Relationship Between Fibrinogen to Albumin Ratio and Prognosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Predictive value of serum albumin levels on cancer survival: a prospective cohort study

Background

Serum albumin levels and cancer mortality are closely related, yet large-sample studies encompassing a broad spectrum of cancer types are lacking.

Methods

This study encompassed patients diagnosed with cancer across the continuous 10 cycles of NHANES surveys from 1999 to 2018. The study population was stratified into two groups based on median albumin levels (≤ 4.2g/dL and > 4.2 g/dL) or cancer aggressiveness (well-survived cancers and poorly-survived cancers). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to evaluate the association between serum albumin levels and cancer mortality. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was conducted to assess the nonlinear relationship between serum albumin levels and the risk of cancer mortality.

Results

Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that patients with albumin levels ≤ 4.2 g/dL exhibited lower survival rates compared to those with levels > 4.2 g/dL, irrespective of cancer aggressiveness. Following adjustment for confounders, decreased albumin levels were associated with an elevated risk of cancer mortality across all groups [all cancers, HR (95%CI) = 2.03(1.73, 2.37); well survived cancers, HR (95%CI) = 1.78(1.38, 2.32); and poorly survived cancers, HR (95%CI) = 1.99(1.64, 2.42)]. RCS analyses revealed a stable nonlinear negative association between albumin levels and cancer mortality in all groups, regardless of confounder adjustment.

Conclusion

Low serum albumin levels predict higher cancer mortality. Furthermore, a nonlinear negative association was observed between serum albumin levels and the risk of cancer mortality.

Prognostic value of preoperative white blood cell to hemoglobin ratio and fibrinogen to albumin ratio in patients with colorectal cancer

The prognostic value of preoperative white blood cell to hemoglobin ratio (WHR) and fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between preoperative WHR and FAR and the prognosis of CRC patients. The retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 207 patients with colorectal cancer who were admitted to Linyi People's Hospital between June 1, 2017 and June 1, 2021. The receiver operator curve was used to determine the cutoff value of 4.604 for WHR and 0.086 for FAR, and the patients were divided into high and low groups for comparative analysis of clinical data. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess independent risk factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in univariate and multifactorial analyses. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for survival analysis and logrank tests were used to assess survival differences. Multifactorial Cox analysis showed that tumor pathological stage (HR = 6.224, 95% CI:3.063-12.647, P < .001), and WHR (HR = 3.681, 95% CI:1.768-7.401, P < .001) were the independent risk factors for DFS in CRC patients. Tumor pathological stage (HR = 4.080, 95% CI:1.992-8.360, P < .001), and WHR (HR = 3.397, 95% CI:1.662-6.940, P = .001) were independent risk factors for OS. High levels of WHR and high levels of FAR were associated with lower DFS (P < .001) and OS (P < .001).CRC patients with both higher WHR and FAR had significantly lower DFS (P < .001) and OS (P < .001). DFS and OS may be shorter in CRC patients with high WHR and high FAR, perhaps associated with poor prognosis in CRC patients, and WHR and FAR may be potential CRC prognostic markers.

Novel prognostic score based on the preoperative total bilirubin-albumin ratio and fibrinogen-albumin ratio in ampullary adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The preoperative total bilirubin-albumin ratio (TBAR) and fibrinogen-albumin ratio (FAR) have been proven to be valuable prognostic factors in various cancers.

AIM

To detect the prognostic value of TBAR and FAR in ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) patients who underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

AC patients who underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy in the National Cancer Center of China between 1998 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic cutoff values of TBAR and FAR were determined through the best survival separation model. Then, a novel prognostic score combining TBAR and FAR was calculated and validated through the logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 188 AC patients were enrolled in the current study. The best cutoff values of TBAR and FAR for predicting overall survival were 1.7943 and 0.1329, respectively. AC patients were divided into a TBAR-low group (score = 0) vs a TBAR-high group (score = 1) and a FAR-low group (score = 0) vs a FAR-high group (score = 1). The total score was calculated as a novel prognostic factor. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that a high score was an independent protective factor for recurrence [score = 1 vs score = 0: Odds ratio (OR) = 0.517, P = 0.046; score = 2 vs score = 0 OR = 0.236, P = 0.038]. In addition, multivariable survival analysis also demonstrated that a high score was an independent protective factor in AC patients (score = 2 vs score = 0: Hazard ratio = 0.230, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

A novel prognostic score based on preoperative TBAR and FAR has been demonstrated to have good predictive power in AC patients who underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, more studies with larger samples are needed to validate this conclusion.

