Which Balance Subcomponents Distinguish Between Fallers and Non-Fallers in People with COPD?

Relationship between patient functionality impairment and caregiver burden: is there a cut off point for the severe COPD patient?

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients experience a progressive limitation of their functionality accompanying their clinical evolution. Concretely, severe COPD patients usually require the figure of a caregiver. Caregiver burden has yet to be explored in other similar chronic diseases. The objective is to propose a cutoff point in different functional impairment aspects, to predict the presence of caregiver burden.

METHODS

Severe COPD patients were divided into two groups according to the caregiver burden, measured with the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). The patients were assessed with the London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scale, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).

RESULTS

70 COPD patients and their caregivers were included in this cross-sectional study. The ROC curve indicated a cutoff point of 19 in the LCADL scale (AUC = 0.722). Dependence in daily life activities had a cutoff point of 123 in the FIM (AUC = 0.776). Social participation in activities of daily living had a cutoff point of 37 in the WHODAS 2.0 (AUC = 0.739).

CONCLUSION

Dyspnea related to functional status, dependence in daily life activities, and social participation in activities of daily living of severe COPD patients can predict caretaker burden.

Updated Perspectives on the Role of Biomechanics in COPD: Considerations for the Clinician

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) demonstrate extra-pulmonary functional decline such as an increased prevalence of falls. Biomechanics offers insight into functional decline by examining mechanics of abnormal movement patterns. This review discusses biomechanics of functional outcomes, muscle mechanics, and breathing mechanics in patients with COPD as well as future directions and clinical perspectives. Patients with COPD demonstrate changes in their postural sway during quiet standing compared to controls, and these deficits are exacerbated when sensory information (eg, eyes closed) is manipulated. If standing balance is disrupted with a perturbation, patients with COPD are slower to return to baseline and their muscle activity is differential from controls. When walking, patients with COPD appear to adopt a gait pattern that may increase stability (eg, shorter and wider steps, decreased gait speed) in addition to altered gait variability. Biomechanical muscle mechanics (ie, tension, extensibility, elasticity, and irritability) alterations with COPD are not well documented, with relatively few articles investigating these properties. On the other hand, dyssynchronous motion of the abdomen and rib cage while breathing is well documented in patients with COPD. Newer biomechanical technologies have allowed for estimation of regional, compartmental, lung volumes during activity such as exercise, as well as respiratory muscle activation during breathing. Future directions of biomechanical analyses in COPD are trending toward wearable sensors, big data, and cloud computing. Each of these offers unique opportunities as well as challenges. Advanced analytics of sensor data can offer insight into the health of a system by quantifying complexity or fluctuations in patterns of movement, as healthy systems demonstrate flexibility and are thus adaptable to changing conditions. Biomechanics may offer clinical utility in prediction of 30-day readmissions, identifying disease severity, and patient monitoring. Biomechanics is complementary to other assessments, capturing what patients do, as well as their capability.

Impairment and characteristics of postural control sub-components in people with COPD: a scoping review

Purpose: Impairment of postural control is common in people with COPD. However, the precise characteristics of this alteration are not clearly known. The "Systems Framework for Postural Control" which define postural control sub-components, represents an interesting tool to explore this field. The main aim of this review was to identify which postural control sub-components are impaired in people with COPD and to summarise characteristics for each sub-component. A secondary aim was to precise the relation between postural control and activities of daily living (ADL).Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted, according to the JBI methodology. Medline, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and HAL were searched from inception to May 2022. The search was performed in English and French.Results: Eighty-nine articles were included. There was evidence of a potential impairment for most of the postural control sub-components. Characteristics of every sub-component alteration were heterogeneous. Reduced postural control could be associated with difficulties in ADL.Conclusions: People with COPD may have impairment in a wide range of postural control sub-components. Further research is needed to clarify if a common pattern of modification exits for this alteration and to precise the link with ADL.Implications for rehabilitationImpairment of postural control is a common extra-respiratory manifestation in people with COPD and so clinicians must include it in their clinical reasoning.Numerous postural control sub-components could be altered in people with COPD, suggesting that postural control assessment must be holistic.This scoping review shows that characteristics of postural control impairment are varied and that there may be no common pattern at the COPD population level.The relationship between impaired postural control and activities of daily living remains unclear, but clinicians should be alert to potential negative interactions between these two areas.