1
|
Boz AAE, Çelik E, Atum M, Çakır B, Aksoy NÖ, Özmen S, Doğan E, Yuvacı İ. Use of a dexamethasone implant to treat macular edema following pars plana vitrectomy and removal of the primary epiretinal membrane. Int Ophthalmol 2024; 44:340. [PMID: 39102035 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03258-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant for the treatment of macular edema (ME) following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and removal of the primary epiretinal membrane (ERM) and to assess the impact of the integrity of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and disorganization of the retinal inner layer (DRIL) grade on visual and anatomical outcomes. METHODS Forty-two pseudophakic patients who developed ME following PPV and removal of the primary stage 2-3 ERM were included. Patients were divided into two groups when ME was diagnosed via spectral domain optic coherence tomography (SD-OCT). In the DEX group (n = 22), DEX was implanted for the treatment of ME. In the control group (n = 20), only observation was conducted, without any treatment. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular thickness (MT) of the two groups were compared at baseline and 1, 6, and 12 months after DEX implantation. The effects of OCT parameters such as EZ integrity and DRIL grade were also evaluated in terms of decreases in MT and increases in VA in the treatment of ME with DEX implantation. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of DEX implantations and adverse effects were also recorded. RESULTS While a statistically significant increase in the mean BCVA was observed in the DEX group (p < 0.001 at months 1, 6, and 12, respectively), no such increase was detected in the control group (p = 0.169, p = 0.065, and p = 0.058 at months 1, 6 and 12, respectively) compared with the baseline. A statistically significant decrease in the mean MT was observed in the DEX group (p < 0.001 at months 1, 6, and 12); however, no significant difference was observed in the control group (p = 0.081, p = 0.065, and p = 0.054 at months 1, 6 and 12, respectively) compared with the baseline. Significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the increase in BCVA (p < 0.01) and decrease in MT (p < 0.01) at all visits, with the outcomes being more favorable in the DEX group. A statistically significant relationship was found between the increase in VA and EZ integrity and DRIL grade in both groups. Ten patients (45.4%) received two injections of DEX during the follow-up. An increase in IOP was observed in five patients (22.7%) who were treated with topical antiglaucomatous drops. No significant side effects were observed. CONCLUSION DEX implantation was found to be effective and safe for the treatment of ME following PPV and primary ERM removal, although some eyes may require repeated injections to achieve visual and anatomical success. Additionally, a relationship was found between EZ integrity, DRIL grade and visual-anatomical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Altan Ertan Boz
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Korucuk street, Korucuk, Adapazarı, 54290, Sakarya, Turkey.
| | - Erkan Çelik
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Korucuk street, Korucuk, Adapazarı, 54290, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Atum
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Korucuk street, Korucuk, Adapazarı, 54290, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Burçin Çakır
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Korucuk street, Korucuk, Adapazarı, 54290, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Nilgün Özkan Aksoy
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Korucuk street, Korucuk, Adapazarı, 54290, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Sedat Özmen
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Korucuk street, Korucuk, Adapazarı, 54290, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Emine Doğan
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Korucuk street, Korucuk, Adapazarı, 54290, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - İsa Yuvacı
- Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Korucuk street, Korucuk, Adapazarı, 54290, Sakarya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luan R, Wang M, Gong Y, Liu B, Huang X, Wang J, Sun S, Zhao J, Chen X, Yang Q, Liu J, Shao Y, Li X. Optical coherence tomography biomarkers as outcome predictors to guide dexamethasone implant use in patients with iERM: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Ophthalmol 2024; 24:193. [PMID: 38664679 PMCID: PMC11044407 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03429-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the anatomical features of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and vitreous cytokine levels as predictors of outcomes of combined phacovitrectomy with intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) treatment. METHODS A prospective, single-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial included 48 eyes. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo the DEX group (combined phacovitrectomy with ERM peeling and Ozurdex implantation) and control group (phacovitrectomy only). