1
|
Yagi H, Boeck M, Petrishka-Lozenska M, Lundgren P, Kasai T, Cagnone G, Wang C, Lee J, Tomita Y, Singh SA, Joyal JS, Aikawa M, Negishi K, Fu Z, Hellström A, Smith LEH. Timed topical dexamethasone eye drops improve mitochondrial function to prevent severe retinopathy of prematurity. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4619093. [PMID: 38978601 PMCID: PMC11230485 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4619093/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
Pathological neovascularization in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) can cause visual impairment in preterm infants. Current ROP treatments which are not preventative and only address late neovascular ROP, are costly and can lead to severe complications. We showed that topical 0.1% dexamethasone eye drops administered prior to peak neovessel formation prevented neovascularization in five extremely preterm infants at high risk for ROP and suppressed neovascularization by 30% in mouse oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) modeling ROP. In contrast, in OIR, topical dexamethasone treatment before any neovessel formation had limited efficacy in preventing later neovascularization, while treatment after peak neovessel formation had a non-statistically significant trend to exacerbating disease. Optimally timed topical dexamethasone suppression of neovascularization in OIR was associated with increased retinal mitochondrial gene expression and decreased inflammatory marker expression, predominantly found in immune cells. Blocking mitochondrial ATP synthetase reversed the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone on neovascularization in OIR. This study provides new insights into topical steroid effects in retinal neovascularization and into mitochondrial function in phase II ROP, and suggests a simple clinical approach to prevent severe ROP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Gael Cagnone
- CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal
- Boston Children's Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
da Cruz NFS, Kawamuro M, Hilgert GR, Pipolo GSR, Maia M. SURGICAL REMOVAL AFTER IATROGENIC SUBRETINAL INJECTION OF AN INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT. Retin Cases Brief Rep 2022; 16:727-730. [PMID: 32618899 DOI: 10.1097/icb.0000000000001034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report a rare case of subretinal migration of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant to treat macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy in a vitrectomized eye and the surgical outcome. OBSERVATIONS A pars plana vitrectomy and a retinotomy were performed to remove the implant and restore vision. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE Subretinal dislodgement of intravitreal implants is a rare and preventable complication. In the current case, we speculated that this complication might have been related to the injection technique, a possible unrecognized retinal perforation before the injection of the implant, or delayed treatment with the implant. Because a retinal detachment and vitreoretinal proliferation were observed, surgical management was required. Increasing widespread application of any technology may lead to a more significant risk of complications, and ophthalmologists should be aware of this potential risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha F S da Cruz
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mariana Kawamuro
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Mauricio Maia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Ophthalmology, Vision Institute, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; and
- Department of Ophthalmology, Brazilian Institute of Fight Against Blindness, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hsia NY, Lin CJ, Chen HS, Chang CH, Bair H, Lai CT, Lin JM, Chen WL, Tien PT, Wu WC, Tsai YY. Short-Term Outcomes of Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema Switch From Ranibizumab to Dexamethasone Implant and the Influential Factors: A Retrospective Real World Experience. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:649979. [PMID: 33996856 PMCID: PMC8121145 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.649979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants in refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) treated by intravitreal ranibizumab. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed DME patients who received DEX implant treatment after being refractory to at least 3 monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injections. The main outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). Results: Twenty-nine eyes of 26 patients who had previously received an average of 8.1 ± 4.4 ranibizumab injections were included. Patients received between one and three DEX implants during 12.4 ± 7.4 months of follow-up. The mean final CRT significantly decreased from 384.4 ± 114.4 μm at baseline to 323.9 ± 77.7 μm (p = 0.0249). The mean final BCVA was 51.4 ± 21.3 letters, which was not significant compared to baseline (44.9 ± 30.2 letters, p = 0.1149). Mean IOP did not increase significantly. All patients tolerated the treatment well without serious adverse events. Higher baseline CRT and worse BCVA correlated with better therapeutic responses. Conclusion: Switching to DEX implant is feasible and safe for treating patients of DME refractory to intravitreal ranibizumab in real world. Further larger-scale or multicenter studies would be conducted to explore different DEX treatment strategies for DME, such as first-line or early switch therapy, for better BCVA improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning-Yi Hsia
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ju Lin
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Huan-Sheng Chen
- An-Shin Dialysis Center, NephroCare Ltd., Fresenius Medical Care, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hsien Chang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Henry Bair
