1
|
Cuccia F, Jafari F, D’Alessandro S, Carruba G, Craparo G, Tringali G, Blasi L, Ferrera G. Preferred Imaging for Target Volume Delineation for Radiotherapy of Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Literature Review of the Available Evidence. J Pers Med 2024; 14:538. [PMID: 38793120 PMCID: PMC11122491 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence in glioblastoma lacks a standardized treatment, prompting an exploration of re-irradiation's efficacy. METHODS A comprehensive systematic review from January 2005 to May 2023 assessed the role of MRI sequences in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation. The search criteria, employing MeSH terms, targeted English-language, peer-reviewed articles. The inclusion criteria comprised both retrospective and prospective studies, excluding certain types and populations for specificity. The PICO methodology guided data extraction, and the statistical analysis employed Chi-squared tests via MedCalc v22.009. RESULTS Out of the 355 identified studies, 81 met the criteria, involving 3280 patients across 65 retrospective and 16 prospective studies. The key findings indicate diverse treatment modalities, with linac-based photons predominating. The median age at re-irradiation was 54 years, and the median time interval between radiation courses was 15.5 months. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were favored for target delineation, with PET-imaging used in fewer studies. Re-irradiation was generally well tolerated (median G3 adverse events: 3.5%). The clinical outcomes varied, with a median 1-year local control rate of 61% and a median overall survival of 11 months. No significant differences were noted in the G3 toxicity and clinical outcomes based on the MRI sequence preference or PET-based delineation. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of recurrent glioblastoma, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were preferred for target delineation, allowing clinicians to deliver a safe and effective therapeutic option; amino acid PET imaging may represent a useful device to discriminate radionecrosis from recurrent disease. Future investigations, including the ongoing GLIAA, NOA-10, ARO 2013/1 trial, will aim to refine approaches and standardize methodologies for improved outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy (G.F.)
| | - Fatemeh Jafari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, Teheran University of Medical Sciences, Teheran 1416634793, Iran
| | | | - Giuseppe Carruba
- Division of Internationalization and Health Research (SIRS), ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Livio Blasi
- Medical Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy (G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marwah R, Xing D, Squire T, Soon YY, Gan HK, Ng SP. Reirradiation versus systemic therapy versus combination therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and toxicity. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:505-524. [PMID: 37733174 PMCID: PMC10589175 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04441-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review compares reirradiation (reRT), systemic therapy and combination therapy (reRT & systemic therapy) with regards to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse effects (AEs) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG). METHODS A search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase and CENTRAL. Studies reporting OS, PFS, AEs and/or QoL and encompassing the following groups were included; reirradiation vs systemic therapy, combination therapy vs systemic therapy, combination therapy vs reRT, and bevacizumab-based combination therapy vs reRT with/without non-bevacizumab-based systemic therapy. Meta-analyses were performed utilising a random effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS Thirty-one studies (three randomised, twenty-eight non-randomised) comprising 2084 participants were included. In the combination therapy vs systemic therapy group, combination therapy improved PFS (HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.41-0.79); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56-0.95); low certainty) and there was no difference in grade 3 + AEs (RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.57-1.86); very low certainty). In the combination therapy vs reRT group, combination therapy improved PFS (HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.38-0.72); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.52-0.93); low certainty). In the bevacizumab-based combination therapy vs reRT with/without non-bevacizumab-based systemic therapy group, adding bevacizumab improved PFS (HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.27-0.77); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.24-0.72; low certainty) and reduced radionecrosis (RR 0.17 (95% CI 0.06-0.48); low certainty). CONCLUSIONS Combination therapy may improve OS and PFS with acceptable toxicities in patients with rHGG compared to reRT or systemic therapy alone. Particularly, combining bevacizumab with reRT prophylactically reduces radionecrosis. REGISTRATION CRD42022291741.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Marwah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Townsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Douglas, Townsville, QLD, 4814, Australia.
