Optimizing the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations within the susceptible range

Risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure in heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

The incidence of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) infection is increasing and is associated with vancomycin treatment failures. However, studies investigating the risk factors for treatment failure in hVISA infection are limited. Patients with hVISA bacteremia treated with vancomycin over 7 days between August 2008 and June 2020 were enrolled in this study. Clinical and microbiological characteristics were compared between vancomycin treatment failure and success groups to identify the risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure. Among the 180 patients with hVISA bacteremia, 102 patients treated with vancomycin over 7 days were included. Vancomycin treatment failed in 80 (78%) patients. Patients in the vancomycin treatment failure group were older (P < 0.001) and more frequently had solid cancer (P = 0.04) than those in the vancomycin treatment success group. Solid organ transplantation (SOT) was more frequent (P < 0.001) in the vancomycin treatment success group. The Charlson comorbidity index (P = 0.01) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (P < 0.001) were higher in the vancomycin treatment failure group. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure were old age and severity of bacteremia. SOT and vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 1.0 mg/L using the broth microdilution (BMD) method were associated with successful vancomycin treatment. Old age and infection severity were independent risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure. Vancomycin MIC using the BMD method is an important risk factor for vancomycin treatment failure, and its use should be considered in hVISA bacteremia.IMPORTANCEIn this study, we assessed the clinical and microbiological characteristics of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediated Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) bacteremia and identified risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure. We found that advanced age and severity of infection were independent risk factors for vancomycin treatment failure. On the other hand, solid organ transplantation and a low vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration were associated with successful vancomycin treatment. This study highlights the importance of vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration in hVISA bacteremia.

Development of a Single-nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping Assay for the Rapid Detection of Vancomycin-intermediate Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Epidemic Lineage ST5

Background

Vancomycin is a treatment option for patients with severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Unfortunately, reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in S. aureus is becoming increasingly common. We developed a method for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of vancomycin-intermediate resistant S. aureus (VISA).

Methods

We performed a microbial genome-wide association study to discriminate between VISA and vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA) using 42 whole-genome sequences. A TaqMan single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping assay was developed to detect target SNPs in VISA strains.

Results

Four SNPs in the VISA strains resulting in nonsynonymous amino-acid substitutions were associated with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin: SA_RS01235 (G203S), SA_RS09725 (V171A), SA_RS12250 (I48F), and SA_RS12550 (G478A). These four SNPs were mainly detected in the typical hospital-associated sequence type (ST)5 clonal lineage. The TaqMan assay successfully detected all four SNPs using as little as 0.2 ng DNA per reaction. Using 10 VSSA and VISA clinical strains each, we validated that the assay accurately discriminates between VISA and VSSA.

Conclusions

The TaqMan SNP genotyping assay targeting four SNPs may be an alternative to current standard methods for the rapid detection of vancomycin-intermediate resistance in S. aureus epidemic lineage ST5.

Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Quinoxaline Derivative Compound Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Background

While the frequency of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to rise globally, there is a fear regarding an increase in vancomycin resistance among S. aureus strains. As far back as the 1960s, MRSA was one of the world's most prevalent antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Among hospitalized patients and community members, MRSA is the cause of a significant number of infections. As a result of its resistance to classical beta-lactam and, in some cases, vancomycin antibiotics, efforts must be made as soon as feasible to find a new approach to fighting MRSA.

Purpose

This study is designed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of quinoxaline derivative compound against MRSA in comparison with vancomycin as a reference drug.

Methods

Sixty MRSA isolates were subjected to susceptibility testing by broth microdilution method for quinoxaline derivative compound and vancomycin. Each drug's minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined and compared.

Results

Among the sixty MRSA isolates, most of the quinoxaline derivative compound MIC findings (56.7%) were 4 µg/mL compared to vancomycin MIC values (63.3%) of 4 µg/mL. In comparison, 20% of quinoxaline derivative compound MIC readings were 2 µg/mL, while the vancomycin MIC results were 6.7%. However, the overall proportion of MIC readings at ≤2 µg/mL for both antibacterial agents was equal (23.3%). None of the isolates were resistant to vancomycin.

Conclusion

This experiment revealed that most MRSA isolates were associated with low MICs (1-4 μg/mL) for quinoxaline derivative compound. Overall, the susceptibility of the quinoxaline derivative compound signifies a promising efficacy against MRSA and may set a novel treatment approach.

Evaluation of biological activities of quinone-4-oxoquinoline derivatives against pathogens of clinical importance

BACKGROUND

Microbial resistance has become a worldwide public health problem, and may lead to morbidity and mortality in affected patients.

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of quinone-4-oxoquinoline derivatives.

METHOD

These derivatives were evaluated against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by their antibacterial activity, anti-biofilm, and hemolytic activities and by in silico assays.