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were assessed at 1 d, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. The structural features of OCT before surgery were analysed for stratified analysis. Baseline soluble CD14 (sCD14) and sCD163 levels in the vitreous fluid were measured using ELISA. RESULTS BCVA and CMT were not significantly different in the DEX and control groups. Eyes with hyperreflective foci (HRF) at baseline achieved better BCVA (Ptime*group=0.746; Pgroup=0.043, Wald χ²=7.869) and lower CMT (Ptime*group = 0.079; Pgroup = 0.001, Wald χ²=6.774) responses to DEX during follow-up. In all patients, the mean vitreous level of sCD163 in eyes with HRF was significantly higher than that in eyes without HRF (P = 0.036, Z=-2.093) at baseline. In the DEX group, higher sCD163 predicted greater reduction in CMT from baseline to 1 month (r = 0.470, P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS We found that intraoperative DEX implantation did not have beneficial effects on BCVA and CMT over a 3-month period in all patients with iERM, implying that the use of DEX for all iERM is not recommended. In contrast, for those with HRF on OCT responded better to DEX implants at the 3-month follow-up and thier vitreous fluid expressed higher levels of sCD163 at baseline. These data support the hypothesis that DEX implants may be particularly effective in treating cases where ERM is secondary to inflammation. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trail has been registered at Chinese Clinical Trail Registry( https://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 2021/03/12 (ChiCTR2100044228). And all patients in the article were enrolled after registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Luan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Manqiao Wang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Yi Gong
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Boshi Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Xinyuan Huang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Shuo Sun
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Jinzhi Zhao
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiteng Chen
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Qianhui Yang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Juping Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China
| | - Yan Shao
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China.
| | - Xiaorong Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, 384300, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baldascino A, Carlà MM, Vielmo L, Gambini G, Marzano FC, Margollicci F, D’Onofrio NC, Rizzo S. Microvascular Changes after Epiretinal Membrane Vitrectomy with Intraoperative Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: An OCT Angiography Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:411. [PMID: 38396450 PMCID: PMC10888329 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to explore microvascular changes evaluated with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with intravitreal Ozurdex implantation, compared with standard PPV. (2) Methods: Prospective interventional analysis on 25 eyes undergoing PPV + Ozurdex (Group A) and 25 eyes undergoing PPV alone. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCTA parameters, such as vessel density (VD) of the superficial and deep capillary plexi (SCP and DCP) in the whole 6.4 mm × 6.4 mm and fovea area, were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months after surgery. (3) Results: Postoperative BCVA significantly improved in both groups. No cases of post-operative cystoid macular edema (CME) were reported in Group A vs. two eyes in Group B. In Group A we found a statistically significant increase of SCP's VD in either the whole image (from 42.1 ± 4.1 to 45.6 ± 4.3%, p = 0.01) and the fovea image (from 38.5 ± 7.5 to 41.7 ± 4.2%, p = 0.03). In Group B, we reported no significant variations in the SCP's VDs. In the DCP, VD significantly increased only in the whole image in Group A. Stage 4 ERMs showed the greatest improvement in VD, especially in Group A. (4) Conclusions: Intraoperative Ozurdex prompted a significant BCVA recovery and limited the occurrence of postoperative CME compared to the standard procedure. Moreover, Ozurdex implant is associated with a better restoration of microvascular structure in SCP and DCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Baldascino
- Ophthalmology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.G.); (F.M.); (N.C.D.); (S.R.)
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore”, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Mario Carlà
- Ophthalmology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.G.); (F.M.); (N.C.D.); (S.R.)
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore”, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Vielmo
- Ophthalmology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.G.); (F.M.); (N.C.D.); (S.R.)
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore”, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gloria Gambini
- Ophthalmology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.G.); (F.M.); (N.C.D.); (S.R.)
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore”, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Margollicci
- Ophthalmology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.G.); (F.M.); (N.C.D.); (S.R.)