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
| | - Daniel Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Townsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Douglas, Townsville, QLD, 4814, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Timothy Squire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Townsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Douglas, Townsville, QLD, 4814, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Yu Yang Soon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hui K Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Cancer Therapies and Biology Group, Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Tumours, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsien CI, Pugh SL, Dicker AP, Raizer JJ, Matuszak MM, Lallana EC, Huang J, Algan O, Deb N, Portelance L, Villano JL, Hamm JT, Oh KS, Ali AN, Kim MM, Lindhorst SM, Mehta MP. NRG Oncology/RTOG1205: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Concurrent Bevacizumab and Reirradiation Versus Bevacizumab Alone as Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1285-1295. [PMID: 36260832 PMCID: PMC9940937 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether reirradiation (re-RT) and concurrent bevacizumab (BEV) improve overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), compared with BEV alone in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). The primary objective was OS, and secondary objectives included PFS, response rate, and treatment adverse events (AEs) including delayed CNS toxicities. METHODS NRG Oncology/RTOG1205 is a prospective, phase II, randomized trial of re-RT and BEV versus BEV alone. Stratification factors included age, resection, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Patients with recurrent GBM with imaging evidence of tumor progression ≥ 6 months from completion of prior chemo-RT were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to re-RT, 35 Gy in 10 fractions, with concurrent BEV IV 10 mg/kg once in every 2 weeks or BEV alone until progression. RESULTS From December 2012 to April 2016, 182 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 170 were eligible. Patient characteristics were well balanced between arms. The median follow-up for censored patients was 12.8 months. There was no improvement in OS for BEV + RT, hazard ratio, 0.98; 80% CI, 0.79 to 1.23; P = .46; the median survival time was 10.1 versus 9.7 months for BEV + RT versus BEV alone. The median PFS for BEV + RT was 7.1 versus 3.8 months for BEV, hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.0; P = .05. The 6-month PFS rate improved from 29.1% (95% CI, 19.1 to 39.1) for BEV to 54.3% (95% CI, 43.5 to 65.1) for BEV + RT, P = .001. Treatment was well tolerated. There were a 5% rate of acute grade 3+ treatment-related AEs and no delayed high-grade AEs. Most patients died of recurrent GBM. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, NRG Oncology/RTOG1205 is the first prospective, randomized multi-institutional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of re-RT in recurrent GBM using modern RT techniques. Overall, re-RT was shown to be safe and well tolerated. BEV + RT demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, specifically the 6-month PFS rate but no difference in OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie L. Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jiayi Huang
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis-Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ozer Algan
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Nimisha Deb
- St Luke's University Hospital & Health Network accruals Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Bethlehem, PA
| | - Lorraine Portelance
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | | | - John T. Hamm
- Norton Hospital Pavilion and Medical Campus, Louisville, KY
| | - Kevin S. Oh
- Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Arif N. Ali
- The Hope Center accruals Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute, Dalton, GA
| | - Michelle M. Kim
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Scott M. Lindhorst
- Medical University of South Carolina Minority Underserved NCORP, Charleston, SC
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lautenschlaeger FS, Dumke R, Schymalla M, Hauswald H, Carl B, Stein M, Keber U, Jensen A, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Eberle F. Comparison of carbon ion and photon reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:427-435. [PMID: 34523017 PMCID: PMC9038837 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01844-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Purpose of this study was to investigate overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma treated with either carbon ion reirradiation or photon reirradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study we evaluated 78 consecutive patients with recurrent IDH (Isocitrate dehydrogenase)-wildtype glioblastoma (38 patients carbon ion re-radiotherapy, 40 patients photon re-radiotherapy) treated with either carbon ion reirradiation or stereotactic photon reirradiation. 45 Gy (RBE; 15 fractions) carbon ion reirradiation (CIRT) or 39 Gy (13 fractions) photon reirradiation (FSRT) was administered, respectively. Overall survival was investigated with respect to histological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox statistics were calculated. A propensity score-matched analysis of the FSRT and CIRT groups using variables from a validated prognosis score was carried out. RESULTS The type of reirradiation (CIRT vs. FSRT) significantly influenced overall survival-8.0 months vs. 6.5 months (univariate: p = 0.046)-and remained an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.017). Propensity score-adjusted analysis with CIRT versus FSRT as the dependent variable yielded a significant overall survival advantage for the CIRT group (median OS 8.9 versus 7.2 months, p = 0.041, 1‑year survival 29 versus 10%). Adverse events (AE) were evaluated for both subgroups. For the FSRT group no toxicity ≥ grade 4 occurred. For the CIRT subgroup no grade 5 AE occurred, but 1 patient developed a grade 4 radionecrosis. We encountered 4 grade 3 toxicities. One patient developed a zoster at the trunk, 2 progressed in their paresis, and 1 featured progressive dysesthesia. CONCLUSION In conclusion, carbon ion treatment is a safe and feasible treatment option for recurrent glioblastoma. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and two different dose levels for CIRT or FSRT, the improved outcome in CIRT reirradiation might be an effect of higher biological impact from carbon ions or a simple dose-escalation effect. This hypothesis needs prospective testing in larger patient cohorts. A prospective phase III randomized trial is in preparation at our center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F S Lautenschlaeger
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany.