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Chun-Ting Lai
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jane-Ming Lin
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Lu Chen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Peng-Tai Tien
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chuan Wu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Yu Tsai
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Optometry, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
AlQahtani AS, Hazzazi MA, Waheeb SA, Semidey VA, Semidey VA, Elgendy HK, Alkhars WI, Abouammoh MA, Al-Dhibi H. Saudi Arabia Guidelines for diabetic macular edema: A consensus of the Saudi Retina Group. Saudi Med J 2021; 42:131-145. [PMID: 33563731 PMCID: PMC7989293 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2021.2.25623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications are major public health burdens in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is 19.7% and the prevalence of diabetic macular edema (DME) is 5.7% in Saudi Arabia. Diabetic macular edema is a vision-threatening complication of DR and a major cause of vision loss worldwide. Ocular treatments include retinal laser photocoagulation, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, intravitreal corticosteroids, and vitreoretinal surgery when necessary. The present consensus was developed as a part of the Saudi Retina Group's efforts to generate Saudi guidelines and consensus for the management of DME, including recommendations for its diagnosis, treatment, and best practice. The experts' panel stipulates that the treatment algorithm should be categorized according to the presence of central macula involvement. In patients with no central macular involvement, laser photocoagulation is recommended as the first-line option. Patients with central macular involvement and no recent history of cardiovascular (CVS) or cerebrovascular disorders can be offered anti-VEGF agents as the first-line option. In the case of non-responders (defined as an improvement of <20% in optical coherence tomography or a gain of fewer than 5 letters in vision), switching to another anti-VEGF agent or steroids should be considered after 3 injections. Within the class of steroids, dexamethasone implants are recommended as the first choice. In patients with a recent history of CVS events, the use of anti-VEGF agents is not recommended, regardless of their lens status. The experts' panel recommends that a future study be conducted to provide a cut-off point for early switching to steroid implants in pseudo-phakic eyes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah S. AlQahtani
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mohammad A. Hazzazi
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Saad A. Waheeb
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Valmore A. Semidey
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Valmore A. Semidey
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Hussein K. Elgendy
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Wajeeha I. Alkhars
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Marwan A. Abouammoh
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Hassan Al-Dhibi
- From the Department of Surgery (AlQahtani), Division of Ophthalmology, National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Waheeb), King Fisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Elgendy), Retina Unit, Magrabi Eye and Ear Hospital, Jeddah; from the Department of Surgery (Hazzazi), Division of Ophthalmology, Riyadh National Guard Hospital, and from King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences; from the Department of Vitreoretinal (Semidey, Al-Dhibi), King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital; from the Department of Ophthalmology (Abouammoh), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh; and from the Department of Retina and Uveitis (Alkhars), Dhahran Eye Specialist Hospital, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang J, Li Y, Fang SF, Wang H. Efficacy of intravitreal Lucentis injection on major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion. BMC Ophthalmol 2020; 20:274. [PMID: 32646391 PMCID: PMC7350754 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01544-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy of intravitreal Lucentis injection on major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods In this retrospective analysis, 43 patients (major BRVO n = 24; macular BRVO, n = 19) were treated with intravitreal injection of Lucentis with a 1 + PRN regimen, which is diagnosed by fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA). “1 + PRN”, namely, one intravitreal injection of Lucentis at the baseline, and then continue or stop according to the condition of the patient. The following observation indexes were measured at baseline and follow-up (1–6 months): best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness (CFT), total retinal volume with macular diameter of 6 mm. During the follow-up, repeated injections were given according to patients’ demand, and the number of injections was recorded. Result The observation indexes of patients with BRVO were significantly improved after 6 months of Lucentis treatment in both major and macular groups, including BCVA, CFT and the retinal volume of the 6 mm-diameter macula. Interestingly, there were significant differences in the therapeutic effect between the two groups, and the macular group had better therapeutic effect than the major group with the less number of repeated injections. Conclusions To sum up, intravitreal injection of Lucentis was effective for both major and macular BRVO, and the efficacy in macular subtype group was better than that in major subtype group with the more obviously improvement and the less number of injections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shandong Provincial Western Hospital, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Jinan, 250023, P.R. China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, P.R. China.,Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Proteomics of Shandong Province, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine,Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, P.R. China
