MAFLD Criteria May Overlook a Subtype of Patient with Steatohepatitis and Significant Fibrosis

Berberine Effects in Pre-Fibrotic Stages of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease-Clinical and Pre-Clinical Overview and Systematic Review of the Literature

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the predominant cause of chronic liver conditions, and its progression is marked by evolution to non-alcoholic steatosis, steatohepatitis, cirrhosis related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and the potential occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. In our systematic review, we searched two databases, Medline (via Pubmed Central) and Scopus, from inception to 5 February 2024, and included 73 types of research (nine clinical studies and 64 pre-clinical studies) from 2854 published papers. Our extensive research highlights the impact of Berberine on NAFLD pathophysiology mechanisms, such as Adenosine Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK), gut dysbiosis, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), Sirtuins, and inflammasome. Studies involving human subjects showed a measurable reduction of liver fat in addition to improved profiles of serum lipids and hepatic enzymes. While current drugs for NAFLD treatment are either scarce or still in development or launch phases, Berberine presents a promising profile. However, improvements in its formulation are necessary to enhance the bioavailability of this natural substance.

The Transition of Cardiovascular Disease Risks from NAFLD to MAFLD

The increased burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) parallels the increased incidence of overweight and metabolic syndrome worldwide. Because of the close relationship between metabolic disorders and fatty liver disease, a new term, metabolic-related fatty liver disease (MAFLD), was proposed by a group of experts to more precisely describe fatty liver disease resulting from metabolic disorders. According to the definitions, MAFLD and NAFLD populations have considerable discrepancies, but overlap does exist. This new definition has a nonnegligible impact on clinical practices, including diagnoses, interventions, and the risk of comorbidities. Emerging evidence has suggested that patients with MAFLD have more metabolic comorbidities and an increased risk of all-cause mortality, particularly cardiovascular mortality than patients with NAFLD. In this review, we systemically summarized and compared the risk and underlying mechanisms of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with NAFLD or MAFLD.

Characteristics and long-term mortality of patients with non-MAFLD hepatic steatosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A cluster of hepatic steatosis without metabolic abnormalities has been excluded by the MAFLD definition, referred to as non-MAFLD steatosis. We aimed to characterize the non-MAFLD steatosis.

METHODS

We included 16,308 individuals from the UK Biobank who had magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) to describe the clinical and genetic features of non-MAFLD steatosis in a cross-sectional design, and 14,797 individuals of the NHANES III who underwent abdominal ultrasonography at baseline to assess the long-term mortality of non-MAFLD steatosis in a prospective cohort design.

RESULTS

Of 16,308 individuals in the UK Biobank, 2747 fatty liver disease (FLD) cases (2604 MAFLD and 143 non-MAFLD) and 3007 healthy controls (without metabolic dysfunctions) were identified. The mean PDFF (10.65 vs. 9.00) and the proportion of advanced fibrosis (fibrosis-4 index > 2.67, 1.27% vs. 1.40%) were comparable between MAFLD and non-MAFLD steatosis. Non-MAFLD steatosis has the highest minor allele frequency of PNPLA3 rs738409, TM6SF2 rs58542926, and GCKR rs1260326 in contrast to the other two groups. The genetic risk score calculated by PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and GCKR has a certain predictive ability for non-MAFLD steatosis (AUROC = 0.69). NHANES III population showed that compared to healthy individuals, the adjusted hazard ratio of non-MAFLD steatosis increased by 1.52 (95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.91) and 1.78 (95% confidence interval: 1.03-3.07) for all-cause and heart disease-related mortality, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-MAFLD steatosis has comparable degrees of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis to MAFLD and increases the risk of mortality. Genetic predisposition highly contributes to the risk of non-MAFLD steatosis.

An Observational Data Meta-analysis on the Differences in Prevalence and Risk Factors Between MAFLD vs NAFLD

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The shift to redefine nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) can profoundly affect patient care, health care professionals, and progress within the field. To date, there remains no consensus on the characterization of NAFLD vs MAFLD. Thus, this study sought to compare the differences between the natural history of NAFLD and MAFLD.

METHODS

Medline and Embase databases were searched to include articles on prevalence, risk factors, or outcomes of patients with MAFLD or NAFLD. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using the generalized linear mix model. Risk factors and outcomes were evaluated in conventional pairwise meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles involving 379,801 patients were included. Pooled prevalence of MAFLD was 39.22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.96%-48.15%) with the highest prevalence in Europe and Asia, followed by North America. The current MAFLD Definition only accounted for 81.59% (95% CI, 66.51%-90.82%) of NAFLD diagnoses. Patients had increased odds of being diagnosed with MAFLD compared with NAFLD (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16-1.63; P < .001). Imaging modality resulted in a significantly higher odds of being diagnosed with MAFLD compared with NAFLD, but not biopsy. MAFLD was significantly associated with males, higher body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, lipids, transaminitis, and greater fibrosis scores compared with NAFLD.

