Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Patients with Bacteremia or Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a combination of the third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime and the novel, non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam that is approved for the treatment of pediatric (≥ 3 months) and adult patients with complicated infections including hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP), and bacteremia. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022362856) aimed to provide a quantitative and qualitative synthesis to evaluate the effectiveness of CAZ-AVI in treating adult patients with bacteremia or nosocomial pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non metallo-β-lactamase-producing strains) and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

METHODS

The databases included in the search, until November 7, 2022, were Embase and PubMed. A total of 24 studies (retrospective: 22, prospective: 2) with separate outcomes for patients with bacteremia or pneumonia were included.

RESULTS

The outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, clinical cure, and microbiological cure. Qualitative (24 studies) and quantitative (8/24 studies) syntheses were performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS checklist and the overall risk of bias was moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

In studies included in the meta-analysis, lower all-cause mortality for patients with bacteremia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.46) and improved rates of clinical cure for patients with bacteremia (OR = 4.90, 95% CI 2.60-9.23) and nosocomial pneumonia (OR = 3.20, 95% CI 1.55-6.60) was observed in the CAZ-AVI group compared with the comparator group. Data provided here may be considered while using CAZ-AVI for the treatment of patients with difficult-to-treat infections.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022362856.

Ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of bacteremia due to carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria in hematological patients: Experience in a single center

INTRODUCTION

Limited experience exists with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in treating bacteremia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) in hematological patients.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational study including patients who received CAZ-AVI for bacteremia due to CRE or CRPA between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. We conducted a multivariable analysis to identify predictors of survival.

RESULTS

56 patients were included and 57 (41 CRE and 16 CRPA) strains were isolated. 35 strains produced carbapenemase, including 25 metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) and 10 serine-beta-lactamase. 48 patients (85.7 %) received combination therapy. All patients with MBL-CRE bacteremia (n = 24) received combination therapy with aztreonam (AZT). The susceptibility rates to CAZ-AVI were only 26.8 % (11/41) in CRE and 80.0 % (8/10) in CRPA. The 30-day survival rates were 85.0 % (34/40) in the CRE group and 81.3 % (13/16) in the CRPA group. In patients with MBL-CRE bacteremia, the 30-day survival was as high as 91.7 % (22/24) due to combination with AZT. Ceftazidime did not influence the activity of aztreonam-avibactam against MBL-CRE in-vitro. Multivariable cox analysis revealed neutropenia >14 days (P = 0.002, HR: 34.483, 95%CI: 3.846-333.333) and a higher Pitt bacteremia score (P = 0.005, HR: 2.074, 95%CI: 1.253-3.436) were risk factors for 30-day survival.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI is highly effective in treating bacteremia due to CRPA and serine-beta-lactamase CRE. The combination of avibactam with AZT is highly effective in treating bacteremia due to AZT-resistant MBL producers.

Efficiency of polymyxin B treatment against nosocomial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Some cohort studies have explored the effects and safety of polymyxin B (PMB) in comparison to other antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial infections, yielding inconsistent results. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of PMB and compared it with other antibiotics.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, searching specific terms to identify quantitative cohort studies or RCTs that compared the effects of PMB with other antibiotics in terms of their efficacy and safety. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was conducted to evaluate the risk of bias of observational studies. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used for outcome assessment. We evaluated heterogeneity using the I 2 test.

Results

A total of 22 observational trials were included in the analysis. The PMB group had a higher mortality rate compared to the control group (odds ratio: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.50, p<0.00001, I 2 = 73%). while, the ceftazidime-avibactam group demonstrated a distinct advantage with lower mortality rates, despite still exhibiting high heterogeneity (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.59-4.69; p = 0.0003; I 2 = 53%). Additionally, the PMB group had a lower nephrotoxicity rate compared to the colistin group but exhibited high heterogeneity in the results (odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93; p = 0.02; I 2 = 73%).

