Socioeconomic inequality in the use of prescription medications for smoking cessation among patients with COPD: a nationwide study

Barriers to implementation of smoking cessation support among healthcare professionals in the secondary healthcare sector: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Smoking cessation support (SCS) in the hospital is essential; patients often struggle to maintain quit attempts, which necessitates assistance from healthcare professionals (HCPs). However, unknown barriers can obstruct the implementation of SCS in hospitals. This study aims to uncover barriers to the implementation of SCS in psychiatric, somatic, inpatient, and outpatient hospital settings.

METHODS

In the period from June to September 2021, HCPs in a large secondary care hospital in the Region of Southern Denmark completed an online, cross-sectional study, providing sociodemographic details and listing potential barriers to SCS. They also shared additional barriers in the form of free-text responses. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of free-text responses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1645 HCPs surveyed, 409 elaborated their response in the free-text field assessing unlisted barriers. Top listed barriers, reported by more than one-third of participants, included: 'lack of time' (45.1%), 'lack of patient motivation' (34.3%), and 'insufficient knowledge on how to support' (32.2%). Free-text responses revealed three barrier-related, which we grouped under the themes of: 'Concerned about the patient', 'Not part of my job', and 'Inappropriate setting'.

CONCLUSIONS

This quantitative and qualitative study identifies barriers to SCS on multiple levels in the hospital setting, i.e. on the patient, provider, and organizational levels. These results can inform healthcare organizations and professionals in the implementation of SCS in routine hospital care.

Influence of ethnicity on adherence to nonsurgical interventions for COPD: a scoping review

Objective

Poor therapeutic adherence and the contributing factors have been extensively researched in several chronic diseases, including COPD. However, the influence of ethnicity on adherence to nonsurgical treatment interventions for COPD (e.g. smoking cessation and pulmonary rehabilitation) is not well understood. This scoping review was performed to better understand variations in adherence among people from minority ethnic communities diagnosed with COPD.

Method

This scoping review was designed based on the refined frameworks of Arksey and O'Malley, developed by JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute). Systematic searches were performed across three databases: CINHAL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid).

Results

Out of 3654 identified records, 37 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion; these were conducted in various countries and involved populations of diverse ethnic groups diagnosed with COPD. The included studies considered provision and/or adherence to medication (n=8, 21.6%), smoking cessation (n=11, 29.7%), influenza vaccinations (n=7, 18.9%), pulmonary rehabilitation (n=11, 29.7%) and oxygen therapy (n=2, 5.4%). Outcomes varied widely between studies within a single intervention (e.g. initiation, adherence and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation programme). However, most of the included studies suggested the presence of inequalities linked to ethnicity across interventions.

Conclusion

This review indicated the presence of poor adherence to nonsurgical interventions among people from minority ethnic backgrounds living with COPD. However, due to the heterogeneity in population groups considered and compared within the individual studies, it is challenging to identify and understand the key inequalities influencing adherence to nonsurgical interventions. Further research is needed to better explore this.

Challenges and perspectives of tobacco cessation in special groups of patients and populations

During the first 2 years of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, health systems worldwide were put under extreme pressure, and healthcare professionals had to manage unprecedented health crises as well as provide healthcare services to an increased number of patients. Therefore, public health policies with respect to smoking and education of the general population regarding the harmful effects of active and second-hand smoking may not have received adequate attention during this period. More specifically, certain subpopulations suffering from chronic diseases may not have received adequate information about the effects of smoking on the course and outcome of their disease; high-level, evidence-based pharmaceutical therapies; and the potential for follow-up. However, adequate education and awareness regarding short- and long-term health benefits from smoking cessation for the general population as well as special subgroups remains of utmost importance. Healthcare professionals should understand that it is only through high-quality evidence and results from independent studies that they will be able to provide their expertise and scientific knowledge concerning newer tobacco products and their effects on human health.

Trends, Patterns and Associated User Characteristics of Antidepressant Prescriptions in Older Adults: A Nationwide Descriptive Cohort Study in Denmark

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antidepressant use in older adults (≥ 65 years) is understudied in large population-based samples, particularly in recent years and regarding user characteristics. We aimed to describe the trends, patterns, and associated user characteristics of all antidepressant prescriptions redeemed by older adults at community pharmacies in Denmark during 2015-2019.

METHODS

This register-based study used a cross-sectional design to characterize antidepressant prescription trends and patterns, and a cohort design to describe user characteristics associated with antidepressant prescription initiation. We used descriptive statistics to characterize trends and patterns, and Poisson regression for analyzing user characteristics.

RESULTS

During the years 2015-2019, 17.9% of 1.2 million older adults redeemed 4.84 million antidepressant prescriptions, where 48.5% were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, followed by noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (26.2%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (12.7%), tricyclic antidepressants (11.2%), and others (1.4%). Amitriptyline and nortriptyline, considered potentially inappropriate medications, were among the 10 most frequently redeemed antidepressants. Only 60.5% of prescriptions had a treatment indication of depression. Prescription-proportion trends by drug classes and individual antidepressants remained consistent. A higher incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of initiating antidepressants was associated with female sex (IRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.34), older age (e.g., 81-85 years vs. 65-70 years: IRR 1.74, 95% CI 1.44-2.11), living in rural areas (North Denmark vs. Capital Region: IRR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.58), and having somatic and psychiatric diagnoses (e.g., per one psychiatric diagnosis: IRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15), while a lower ratio was associated with being non-Western (vs. Danish: IRR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.89) and having hospital contacts for psychiatric treatment (per each contact: IRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-1.00).

