Safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: current evidence

Efficacy of 8 weeks elbasvir/grazoprevir regimen for naïve-genotype 1b, HCV infected patients with or without glucose abnormalities: Results of the EGG18 study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Direct Acting Antivirals(DAAs) achieve the highest rate of sustained viral response(SVR) in patients with genotype-1b(G1b) Hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection. Reducing treatment duration can simplify the management and improve adherence of therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study evaluates the efficacy of 8 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir regimen in 75 treatment-naïve(TN), G1b patients with mild-moderate fibrosis(Liver Stiffness by Fibroscan® <9.0 kPa). Viral load(VL) has been evaluated by Roche TaqMan RT-PCR(LLOQ<15 IU/ml).

RESULTS

Mean age was 61.0 ± 14.2 years, 44% were male, mean LS by Fibroscan® was 6.1 ± 1.8 kPa. Twenty-eight patients(37.3%) had an HOMA>2.5. Two patients were excluded from analysis(one dropped out and the other one had diagnosed genotype 2c at genotyping by sequencing performed after relapse). At 8 weeks(EOT), 71 out of 73 patients(97.3%) had undetectable HCV-RNA, while in two cases HCV-RNA was detectable but with VL<15 IU/ml. Both of them achieved SVR. Two G1b patients relapsed at 12 weeks of follow-up, both with baseline VL>800,000 IU/ml and HOMA score 1.3 and 3.8 respectively. Both had undetectable HCV VL at 4th week and at the EOT. Modified intention-to-treat SVR12 for G1b patients was 71/73(97.3%).

CONCLUSION

In naïve, genotype-1b HCV-infected patients with mild/moderate liver fibrosis, short course of 8 weeks of EBR/GZR appears to achieve high efficacy regardless of features of insulin resistance.

Efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment for Chinese patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) treatment in Chinese patients with GT1b chronic hepatitis virus C (HCV) infections.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 49 treatment-naive patients with chronic GT1b HCV infection were treated with GZR (100 mg) plus EBR (50 mg) for 12 weeks. The viral response was the primary endpoint and fibrosis stage changes during and after treatment, as well as the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

After 2-week EBR/GZR treatment, the virologic response rate was 85.1% (80/94) and reached 100% (94/94) after 8 and 12 weeks of therapy. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 100% at the 12, 24 and 48-week follow-ups. Multivariate analysis revealed that the baseline viral load of HCV RNA may affect the rapid 2-week virologic response (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.92, P=0.034), but did not influence efficacy during further treatment or follow-ups. Fifteen patients with ≥1 TEAE (16.0%) were observed and 7 (7.4%) and 8 (8.5%) patients had mild ALT or AST elevations (1.1-2.5× BL), but no serious drug-related AEs occurred. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), the AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the fibrosis index based on 4 factor (FIB4) scores were consistently reduced, especially in patients with high baseline assessments after 12 weeks' treatment and during follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

A 12-week EBR/GZR regimen shows high efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with GT1b HCV infections.

Phase 3, Multicenter Open-Label study to investigate the efficacy of elbasvir and grazoprevir fixed-dose combination for 8 weeks in treatment-naïve, HCV GT1b-infected patients, with non-severe fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Genotype 1b is the most common HCV genotype worldwide, accounting for the largest proportion of infections in Europe, Russia, Latin America and Asia. Reducing treatment duration can improve adherence, reduce drug exposure and cost. Accordingly, we evaluated the efficacy of 8 weeks fixed-dose combination of grazoprevir-elbasvir in treatment-naïve patients, with non-severe fibrosis.

METHODS

HCV mono-infected and treatment naïve patients with non-severe fibrosis (Fibroscan^® <9.5 kPa and Fibrotest^®  < 0.59) were enrolled in a study which included 117 patients. Genotyping by sequencing identified five patients with non-1b genotype (two GT1a, one GT1h, one GT1e and one GT1l). Thus, we included in the final analysis 112 GT1b patients. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with HCVRNA below the lower limit of quantification 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12).

FINDINGS

Mean age was 54 ± 13 years, 31% were men and viral load was higher than 800.000 IU/mL in 70 of 112 patients (63%). Using Fibroscan^® , 100 had F0-1 fibrosis score. FIB-4 lower than 1.45 and APRI less than 1 was found in 74/112 (66%) and 107/112 (95%) patients respectively. Relapse occurred in three patients by week 12. These three patients had a viral load higher than 6 million IU/mL and NS5A Y93H RAS (resistance-associated substitution). Then, modified intention-to-treat SVR12 for patients with genotype 1b was 109/112 (97%). By week 24; five relapses were observed and all had the Y93H RAS at relapse. SVR12 was achieved in 100% of patients with a baseline viral load below 6 million and decreased to 98% (98/100) by follow-up week 24.

