The Association of Syntax Score with Levels of Lipoprotein(a) and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Different Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels

Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are independently associated with the presence of significant coronary stenosis in de-novo patients with stable chest pain

BACKGROUND

The role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) in the risk-assessment of patients with de-novo stable chest pain is sparsely investigated. We assessed the association between Lp(a) concentration and the presence of coronary stenosis on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography in a broad population of patients referred with stable chest pain.

METHODS

Lp(a) measurements and coronary CT angiography were performed in 4,346 patients with stable chest pain and no previous history of coronary artery disease. The patients were included in the trial program, the Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary artery disease, Dan-NICAD. The prevalence and odds ratios for stenosis were calculated comparing normal Lp(a) (< 20 nmol/l) with moderately elevated (20 to <125 nmol/l), high (125 to <200 nmol/l), and very high (≥200 nmol/l) Lp(a) concentrations in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 2,418 (55.6%), 1,276 (29.4%), 425 (9.8%), and 227 (5.2%) patients had normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a) levels, respectively. The prevalences of coronary stenosis increased with increasing Lp(a) concentration (n = 569 (23.5%), n = 328 (25.7%), n = 129 (30.4%), and n = 77 (33.9%) in patients with normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a), respectively). Likewise, the prevalence of patients with multivessel disease increased with increasing Lp(a) concentration (n = 252 (10.4%), n = 149 (11.7%), n = 61 (14.4%), and n = 41 (18.1%) in patients with normal, moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a), respectively). In an unadjusted model, odds ratios for stenosis increased with increasing Lp(a) concentrations odds ratio 95% CI: 1.12 (0.96-1.31), 1.42 (1.13-1.77), and 1.67 (1.24-2.22) for moderately elevated, high, and very high Lp(a) versus normal Lp(a), respectively). Adjustment for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors did not affect the association.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable, symptomatic patients without established coronary artery disease, Lp(a) levels are positively associated with the presence of coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography. These findings may warrant using Lp(a) in the diagnostic management of patient with suspected coronary artery disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The 3 studies within the Dan-NICAD program are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: Dan-NICAD, NCT02264717, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02264717?term=dan-nicad&rank=1. Dan-NICAD 2, NCT03481712, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03481712?term=dan-nicad&rank=3. Dan-NICAD 3, NCT04707859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04707859?term=dan-nicad&rank=2.

Role of LipoprotEin(a) in CardiovascuLar diseases and premature acute coronary syndromes (RELACS study): Impact of Lipoprotein(a) levels on the premature coronary event and the severity of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] emerging as a significant risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the role and the impact of Lp(a) in the early formation and progression of complex CAD remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Lp(a) levels on the age of first acute coronary events and CAD severity in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The RELACS study, a single-center prospective observational study that included 774 consecutive ACS patients. Lp(a) levels were measured and stratified into tertiles. Primary endpoint was the correlation between Lp(a) levels and the age of first acute coronary event. Secondary endpoint was correlation between Lp(a) levels and CAD complexity (SYNTAX I and Gensini scores). The mean (SD) age was 63.2 (12.6) years and 603 (78 %) were males. The clinical presentations included 40.1 % of patients with STEMI, 46.9 % with NSTEMI, and 13 % with unstable angina. Median baseline Lp(a) level was 21.85 mg/dL. Higher Lp(a) levels were linked to a younger age of the first coronary event (B coefficient -0.83, p = 0.002). Positive correlations were found between Lp(a) levels and Gensini (r = 0.16, p = 0.011) and SYNTAX scores (r = 0.14, p = 0.004). Each tertile increase in Lp(a) corresponded to an 8.01-point increase in Gensini score (p = 0.019) and a 2.92-point increase in SYNTAX score (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with earlier onset and greater complexity of CAD in ACS patients. These findings suggest Lp(a) is a critical risk factor for early atherogenesis and may require aggressive lipid-lowering strategies in primary prevention settings.

Lipoprotein(a) as an Independent Predictor of Elevated SYNTAX Score

Background/Objectives: Increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level is associated with elevated possibility of atherosclerosis progression. SYNTAX score enables to grade the anatomy of coronary arteries. To identify the impact of increased Lp(a) level on SYNTAX score in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: In our analysis, we enrolled 173 consecutive adult patients hospitalized for AMI in a tertiary cardiology center from December 2022 to August 2023. Patient characteristics were compared for patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 (64 patients) and SYNTAX score < 23 (109 patients). The SYNTAX score was estimated based on the results of coronary angiography. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with SYNTAX score. Results: Individuals with the SYNTAX score ≥ 23 were more likely to have arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, significant stenosis in the left main coronary artery, and higher Lp(a) levels than those with SYNTAX < 23 (all p < 0.05). On univariate analysis, age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, p = 0.001), Lp(a) levels (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.001), and arterial hypertension (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.26-5.74, p = 0.011) were associated with SYNTAX score ≥ 23. Multivariable determinants of SYNTAX score ≥ 23 were as follows: Lp(a) levels (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.029), and age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.005). The cut-off value for Lp(a) 166.16 nmol/L identifies patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 with 97% sensitivity and 44% specificity (area under curve 0.78, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) concentration is associated with a higher SYNTAX score. A cut-off value of Lp(a) above 166.16 nmol/L allows us to identify subjects with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 with good specificity and sensitivity.