Prognostic Role of Preoperative Onodera's Prognostic Nutritional Index (OPNI) in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The inflammatory parameters of peripheral blood are related to the prognosis of various cancers. The aim of this meta-analysis is to explore the prognostic value of preoperative OPNI in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

METHODS

The following search strategies were used to locate all literature published up to May 1, 2022: PubMed, Web of Science, CBM, EMBASE, and Cochrane, using the keywords "Prognosis," "survival," "Nutritional Assessment," "Nutrition Index," and "PNI," "OPNI," "Gastrointestinal stromal tumor," and "GIST." Studies that did not report an associated cumulative hazard ratio (HR) of recurrence-free survival (RFS) were excluded. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by a fixed-effects model. Subgroups were analyzed for heterogeneity of studies, and Egger's test was applied to assess the risk of publication bias.

RESULTS

Through the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 articles with a total of 2462 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors were selected for analysis. The HR summary of univariate analysis of RFS was 2.73 (95% CI: 2.17-3.43, P < 0.0001), and there was no heterogeneity, which indicated that the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with low OPNI before operation was poor. Except for one article that did not give the HR of RFS under the condition of multi-factor analysis, the other 7 articles gave the HR of RFS and summarized it to 1.81 (95% CI: 1.40-3.83, P < 0.0001). Although there was slight heterogeneity in the multifactorial analysis, the publication bias risk and sensitivity assessment showed that the results were still reliable (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that decreased preoperative OPNI is closely associated with poor long-term survival (RFS) in GIST patients. Monitoring OPNI in GIST patients may help with risk stratification and individualized treatment.

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have investigated the prognostic value of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). However, the results have been inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to quantitatively determine the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of PNI in GISTs.

DESIGN

This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Pooled HRs and 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the prognostic value of PNI in patients with GISTs. Combined ORs and corresponding 95% CIs were used to evaluate the association between the PNI and clinicopathological characteristics.

DATA SOURCES

The electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were thoroughly searched from inception to December 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

A random-effects model or fixed-effects model was selected based on the level of heterogeneity among the included studies.

RESULTS

Eight studies comprising 2307 patients were included in this meta-analysis. A low PNI was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.47, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 4.35, 95% CI 1.25 to 16.83, p=0.033) in patients with GISTs. In addition, a low PNI was significantly associated with tumour size ≥5 cm (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.24, p=0.002) and primary tumour site in small intestine/colorectum/extra-GISTs (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.26, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GISTs and a lower PNI had inferior RFS and OS. Patients with GISTs and a low PNI may have a higher risk of tumour recurrence.

The prognostic significance of prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment before treatment is important for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), which will determine the priority of surgery or preoperative treatment. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is an integrated parameter consisting of serum albumin and lymphocyte count. Immunonutritional status defined in this manner is well-known to be closely linked to the prognosis of several other cancers. Nevertheless, the prognostic value of PNI specifically in GISTs has not been well-established. This study aimed to verify the prognostic role of PNI in patients with GISTs.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on medical databases up to June, 2022, and the raw data (hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) focusing on the prognostic value of PNI in patients with GISTs regarding recurrence-free survival were extracted and synthesized adopting the random-effects model. This review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022345440).

RESULTS

A total of 8 eligible studies including 2627 patients with GISTs was analyzed and the pooled results confirmed that an elevated PNI was associated with a better recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.40-0.68), with a moderate heterogeneity (I-square, 38%). The findings from subgroup analysis were consistent with the overall pooled results, and a sensitivity analysis, not the subgroup analysis, identified the source of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Elevated pretreatment PNI may be a useful indicator for assessing risk of recurrence in patients from China with GISTs. Studies in other countries and regions are needed to further verify the prognostic value of PNI in GISTs.

The prognostic value of fibrinogen to albumin ratio in malignant tumor patients: A meta-analysis

Background

Recent studies have shown that the fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) is closely related to the prognosis of various cancers. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the prognostic value of FAR in malignancies based on the available evidence.

