Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Asthma-COPD Overlap in Japanese Patients with COPD

Heterogeneity of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap from a cohort of patients with severe asthma and COPD

BACKGROUND

A considerable proportion of patients have features of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) simultaneously, called asthma-COPD overlap (ACO).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify heterogeneity of ACO from a cohort of patients with severe asthma and COPD using the same diagnostic criteria.

DESIGN

We used the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) and the Korean COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) to evaluate clinical characteristics of ACO from each cohort.

METHODS

We classified subjects into four groups: (1) pure severe asthma, (2) ACO from the severe asthma cohort, (3) ACO from the COPD cohort, and (4) pure COPD. ACO was defined by satisfying extreme bronchodilator response (BDR) >15% and 400 ml and/or blood eosinophil count ⩾300 /µL in patients aged 40 years or older and post-BD forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio <0.7.

RESULTS

The ACO group had 25 (23%) of 111 in the ISAR cohort and 403 (23%) of 1781 in the KOCOSS cohort. The ACO from the COPD cohort was older with more males and more smokers, but had similar degree of airflow limitation compared with the ACO from the severe asthma cohort. ICS-containing inhaler treatment was prescribed for all severe asthma subjects, but only for 43.9% of ACO subjects from the COPD cohort. Compared with patients having pure severe asthma, the risk for exacerbation was comparable in ACO either from severe asthma or COPD cohort [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.54, 95% CI: 0.22-10.95 or aOR: 2.15, 95% CI: 0.59-7.85].

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of ACO was similar in severe asthma and COPD cohorts applying identical diagnostic criteria. ACO from the severe asthma cohort was similar to ACO from the COPD cohort in terms of lung function and exacerbation risk.

Clinical Indicators for Asthma-COPD Overlap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Some clinical indicators have been reported to be useful in differentiating asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) from pure asthma/COPD, but the results were inconsistent. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of these indicators for ACO.

Methods

Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid and Web of Science were retrieved. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in random-effects models.

Results

48 eligible studies were included. The pooled results indicated, compared with pure asthma, ACO patients had lower levels of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁)% predicted (pred) (SMD=−1.09, 95% CI −1.3 to −0.87), diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO)% pred (SMD=−0.83, 95% CI −1.24 to −0.42), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (SMD=−0.23, 95% CI −0.36 to −0.11), and higher levels of induced sputum neutrophil (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.81), circulating YKL-40 (SMD = 0.96, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.64). However, relative to COPD alone, ACO patients had higher levels of FEV₁% pred (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.26), DLCO% pred (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.6), FeNO (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.78), serum total immunoglobulin (Ig)E (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.75), blood eosinophil (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.59), induced sputum eosinophil (SMD = 0.62, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83), and lower levels of induced sputum neutrophil (SMD=−0.48, 95% CI −0.7 to −0.27), circulating YKL-40 (SMD=−1.09, 95% CI −1.92 to −0.26).

Conclusion

Compared with pure asthma/COPD, ACO patients have different levels of FEV₁% pred, DLCO% pred, FeNO, serum total IgE, blood eosinophil, induced sputum eosinophil/neutrophil, and circulating YKL-40, which could be helpful to establish a clinical diagnosis of ACO.

Asthma-COPD Overlap: What Are the Important Questions?

Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) is a heterogeneous condition that describes patients who show persistent airflow limitation with clinical features that support both asthma and COPD. Although no single consensus definition exists to diagnose this entity, common major criteria include a strong bronchodilator reversibility or bronchial hyperreactivity, a physician diagnosis of asthma, and a ≥ 10-pack-year cigarette smoking history. The prevalence of ACO ranges from 0.9% to 11.1% in the general population, depending on the diagnostic definition used. Notably, patients with ACO experience greater symptom burden, worse quality of life, and more frequent and severe respiratory exacerbations than those with asthma or COPD. The underlying pathophysiologic features of ACO have been debated. Although emerging evidence supports the role of environmental and inhalational exposures in its pathogenesis among patients with a pre-existing airway disease, biomarker profiling and genetic analyses suggest that ACO may be a heterogeneous condition, but with definable characteristics. Early-life factors including childhood-onset asthma and cigarette smoking may interact to increase the risk of airflow obstruction later in life. For treatment options, the population with ACO historically has been excluded from therapeutic trials; therefore strong, evidence-based recommendations are lacking beyond first-line inhaler therapies. Advanced therapies in patients with ACO are selected according to disease phenotypes and are based on extrapolated data from asthma and COPD. Research focused on defining biomarkers and evidence-based treatment options for ACO is needed urgently.

Current Knowledge of Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO) Genetic Risk Factors, Characteristics, and Prognosis

Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) is a newly identified phenotype of chronic obstructive airway diseases with shared asthma and COPD features. Patients with ACO are poorly defined, and some evidence suggests that they have worse health outcomes and greater disease burden than patients with COPD or asthma. Generally, there is no evidence-based and universal definition for ACO; several consensus documents have provided various descriptions of the phenotype. In addition, the mechanisms underlying the development of ACO are not fully understood. Whether ACO is a distinct clinical entity with its particular discrete genetic determinant different from asthma and COPD alone or an intermediate phenotype with overlapping genetic markers within asthma and COPD spectrum of obstructive airway disease remains unproven. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the genetic risk factors, characteristics, and prognosis of ACO.

Update on Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO): A Narrative Review

Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are well-characterized diseases, they can coexist in a given patient. The term asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) was introduced to describe patients that have clinical features of both diseases and may represent around 25% of COPD patients and around 20% of asthma patients. Despite the increasing interest in ACO, there are still substantial controversies regarding its definition and its position within clinical guidelines for patients with obstructive lung disease. In general, most definitions indicate that ACO patients must present with non-reversible airflow limitation, significant exposure to smoking or other noxious particles or gases, together with features of asthma. In patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD, the identification of ACO has therapeutic implication because the asthmatic component should be treated with inhaled corticosteroids and some studies suggest that the most severe patients may respond to biological agents indicated for severe asthma. This manuscript aims to summarize the current state-of-the-art of ACO. The definitions, prevalence, and clinical manifestations will be reviewed and some innovative aspects, such as genetics, epigenetics, and biomarkers will be addressed. Lastly, the management and prognosis will be outlined as well as the position of ACO in the COPD and asthma guidelines.