Conclusion

In patients with nosocomial infections, PMB is not superior to other antibiotics in terms of mortality, specifically when compared to ceftazidime-avibactam. However, PMB demonstrated an advantage in terms of nephrotoxicity compared to colistin.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Combination Therapy versus Monotherapy for the Treatment Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: A Retrospective Observational Study

Purpose

Since the introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in the Chinese market, accumulating clinical evidence has substantiated its efficacy in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). Nevertheless, an ongoing debate persists concerning the choice between monotherapy and combination therapy when devising clinical anti-infection protocols.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective, single-center observational study enrolled patients with CR-GNB infections who received CZA treatment between December 2019 and August 2023. The primary outcome assessed was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcome measured was 14-day bacterial clearance. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to identify variables that were independently associated with 30-day mortality rate.

Results

Eighty-three patients were enrolled in the study; of which, 45 received CZA monotherapy, whereas 38 received combination therapy. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 31.3%, and no significant difference was observed in the 30-day mortality rates between the CZA combination therapy and monotherapy groups (31.6% vs 31.1%, p=0.963). After adjustment by propensity score matching, the 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups (28.6% vs 31.4%, p=0.794). Multivariate COX analysis revealed that age and SOFA score were independent predictors of 30-day mortality.

Conclusion

Combination therapy with CZA and other antimicrobials was not found to have an advantage over monotherapy in reducing the 30-day mortality rate.

The Clinical Efficacy of Adding Ceftazidime/Avibactam to Standard Therapy in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumonia with blaOXA-48-like Genes

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is FDA-approved for managing infections caused by resistant gram-negative bacilli, particularly infections via carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales pathogens. The clinical data are still limited, particularly those in Saudi Arabia. The present study is a retrospective cohort study that was carried out at the Armed Forces Hospital in the southern region of Saudi Arabia to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes for CAZ-AVI-treated patients as monotherapy and as an add-on to standard therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP) OXA-48 infections to those treated with standard drugs. The study included CRKP OXA-48-like infected patients who were administered antibiotics for more than seven days from 1 August 2018 to May 2023. Patients' baseline characteristics and demography were extracted from the clinical records, and their clinical/microbiology efficiencies were assessed as per the corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to identify the potential independent variable for CAZ-AVI efficiency. A total of 114 patient files were included for the evaluation. Among these patients, 64 used CAZ-AVI combined with standard therapy and were included in the intervention group, and 50 of them used standard therapy and were included in the comparative group. Following analysis, CAZ-AVI's clinical success was 42.2% (p = 0.028), while the intervention versus comparative groups showed decreased 30-day all-cause mortality (50.0% versus 70.0%; p = 0.036) and infection recurrence (7.8% versus 24.0%; p = 0.019), as well as substantially increased rates of microbial eradication (68.8% versus 42.0%; p = 0.007). CAZ-AVI add-on therapy rather than monotherapy showed statistically significant favored clinical and microbial outcomes over the standard therapy. Furthermore, sex (female %), ICU admission, and fever were negatively associated with patients' 30-day all-cause mortality, serving as independent negative factors. Only fever, CRP bio levels, inotropes, and ICU admissions were significant predictors influencing the CAZ-AVI's clinical efficiency. The duration of CAZ-AVI therapy positively influenced CAZ-AVI's microbial eradication, while both WBC counts and fever experiences were negative predictors. This study shows the effective usage of CAZ-AVI against CRKP OXA-48-like infections. The influencing independent variables depicted here should recommend that clinicians individualize the CAZ-AVI dose based on co-existing risk factors to achieve optimal survival and efficacy. Prospective multicenter and randomized control studies are recommended, with individualized CAZ-AVI precision administration implemented based on patients' characteristics.