Impact of elevated lipoprotein(a) on coronary artery disease phenotype and severity

AIMS

A thorough characterization of the relationship between elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery disease (CAD) is lacking. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the association of increasing Lp(a) levels and CAD severity in a real-world population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This non-interventional, cross-sectional, LipidCardio study included patients aged ≥21 years undergoing angiography (October 2016-March 2018) at a tertiary cardiology centre, who have at least one Lp(a) measurement. The association between Lp(a) and CAD severity was determined by synergy between PCI with taxus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX)-I and Gensini scores and angiographic characteristics. Overall, 975 patients (mean age: 69.5 years) were included; 70.1% were male, 97.5% had Caucasian ancestry, and 33.2% had a family history of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Median baseline Lp(a) level was 19.3 nmol/L. Patients were stratified by baseline Lp(a): 72.9% had < 65 nmol/L, 21.0% had ≥100 nmol/L, 17.2% had ≥125 nmol/L, and 12.9% had ≥150 nmol/L. Compared with the normal (Lp(a) < 65 nmol/L) group, elevated Lp(a) groups (e.g. ≥ 150 nmol/L) had a higher proportion of patients with prior CAD (48.4% vs. 62.7%; P < 0.01), prior coronary revascularization (39.1% vs. 51.6%; P = 0.01), prior coronary artery bypass graft (6.0% vs. 15.1%; P < 0.01), vessel(s) with lesions (68.5% vs. 81.3%; P = 0.03), diffusely narrowed vessels (10.9% vs. 16.5%; P = 0.01) or chronic total occlusion lesions (14.3% vs. 25.2%; P < 0.01), and higher median SYNTAX-I (3.0 vs. 5.5; P = 0.01) and Gensini (10.0 vs. 16.0; P < 0.01) scores.

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) was associated with a more severe presentation of CAD. Awareness of Lp(a) levels in patients with CAD may have implications in their clinical management.

Redox Status and Telomere-Telomerase System Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Using a Principal Component Analysis: Is There a Link?

In the present study, we examined redox status parameters in arterial and venous blood samples, its potential to predict the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients assessed through its impact on the comprehensive grading SYNTAX score, and its clinical accuracy. Potential connections between common blood biomarkers, biomarkers of redox status, leukocyte telomere length, and telomerase enzyme activity in the acute myocardial infarction burden were assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). This study included 92 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Significantly higher levels of advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), superoxide anion (O2•-), ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), and significantly lower levels of total oxidant status (TOS) and total protein sulfhydryl (SH-) groups were found in arterial blood than in the peripheral venous blood samples, while biomarkers of the telomere-telomerase system did not show statistical significance in the two compared sample types (p = 0.834 and p = 0.419). To better understand the effect of the examined biomarkers in the AMI patients on SYNTAX score, those biomarkers were grouped using PCA, which merged them into the four the most contributing factors. The "cholesterol-protein factor" and "oxidative-telomere factor" were independent predictors of higher SYNTAX score (OR = 0.338, p = 0.008 and OR = 0.427, p = 0.035, respectively), while the ability to discriminate STEMI from non-STEMI patients had only the "oxidative-telomere factor" (AUC = 0.860, p = 0.008). The results show that traditional cardiovascular risk factors, i.e., high total cholesterol together with high total serum proteins and haemoglobin, are associated with severe disease progression in much the same way as a combination of redox biomarkers (pro-oxidant-antioxidant balance, total antioxidant status, IMA) and telomere length.

Vascular smooth muscle cells in low SYNTAX scores coronary artery disease exhibit proinflammatory transcripts and proteins correlated with IL1B activation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The SYNTAX score is clinically validated to stratify number of lesions and pattern of CAD. A better understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms influencing the pattern and complexity of coronary arteries lesions among CAD patients is needed.

METHODS

Human arterial biopsies from 49 patients (16 low-SYNTAX-score (LSS, <23), 16 intermediate-SYNTAX-score (ISS, 23 to 32) and 17 high-SYNTAX-score (HSS, >32)) were evaluated using Affymetrix GeneChip® Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 microarray. The data were validated by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Primary VSMC from patients with low and high SYNTAX scores were isolated and compared using immunohistochemistry, qPCR and immunoblotting to confirm mRNA and proteomic results.

RESULTS

The IL1B was verified as the top upstream regulator of 47 inflammatory DEGs in LSS patients and validated by another sets of patient samples using NGS analysis. The upregulated expression of IL1B was translated to increased level of IL1β protein in the LSS tissue based on immunohistochemical quantitative analysis. Plausibility of idea that IL1B in the arterial wall could be originated from VSMC was checked by exposing culture to proinflammatory conditions where IL1B came out as the top DEG (logFC = 7.083, FDR = 1.38 × 10-114). The LSS patient-derived primary VSMCs confirmed higher levels of IL1B mRNA and protein.

CONCLUSIONS

LSS patients could represent a group of patients where IL1B could play a substantial role in disease pathogenesis. The LSS group could represent a plausible cohort of patients for whom anti-inflammatory therapy could be considered.