1
|
Villar Martínez M, Calvo Manuel E, Aguilar-Shea AL. [COPD inhaled therapy narrative review]. Semergen 2024; 50:102284. [PMID: 38925076 DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
The basis of COPD maintenance treatment is the long-acting bronchodilators and the inhaled corticosteroids. Faced with the recent modifications in the clinical practice guidelines, we have carried out a review of studies that contrast the various therapeutic alternatives and pharmacological agents within each category, with the fundamental purpose of shedding light on which of these options prove to be more effective. Triple therapy stands out as essential in poorly controlled patients or with an eosinophilic phenotype, surpassing dual therapy. However, among the combinations of LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/IC, no drug is observed to be superior in the reviewed evidence. Although triple therapies include corticosteroids, there does not appear to be a significant increase in side effects or pneumonia. Regarding monotherapy with LAMA, no significant differences are seen between the drugs, but in dual therapy with LABA/IC, the budesonide/formoterol combination seems to offer better control than fluticasone/salmeterol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Villar Martínez
- Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.
| | - E Calvo Manuel
- Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España
| | - A L Aguilar-Shea
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Puerta de Madrid, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baker JG, Shaw DE. Asthma and COPD: A Focus on β-Agonists - Past, Present and Future. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2024; 285:369-451. [PMID: 37709918 DOI: 10.1007/164_2023_679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Asthma has been recognised as a respiratory disorder for millennia and the focus of targeted drug development for the last 120 years. Asthma is one of the most common chronic non-communicable diseases worldwide. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, is caused by exposure to tobacco smoke and other noxious particles and exerts a substantial economic and social burden. This chapter reviews the development of the treatments of asthma and COPD particularly focussing on the β-agonists, from the isolation of adrenaline, through the development of generations of short- and long-acting β-agonists. It reviews asthma death epidemics, considers the intrinsic efficacy of clinical compounds, and charts the improvement in selectivity and duration of action that has led to our current medications. Important β2-agonist compounds no longer used are considered, including some with additional properties, and how the different pharmacological properties of current β2-agonists underpin their different places in treatment guidelines. Finally, it concludes with a look forward to future developments that could improve the β-agonists still further, including extending their availability to areas of the world with less readily accessible healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian G Baker
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
- Cell Signalling, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Dominick E Shaw
- Nottingham NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng W, Zhou A, Zeng Y, Lin L, Song Q, Liu C, Zhou Z, Peng Y, Yang M, Yang L, Chen Y, Cai S, Chen P. Prediction of Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with the New Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Group Classification: A Prospective Cohort and a Retrospective Analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2341-2352. [PMID: 37908629 PMCID: PMC10615105 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s429104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The revised Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2023 group ABE classification has undergone major modifications, which can simplify clinical assessment and optimize treatment recommendations for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). However, the predictive value of the new grouping classification for prognosis is worth further exploration. We aimed to compare the prediction of hospitalization and mortality between this new GOLD group 2023 ABE classification and the earlier 2017 ABCD classification in a Chinese COPD cohort. Methods Data from 2,499 outpatients with COPD, who first registered in the RealDTC study of Second Xiangya Hospital from December 2016 to December 2019, were collected prospectively and assessed retrospectively. Patients were followed up on all-cause mortality until October 2022 or death. Results Of the 2,499 patients with COPD, the risk of hospitalization during the first-year follow-up was higher in group E than in groups A and B. The mortality was higher in group E than in groups A and B, and group B was higher than group A. No differences were seen in the area under the curve (AUC) of 2017 vs 2023 GOLD grouping to predict hospitalization. The time-dependent AUC and concordance index for predicting mortality is slightly higher in the GOLD 2017 ABCD than in the 2023 ABE groups. The new GOLD 12-subgroup (1A-4E) classification combining the GOLD 1-4 staging and grouping performed similarly discriminate predictive power for mortality to the GOLD 2017 16-subgroup (A1-4D) classification. Conclusion The risk of hospitalization during the first-year follow-up was higher in group E than in groups A and B. The all-cause mortality increased gradually from GOLD group A to E. The GOLD 2023 classification based on ABE groups did not predict mortality better than the earlier 2017 ABCD classifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Cheng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Aiyuan Zhou
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuqin Zeng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ling Lin
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qing Song
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Cong Liu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zijing Zhou
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yating Peng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Min Yang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lizhen Yang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shan Cai
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Xiangya Hospital; Research Unit of Respiratory Disease; Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Requena G, Czira A, Banks V, Wood R, Tritton T, Castillo C, Yeap J, Wild R, Compton C, Rothnie KJ, Herth FJF, Quint JK, Ismaila AS. Comparative Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium on Moderate-to-Severe Exacerbations in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Clinical Practice in England. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:2039-2054. [PMID: 37731774 PMCID: PMC10508247 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s408688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and increased economic healthcare burden for patients with COPD. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) dual therapy is recommended for patients receiving mono-bronchodilator therapy who experience exacerbations or ongoing breathlessness. This study compared two single-inhaler LAMA/LABA dual therapies, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) and indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY), on moderate-to-severe exacerbation rates in patients with COPD in England. Patients and Methods This retrospective cohort study used linked primary care electronic health record data (Clinical Practice Research Datalink-Aurum) and secondary care data (Hospital Episode Statistics) to assess outcomes for patients with COPD who had a first prescription for single-inhaler UMEC/VI or IND/GLY (index date) between 1 January 2015 and 30 September 2019 (indexing period). Analyses compared UMEC/VI and IND/GLY on moderate-to-severe, moderate, and severe exacerbations, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and direct costs at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and time-to-first on-treatment exacerbation up to 24 months post-index date. Following inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), non-inferiority and superiority of UMEC/VI versus IND/GLY were assessed. Results In total, 12,031 patients were included, of whom 8753 (72.8%) were prescribed UMEC/VI and 3278 (27.2%) IND/GLY. After IPTW, for moderate-to-severe exacerbations, weighted rate ratios were <1 at 6, 12, and 18 months and equal to 1 at 24 months for UMEC/VI; around the null value for moderate exacerbations and <1 at all timepoints for severe exacerbations. UMEC/VI showed lower HCRU incidence rates than IND/GLY for all-cause Accident and Emergency visits and COPD-related inpatient stays and associated all-cause costs at 6 months post-indexing. Time-to-triple therapy was similar for both treatments. Conclusion UMEC/VI demonstrated non-inferiority to IND/GLY in moderate-to-severe exacerbation reduction at 6, 12 and 18 months. These results support previous findings demonstrating similarity between UMEC/VI and IND/GLY on reduction of moderate-to-severe exacerbations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gema Requena
