Non-Surgical Interventions for Hospitalized Adults with Class II or Class III Obesity: A Scoping Review

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives of Nonsurgical Care of Older Inpatients with Class II or III Obesity and Comorbidities: A Qualitative Study

Background

Older people with Class II or III obesity and comorbidities experience complex care needs with frequent hospital admissions. In 2019/20 the National Health Service in England reported a 17% increase in hospital admissions of patients with obesity compared to 2018/19. Gaps in care for this population have been identified.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals delivering non-surgical care to older people with Classes II or III obesity admitted to a tertiary care hospital.

Methods

Healthcare professionals delivering non-surgical care to older people admitted with Class II or III obesity with comorbidities were recruited from an Australian tertiary referral hospital. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 healthcare professionals from seven disciplines between August and December 2019. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and reviewed by participants for accuracy. Thematic inductive data analysis was deductively mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

Results

Four major themes of Barriers, Facilitators, Current Practice, and Recommendations and 11 subthemes were identified and mapped to nine domains in the TDF. The Barriers subtheme identified perceived patient related factors, health system issues, and provider issues, while the Facilitators subtheme included a patient centred approach, knowledge, and resources in the subacute setting. The major Current Practice theme explored factors influencing clinical management, and the Recommendations subthemes included engaging patients, access to quality care, education and support, and obesity as a chronic disease.

Conclusion

This novel application of the TDF provided broad insights related to the barriers and facilitators in delivering non-surgical care to this hospital population, from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Understanding how these barriers interact can provide strategies to influence behaviour change and assist in the development of a holistic multidisciplinary model of care.

SICOB-endorsed national Delphi consensus on obesity treatment optimization: focus on diagnosis, pre-operative management, and weight regain/insufficient weight loss approach

PURPOSE

Overweight and obesity affects 60% of adults causing more than 1.2 million deaths across world every year. Fight against involved different specialist figures and multiple are the approved weapons. Aim of the present survey endorsed by the Italian Society of Bariatric Surgery (SICOB) is to reach a national consensus on obesity treatment optimization through a Delphi process.

METHODS

Eleven key opinion leaders (KOLs) identified 22 statements with a major need of clarification and debate. The explored pathways were: (1) Management of patient candidate to bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS); (2) Management of patient not eligible for BMS; (3) Management of patient with short-term (2 years) weight regain (WR) or insufficient weight loss (IWL); (4) Management of the patient with medium-term (5 years) WR; and (5) Association between drugs and BMS as WR prevention. The questionnaire was distributed to 65 national experts via an online platform with anonymized results.

RESULTS

54 out of 65 invited panelists (83%) respond. Positive consensus was reached for 18/22 statements (82%); while, negative consensus (s20.4; s21.5) and no consensus (s11.5, s17) were reached for 2 statements, respectively (9%).

CONCLUSION

The Delphi results underline the importance of first-line interdisciplinary management, with large pre-treatment examination, and establish a common opinion on how to properly manage post-operative IWL/WR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

Report of expert committees.

Inpatient medical management of severe pediatric obesity: Literature review and case reports

Pediatric obesity rates continue to rise steeply with significant adverse effects on health outcomes across the lifespan. Significant obesity can affect the efficacy, side effects, and ability to use certain treatment, medication, or imaging modalities needed in the evaluation and management of acute pediatric conditions. Inpatient settings are rarely used as an opportunity for weight counseling and thus there is a paucity of clinical guidelines on how to manage severe obesity in the inpatient setting. We present a literature review and three patient cases with single-center protocol for non-surgical management of severe obesity in children admitted for other acute medical reasons. We performed a PubMed review from January 2002 to February 2022 utilizing keywords: "inpatient," "obesity," and "intervention." For our cases, we identified three patients with severe obesity acutely impacting their health while admitted for medical treatment who concurrently underwent acute, inpatient, weight loss regimens at a single children's hospital. The literature search yielded 33 articles describing inpatient weight loss treatments. Three patients met case criteria, all three of which demonstrated a decrease in their weight in excess percent of the 95th percentile after inpatient weight-management protocol implementation (% reduction BMI_p95: 16%-30%). This highlights obesity acutely limits or impacts specific medical care required during inpatient admissions in pediatric patients. It also suggests that implementation of an inpatient weight-management protocol during admission may provide an opportune setting to support acute weight loss and overall improved health outcomes in this high-risk cohort.

Is Intermittent Fasting Better Than Continuous Energy Restriction for Adults with Overweight and Obesity?

As a popular weight management intervention, intermittent fasting (IF) has been widely applied to the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. This review describes the different forms and implementation protocols of IF and their effects on body weight, body composition, cardiometabolic risk factors and other diseases. The existing evidence suggests that IF is as effective as continuous energy restriction and may be a feasible and effective approach to weight loss.