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore”, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Claudio D’Onofrio
- Ophthalmology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.G.); (F.M.); (N.C.D.); (S.R.)
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore”, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Stanislao Rizzo
- Ophthalmology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (G.G.); (F.M.); (N.C.D.); (S.R.)
- Ophthalmology Unit, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore”, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nie Z, Li W, Duan N, Wei J, Zhang X, Guo H, Bai S, Li X, Hu B. Changes in optical coherence tomography biomarkers in eyes with advanced idiopathic epiretinal membrane treated with dexamethasone implantation. BMC Ophthalmol 2024; 24:54. [PMID: 38308204 PMCID: PMC10837986 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03312-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effects of vitrectomy and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implantation on retinal biomarkers in patients with advanced idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IERM) and to evaluate this treatment's anatomical and functional outcomes. METHODS This retrospective study included 41 patients with advanced IERM who underwent vitrectomy and were divided into a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) group (20 eyes) and a dexamethasone (DEX) group (21 eyes) based on intravitreal DEX implantation. We collected data on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), subretinal fluid, intraretinal cystoid changes (IRC), integrity of the inner-outer segment layer, and intraocular pressure. RESULTS BCVA improved significantly in both groups; the DEX group had a higher visual acuity gain at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.002 and 0.023, respectively). Postoperative CMT gradually decreased in both groups, with the DEX group showing a greater decrease at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.009 and 0.033, respectively). Six months after surgery, the DRIL and IRC grades in the DEX group were significantly improved compared to those in the PPV group (P = 0.037 and 0.038, respectively). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that patients with intraoperative DEX implants were more likely to have a significant CMT reduction (≥ 100 μm) from baseline (odds ratio (OR), 9.44; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.58-56.56; P = 0.014) at 6 months and less likely to exhibit DRIL at 6 months postoperatively (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68; P = 0.021). CONCLUSION Vitrectomy combined with intravitreal DEX implantation facilitates the recovery of postoperative visual acuity and improvement of anatomical outcomes in patients with advanced IERM, effectively reducing CMT and improving DRIL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zetong Nie
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Wenbo Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Naxin Duan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Jiaoting Wei
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Xiang Zhang
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Haoxin Guo
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Siqiong Bai
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Xiaorong Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China
| | - Bojie Hu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, No. 251, Fukang Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300384, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li S, Zeng Q, Zhu L, Liu W, Li Y, Li J, Li X, Zhao M, Qu J. Intraoperative slow-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in epiretinal membrane peeling surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1219861. [PMID: 37727387 PMCID: PMC10505737 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1219861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of the dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant for the regression of macular edema and the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after the removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial recruited 81 patients with idiopathic ERM. These patients all underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy combined with ERM and internal limiting membrane peeling surgery. Among them, 41 eyes in the DEX group received additional DEX implants and 40 in the non-DEX group did not. Outcomes including central retinal thickness (CRT), BCVA, and intraocular pressure were measured 1 and 3 months after surgery. Results: The DEX group had thinner CRTs compared to the non-DEX group at 1 month postoperatively (p <0.05), but did not differ significantly at the 1-week and 3-month follow-up visits (p = 0.109 and p = 0.417, respectively). There were no statistical differences with respect to BCVA (p = 0.499, 0.309, 0.246, and 0.517, respectively) and intraocular pressure (p = 0.556, 0.639, 0.741, and 0.517, respectively) between the two groups at each point of follow-up visits. Conclusion: DEX accelerated the reduction of CRT at 1 month after surgery. However, no evidence of further anatomical (CRT) or functional (BCVA) benefits using DEX was observed at 3 months. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05416827.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jinfeng Qu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Retinal and Choroid Diseases, College of Optometry, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pignatelli F, Niro A, Fallico M, Passidomo F, Gigliola S, Nacucchi A, Bonfiglio V, Reibaldi M, Addabbo G, Avitabile T. Mid-term safety and effectiveness of macular peeling one month after intravitreal dexamethasone implant for tractional diabetic macular edema. Sci Rep 2023; 13:5990. [PMID: 37045880 PMCID: PMC10097727 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32780-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Macular peeling combined or followed by intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-i) was recommended as an efficacy approach for tractional diabetic macular edema (tDME). Knowing the synergistic effect of cataract surgery and DEX-i one month earlier in eyes with DME, we compared Epiretinal Membrane/Inner Limiting Membrane (ERM/ILM) peeling preceded by DEX-i one month before versus ERM/ILM peeling alone for the treatment of tDME. A retrospective study on patients affected by tDME who underwent ERM/ILM peeling one month after DEX-i (n = 11; Group A) or ERM/ILM peeling alone (n = 10; Group B) was performed. Longitudinal comparison of best-correct visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) between the time of surgery (T0) and each time point (months 1,3,5,6) within and among the groups were assessed. To evaluate the repeated measurements of BCVA, CRT, and IOP, a linear mixed-effects model was used. In Group A, DEX-i significantly improved mean BCVA and CRT (P < 0.001) just after 1 month (T0). After ERM/ILM peeling, mean BCVA and CRT significantly improved from month 1 in Group A and month 3 in Group B. Mixed model revealed a significant difference in BCVA (P ≤ 0.0001) and CRT (P ≤ 0.02) at different time-points among the groups with better results in Group A. Neither complications nor uncontrolled IOP increase was detected. ERM/ILM peeling confirmed its effectiveness in treating tDME. DEX-i performed one month before surgery seemed to be a safe approach and ensured a greater and faster recovery considering functional and tomographic parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pignatelli
- Eye Clinic, Hospital "SS. Annunziata", ASL TA, Via F. Bruno, 1, 74010, Taranto, Italy
| | - Alfredo Niro
- Eye Clinic, Hospital "SS. Annunziata", ASL TA, Via F. Bruno, 1, 74010, Taranto, Italy.
| | - Matteo Fallico
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Fedele Passidomo
- Eye Clinic, Hospital "SS. Annunziata", ASL TA, Via F. Bruno, 1, 74010, Taranto, Italy
| | - Samuele Gigliola
- Eye Clinic, Hospital "SS. Annunziata", ASL TA, Via F. Bruno, 1, 74010, Taranto, Italy
| | - Annalisa Nacucchi
- Eye Clinic, Hospital "SS. Annunziata", ASL TA, Via F. Bruno, 1, 74010, Taranto, Italy
| | - Vincenza Bonfiglio
- Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Michele Reibaldi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Addabbo
- Eye Clinic, Hospital "SS. Annunziata", ASL TA, Via F. Bruno, 1, 74010, Taranto, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Macular Surgery: Classification, Management and Surgical Techniques. J Ophthalmol 2023; 2023:9891345. [PMID: 36700117 PMCID: PMC9870682 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9891345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
|
8
|
Fallico M, Maugeri A, Romano GL, Bucolo C, Longo A, Bonfiglio V, Russo A, Avitabile T, Barchitta M, Agodi A, Pignatelli F, Marolo P, Ventre L, Parisi G, Reibaldi M. Epiretinal Membrane Vitrectomy With and Without Intraoperative Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:635101. [PMID: 33935724 PMCID: PMC8082723 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.635101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of vitrectomy combined with intravitreal dexamethasone implant vs. vitrectomy without the implant in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Studies that compared ERM vitrectomy with and without intraoperative dexamethasone implant with a follow-up ≥3 months were included. The primary outcome was mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change between eyes undergoing ERM vitrectomy combined with dexamethasone implant (DEX group) and eyes undergoing ERM vitrectomy alone (control group) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included mean BCVA change at 6 months and mean optical coherence tomography central macular thickness (CMT) change at both 3-months and 6-months follow-up. Mean differences (MDs) with their 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated. Meta-analyses were based either on random effect model or fixed effect model according to heterogeneity. Results: Four studies were included. At 3 months, ERM vitrectomy combined with dexamethasone implant yielded a greater visual gain compared to vitrectomy alone (MD = 9.7; 95%CI = 2.6–16.8; p = 0.01). However, significant heterogeneity was found. A sensitivity analysis