RESULTS

The quinone-4-oxoquinoline derivatives presented broad-spectrum antibacterial activities, and in some cases were more active than commercially available reference drugs. These compounds also inhibited bacterial adhesion and the assays revealed seven non-hemolytic derivatives. The derivatives seem to cause damage to the bacterial cell membrane and those containing the carboxyl group at the C-3 position of the 4-quinolonic nucleus were more active than those containing a carboxyethyl group.

CONCLUSION

The isoquinoline-5,8-dione nucleus also favored antimicrobial activity. The study showed that the target of the derivatives must be a non-conventional hydrophobic allosteric binding pocket on the DNA gyrase enzyme.

Optimal Practice for Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Position Statement From the Anti-infectives Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology

ABSTRACT

Individualization of vancomycin dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data is known to improve patient outcomes compared with fixed or empirical dosing strategies. There is increasing evidence to support area-under-the-curve (AUC24)-guided TDM to inform vancomycin dosing decisions for patients receiving therapy for more than 48 hours. It is acknowledged that there may be institutional barriers to the implementation of AUC24-guided dosing, and additional effort is required to enable the transition from trough-based to AUC24-based strategies. Adequate documentation of sampling, correct storage and transport, accurate laboratory analysis, and pertinent data reporting are required to ensure appropriate interpretation of TDM data to guide vancomycin dosing recommendations. Ultimately, TDM data in the clinical context of the patient and their response to treatment should guide vancomycin therapy. Endorsed by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, the IATDMCT Anti-Infectives Committee, provides recommendations with respect to best clinical practice for vancomycin TDM.

In Vitro Activity of Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolid and Daptomycin Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Collected from Chinese Hospitals in 2018-2020

Introduction

Vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin are four major antibacterials used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection treatment. However, with the increasing failure of clinical MRSA anti-infective treatment, it is urgent to investigate the status of MRSA sensitivity to these four drugs.

Methods

In the present study, 407 non-duplicated MRSA isolates from 6 provinces in China were collected from January 2018 to August 2020. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin were determined by broth microdilution method, and their MIC50, MIC90, and geometric mean MIC were calculated.

Results

All 407 MRSA strains were sensitive to these four antibacterials. MIC range of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin was 0.25 to 2 mg/L, 0.125 to 4 mg/L, 0.25 to 4 mg/L and 0.06 to 1 mg/L, respectively. Between 2018 and 2020, there was no “MIC creep” in vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin. The geometric mean MIC of linezolid was not increased, but both MIC50 and MIC90 in 2019 and 2020 MRSA isolates were higher than 2018 isolates.

Conclusion

All MRSA isolates remained sensitivity to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin. The linezolid MIC50 and MIC90 increased have been found in this study.

Discordance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at 2 μg/mL between Vitek II, E-test, and Broth Microdilution

Background

Vancomycin, the first line antibiotic for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, is often administered inappropriately when MIC is greater than 2 µg/mL, including ‘susceptible’ strains. This study assessed the discordance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Methods

In total, 229 MRSA isolates from blood cultures collected between 2009 and 2015 at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan were examined. The MICs of vancomycin were measured using Vitek 2, E-test, and standard broth microdilution at the level of 2 µg/mL.

Results

The geometric mean of the MICs of hospital-acquired MRSA was higher than that of community-acquired MRSA (P < 0.001), with the exact agreement rates (with broth microdilution) at 2 µg/mL being 53.6% in Vitek 2 and 86.7% in E-test. Overall, E-test (98.1%) had more categorical accordance than did Vitek 2 (94.0%; P = 0.026). Vitek 2 had a tendency to overestimate MRSA in high-MIC isolates, whereas E-test inclined underestimation in low-MIC isolates. Surprisingly, the discordance rates of MRSA vancomycin MICs were higher in hospital-acquired isolates (13.3%–17.0%) than in community-acquired isolates (6.2%–7.0%).

Conclusion

The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends the use of alternative antimicrobial agents when vancomycin MIC is ≥ 2 µg/mL; in this study, only 53.6% of the isolates tested using Vitek 2 showed a high MIC in the broth microdilution method. Accurate identification of the resistance profile is a key component of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Therefore, to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use and mitigate the emergence of resistant strains, we recommend using complementary tests such as E-test or Broth microdilution to verify the MIC before administering second-line antibiotics.

Strengths

(1) We compared the categorical agreement between different methods measuring MRSA MICs level. (2) Physicians should incorporate this information and consider a complementary test to verify the appropriateness of the decision of shifting vancomycin to second-line antibiotic treatment to improve patients’ prognosis. (3) MRSA-vancomycin MICs at a cutoff of 2 µg/mL obtained using Vitek II exhibited a higher sensitivity level and negative predictive value than those obtained using E-test in the prediction of categorical agreement with standard broth microdilution.

