1
|
Neuville P, Murez T, Savoie PH, Rocher L, Fléchon A, Ferretti L, Van Hove A, Branger N, Camparo P, Rouprêt M. Primary urethral carcinoma: Recommendations of the oncology committee of the French Urology Association. THE FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2024; 34:102606. [PMID: 38437949 DOI: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) is defined as a tumor process arising within the urethra, with no history of other urinary tract localization or synchronous tumor of the urinary tract. The most common histological types are urothelial carcinoma (UC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC). In men, UC predominates, while AC is rare. In women, AC affects around one in two patients, while EC and UC are equally divided between the remaining cases. Diagnosis is often delayed, and requires endoscopic examination with biopsies. MRI is the gold standard for local staging. FDG-PET scan can help in cases of doubt about regional or distant extension. The prognosis remains unfavorable despite aggressive surgical treatment. Multimodal management combining surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy appears to improve prognosis in severe forms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Neuville
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | - Thibaut Murez
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et de transplantation rénale, CHU de Montpellier, 371, avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France
| | - Pierre Henri Savoie
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Centre d'urologie UROVAR, polyclinique les Fleurs, 332, avenue Frédéric-Mistral, 83190 Ollioules, France
| | - Laurence Rocher
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, AP-HP, 157, rue de la Porte-de-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France; Université Paris-Saclay, BIOMAPS, 63, avenue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Aude Fléchon
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Ludovic Ferretti
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13273 Marseille, France; Service d'urologie, MSP Bordeaux Bagatelle, 203, route de Toulouse, 33401 Talence, France
| | - Antoine Van Hove
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Hôpital européen, 6, rue Désirée-Clary, 13003 Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Branger
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13273 Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Camparo
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Institut de pathologie des Hauts-de-France, 11, allée de l'Échauguette, 80000 Amiens, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wenzel M, Ruvolo CC, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, Hoeh B, Tian Z, Saad F, Briganti A, Tilki D, Banek S, Mandel P, Becker A, Kluth LA, Chun FK, Karakiewicz PI. Epidemiology of Unconventional Histological Subtypes of Urethral Cancer. Urol Int 2023; 107:15-22. [PMID: 35882213 PMCID: PMC9909713 DOI: 10.1159/000525673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to examine cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of unconventional urethral cancers. METHODS Within the SEER (2004-2016) database, we analyzed CSM of 165 patients with unconventional urethral-cancer histology. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to test the effect of unconventional histologies in urethral cancer on CSM. RESULTS Of 165 eligible patients, the Mullerian type accounted for 55 (33.3%) versus melanocytic (26.7%) versus neuroendocrine 25 (15.2%) versus lymphoma 22 (13.3%) versus mesenchymal/sarcoma 15 (9.1%) versus spindle cell 4 (2.1%) patients. Median age at diagnosis was 81 years in spindle cell, 75 in melanocytic, 74 in neuroendocrine and mesenchymal/sarcoma, 67 in lymphoma, and 62 years Mullerian type (p < 0.001). Of all, 116 (70.3%) were female. The Mullerian type exhibited the highest female ratio (96.4%) versus the lowest female ratio in neuroendocrine (24.0%). The Mullerian type was most frequent in African-American females. In Caucasian females, the melanocytic type was most frequent (49.1%). In African-American (38.9%) and Caucasian males (33.3%), neuroendocrine histology was most frequent. Three-year CSM was, respectively, 27.5%, 23.1% 22.3%, 20.5%, and 16.1% for melanocytic, mesenchymal/sarcoma, Mullerian type, neuroendocrine, and lymphoma histology. Median cancer-specific survival was 106 versus 10 months for combined nonmetastatic versus metastatic nonconventional histologies. CONCLUSION Important age, sex, racial/ethnic group distribution, and survival differences exist between each unconventional urethral-cancer histological subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe Universtity Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany,Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada,*Mike Wenzel,
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada,Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada,Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luigi Nocera
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada,Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe Universtity Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany,Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany,Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Severiné Banek
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe Universtity Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe Universtity Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe Universtity Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A. Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe Universtity Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K.H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe Universtity Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang S, Wan S, Zheng D, Yin Y, Li W, Shang P. Treatment and outcomes of primary urethral cancer. Asian J Surg 2022; 45:1726-1727. [DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
4
|
Primary tumor surgery improves survival in non-metastatic primary urethral carcinoma patients: a large population-based investigation. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:857. [PMID: 34315433 PMCID: PMC8314574 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08603-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) is a rare genitourinary malignancy with a relatively poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of surgery on survival of patients diagnosed with PUC. Methods A total of 1544 PUC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified based on the SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and the Fine and Gray competing risks analysis were performed to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). The multivariate Cox regression model and competing risks regression model were used to identify independent risk factors of OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results The 5-yr OS was significantly better in patients who received either local therapy (39.8%) or radical surgery (44.7%) compared to patients receiving no surgery of the primary site (21.5%) (p < 0.001). Both local therapy and radical surgery were each independently associated with decreased CSM, with predicted 5-yr cumulative incidence of 45.4 and 43.3%, respectively, compared to 64.7% for patients receiving no surgery of the primary site (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that primary site surgery was independently associated with better OS (local therapy, p = 0.037; radical surgery, p < 0.001) and decreased CSM (p = 0.003). Similar results were noted regardless of age, sex, T stage, N stage, and AJCC prognostic groups based on subgroup analysis. However, patients with M1 disease who underwent primary site surgery did not exhibit any survival benefit. Conclusion Surgery for the primary tumor conferred a survival advantage in non-metastatic PUC patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08603-z.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wenzel M, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, Würnschimmel C, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Tilki D, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FK, Karakiewicz PI. Sex-Related Differences Include Stage, Histology, and Survival in Urethral Cancer Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:135-143. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