CONCLUSION

SSRIs were the most commonly redeemed antidepressants, with consistent trends in Danish older adults. Besides clinical conditions, sociodemographics, e.g., sex, age, ethnicity, and place of residence, may influence antidepressant use.

Developments in smoking cessation interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the past 5 years: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Smoking cessation is the most effective strategy for slowing the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, COPD patients find it difficult to quit smoking with standard cessation interventions.

AREAS COVERED

A scoping review of smoking cessation for COPD patients was conducted by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for all studies published between 1 January 2016 and 22 September 2021. Four themes were set up and 47 studies were included eventually. The majority of the included studies (61.7%, 29/47) investigated efficacy and effectiveness, including new strategies for extended treatment and mobile health (mHealth) delivery approach. Studies examining accessibility and utilization (31.9%, 15/47), safety (10.6%, 5/47), and health economics (6.4%, 3/47) were also reviewed. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials was also evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacotherapy combined with behavioral interventions delivered via mHealth may be a promising strategy to help COPD smokers quit. However, the overall quality of the current studies is poor, making it challenging for clinicians to make informed decisions. Future high-quality studies are needed to provide conclusive evidence on the optimal pharmacotherapies and the most cost-effective comprehensive smoking cessation interventions, particularly those integrated into disease management for smokers with COPD.

Vaccination and modern management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) carries a tremendous societal and individual burden, posing significant challenges for public health systems worldwide due to its high morbidity and mortality. Due to aging and multimorbidity but also in the wake of important progress in deciphering the heterogeneous disease endotypes, an individualized approach to the prevention and management of COPD is necessary.

AREAS COVERED

This article tackles relevant immunization strategies that are available or still under development with a focus on the latest evidence but also controversies around different regional immunization approaches. Further, we present the crossover between chronic lung inflammation and lung microbiome disturbance as well as its role in delineating COPD endotypes. Moreover, the article attempts to underline endotype-specific treatment approaches. Lastly, we highlight non-pharmacologic prevention and management programs in view of the challenges and opportunities of the COVID-19 era.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the remaining challenges, personalized medicine has the potential to offer tailored approaches to prevention and therapy and promises to improve the care of patients living with COPD.

National Epidemiological Case-Control Study of Pharmacological Smoking Cessation Treatment in Danish Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive lung disease that is mainly caused by smoking, and most patients with COPD are either former or current smokers. The optimal way to slow down disease progression and reduce overall mortality is for patients to stop smoking. Patients with COPD are known to have lower socio-economic status and to be more nicotine-dependent than most other smokers and therefore face difficulties when attempting to quit smoking. Pharmacological smoking cessation treatment is known to be the most effective. However, the extent to which this treatment is actually offered to Danish smokers with COPD is unknown.

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate if patients with COPD were more likely to redeem a prescription for smoking cessation medication compared with matched controls.

Materials and Methods

The study was designed as a registry-based, non-interventional case-control study. All Danish patients with COPD (ICD-10-code J 44 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) diagnosed between 2009 and 2015 were included (130,797 cases). Controls (252,216) were matched on age, gender and geography. Primary outcome was the number of redeemed prescriptions for smoking cessation medication.

Results

We found that 12% of patients with COPD redeemed a prescription for smoking cessation medication during the eight-year study period. The odds ratio (OR) for redeeming a prescription on smoking cessation medicine was OR 6.22 for patients with COPD compared with their matched controls. We also found that patients with COPD were more likely to redeem smoking cessation medication if they were younger, female or single.

Conclusion

There is substantial room for improvement with respect to pharmacological smoking cessation treatment in Danish patients with COPD. In-depth knowledge of factors contributing to the patients choice of smoking cessation treatment might allow for more personalized guidance of patients with COPD.

Secular trends in smoking in relation to prevalent and incident smoking-related disease: A prospective population-based study

INTRODUCTION

We examined changes in smoking habits in the general population according to prevalence and incidence of chronic diseases affected by smoking.

METHODS

We included 12283 individuals enrolled from 2003 in the Copenhagen General Population Study and re-examined from 2014. Participants were classified as either healthy or suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, diabetes mellitus, heart disease or stroke.

RESULTS

At entry, smoking prevalence was 15.4% in healthy participants, 29.8% with COPD, 15.8% with asthma, 21.7 % with diabetes mellitus, 17.2 % with ischemic heart disease/heart failure and 18.6% in participants with previous stroke. Smoking prevalence declined during the 10 years of observation. Among healthy subjects who developed one of the above mentioned diseases during follow-up, those who developed COPD had the highest initial smoking prevalence (51.5%). Quit rates were highest in those who developed asthma resulting in smoking prevalence of 8.2% versus 27.7% in COPD. After adjustment for age, smoking severity and genotype previously associated with heavy smoking (CHRNA3 rs1051730 AA), significant predictors of quitting were new diagnosis of ischemic heart disease/heart failure (OR=2.33, 95 % CI: 1.61–3.42), new diagnosis of asthma (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.18–2.90) and low number of pack-years.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with prevalent smoking related diseases continued to smoke more than healthy individuals. Incident heart disease and asthma, but not incident COPD, stroke or diabetes were associated with a higher chance of quitting. Special focus on smokers with COPD, asthma, diabetes, stroke and ischemic heart disease/heart failure is warranted to decrease smoking prevalence in these groups. Smokers with a new diagnosis of diabetes, stroke and COPD need special smoking cessation support.