Palatability and physical properties of potassium-binding resin RDX7675: comparison with sodium polystyrene sulfonate

Consensus statement on the management of hyperkalaemia-An Asia-Pacific perspective

Hyperkalaemia is an electrolyte imbalance that impairs muscle function and myocardial excitability, and can potentially lead to fatal arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The prevalence of hyperkalaemia is estimated to be 6%-7% worldwide and 7%-10% in Asia. Hyperkalaemia frequently affects patients with chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus, particularly those receiving treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. Both hyperkalaemia and interruption of RAAS inhibitor therapy are associated with increased risks for cardiovascular events, hospitalisations, and death, highlighting a clinical dilemma in high-risk patients. Conventional potassium-binding resins are widely used for the treatment of hyperkalaemia; however, caveats such as the unpalatable taste and the risk of gastrointestinal side effects limit their chronic use. Recent evidence suggests that, with a rapid onset of action and improved gastrointestinal tolerability, novel oral potassium binders (e.g., patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) are alternative treatment options for both acute and chronic hyperkalaemia. To optimise the care for patients with hyperkalaemia in the Asia-Pacific region, a multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to review published literature, share clinical experiences, and ultimately formulate 25 consensus statements, covering three clinical areas: (i) risk factors of hyperkalaemia and risk stratification in susceptible patients; (ii) prevention of hyperkalaemia for at-risk individuals; and (iii) correction of hyperkalaemia for at-risk individuals with cardiorenal disease. These statements were expected to serve as useful guidance in the management of hyperkalaemia for health care providers in the region.

Patient Involvement in the Design of an Innovative Clinical Study to Compare the Palatability of Anti-Hyperkalemia Medications

The inclusion of patient representatives as study consultants brings diverse perspectives, insights, and experiences to clinical trial design and execution, and their role in the clinical trial development process is being increasingly recognized and valued. The APPETIZE study evaluated the palatability of, and preference for, three potassium binders for treating hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. A core aspect of the development of this study was the inclusion of a patient representative during the design stage. Here, I describe the process of patient involvement in the APPETIZE study design (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04566653), the resultant positive impacts, and key learnings. A patient with chronic kidney disease was invited to be a member of the APPETIZE trial design team. This patient representative attended study team meetings and provided invaluable input into protocol development, questionnaire selection, design of patient information sheets and consent forms, and primary manuscript structure. These critical insights resulted in an enhanced trial design and generation of high-quality, patient-relevant data. APPETIZE provides an excellent example of a patient preference study that relied on input from multiple stakeholder groups, including, most notably, the patients themselves. This approach may serve as a model for early and deep patient engagement in the design and interpretation of clinical trials.

Randomised, blinded, cross-over evaluation of the palatability of and preference for different potassium binders in participants with chronic hyperkalaemia in the USA, Canada and Europe: the APPETIZE study

OBJECTIVES

Traditional potassium (K+) binders for treating hyperkalaemia are unpalatable and poorly tolerated. Newer K+ binders are reportedly better tolerated; however, no published data describe their palatability, a determinant of long-term adherence. This study evaluated the palatability of and preference for three K+ binders: sodium and calcium polystyrene sulfonate (S/CPS), sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) and calcium patiromer sorbitex (patiromer).

DESIGN

Phase 4, randomised, participant-blinded, cross-over study. Participants were randomised to one of six taste sequences and, using a 'sip and spit' approach, tasted each K+ binder before completing a survey.

SETTING

17 centres across the USA, Canada and European Union.

PARTICIPANTS

144 participants with chronic kidney disease, hyperkalaemia and no recent use of K+ binders.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

For the primary (USA) and key secondary (Canada and European Union) endpoints, participants rated palatability attributes (taste, texture, smell and mouthfeel) and willingness to take each K+ binder on a scale of 0-10 (rational evaluation). Feelings about each attribute, and the idea of taking the product once daily, were evaluated using a non-verbal, visual measure of emotional response. Finally, participants ranked the K+ binders according to palatability.

RESULTS

In each region, SZC and patiromer outperformed S/CPS on overall palatability (a composite of taste, texture, smell and mouthfeel), based on rational evaluation and emotional response. Taking the product once daily was more appealing for SZC and patiromer, creating greater receptivity than the idea of taking S/CPS. The emotional response to mouthfeel had the strongest influence on feelings about taking each product. In each region, a numerically greater proportion of participants ranked SZC as the most preferred K+ binder versus patiromer or S/CPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Preference for more palatable K+ binders such as SZC and patiromer may provide an opportunity to improve adherence to long-term treatment of hyperkalaemia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04566653.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for hyperkalemia among patients with chronic kidney disease or heart failure in Kuwait

INTRODUCTION

Our model was conducted from Kuwaiti payer's perspective to provide evidence on the cost-effectiveness of Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) versus patiromer to correct and maintain serum potassium (K+) in combination with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) with different dose titration in patients with chronic kidney disease/heart failure (CKD/HF) with/without renal replacement therapy (RRT).