CONCLUSIONS

There were stark differences in the prevalence and risk factors between MAFLD and NAFLD. However, in the use of the MAFLD Definition, a greater emphasis on the management of concomitant metabolic diseases and a collaborative effort is required to explore the complex pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the disease.

Metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease: The new nomenclature and its impact

BACKGROUND

In 2020, an international expert panel proposed a new definition of fatty liver: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The MAFLD added the criteria for defining metabolic dysfunctions, which are high-risk factors for liver-related and cardiovascular events. Contrary to the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) definition, it allows the coexistence of MAFLD and significant alcohol use in the same patient.

AIM

To review the existing data that evaluate the clinical profile and long-term outcome difference between the patients identified as MAFLD and NAFLD.

METHODS

Databases MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASE were searched and relevant publications up to June 28, 2022 were assessed. Studies were included if they involved human participants diagnosed with MAFLD.

RESULTS

A total of 2324 records were reviewed, of which 1575 duplicate citations were removed. Of the 2324 records screened, 207 articles were excluded, and 542 articles were assessed for their eligibility, for which 511 were excluded. The remaining 31 articles were selected for review. MAFLD diagnostic criteria were able to identify more individuals with fatty liver. Studies have shown that patients included using the MAFLD criteria were associated with higher risks of hepatic fibrosis when compared to NAFLD. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease-related, and cancer-related mortality were shown to be higher in MAFLD patients. MAFLD patients also had higher baseline metabolic derangement, and risks of developing obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular events. Of the 3 subtypes, diabetes mellitus has the strongest association with negative outcomes, followed by metabolic dysfunction and elevated body mass index. Within the subtypes of MAFLD, patients with more metabolic conditions at the time of diagnosis had worse hepatic and liver injury compared to those with a single metabolic condition.

CONCLUSION

MAFLD is a new definition of fatty liver disease that is gaining increasing acceptance. It is based on empirical clinical practice on positive inclusion of metabolic risk factors and recent evidence suggests that it helps to identify patients with higher risk for liver-related as well as cardiovascular events.

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease better identifying patients at risk of liver and cardiovascular complications

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

A nomenclature of "metabolic associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD) with a new definition was proposed in 2020 instead of the previous "non-alcoholic fatty liver disease" (NAFLD). Whether it better coheres with the clinical demand remains controversial.

METHODS

The participants with fatty liver on ultrasonography in Taiwan bio-bank cohorts were included. MAFLD is defined as the presence of fatty liver, plus any of the following three conditions: overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), or metabolic dysfunction. The severity of liver fibrosis was determined using fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). The risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was assessed using intima-media thickness (IMT) or plaques of carotid duplex ultrasound.

RESULTS

A total of 9,719 subjects (ages 55.9 ± 10.8; males 42.6%) were distributed among 4 groups: "overlapping group", "MAFLD only", "NAFLD only", and "neither fatty liver disease (FLD)" with the percentages of 79.7, 12, 7.1, and 1.2%, respectively. Compared with NAFLD patients, MAFLD patients had a greater percentage of males, higher levels of BMI, waist circumference, HbA1c, and triglyceride. In addition, they had higher levels of serum ALT, AST, GGT, fatty liver index (FLI), NFS, and IMT, but no difference in FIB-4 index and the percentage of carotid plaques. To note, "MAFLD only group" had greater levels of AST, ALT, GGT, FLI, FIB-4, NFS, IMT and a higher percentage of carotid plaques than the "NAFLD only group".

CONCLUSION

The grand, population-based study showed MAFLD with new diagnostic criteria to aid in identifying a greater number of high-risk patients of metabolic, liver, and cardiovascular complications, suggesting MAFLD may be a better nomenclature than NAFLD in clinical practice.

Molecular Advances in MAFLD—A Link between Sphingolipids and Extracellular Matrix in Development and Progression to Fibrosis

Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) is a major cause of liver diseases globally and its prevalence is expected to grow in the coming decades. The main cause of MAFLD development is changed in the composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Increased production of matrix molecules and inflammatory processes lead to progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis, and ultimately liver failure. In addition, increased accumulation of sphingolipids accompanied by increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the ECM is closely related to lipogenesis, MAFLD development, and its progression to fibrosis. In our work, we will summarize all information regarding the role of sphingolipids e.g., ceramide and S1P in MAFLD development. These sphingolipids seem to have the most significant effect on macrophages and, consequently, HSCs which trigger the entire cascade of overproduction matrix molecules, especially type I and III collagen, proteoglycans, elastin, and also tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, which as a result cause the development of liver fibrosis.