| | - Shu-Fen Fang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Laizhou People's Hospital of Yantai, Yantai, 261400, P.R. China
| | - Hong Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, No.107, west wenhua road, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eandi CM, De Geronimo D, Giannini D, Polito MS, Tosi GM, Neri G, Le Mer Y, Varano M, Parravano M. Baseline SD-OCT characteristics of diabetic macular oedema patterns can predict morphological features and timing of recurrence in patients treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implants. Acta Diabetol 2020; 57:867-874. [PMID: 32114643 PMCID: PMC7311372 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01504-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the timing and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features of diabetic macular oedema (DME) recurrence according to baseline OCT patterns in patients treated with dexamethasone implant (DEX-I). METHODS This is a retrospective observational study (72 eyes/65 patients). Best-corrected visual acuity, timing of DME recurrence, and SD-OCT pattern [intraretinal cysts (IRC), IRC plus subretinal fluid (mixed), external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid (IS/OS) layer integrity] were assessed at baseline and monthly until first DME recurrence. RESULTS Forty-two (58.3%) and 30 (41.6%) DME eyes had an IRC and mixed DME pattern at baseline, respectively. Twenty-four out of thirty mixed eyes (80%) relapsed without subretinal fluid. At baseline, mixed eyes showed similar changes in ELM and IS/OS (60 and 76.6% of eyes, respectively) versus IRC eyes (42.8 and 80.9% of eyes). After DME recurrence, more mixed eyes at baseline showed ELM and IS/OS changes (63.3 and 86.6%) than IRC eyes (50 and 76.2%). 33.3% of mixed eyes had DME recurrence at ≥ 6 months from first DEX-I implant versus 19% of IRC eyes. CONCLUSIONS Mixed DME eyes were treated with DEX-I relapse later and more frequently without subretinal fluid than IRC eyes. SD-OCT characteristics of different DME patterns at baseline can predict morphological features and timing of DME recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara M Eandi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, C. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Fondation Asile des aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fondation Ophtalmologique A. De Rothschild, Paris, France.
| | | | | | - Maria Sole Polito
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, C. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Gian Marco Tosi
- Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Neri
- Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Yannick Le Mer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Fondation Ophtalmologique A. De Rothschild, Paris, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Urbančič M, Gardašević Topčić I. Dexamethasone implant in the management of diabetic macular edema from clinician's perspective. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13:829-840. [PMID: 31190726 PMCID: PMC6526171 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s206769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide an overview of characteristics and principles of use of dexamethasone implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). The condensed information about patient selection, dosing, and postinjection management is provided to make the clinician’s decisions easier in real-life practice. DME is a common complication of diabetes and the leading cause of visual loss in the working-age population. Inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of DME. The breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier involves the expression of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Steroids have proved to be effective in the treatment of DME by blocking the production of VEGF and other inflammatory cytokines, by inhibiting leukostasis, and by enhancing the barrier function of vascular endothelial cell tight junctions. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of DME resistant to anti-VEGF therapy and in vitrectomized eyes. Data from clinical trials suggest that dexamethasone implant can be considered as first-line treatment in pseudophakic eyes. Dexamethasone implant is also the first-line therapy in patients not suited for anti-VEGF therapy, pregnant women, and patients unable to return for frequent monitoring. It has been shown that the maximum effect of dexamethasone implant on visual gain and retinal thickness occurs approximately 2 months after injection. Various treatment regimens are used in real-life situations, and reported reinjection intervals were usually <6 months. The number of retreatments needed decreased over time. Treatment algorithms should be personalized. Postinjection management and follow-up should consider potential adverse events such as intraocular pressure elevation and cataract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojca Urbančič
- Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nalçacı S, Akkın C, Afrashi F. Dexamethasone Implant in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Resistant to Anti-VEGF Therapy. Turk J Ophthalmol 2019; 49:73-77. [PMID: 31055891 PMCID: PMC6517853 DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2018.84665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of single dose intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) resistant to anti-VEGF therapy. Materials and Methods: Twenty eyes of 14 patients (8 male, 6 female; mean age, 65±5.7 years) with DME resistant to intravitreal ranibizumab injections were studied. A single intravitreal dexamethasone implant was injected into each eye and patients were followed up for 6 months. Response to therapy was assessed monthly by measuring intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central foveal thickness (CFT). Results: Baseline (before injection) IOP was 14.9±2.7 mmHg and did not change significantly in the six months following injection. Baseline BCVA was 1.04±0.35 LogMAR and improved to 0.86±0.31 at month 1 without statistical significance (p=0.056). CFT was significantly lower in all monthly measurements compared to its baseline value of 682.2±229.2 μm. During the follow-up period, endophthalmitis, significant cataract, or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment were not detected. Conclusion: Intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection is associated with significant CFT reduction for up to six months without causing any complications. Although BCVA did not improve in parallel with the CFT reduction, intravitreal dexamethasone implant should be considered as an effective and safe treatment option in the management of DME patients resistant to anti-VEGF injections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhad Nalçacı
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Cezmi Akkın
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Filiz Afrashi
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kurt MM, Çekiç O, Akpolat Ç, Elçioglu M. EFFECTS OF INTRAVITREAL RANIBIZUMAB AND BEVACIZUMAB ON THE RETINAL VESSEL SIZE IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA. Retina 2018; 38:1120-1126. [PMID: 28520638 DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000001682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to assess the effects of a single injection of intravitreal ranibizumab (RAN) or bevacizumab (BEV) on the retinal vessel size in eyes with diabetic macular edema. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 32 patients were enrolled in the RAN group, and 30 patients were included in BEV group. Each of these groups was also subdivided into two others groups: a study group and a control group. The study groups were composed of the injected eyes, whereas the noninjected fellow eyes served as the control groups. The patients underwent complete ophthalmic examinations, including optical coherence tomography and fundus fluorescein angiography, and the primary outcome measures included the central retinal artery equivalent, central retinal vein equivalent, and artery-to-vein ratio. RESULTS In the RAN study group (n = 32), the preinjection mean central retinal artery equivalent (175.42 μm) decreased to 169.01 μm after 1 week, and to 167.47 μm after 1 month (P < 0.001), whereas the baseline central retinal vein equivalent (235.29 μm) decreased initially to 219.90 μm after 1 week, and to 218.36 μm after 1 month (P < 0.001). In the BEV study group (n = 30), the preinjection central retinal artery equivalent (150.21 μm) decreased to 146.25 μm after 1 week, and to 145.89 μm after 1 month (P < 0.001); whereas the baseline central retinal vein equivalent (211.87 μm) decreased initially to 204.59 μm after 1 week and was 205.24 μm after 1 month (P < 0.001). The preinjection artery-to-vein ratio values changed significantly (P = 0.001) after 1 week and after 1 month in the RAN group, but no significant alteration in the artery-to-vein ratio was observed in the BEV group (P = 0.433). In both the RAN (n = 32) and BEV (n = 30) control groups, none of the 3 parameters changed throughout the study period, when compared with the baseline. CONCLUSION The results of this study showed that both RAN and BEV injections significantly constricted the retinal blood vessel diameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed Mustafa Kurt
- Department of Ophthalmology, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Al-khersan H, Hariprasad SM, Chhablani J, Al-khersan H, Hariprasad SM, Chhablani JK, Agarwal K, Ansari W, Agrawal KU, Arevalo JF, Banker AS, Farah ME, Goel N, Gupta V, Jain NV, Lanzetta P, Loewenstein A, Mehrotra N, Modi A, Nagpal M, Rosenblatt A, Sarao V, Sarvaiya C, Singh RP, Veritti D, Yadav NK. Early Response to Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema May Predict Visual Outcome. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 184:121-128. [PMID: 29032109 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Revised: 10/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether early visual acuity response to intravitreal dexamethasone implant therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) is associated with long-term outcome. DESIGN Retrospective case series. METHODS Multicenter (8 sites) retrospective review of medical records of eyes with DME treated with 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant and minimum 18-month follow-up. One hundred and two eyes were included. Eyes with vitreoretinal interface abnormalities or that had undergone vitrectomy were excluded. Eyes were categorized into 3 groups based on change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months (logMAR equivalence of <5-letter, 5-9-letter, or ≥10-letter gain). Visual acuity outcomes were determined for each early response group. The relationship between early (3-month) and overall change in BCVA was assessed using regression analysis. RESULTS In the study population (102 eyes), <5-letter, 5- to 9-letter, and ≥10-letter BCVA improvements were seen in 44.1%, 18.6%, and 37.3% of eyes, respectively, at 3 months. Among suboptimal (<5-letter) responders at 3 months, 6.7% showed ≥10-letter gains at study conclusion compared to 29% in the robust (≥10-letter) early response group (P = .009). Change in BCVA at 3 months showed significant positive correlation with overall change in BCVA (coefficient = 0.44, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS A similar proportion of eyes demonstrated suboptimal (<5-letter) and robust (≥10-letter) early response to treatment at 3 months. Eyes with a robust early response demonstrated ≥10-letter long-term gain in BCVA at a significantly higher rate compared to those with poor early response. Early treatment response directly correlated with overall change in BCVA.