excluding the only retrospective non-randomized study confirmed a greater visual gain in the DEX group (MD = 7.1; 95%CI = 2.7–11.6; p < 0.01), with no heterogeneity. At 6 months, a non-significant but borderline difference in visual gain was shown between in the two groups (MD = 5.1; 95%CI = −0.3–10.5; p = 0.06), with no heterogeneity. Three-month analysis of CMT revealed a greater reduction in the DEX group (MD = −80.2; 95%CI =−149.1–11.2; p = 0.02), but with significant heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis excluding the only retrospective non-randomized study allowed to reduce heterogeneity, but no difference in 3-months CMT change was found between the two groups (MD = −50.0; 95%CI = −106.2–6.2; p = 0.08). At 6 months, no difference in CMT change was shown between the two groups (MD = −48.5; 95%CI = −120.5–23.5; p = 0.19), with significant heterogeneity. Conclusions: Intraoperative dexamethasone implant in eyes undergoing vitrectomy for ERM provided a better visual outcome at 3 months compared to ERM vitrectomy without the implant, with limited evidence of better anatomic outcome as well. Further studies are needed to ascertain whether dexamethasone implant would ensure a significant long-term visual benefit as a result of a faster reduction of macular thickening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Fallico
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Andrea Maugeri
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanni L Romano
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Center for Research in Ocular Pharmacology-CERFO, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Claudio Bucolo
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Center for Research in Ocular Pharmacology-CERFO, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Longo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Vincenza Bonfiglio
- Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Ophthalmology Section, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Russo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Martina Barchitta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonella Agodi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Paola Marolo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Ventre
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Parisi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Reibaldi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic Section, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Iovino C, Peiretti E, Giannaccare G, Scorcia V, Carnevali A. Evolving Treatment Paradigm in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Era of COVID-19. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:670468. [PMID: 33912065 PMCID: PMC8072466 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.670468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Iovino
- Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Enrico Peiretti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Scorcia
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Adriano Carnevali
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Savastano A, Bitossi A, Giansanti F, Vannozzi L, Caporossi T, Barca F, Virgili G, Gambini G, De Vico U, Bernardinelli P, Savastano MC, Rizzo S. Evaluation of intraoperative slow-release dexamethasone implant combined with idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020; 259:379-385. [PMID: 32892264 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04911-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative slow-release dexamethasone implant (DEX) combined with removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS In this observational retrospective study, data of 40 patients with phakic eyes affected by idiopathic ERM were analysed. All patients underwent cataract phacoemulsification, 25-gauge (G) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), ERM removal with DEX implant ("DEX YES" group, #20) or without DEX implant ("DEX NO" group, #20). We collected data on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) < 20/40 Snellen charts, central macular thickness (CMT) ≤ 400 μm (measured by SD-OCT) and integrity of sub-foveal ellipsoid/myoid zone. BCVA, CMT and intraocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated at baseline as well as 15, 30 and 90 days after surgery. RESULTS In the "DEX YES" group, statistically significant BCVA improvement was observed at 15, 30 and 90 days (p < 0.001), while in the "DEX NO" group, improvements were observed only at 30 and 90 days (p < 0.001). In both groups, CMT significantly decreased at each follow-up visit (p < 0.001), and no statistically significant increase of IOP was detected at each follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS In this study, DEX accelerated the improvement of BCVA at 15 days after surgery. However, no evidence of further anatomical (CMT) and functional (BCVA) DEX effectiveness combined with removal of idiopathic ERM by 25-G PPV at 30 and 90 days follow-up was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Savastano
- Unit of Ophthalmology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- Catholic University of "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
