. Most observational and cross-sectional studies were rated good quality, whereas most controlled intervention studies were rated fair quality. Three studies were rated poor quality. The most frequently measured side effects were pain, low mood, hot flashes, insomnia, anxiety, fatigue, weight gain, concentration/memory problems. CONCLUSIONS This review identified a lack of consistency in the measurement of adherence and the definition of persistence across studies. The instruments used to measure side effects also varied significantly. This variation and lack of consistency makes it difficult to evaluate and summarise the role of HT side effects in HT adherence and persistence behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sommer Agnew
- University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola Peddie
- University of Strathclyde, George Street, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Diane Dixon
- University of Aberdeen, Kings College, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khojasteh Poor F, Keivan M, Ramazii M, Ghaedrahmati F, Anbiyaiee A, Panahandeh S, Khoshnam SE, Farzaneh M. Mini review: The FDA-approved prescription drugs that target the MAPK signaling pathway in women with breast cancer. Breast Dis 2021; 40:51-62. [PMID: 33896802 DOI: 10.3233/bd-201063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and the prevalent type of malignancy among women. Multiple risk factors, including genetic changes, biological age, dense breast tissue, and obesity are associated with BC. The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling pathway has a pivotal role in regulating biological functions such as cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and survival. It has become evident that the MAPK pathway is associated with tumorigenesis and may promote breast cancer development. The MAPK/RAS/RAF cascade is closely associated with breast cancer. RAS signaling can enhance BC cell growth and progression. B-Raf is an important kinase and a potent RAF isoform involved in breast tumor initiation and differentiation. Depending on the reasons for cancer, there are different strategies for treatment of women with BC. Till now, several FDA-approved treatments have been investigated that inhibit the MAPK pathway and reduce metastatic progression in breast cancer. The most common breast cancer drugs that regulate or inhibit the MAPK pathway may include Farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs), Sorafenib, Vemurafenib, PLX8394, Dabrafenib, Ulixertinib, Simvastatin, Alisertib, and Teriflunomide. In this review, we will discuss the roles of the MAPK/RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway in BC and summarize the FDA-approved prescription drugs that target the MAPK signaling pathway in women with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Khojasteh Poor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| | - Mona Keivan
- Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.,Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ramazii
- Kerman University of Medical Sciences, University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
| | - Farhoodeh Ghaedrahmati
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Amir Anbiyaiee
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Samira Panahandeh
- School of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Seyed Esmaeil Khoshnam
- Persian Gulf Physiology Research Center, Medical Basic Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Maryam Farzaneh
- Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Song K, Farzaneh M. Signaling pathways governing breast cancer stem cells behavior. Stem Cell Res Ther 2021; 12:245. [PMID: 33863385 PMCID: PMC8052733 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02321-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the second common cancer and the leading cause of malignancy among females overall. Breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) are a small population of breast cancer cells that play a critical role in the metastasis of breast cancer to other organs in the body. BCSCs have both self-renewal and differentiation capacities, which are thought to contribute to the aggressiveness of metastatic lesions. Therefore, targeting BCSCs can be a suitable approach for the treatment and metastasis of breast cancer. Growing evidence has indicated that the Wnt, NFκB, Notch, BMP2, STAT3, and hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathways govern epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) activation, growth, and tumorigenesis of BCSCs in the primary regions. miRNAs as the central regulatory molecules also play critical roles in BCSC self-renewal, metastasis, and drug resistance. Hence, targeting these pathways might be a novel therapeutic approach for breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. This review discusses known signaling mechanisms involved in the stimulation or prevention of BCSC self-renewal, metastasis, and tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Song
- Xuzhou Vocational College of Bioengineering, Xuzhou, 221006, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Maryam Farzaneh
- Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Awareness of the Causes Leading to Surgical Ablation of Ovarian Function in Premenopausal Breast Cancer-A Single-Center Analysis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57040385. [PMID: 33923478 PMCID: PMC8073028 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57040385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Ovarian surgical ablation (OSA) in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is usually performed to halt ovarian function in premenopausal patients. Since alternative pharmacological therapy exists and few studies have investigated why surgery is still performed, we aimed to analyze the reasons for the use of OSA despite the remaining controversy. Materials and Methods: Premenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients treated at a tertiary center (2005–2011) were selected, and patients with germline mutations were excluded. Results: Seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Globally, the main reasons for OSA included: continued menstruation despite hormone therapy with or without ovarian medical ablation (OMA) (34.2%), patient informed choice (31.6%), disease progression (16.5%), gynecological disease requiring surgery (13.9%), and tamoxifen intolerance/contraindication (3.8%). In women aged ≥45 years, patient choice was significantly more frequently the reason for OSA (47.4% versus 17.1% (p = 0.004)). For those aged <45 years, salvation attempts were significantly more frequent as compared to older women (26.8% versus 5.3% (p = 0.01)). In 77.8% of women undergoing OSA with menstrual cycle maintenance, surgery was performed 1–5 years after diagnosis, while surgery was performed earlier (0–3 months after diagnosis) in patients undergoing OSA as an informed choice (56.0%), as a salvation attempt (53.8%), or due to gynecological disease (63.6%). The leading reason for OSA in women previously undergoing OMA was continued menstruation (60.0%). Conclusions: This study suggests a possible failure of pharmacological ovarian suppression and reinforces the need for shared decision-making with patients when discussing treatment strategies, although validation by further studies is warranted due to our limited sample size.
Collapse
|
8
|
Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Partridge AH, Abulkhair O, Azim HA, Bianchi-Micheli G, Cardoso MJ, Curigliano G, Gelmon KA, Harbeck N, Merschdorf J, Poortmans P, Pruneri G, Senkus E, Spanic T, Stearns V, Wengström Y, Peccatori F, Pagani O. ESO-ESMO 4th International Consensus Guidelines for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4). Ann Oncol 2020; 31:674-696. [PMID: 32199930 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The 4th International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4) took place in October 2018, in Lugano, Switzerland, organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO). Consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer in young women were updated from BCY3 with incorporation of new evidence to inform the guidelines. Areas of research priorities were also identified. This article summarizes the ESO-ESMO international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - F Cardoso
- Breast Unit Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - A H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - O Abulkhair
- King Abdulaziz Medical City for National Guard, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - H A Azim
- School of Medicine, Monterrey Institute of Technology, Monterrey, MX
| | | | - M-J Cardoso
- Breast Unit Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal; Nova Medical School Lisbon, Portugal
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - K A Gelmon
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | | | - P Poortmans
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology & Paris Sciences & Lettres - PSL University, Paris, France
| | - G Pruneri
- National Cancer Institute, IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - E Senkus
- Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - T Spanic
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - V Stearns
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA
| | - Y Wengström
- Department of Neurobiology Cancer Science and Society, Karolinska Institute and Theme Cancer Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
| | - F Peccatori
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS & European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - O Pagani
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland and Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland, Geneva University Hospitals, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bui KT, Willson ML, Goel S, Beith J, Goodwin A. Ovarian suppression for adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 3:CD013538. [PMID: 32141074 PMCID: PMC7059882 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 80% of breast cancers amongst premenopausal women are hormone receptor-positive. Adjuvant endocrine therapy is an integral component of care for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and in premenopausal women includes oestrogen receptor blockade with tamoxifen, temporary suppression of ovarian oestrogen synthesis by luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists, and permanent interruption of ovarian oestrogen synthesis with oophorectomy or radiotherapy. Recent international consensus statements recommend single-agent tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors with ovarian function suppression (OFS) as the current standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women (often preceded by chemotherapy). This review examined the role of adding OFS to another treatment (i.e. chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, or both) or comparing OFS to no further adjuvant treatment. OBJECTIVES To assess effects of OFS for treatment of premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. SEARCH METHODS For this review update, we searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 8), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov on 26 September 2019. We screened the reference lists of related articles, contacted trial authors, and applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised trials assessing any method of OFS, that is, oophorectomy, radiation-induced ovarian ablation, or LHRH agonists, as adjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. We included studies that compared (1) OFS versus observation, (2) OFS + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, (3) OFS + tamoxifen versus tamoxifen, and (4) OFS + chemotherapy + tamoxifen versus chemotherapy + tamoxifen. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Toxicity, contralateral breast cancer, and second malignancy were represented as risk ratios (RRs), and quality of life data were extracted when provided. MAIN RESULTS This review update included 15 studies involving 11,538 premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer; these studies were conducted from 1978 to 2014. Some of these treatments are not current standard of care, and early studies did not assess HER2 receptor status. Studies tested OFS versus observation (one study), OFS plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (six studies), OFS plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen (six studies), and OFS plus chemotherapy and tamoxifen versus chemotherapy and tamoxifen (two studies). Of those studies that reported the chemotherapy regimen, an estimated 72% of women received an anthracycline. The results described below relate to the overall comparison of OFS versus no OFS. High-certainty evidence shows that adding OFS to treatment resulted in a reduction in mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 0.94; 11 studies; 10,374 women; 1933 reported events). This treatment effect was seen when OFS was added to observation, to tamoxifen, or to chemotherapy and tamoxifen. The effect on mortality was not observed when OFS was added to chemotherapy without tamoxifen therapy (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.09; 5 studies; 3087 women; median follow-up: range 7.7 to 12.1 years). The addition of OFS resulted in improved DFS (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.90; 10 studies; 8899 women; 2757 reported events; high-certainty evidence). The DFS treatment effect persisted when OFS was added to observation, to tamoxifen, and to chemotherapy and tamoxifen. The effect on DFS was reduced when OFS was added to chemotherapy without tamoxifen therapy (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.01; 5 studies; 2450 women). Heterogeneity was low to moderate across studies for DFS and OS (respectively). Evidence suggests that adding OFS slightly increases the incidence of hot flushes (grade 3/4 or any grade; risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.82; 6 studies; 5581 women; low-certainty evidence, as this may have been under-reported in these studies). Two other studies that could not be included in the meta-analysis reported a higher number of hot flushes in the OFS group than in the no-OFS group. Seven studies involving 5354 women collected information related to mood; however this information was reported as grade 3 or 4 depression, anxiety, or neuropsychiatric symptoms, or symptoms were reported without the grade. Two studies reported an increase in depression, anxiety, and neuropsychiatric symptoms in the OFS group compared to the no-OFS group, and five studies indicated an increase in anxiety in both treatment groups (but no difference between groups) or no difference overall in symptoms over time or between treatment groups. A single study reported bone health as osteoporosis (defined as T score < -2.5); this limited evidence suggests that OFS increases the risk of osteoporosis compared to no-OFS at median follow-up of 5.6 years (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10 to 28.82; 2011 women; low-certainty evidence). Adding OFS to treatment likely reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.97; 9 studies; 9138 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Quality of life was assessed in five studies; four studies used validated tools, and the fifth study provided no information on how data were collected. Two studies reported worse quality of life indicators (i.e. vaginal dryness, day and night sweats) for women receiving OFS compared to those in the no-OFS group. The other two studies indicated worsening of symptoms (e.g. vasomotor, gynaecological, vaginal dryness, decline in sexual interest, bone and joint pain, weight gain); however these side effects were reported in both OFS and no-OFS groups. The study that did not use a validated quality of life tool described no considerable differences between groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review found evidence that supports adding OFS for premenopausal women with early, hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. The benefit of OFS persisted when compared to observation, and when added to endocrine therapy (tamoxifen) or chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (tamoxifen). The decision to use OFS may depend on the overall risk assessment based on tumour and patient characteristics, and may follow consideration of all side effects that occur with the addition of OFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Tam Bui
- Concord Repatriation General HospitalMedical Oncology Department1A Hospital RoadConcordNSWAustralia2137
| | - Melina L Willson
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of SydneySystematic Reviews and Health Technology AssessmentsLocked Bag 77SydneyNSWAustralia1450
| | - Shom Goel
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneAustralia
- University of MelbourneSir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyMelbourneAustralia
| | - Jane Beith
- Chris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdownNSWAustralia2050
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Concord Repatriation General HospitalMedical Oncology Department1A Hospital RoadConcordNSWAustralia2137
- The University of Sydney, Concord Repatriation General HospitalConcord Clinical SchoolConcordNSWAustralia2137
- Sydney Local Health District and South Western Sydney Local Health DistrictCancer Genetics DepartmentSydneyAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|