METHODOLOGY

The model was developed as a patient-level, fixed-time increment stochastic simulation to simulate the complexity of disease, including multiple coexisting and competing conditional risks. This model was established to compare SZC versus patiromer as a treatment for hyperkalemia (HK) among adult populations with underlying conditions of advanced CKD stages 3a-5 or HF to correct and maintain serum K + over a lifetime horizon. The clinical outcomes of SZC and patiromer were demonstrated through arm-specific K + trajectories extracted from the HARMONIZE trial and OPAL-HK trial, respectively. The utility data was captured from different studies. Direct medical cost was captured from local data from Kuwaiti hospitals. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty in the model.

RESULTS

Within different scenarios of CKD/HF, SZC was a cost-saving option, with/without RRT, whether one-off administration or repeated administration, except for one-off treatment administration among the HF cohort, which generated an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of KWD 331/quality adjusted life year (QALY). The incremental QALY of SZC ranged from 0.007 to 0.202. In addition, the savings observed with SZC fall within a range of KWD -60 to KWD -1,235 at serum K+ ≥ 5.1 mmol/L.

CONCLUSION

The evidence generated by our model recommends the inclusion of SZC as a treatment option to correct HK and maintain normal serum K + level for CKD/HF patients within the Kuwaiti healthcare system. The costs saved from reducing frequent HK episodes, RAASis discontinuation/down titration, major cardiovascular events, and hospitalization offset the drug acquisition cost of SZC.

Practical patient care appraisals with use of new potassium binders in heart failure and chronic kidney diseases

Hyperkalaemia is a life-threatening condition leading to significant morbidity and mortality. It is common in heart failure and in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients due to the diseases themselves, which often coexist, the high co-presence of diabetes, the fluctuations in renal function, and the use of some drugs [i.e. renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors]. Hyperkalaemia limits their administration or uptitration, thus impacting on mortality. New K + binders, namely patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9), are an intriguing option to manage hyperkalaemia in heart failure and/or CKD patients, both to reduce its fatal effects and to let clinicians uptitrate RAAS inhibition. Even if their real impact on strong outcomes is still to be determined, we hereby provide a practical approach to favour their use in routine clinical practice in order to gain the correct confidence and provide an additive tool to heart failure and CKD patients' wellbeing. New trials are welcome to fill the gap in knowledge.

Rationale and design of CONTINUITY: a Phase 4 randomized controlled trial of continued post-discharge sodium zirconium cyclosilicate treatment versus standard of care for hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease

Background

Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) hospitalized with hyperkalemia are at risk of hyperkalemia recurrence and re-hospitalization. We present the rationale and design of CONTINUITY, a study to examine the efficacy of continuing sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC)-an oral, highly selective potassium (K⁺) binder-compared with standard of care (SoC) on maintaining normokalemia and reducing re-hospitalization and resource utilization among participants with CKD hospitalized with hyperkalemia.

Methods

This Phase 4, randomized, open-label, multicenter study will enroll adults with Stage 3b-5 CKD and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m², within 3 months of eligibility screening, hospitalized with a serum potassium (sK⁺) level of >5.0-≤6.5 mmol/L, without ongoing K⁺ binder treatment. The study will include an in-hospital phase, where participants receive SZC for 2-21 days, and an outpatient (post-discharge) phase. At discharge, participants with sK⁺ 3.5-5.0 mmol/L will be randomized (1:1) to SZC or SoC and monitored for 180 days. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of normokalemia at 180 days. Secondary outcomes include incidence and number of hospital admissions or emergency department visits both with hyperkalemia as a contributing factor, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor down-titration. The safety and tolerability of SZC will be evaluated.Ethics approval has been received from all relevant ethics committees. Enrollment started March 2022 and the estimated study end date is December 2023.

Conclusions

This study will assess the potential of SZC versus SoC in managing people with CKD and hyperkalemia post-discharge.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05347693; EudraCT: 2021-003527-14, registered on 19 October 2021.

In pursuit of balance: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and hyperkalaemia treatment

Hyperkalaemia is a life-threatening condition leading to significant morbidity and mortality. It is common in heart failure (HF) patients due to the disease itself, which often co-exists with chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus, the fluctuations in renal function, and the use of some drugs [i.e. renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors]. In particular, hyperkalaemia opposes to their administration or up-titration, thus impacting on mortality. New K+ binders, namely, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, are an intriguing option to manage hyperkalaemia in HF patients, both to reduce its fatal effects and to let clinicians up-titrate RAAS inhibitors. Even if their real impact on strong outcomes is still to be determined, we hereby provide an overview of hyperkalaemia in HF and its current management. New trials are welcome to fill the gap in knowledge.