INTERPRETATION

Naïve patients with genotype 1b and non-severe fibrosis can achieve an SVR12 of 97% and an SVR24 of 95%. Then, these patients can be treated with grazoprevir-elbasvir for 8 weeks.

Real-world experience with Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in the treatment of previously "difficult to treat" patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 and 4

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Grazoprevir/elbasvir (GZR/EBR) was approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 4 infected patients with or without compensated liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to assess GZR/EBR regimen in the real-world experience, particularly in previously "difficult-to-treat" patients with chronic kidney diseases, human immunodeficiency virus-coinfected, cirrhotics, and treatment-experienced.

METHODS

The analysis included patients treated with GZR/EBR selected from 10 152 individuals from the EpiTer-2 database, large national real-world study evaluating antiviral treatment in 22 Polish hepatology centers between 2015 and 2018. Data were completed retrospectively and submitted online.

RESULTS

A total of 1615 patients who started GZR/EBR therapy in 2017 and 2018 with a female predominance (54%) and median age of 54 years were analyzed. The majority were infected with GT1b (89%) and treatment naïve (81%). Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed in 19%, and 70% of patients had comorbidities, of which chronic renal disease was present in 7% and HIV-coinfection in 4%. Overall, a sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved by 95% according to intent-to-treat (ITT) and 98% after exclusion of lost to follow up (modified ITT). No differences were found in cure rate between all included patients and subpopulations previously considered as difficult-to-treat. Majority of patients completed the treatment course as scheduled, adverse events were mostly mild and did not lead to therapy discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

GZR/EBR treatment carried-out in patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and 4 demonstrated good tolerability and an excellent SVR rate with no effectiveness reduction in so called difficult-to-treat populations.

New Drugs for NASH and HIV Infection: Great Expectations for a Great Need

In recent years, there has been an increasing number of clinical trials for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) are commonly excluded from these studies, usually due to concerns over drug-drug interactions associated with antiretroviral therapy. The Steatohepatitis in HIV Emerging Research Network, a group of international experts in hepatology and infectious diseases, discusses our current understanding on the interaction between human immunodeficiency virus and NASH, and the issues related to the inclusion of PLWH in NASH clinical trials. Recent trials addressing NASH treatment in PLWH are discussed. The risk of drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral therapy and aramchol, cenicriviroc, elafibranor, obeticholic acid and resmetirom (MGL-3196), which are currently in phase 3 trials for the treatment of NASH, are reviewed. A model for trial design to include PLWH is proposed, strongly advocating for the scientific community to include this group as a subpopulation within studies.

The efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment in HCV genotype 1 patients in Taiwan

Background

Elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) is a new generation, fixed‐dose, combination antiviral drug used in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 or 4 infection. Our study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of EBR/GZR after its launch in Taiwan.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. Patients who had received EBR/GZR for chronic HCV GT 1 between June 2017 and April 2018 were recruited. Patients’ age, sex, HCV GT, changes in HCV RNA level before and after treatment, sustained virologic response 12 weeks (SVR12) after the cessation of drug administration, side effects, and interaction effects were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety.

Results

A total of 149 patients were recruited. Of them, 145 (97.3%) had HCV GT 1b, and the rest had HCV GT 1a; most of the EBR/GZR‐related side effects in this study were mild. Three participants were discontinued because their alanine transaminase levels were elevated to over 10 times the upper limit of normal. The therapeutic effect analyses revealed a rapid virologic response rate of 95.3% and an SVR12 rate of 98%. Subgroup analyses performed using SVR12 as the outcome variable revealed three demographic factors HCV GT 1, hepatocellular carcinoma medical history, and noncirrhosis plus HCV RNA level.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that EBR/GZR is safe and effective for treating patients with HCV GT 1 and exhibited excellent overall clinical efficacy in Taiwan. The therapeutic effects are unrelated to factors such as sex, HCV RNA level before treatment, and history of liver cirrhosis.

EBR/GZR is safe and effective for HCV GT 1 in Taiwan.

SVR rate is high and compare with western country.

Medication related side effect is mild and tolerable.

There are no significant statistic difference in renal function in each group during the period of treatment and follow‐up.