Limitation

(1) Our research was based on a single hospital-based study. (2) The MRSA strains in this study were stored for more than 12 months after isolation. (3) We did not collect information on clinical prognosis.

Reporting elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: consensus by an International Working Group

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains an important cause of serious infection, for which vancomycin is often recommended as the first-choice antibiotic treatment. Appropriate vancomycin prescribing requires accurate measurement of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to avoid treatment failure, and yet determination can be challenging due to methodological difficulties associated with susceptibility testing. An International Working Group of infectious disease specialists and clinical/medical microbiologists reached a consensus that empirical MRSA infection therapies should be chosen regardless of the suspected origin of the infecting strain (e.g., community or hospital) due to the complex intermingling epidemiology of MRSA clones in these settings. Also, if an elevated vancomycin MIC in the susceptible range is obtained in routine testing, an alternative second method should be used for confirmation and to aid antibiotic therapy recommendations. There is no absolutely dependable method for the accurate determination of vancomycin MIC, but broth microdilution appears to be the most reliable.

Vancomycin plus nafcillin salvage for the treatment of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia following daptomycin failure: a case report and literature review

Background:

Evidence supporting beta-lactam plus vancomycin synergy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to grow. Current in vivo evidence demonstrates that combination therapy is associated with shorter time to blood sterilization than vancomycin monotherapy. However, this combination has not been reported as salvage therapy for persistent MRSA bacteremia.

Case report:

We report a case of an 81-year-old male who was successfully treated with vancomycin plus nafcillin after failing vancomycin monotherapy, daptomycin monotherapy, and daptomycin plus gentamicin combination therapy. The patient originally presented with sepsis from a suspected urinary tract infection. Blood cultures drawn on days 1, 3, 5, 15, 19, 23, and 28 remained positive for MRSA despite multiple antimicrobial therapy changes. On day 29, therapy was changed to vancomycin plus nafcillin. Blood cultures drawn on day 32 remained negative. After 11 days, nafcillin was changed to piperacillin–tazobactam due to an infected decubitus ulcer. The combination was continued for 42 days after achieving blood sterility, 71 days after the patient originally presented. Evidence regarding salvage therapy for persistent bacteremia is sparse and is limited to case reports and case series.

Conclusion:

This case report supports that vancomycin plus an anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam combination should be further studied as salvage therapy for persistent MRSA bacteremia.

Sustained improvement in vancomycin dosing and monitoring post-implementation of guidelines: Results of a three-year follow-up after a multifaceted intervention in an Australian teaching hospital

INTRODUCTION

Despite vancomycin being in use for over half-a-century, it is still not dosed or monitored appropriately in many centers around the world. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to implement a vancomycin dosing and monitoring guideline across multiple medical and surgical units over time.

METHODS

This was an observational before-and-after interventional cohort study. The pre-intervention period was August to December 2010-2011 and the post-intervention period was September to November 2012-2014. The implementation strategy comprised: face-to-face education, online continuing medical education, dissemination of pocket guideline and email reminder. Outcome measures included: appropriate prescribing of loading and maintenance doses, therapeutic drug monitoring, time to attain target range and nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

Post-implementation prescribing of loading doses increased (10.4%-43.6%, P=<0.001), guideline adherent first maintenance dose (44%-68.4% P = 0.04), correct dose adjustment from (53.1%-72.2%, P = 0.009). Beneficial effects pre and post-implementation were observed for adherent timing of initial concentration (43.2%-51.9%, P = 0.01), concentrations in target range (32.6%-44.1%, P = 0.001), time to target range (median 6-4 days, P=<0.001), potentially nephrotoxic concentrations (30.7%-20.9%, P=<0.001) and nephrotoxicity (10.4%-6.8%, P=<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A multifaceted intervention to implement a vancomycin dosing and monitoring guideline significantly improved prescribing, monitoring, pharmacokinetic and safety outcomes for patients treated with vancomycin over an extended period. However, increased guideline adoption by clinicians is required to maximize and prolong the utility of this important agent.

Dosing strategies to optimize currently available anti-MRSA treatment options (Part 1: IV options)

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continues to be a predominant pathogen resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal dosing of anti-MRSA agents is needed to help prevent the development of antimicrobial resistance and to increase the likelihood of a favorable clinical outcome. Areas covered: This review summarizes the available data for antimicrobials routinely used for MRSA infections that are not administered orally or topically. We make recommendations and highlight the current gaps in the literature. A PubMed (1966 - Present) search was performed to identify relevant literature for this review. Expert commentary: Improvements in MIC determination and therapeutic drug monitoring are needed to fully implement individualized dosing that optimizes antimicrobial pharmacodynamics.Additional data will become available for these agents in regards to effectiveness for severe MRSA infections and pharmacokinetic data for special patient populations.