Method

To systematically search the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, Baidu scholars, CNKI and VIP databases for relevant studies published before April 1, 2022, and to evaluate the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) and survival of patients with malignant tumors through a meta-analysis relationship between the results. Results. This meta-analysis included 19 eligible studies involving 5926 cancer patients. We found that high FAR was associated with poor overall survival (HR=2.25, 95%CI 1.86-2.74, p&lt;0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR=2.29, 95%CI 1.91-2.76, P&lt;0.001), progression-free survival (HR: 2.10, 95%CI 1.58-2.79, p&lt;0.001), disease-free survival (HR=1.52, 95%CI 1.17-1.96, p=0.001), and time to recurrence (HR: 1.555, 95%CI 1.031-2.346, P=0.035) was significantly correlated.

Conclusions

High FAR is significantly associated with poor clinical outcomes in cancer, suggesting that it may be an important predictor of prognosis in patients with malignancies.

Prognostic Factors and Management of Colorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Introduction The gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. Even though it can be found in any location of the digestive tract, the colorectal GIST is rare. With this study, we aim to review the current knowledge regarding the prognosis and management of colorectal GIST.

Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, and 717 articles were collected. After analyzing these studies, 60 articles were selected to use in this review.

Results The mitotic index, as well as tumor size and location were identified as good discriminators of prognosis in various studies. Surgery remains the only curative therapy for potentially resectable tumors. However, even after surgical resection, some patients develop disease recurrence and metastasis, especially those with high-risk tumors. Therefore, surgical resection alone might be inadequate for the management of all colorectal GISTs. The discovery of GIST's molecular pathway led to a shift in its therapy, insofar as tyrosine kinase inhibitors became part of the treatment schemes for this tumor, revolutionizing the treatment's outcome and prognosis.

Discussion/Conclusion The controversy concerning colorectal GIST prognosis and treatment can be, in part, attributed to the limited number of studies in the literature. In this review, we gathered the most recent knowledge about the prognosis and management of GIST in this rare location and propose two algorithms for its approach. Lastly, we highlight the importance of an individualized approach in the setting of a multidisciplinary team.

Pretreatment Fibrinogen-Albumin Ratio (FAR) Associated with Treatment Response and Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line Anti-PD-1 Therapy Plus Platinum-Based Combination Chemotherapy

Purpose

PD-1 inhibitors have been routinely used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have significantly improved clinical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to explore the influence of pretreatment fibrinogen-albumin ratio (FAR) on treatment response and survival in advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line anti-PD-1 therapy plus platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

A total of 91 patients with advanced NSCLC were included in the study. All patients received at least two cycles of systemic first-line anti-PD-1 therapy plus platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff values of FAR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors, and the Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival curves.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that N stage (N2-3) and high FAR (≥0.175, optimal cutoff value) were independent predictors for objective response rate (P = 0.0002, P = 0.0005, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival showed that high FAR (≥0.145) was independent prognostic factors (P = 0.0061, P = 0.0024, respectively). Progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly shorter in the high FAR (≥0.145) group than those in the low FAR (<0.145) group (P = 0.0024, P = 0.0024, respectively).

Conclusion

Pretreatment FAR was an independent predictor for treatment response and independent prognostic factors in advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line anti-PD-1 therapy plus platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

Two new inflammatory markers related to the CURB-65 score for disease severity in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: The hypersensitive C-reactive protein to albumin ratio and fibrinogen to albumin ratio

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship among hypersensitive C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR), and the CURB-65 score for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) severity.

Methods

Clinical data and laboratory indicators of 82 patients with CAP and 40 healthy subjects were retrospectively analysed. The relationship among CAR, FAR, and the severity of CAP was then analysed.

Results

CAR and FAR in patients with low-risk CAP were significantly higher than those in the normal control group (P < 0.05). CAR and FAR in patients with medium-high-risk CAP were further increased compared with those in patients with low-risk CAP (P < 0.05). CAR and FAR were positively correlated with hypersensitive C-reactive protein, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and CURB-65 scores (P < 0.05). In the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting severe CAP, the area under the curve of combining four biomarkers (CAR + FAR + NLR + PLR) was the largest. CAR was also an independent risk factor for severe CAP (OR = 8.789, 95% CI: 1.543-50.064, P = 0.014).

Conclusions

CAR and FAR may be used as the inflammatory markers for CAP severity evaluation.