Decreasing racial disparity with the combination of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Racial Disparity in HCV Demographics and Treatment Between Interferon Era (2002-2003) and Direct Acting Anti-viral Era (2019)

Introduction  Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment increased the sustained viral response (SVR) rate of patients with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) and eliminated response disparities between African American (AA) and non-AA patients seen with interferon (IFN). The aim of this study was to compare 2019 HCV patients (DAA era) to patients from January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003 (IFN era) in our predominantly AA clinic population. Methods We extracted data on 585 HCV patients seen in 2019 (DAA era) and compared them to 402 patients seen in the IFN era. Results Most HCV patients were born between 1945 and 1965, but in the DAA era more younger patients were identified. Non-AA patients in both eras were less likely to be infected with genotype 1 compared to AA (95% vs 54%, P<0.001). Fibrosis was not increased in the DAA Era as compared to the IFN era as assessed either by serum-based assays (APRI, FIB-4) or transient elastography (FibroScan) (DAA era) vs biopsy (IFN era). More patients were treated in 2019 compared to 2002-2003 (159/585=27% vs 5/402=1%). For untreated patients, subsequent treatment within one year of the initial visit was low and similar in both eras (35%). Conclusion There continues to be a need to screen patients born between 1945 and 1965 for HCV as well as to identify increasing numbers of patients below this age cohort. Even though current therapies are oral, highly effective, and can be 8-12 weeks in duration, significant numbers of patients were not treated within a year of first visit.

Has Access to Hepatitis C Virus Therapy Changed for Patients With Mental Health or Substance Use Disorders in the Direct-Acting-Antiviral Period?

Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) became available in 2014, but the role of mental health or substance use disorders (MH/SUD) on access to treatment is unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the extent and predictors of HCV treatment in the pre-DAA and post-DAA periods in four large, diverse health care settings in the United States. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 29,544 adults with chronic HCV who did or did not receive treatment from January 1, 2011, to February 28, 2017. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to examine cumulative risk for receiving HCV treatment stratified by MH/SUD. Predictors of HCV treatment in the pre-DAA (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013) and post-DAA (January 1, 2014, to February 28, 2017) cohorts were analyzed using multivariate generalized estimating equations and a modified Poisson model. Overall, 21.7% (2,879/13,240) of those with chronic HCV post-DAA were treated compared with 3.5% (574/16,304) in the pre-DAA period. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, Hispanic whites (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25, 0.52) were less likely to be treated in the post-DAA period. Those with concurrent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (AOR 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05, 1.83), cirrhosis (AOR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.74, 2.31), and liver transplant (AOR 2.72; 95% CI, 1.87, 3.94) were more likely to be treated post-DAA. Those with MH/SUD were less likely to be treated both before (AOR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36, 0.60) and after (AOR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55, 0.71) DAA therapy was available. Overall, the cumulative risk for receiving HCV treatment from 2011 to 2017 among those with versus without MH/SUD was 13.6% versus 21.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The volume of patients treated for HCV has increased in the post-DAA period, especially among those with liver-related comorbidities, but disparities in access to treatment continue among those with MH/SUD.