6
|
Wang M, Yang M, Wu P, Deng S, Wang J, Chen J, Wang J, Liu M. Transperineal-incision urethrectomy combined with laparoscopic prostatectomy for a male patient with squamous cell carcinoma involving distal plus proximal urethra and untypical symptoms-a case report. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:976-982. [PMID: 33718098 PMCID: PMC7947435 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) is a rare malignancy, covering less than 1% of all genitourinary cancers. Different tumor location, classified as tumor in distal or proximal urethra, represents different characteristics and often leads to different treatment modality. However, data on the surgical approach for PUC involving both distal and proximal urethra remains rare. In this case, we presented a 75-year-old man with untypical symptoms of perineal mass and unspecific frequent and painful urination. Results of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan, and percutaneous biopsy revealed a cT2N1M0 PUC involving both distal and proximal urethra. Given the request of patients for a normal penile appearance after surgery, a transperineal-incision urethrectomy combined with laparoscopic prostatectomy and iliac lymphadenectomy was performed with optimal outcomes. The results of histopathological analysis revealed a moderately-high differentiated PUC with no positive lymph node. Post-operative recovery was uneventful. On first visit 1-month after surgery, physical examination revealed a satisfactory wound healing and appearance of penis and no recurrent lesions were found on mp-MRI. This is a rare case with untypical symptoms indicating that patients with PUC involving both distal and proximal urethra may present with no symptoms of urethral stricture but only non-specific lower urinary symptoms. The surgical approach we proposed in this case proves to be a safe and feasible one to completely resect the tumor and preserve a normal appearance of penis, thus worth to be applied in the specific patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Mingzi Yang
- Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Pengjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shumin Deng
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jianlong Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Chen
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jianye Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Primary Urethral Carcinoma-2020 Update. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:424-432. [PMID: 32605889 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) is a rare cancer accounting for <1% of all genitourinary malignancies. OBJECTIVE To provide updated practical recommendations for the diagnosis and management of PUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic search interrogating Ovid (Medline), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Urothelial carcinoma of the urethra is the predominant histological type of PUC (54-65%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (16-22%) and adenocarcinoma (10-16%). Diagnosis of PUC depends on urethrocystoscopy with biopsy and urinary cytology. Pathological staging and grading are based on the tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification and the 2016 World Health Organization grading systems. Local tumour extent and regional lymph nodes are assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, and the presence of distant metastases is assessed by computed tomography of the thorax/abdomen and pelvis. For all patients with localised distal tumours (≤T2N0M0), partial urethrectomy or urethra-sparing surgery is a valid treatment option, provided that negative intraoperative surgical margins can be achieved. Prostatic Ta-Tis-T1 PUC can be treated with repeat transurethral resection of the prostate and bacillus Calmette-Guérin. In prostatic or proximal ≥ T2N0 disease, neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy should be considered prior to radical surgery. All patients with locally advanced disease (≥T3N0-2M0) should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team. In men with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma, curative radiotherapy combined with radiosensitising chemotherapy can be offered for definitive treatment and genital preservation. In patients with local urethral recurrence, salvage surgery or radiotherapy can be offered. For patients with distant metastatic disease, systemic therapy based on tumour characteristics can be evaluated. CONCLUSIONS These updated European Association of Urology guidelines provide up-to-date guidance for the contemporary diagnosis and management of patients with suspected PUC. PATIENT SUMMARY Primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) is a very rare, but aggressive disease. These updated European Association of Urology guidelines provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians treating patients with PUC.
Collapse
|
8
|
Nomograms for predicting long-term overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with primary urethral carcinoma: a population-based study. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 52:287-300. [PMID: 31612421 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02314-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to identify the independent prognostic factors in patients with primary urethral carcinoma (PUC) and to predict their overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) at 3, 5, and 8 years. METHODS Patients with PUC identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were divided into training and validation cohorts. Nomograms were constructed based on the results of Cox regression analysis. The predictive performance of each nomogram was evaluated using the consistency index (C-index), the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), and calibration plots. Decision-curve analysis (DCA) was used to test the clinical value of the predictive models. RESULTS Our study screened 822 patients with PUC. Multivariate analysis showed that the age at diagnosis, race, histology, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and surgery status were independent prognostic factors for CSS and age at diagnosis, race, histology, AJCC stage, surgery status, and chemotherapy for OS (all P < 0.05). We used these prognostic factors to construct nomograms. The C-indexes for OS and CSS were 0.713 and 0.741 in training cohorts and 0.714 and 0.738 in validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC and calibration plots demonstrated the good performance of both nomograms. The DCA indicated the presence of clinical net benefits in both the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSION We developed and validated nomograms for predicting OS and CSS in patients with PUC, which can help clinicians make treatment decisions.
Collapse
|