Global Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of 10 739 607 Individuals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed as a better definition of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to encompass the metabolic dysregulation associated with NAFLD. This redefinition challenges our understanding of the disease. Hence, this study sought to conduct an updated analysis of the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and associated factors of MAFLD, with a further sensitivity analysis done based on lean and nonobese MAFLD individuals.

METHODS

Medline and Embase databases were searched to include articles on MAFLD. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using the generalized linear mix model. Associating factors were evaluated in conventional pairwise meta-analysis with sensitivity analysis on lean and nonobese MAFLD.

RESULTS

From pooled analysis involving 3 320 108 individuals, the overall prevalence of MAFLD was 38.77% (95% CI 32.94% to 44.95%); 5.37% (95% CI 4.36% to 6.59%) and 29.78% (95% CI 26.06% to 33.79%) of lean and nonobese individuals, respectively, had MAFLD. Metabolic complications such as hypertension [odds ratio (OR) 2.63, 95% CI 1.85 to 3.74, P < 0.0001 and OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.74 to 2.38, P < 0.0001, respectively] and diabetes (OR 3.80, 95% CI 2.65 to 5.43, P < 0.0001 and OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.81 to 4.27, P < 0.0001, respectively) were found as significant associating factors associated with lean and nonobese MAFLD.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports previous studies in reporting MAFLD to affect more than a third of the global population. While exploration of the pathogenic basis of fatty liver disease without metabolic dysregulation is required, the emphasis on management of concomitant metabolic disease in MAFLD can improve multidisciplinary efforts in managing the complex disease.

MAFLD is Associated with the Risk of Liver Fibrosis and Inflammatory Activity in HBeAg-Negative CHB Patients

PURPOSE

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) are both important public health problems. The effect of concomitant MAFLD on patients with CHB is still unclear. This study aimed to explore the influence of MAFLD on liver fibrosis and inflammation in CHB patients with different hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 399 treatment-naïve CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy. All patients were divided into two groups (HBeAg± group). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with liver inflammatory activity and significant fibrosis in patients with CHB. Multivariable logistic regressions were repeated in subgroups stratified by HBeAg status.

RESULTS

In patients with CHB, MAFLD was independently associated with a risk of moderate-to-severe liver activity and significant fibrosis (P <0.05). In the HBeAg-negative group, patients with MAFLD had significantly higher levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P <0.05) and more severe liver inflammatory activity and fibrosis (P <0.05) compared to those without MAFLD. MAFLD was independently associated with a risk of moderate-to-severe liver activity (A ≥3: OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.71-9.22, P =0.001) and significant fibrosis (F ≥2: OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.09-3.73, P =0.026). In the HBeAg-positive group, MAFLD was found to be independently associated with moderate-to-severe liver activity (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.03-5.79, P =0.044) but not fibrosis (P =0.618).

CONCLUSION

MAFLD is associated with the risk of liver fibrosis and inflammatory activity in HBeAg-negative CHB patients. Sufficient attention should be paid to the prevention and treatment of MAFLD in patients with CHB, especially in HBeAg-negative patients.

Association Between Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and the Risk of Cirrhosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B-A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a novel proposed concept that is being recognized worldwide. Both chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and MAFLD have been independently attributed to an increased risk of disease development to cirrhosis. However, it is still unclear whether MAFLD is associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis in CHB patients.

AIM

This study aimed to analyze the impact of MAFLD on the risk of cirrhosis in CHB patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive CHB patients with or without MAFLD were enrolled from January 1st, 2007, to May 1st, 2020, in Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to balance the covariates across groups. The weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to compare both groups for the risk of cirrhosis.

RESULTS

A total of 1223 CHB patients were included in this study during the median follow-up of 5.25 years; of these patients, 355 were CHB-MAFLD patients. After IPTW, the weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the weighted cumulative incidence of cirrhosis was significantly higher in patients with MAFLD than that in patients without MAFLD (12.6% versus 7.1%, P=0.015). In the weighted multivariate Cox analysis, coexisting MAFLD was related to an increased risk of cirrhosis [adjusted weighted hazard ratio (HR) 1.790; P =0.020]. Age (>40 years, adjusted weighted HR, 1.950; P=0.015), diabetes mellitus (adjusted weighted HR, 1.883; P=0.041), non-antiviral treatment (adjusted weighted HR, 2.037; P=0.013), and baseline serum HBV DNA levels (>2.4 log¹⁰ IU/mL, adjusted weighted HR, 1.756; P=0.045) were significant risk factors for cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

We found that MAFLD was associated with a higher risk of cirrhosis in CHB patients.