JE, Wang J, Onishi Y, Yajima T, Sada K, Yamamoto Y, Shibagaki Y. Validation of a new instrument for measuring disease-specific quality of life: A pilot study among patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperkalemia

BACKGROUND

To prepare for a longitudinal study of the effects of potassium-lowering treatment on quality of life (QOL), we quantified the validity of a new disease-specific instrument for measuring QOL, using data from patients who had hyperkalemia (HK) due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) or chronic heart failure, and were also being treated with potassium binders (PBs).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the participants were 98 patients at five outpatient clinics in Japan. The outcome measures were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form (SF-36), a widely used generic measure of QOL, and the Quality of Life Disease-specific Impact Scale (QDIS-7), a recently-developed disease-specific measure of QOL. Internal-consistency reliability was quantified, and factor analysis was done to confirm hypothesized QOL dimensions. Validation tests used two external criteria: CKD stage, and PB formulation. PB formulation was used because different formulations are associated with different degrees of patients' burden. Using a previously-described method, we computed the relative validity (RV) of the two measures.

RESULTS

Two factor scoring of the SF-36 and one factor scoring of the QDIS-7, as standardized from previous studies, were confirmed. The RVs showed that the QDIS-7 was much more valid than the SF-36, for discriminating between groups defined clinically (by CKD stage), and also between groups defined by PB formulation. Reliability was satisfactory: 0.73-0.95 for the SF-36 and 0.86 for the QDIS-7.

CONCLUSIONS

The QDIS-7 with CKD or PB attributions was more valid than the SF-36 for measuring the effects of CKD and of PB formulation on QOL.

Clinical Management of Hyperkalemia

Hyperkalemia is an electrolyte abnormality with potentially life-threatening consequences. Despite various guidelines, no universally accepted consensus exists on best practices for hyperkalemia monitoring, with variations in precise potassium (K⁺) concentration thresholds or for the management of acute or chronic hyperkalemia. Based on the available evidence, this review identifies several critical issues and unmet needs with regard to the management of hyperkalemia. Real-world studies are needed for a better understanding of the prevalence of hyperkalemia outside the clinical trial setting. There is a need to improve effective management of hyperkalemia, including classification and K⁺ monitoring, when to reinitiate previously discontinued renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy, and when to use oral K⁺-binding agents. Monitoring serum K⁺ should be individualized; however, increased frequency of monitoring should be considered for patients with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, heart failure, or a history of hyperkalemia and for those receiving RAASi therapy. Recent clinical studies suggest that the newer K⁺ binders (patiromer sorbitex calcium and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) may facilitate optimization of RAASi therapy. Enhancing the knowledge of primary care physicians and internists with respect to the safety profiles of these newer K⁺ binders may increase confidence in managing patients with hyperkalemia. Lastly, the availability of newer K⁺-binding agents requires further study to establish whether stringent dietary K⁺ restrictions are needed in patients receiving K⁺-binder therapy. Individualized monitoring of serum K⁺ among patients with an increased risk of hyperkalemia and the use of newer K⁺-binding agents may allow for optimization of RAASi therapy and more effective management of hyperkalemia.

Evaluation of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of the Potassium Binder RDX7675 in Mice

INTRODUCTION

Hyperkalemia is a common complication in patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease, particularly those who are taking inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. RDX7675, the calcium salt of a reengineered polystyrene sulfonate-based resin, is a potassium binder that is being investigated as a novel treatment for hyperkalemia. This study evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects of RDX7675 in mice, compared to 2 current treatments, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) and patiromer.

METHODS

Seven groups of 8 male CD-1 mice were given either standard chow (controls) or standard chow containing 4.0% or 6.6% active moiety of RDX7675, patiromer, or SPS for 72 hours. Stool and urine were collected over the final 24 hours of treatment for ion excretion analyses.

RESULTS

RDX7675 increased stool potassium (mean 24-hour excretion: 4.0%, 9.19 mg; 6.6%, 18.11 mg; both P < .0001) compared with controls (4.47 mg) and decreased urinary potassium (mean 24-hour excretion: 4.0%, 12.05 mg, P < .001; 6.6%, 6.68 mg, P < .0001; vs controls, 20.38 mg). The potassium-binding capacity of RDX7675 (stool potassium/gram of resin: 4.0%, 1.14 mEq/g; 6.6%, 1.32 mEq/g) was greater (all P < .0001) than for patiromer (4.0%, 0.63 mEq/g; 6.6%, 0.48 mEq/g) or SPS (4.0%, 0.73 mEq/g; 6.6% 0.55 mEq/g). RDX7675 and patiromer decreased urinary sodium (mean 24-hour excretion: 0.07-1.38 mg; all P < .001) compared to controls (5.01 mg). In contrast, SPS increased urinary sodium excretion (4.0%, 13.31 mg; 6.6%, 17.60 mg; both P < .0001) compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

RDX7675 reduced intestinal potassium absorption and had a greater potassium-binding capacity than patiromer or SPS in mice. The calcium-based resins RDX7675 and patiromer reduced intestinal sodium absorption, unlike sodium-based SPS. These results support further studies in humans to confirm the potential of RDX7675 for the treatment of patients with hyperkalemia.