Collapse
|
11
|
Aflibercept in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review and Consensus Paper. Eur J Ophthalmol 2017; 27:627-639. [DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5001053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To reach a consensus, among experts, on the role of aflibercept in diabetic macular edema (DME) through literature review. Methods Two round tables, involving 12 Italian experts, were organized: in the first one, 6 pharmacologic and clinical questions were selected and analyzed by a systematic literature review, using a population, intervention, control, and outcomes framework; in the second one, the nominal group technique was used to discuss relevant evidence related to each question. The consensus was assessed using the 5-point Delphi score. Results Agreement on statements was reached on 6/6 questions. The final statements were as follows: 1) High levels of both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor play an important role in the pathogenesis of DME. 2) The aflibercept pharmacologic profile is notably different from that of other anti-VEGF. 3) Aflibercept significantly improves functional and anatomical outcomes, and rapidly improves best-corrected visual acuity up to its peak; these results remain stable over time. 4) Diabetic macular edema aflibercept treatment requires a 5-monthly injection loading phase. Alternatively, a personalized pro re nata (PRN) regimen based on monthly monitoring and strict retreatment criteria can be used. 5) As an alternative to the bimonthly fixed regimen, in the maintenance phase the treatment schedule may be a PRN regimen with strict retreatment criteria or a treat and extend regimen. 6) No concerns on aflibercept ocular and systemic safety emerged from the literature. Conclusions Consensus was reached among experts on how to best treat patients with DME with aflibercept.
Collapse
|
12
|
Valverde-Megías A, Cifuentes-Canorea P, Ruiz-Medrano J, Peña-García P, Megías-Fresno A, Donate-López J, García-Feijoo J. Systemic Effects of Repeated Intraocular Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Diabetic Patients: A Retrospective Study. Diabetes Ther 2017; 8:1087-1096. [PMID: 28918546 PMCID: PMC5630562 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-017-0307-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of repeated intraocular dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) injections on metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS Retrospective study of 165 type 2 diabetic patients starting Ozurdex treatment who received no less than three consecutive injections. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum creatinine, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides (TGs) were evaluated during 15 months of follow-up after Ozurdex treatment onset. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Mean baseline values for HbA1c, creatinine, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and TGs before treatment (7.1%, 1.3, 176.7, 51.1, and 125.6 mg/dl, respectively) were similar to mean values after Ozurdex onset (Wilcoxon test p values were 0.68, 0.41, 0.06, 0.87, and 0.33, respectively) and remained stable during the follow-up period. Mean LDL cholesterol levels increased slightly after Ozurdex treatment onset (90.1 vs 88.2 mg/dl, p = 0.04) but after 15 months of follow-up they had returned to baseline values. Transient increase in LDL cholesterol was remarkable in the group of 24 bilaterally treated patients (96.8 vs 88.4 mg/dl, p = 0.03). A third of these patients increased their baseline LDL values by more than 20%. Even with continuous injections of Ozurdex, LDL cholesterol levels also declined back to baseline by month 15. CONCLUSION Ozurdex injections had no influence on HbA1c or renal function. Lipid profile changes were mild and transient. However, a significant temporary increase has been found in LDL cholesterol levels in patients receiving simultaneous bilateral injections. Lipid levels should be monitored in patients starting with bilateral Ozurdex injections especially in those with recent history of acute myocardial infarction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Valverde-Megías
- Retina Service, Ophthalmology Department, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | - Pablo Peña-García
- Ophthalmology Department, Castilla-La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain
| | - Alicia Megías-Fresno
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Donate-López
- Retina Service, Ophthalmology Department, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julián García-Feijoo
- Retina Service, Ophthalmology Department, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To discuss the characteristics, indications and adverse events (AEs) of sustained-release corticosteroid devices for the treatment of cystoid macular edema (CME). RECENT FINDINGS Ozurdex® is approved for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion related-CME and noninfectious posterior uveitis (NIPU). It releases dexamethasone over a maximum period of 6 months making repeated intravitreal injections necessary for recurrent CME. Iluvien® releases fluocinolone for up to 36 months and is effective for the treatment of chronic DME. Retisert® (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) also releases fluocinolone, and is approved for chronic NIPU. Both Iluvien® and Retisert® are non-biodegradable devices and are highly associated with cataract and glaucoma. SUMMARY Long-acting intraocular corticosteroid formulations offer a more predictable drug-release profile and reduced dosing frequency in comparison to conventional formulations of the same compounds but the risk-benefit ratio must be taken into consideration previous to the implantation of those devices.
Collapse
|