| | - R Dumke
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Schymalla
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - H Hauswald
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
- RNS Gemeinschaftspraxis, St. Josefs-Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B Carl
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Stein
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - U Keber
- Institut für Neuropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - A Jensen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - R Engenhart-Cabillic
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - F Eberle
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
García-Cabezas S, Rivin del Campo E, Solivera-Vela J, Palacios-Eito A. Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed? World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:767-786. [PMID: 34631441 PMCID: PMC8479348 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Optimal management after recurrence or progression of high-grade gliomas is still undefined and remains a challenge for neuro-oncology multidisciplinary teams. Improved radiation therapy techniques, new imaging methods, published experience, and a better radiobiological knowledge of brain tissue have positioned re-irradiation (re-RT) as an option for many of these patients. Decisions must be individualized, taking into account the pattern of relapse, previous treatment, and functional status, as well as the patient’s preferences and expected quality of life. Many questions remain unanswered with respect to re-RT: Who is the most appropriate candidate, which dose and fractionation are most effective, how to define the target volume, which imaging technique is best for planning, and what is the optimal timing? This review will focus on describing the most relevant studies that include re-RT as salvage therapy, with the aim of simplifying decision-making and designing the best available therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia García-Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | | | - Juan Solivera-Vela
- Department of Neurosurgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Amalia Palacios-Eito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miles X, Vandevoorde C, Hunter A, Bolcaen J. MDM2/X Inhibitors as Radiosensitizers for Glioblastoma Targeted Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:703442. [PMID: 34307171 PMCID: PMC8296304 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.703442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhibition of the MDM2/X-p53 interaction is recognized as a potential anti-cancer strategy, including the treatment of glioblastoma (GB). In response to cellular stressors, such as DNA damage, the tumor suppression protein p53 is activated and responds by mediating cellular damage through DNA repair, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Hence, p53 activation plays a central role in cell survival and the effectiveness of cancer therapies. Alterations and reduced activity of p53 occur in 25-30% of primary GB tumors, but this number increases drastically to 60-70% in secondary GB. As a result, reactivating p53 is suggested as a treatment strategy, either by using targeted molecules to convert the mutant p53 back to its wild type form or by using MDM2 and MDMX (also known as MDM4) inhibitors. MDM2 down regulates p53 activity via ubiquitin-dependent degradation and is amplified or overexpressed in 14% of GB cases. Thus, suppression of MDM2 offers an opportunity for urgently needed new therapeutic interventions for GB. Numerous small molecule MDM2 inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical evaluation, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy and/or other targeted agents. In addition, considering the major role of both p53 and MDM2 in the downstream signaling response to radiation-induced DNA damage, the combination of MDM2 inhibitors with radiation may offer a valuable therapeutic radiosensitizing approach for GB therapy. This review covers the role of MDM2/X in cancer and more specifically in GB, followed by the rationale for the potential radiosensitizing effect of MDM2 inhibition. Finally, the current status of MDM2/X inhibition and p53 activation for the treatment of GB is given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xanthene Miles
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alistair Hunter
- Radiobiology Section, Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Julie Bolcaen
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|