- GSK, R&D Global Medical, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - Victoria Banks
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Robert Wood
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Theo Tritton
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | | | - Jie Yeap
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | - Rosie Wild
- Real-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, Cheshire, UK
| | | | | | - Felix J F Herth
- Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg and Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jennifer K Quint
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang WC, Chen CY, Liao WC, Wu BR, Chen WC, Tu CY, Chen CH, Cheng WC. Differences in Pulmonary Function Improvement after Once-Daily LABA/LAMA Fixed-Dose Combinations in Patients with COPD. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11237165. [PMID: 36498738 PMCID: PMC9739795 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This real-world study evaluated the efficacy of once-daily long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for improving lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients with COPD who were treated with once-daily LABA/LAMA FDCs for 12 months were included. We evaluated their lung function improvement after 12 months of treatment with different LABA/LAMA FDCs. A total of 198 patients with COPD who were treated with once-daily LABA/LAMA FDCs were analyzed. A total of 114 patients were treated with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VIL); 34 patients were treated with indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY); and 50 patients were treated with tiotropium/olodaterol (TIO/OLO). The forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was significantly increased in the patients treated with all three once-daily FDCs (55.2% to 60.9%, p = 0.012 for UMEC/VIL, 58.2% to 63.6%, p = 0.023 for IND/GLY, and 54.1% to 57.7%, p = 0.009 for TIO/OLO). The treatment of COPD patients with TIO/OLO resulted in a significant improvement in both forced vital capacity (FVC%) (71.7% to 77.9%, p = 0.009) and residual volume (RV%) (180.1% to 152.5%, p < 0.01) compared with those treated with UMEC/VIL (FVC%: 75.1% to 81.5%, p < 0.001; RV%:173.8% to 165.2%, p = 0.231) or IND/GLY (FVC%: 73.9% to 79.3%, p = 0.08; RV%:176.8% to 168.3%, p = 0.589). Patients treated with UMEC/VIL or TIO/OLO showed significant improvement in FVC. In addition, those receiving TIO/OLO also showed significant improvement in RV reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Chun Huang
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, North District, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 406, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yu Chen
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, North District, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chih Liao
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, North District, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 406, Taiwan
| | - Biing-Ru Wu
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, North District, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chun Chen
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, North District, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yen Tu
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, North District, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 406, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hung Chen
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, North District, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 406, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (C.-H.C.); (W.-C.C.)
| | - Wen-Chien Cheng
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yude Road, North District, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 406, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (C.-H.C.); (W.-C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weng CF, Wu CC, Wu MH, Lin FJ. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Different Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Long-Acting β 2-Agonists in Patients With COPD. Chest 2022; 163:799-814. [PMID: 36442662 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Researchers have yet to obtain conclusive evidence differentiating among fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) for COPD in terms of real-world clinical outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION What are the differences between available LAMA/LABA FDCs on the risk of acute exacerbation (AE) and cardiovascular events? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study based on a national insurance claims database included patients with COPD ≥ 40 years of age who were newly prescribed glycopyrronium (GLY)/indacaterol (IND), umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI), or tiotropium (TIO)/olodaterol (OLO) FDC between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. Propensity score matching and Cox regression models were used to compare outcomes of AE and cardiovascular events associated with LAMA/LABA FDC treatment. RESULTS Among the 44,498 patients identified and included, 15,586 received GLY/IND, 20,460 received UMEC/VI, and 8,452 received TIO/OLO. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after 1:1 matching of UMEC/VI and GLY/IND, 2:1 matching of UMEC/VI and TIO/OLO, and 2:1 matching of GLY/IND and TIO/OLO. Risk of severe AE was lower among patients treated with UMEC/VI or GLY/IND than among those who received TIO/OLO (UMEC/VI vs TIO/OLO: 17.85 vs 29.32 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; GLY/IND vs TIO/OLO: 15.54 vs 25.53 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88). In addition, GLY/IND users tended to have a lower risk of cardiovascular events than TIO/OLO users, but the difference dissipated when restricting follow up to a shorter duration. INTERPRETATION Our results revealed that the risk of severe AE was lower among patients with COPD receiving UMEC/VI or GLY/IND than among those receiving TIO/OLO, whereas the incidence of cardiovascular events was similar across groups but was slightly lower in GLY/IND users when compared with TIO/OLO users. Further research will be required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Fu Weng
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, Hsinchu; School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu
| | - Chien-Chih Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei; School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - Mei-Hsuan Wu
- Teaching and Research Center, Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, Hsinchu; Precision Medicine Ph.D. Program, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu
| | - Fang-Ju Lin
- Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei; School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei; Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matera MG, Rinaldi B, Belardo C, Cazzola M. Pharmacotherapy of LAMA/LABA inhaled therapy combinations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical overview. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:1269-1281. [DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2134113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gabriella Matera
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Barbara Rinaldi
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmela Belardo
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Cazzola
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|