| | - Alice Bitossi
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Giansanti
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Vannozzi
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Tomaso Caporossi
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Barca
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gianni Virgili
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gloria Gambini
- Unit of Ophthalmology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto De Vico
- Unit of Ophthalmology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizio Bernardinelli
- Unit of Ophthalmology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Savastano
- Unit of Ophthalmology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy
| | - Stanislao Rizzo
- Unit of Ophthalmology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy
- Consiglio Nazionale della Ricerca (CNR), Istituto di Neuroscienze, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iovino C, Mastropasqua R, Lupidi M, Bacherini D, Pellegrini M, Bernabei F, Borrelli E, Sacconi R, Carnevali A, D’Aloisio R, Cerquaglia A, Finocchio L, Govetto A, Erba S, Triolo G, Di Zazzo A, Forlini M, Vagge A, Giannaccare G. Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant as a Sustained Release Drug Delivery Device for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Pharmaceutics 2020; 12:pharmaceutics12080703. [PMID: 32722556 PMCID: PMC7466091 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12080703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug delivery into the vitreous chamber remains a great challenge in the pharmaceutical industry due to the complex anatomy and physiology of the eye. Intravitreal injection is the mainstream route of drug administration to the posterior segment of the eye. The purpose of this review is to assess the current literature about the widening use of the intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (Dex) implant, and to provide a comprehensive collection of all the ocular disorders that benefit from Dex administration. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth-factors (VEGFs) have been largely indicated as a first-choice level, the Dex implant represents an important treatment option, especially in selected cases, such as vitrectomized eyes or patients in whom anti-VEGF failed or are contraindicated. In this article, the safety profile as well as the list of the possible complications related to intravitreal Dex injection are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Iovino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-070-609-2319
| | - Rodolfo Mastropasqua
- Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy;
| | - Marco Lupidi
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (M.L.); (A.C.)
- Fondazione per la Macula Onlus, DINOMGI., University Eye Clinic, 16132 Genova, Italy
- Centre de l’Odéon, 113 Boulevard St Germain, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Daniela Bacherini
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, 50139 Florence, Italy; (D.B.); (L.F.)
| | - Marco Pellegrini
- Ophthalmology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Federico Bernabei
- Ophthalmology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.P.); (F.B.)
| | - Enrico Borrelli
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital San Raffaele, University Vita Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.B.); (R.S.)
| | - Riccardo Sacconi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital San Raffaele, University Vita Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (E.B.); (R.S.)
| | - Adriano Carnevali
- Department of Ophthalmology, University “Magna Graecia,” 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (A.C.); (G.G.)
| | - Rossella D’Aloisio
- Department of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy;
| | - Alessio Cerquaglia
- Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 06129 Perugia, Italy; (M.L.); (A.C.)
| | - Lucia Finocchio
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, 50139 Florence, Italy; (D.B.); (L.F.)
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London EC1V2PD, UK
| | - Andrea Govetto
- Fatebenefratelli-Oftalmico Hospital, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 63631 Milan, Italy; (A.G.); (S.E.); (G.T.)
- Bristol Eye Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS12LX, UK
| | - Stefano Erba
- Fatebenefratelli-Oftalmico Hospital, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 63631 Milan, Italy; (A.G.); (S.E.); (G.T.)
| | - Giacinto Triolo
- Fatebenefratelli-Oftalmico Hospital, ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, 63631 Milan, Italy; (A.G.); (S.E.); (G.T.)
| | - Antonio Di Zazzo
- Ophthalmology Complex Operative Unit, Campus Bio Medico University Hospital, 00128, Rome, Italy;
| | | | - Aldo Vagge
- University Eye Clinic, DINOGMI, Polyclinic Hospital San Martino IRCCS, 16132 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Giannaccare
- Department of Ophthalmology, University “Magna Graecia,” 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (A.C.); (G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|