Enhanced protective efficacy of an OprF/PcrV bivalent DNA vaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa using a hydrogel delivery system

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is one of the leading pathogens responsible for hospital-acquired infections. With the increasing antibiotic resistance of PA, clinical treatment has become increasingly challenging. DNA vaccines represent a promising approach for combating PA infection. However, the immune response induced by a single antigen is limited, and combination vaccines hold greater therapeutic potential. The highly conserved OprF and PcrV genes are attractive candidate antigens for vaccine development, but the poor delivery of such vaccines has limited their clinical application. In this study, we constructed an OprF/PcrV bivalent DNA vaccine, and a polyaspartamide/polyethylene glycol di-aldehyde (PSIH/PEG DA) hydrogel was formulated to improve DNA delivery. The OprF/PcrV DNA vaccine formulated with the PSIH/PEG DA hydrogel was carefully characterized in vitro and in vivo and showed suitable compatibility. The PSIH/PEG DA hydrogel formulation induced a mixed Th1/Th2/Th17 immune response in mice, leading to a significant increase in antibody titers, lymphocyte proliferation rates, and cytokine levels compared to those in mice treated with single or combined vaccines. The PSIH/PEG DA hydrogel delivery system significantly enhanced the immune protection of the DNA vaccine in a murine pneumonia model, as revealed by the reduced bacterial burden and inflammation in the mouse lungs and increased survival rate. In conclusion, the PSIH/PEG DA hydrogel delivery system can further enhance the immune efficacy of the combination OprF/PcrV DNA vaccine. This research provides a novel optimized strategy for the prevention and treatment of PA infection using DNA vaccines.

Clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam combination therapy for severe hospital-acquired pulmonary infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study aimed to identify the effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and its optimisation programs for severe hospital-acquired pulmonary infections (sHAPi) caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA and DTR-P. aeruginosa).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed observational data on treatment and outcomes of CAZ/AVI for sHAPi caused by CRPA or DTR-P. aeruginosa. The primary study outcomes were to evaluate the clinical and microbiology efficacy of CAZ/AVI.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 84 in-patients with sHAPi caused by CRPA (n = 39) and DTR-P. aeruginosa (n = 45) who received at least 72 h of CAZ/AVI therapy. The clinical cure rate was 63.1% in total. There was no significant difference in study outcomes between patients treated with CAZ/AVI monotherapy and those managed with combination regimens. CAZ/AVI as first-line therapy possessed prominent clinical benefits regarding infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa. The clinical cure rate was positively relevant with loading dose for CAZ/AVI (odds ratio [OR] 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004-0.19; P < 0.001) and with CAZ/AVI administration by prolonged infusion (odds ratio 0.15; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.77; P = 0.002). APACHE II score>15 (P = 0.013), septic shock at infection onset (P = 0.001), and CAZ/AVI dose adjustment for renal dysfunction (P = 0.003) were negative predictors of clinical cure.

CONCLUSION

CAZ/AVI is a valid alternative for sHAPi caused by CPRA and DTR-P. aeruginosa, even when used alone. Optimisations of the treatment with CAZ/AVI in critically ill patients, including loading dose, adequate maintenance dose and prolonged infusion, were positively associated with potential clinical benefits.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Infections: A Real-World Experience in the ICU

Purpose

Ceftazidime-avibactam (C-A) is a treatment option for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) infections, but little is known regarding its suitability for the intensive care unit (ICU). The current study aimed to analyze use of C-A for critically ill patients, determine independent predictors of clinical outcome and mortality and explore routine dosages for patients in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

Patients and Methods

A single-center, retrospective and observational study was conducted in critically ill patients receiving different C-A-based therapies for CR-GNB infections in a tertiary teaching hospital in Beijing, China. Demographic data, severity of infection, clinical outcomes and mortality were assessed. The primary and secondary outcome of this study was 90-day all-cause mortality and 14-day clinical response, respectively.

Results

A total of 43 patients with CR-GNB infection were enrolled, including 14 (32.6%) patients received C-A monotherapy. C-A monotherapy and combination with other agents did not affect 14-day clinical response or 90-day survival. All-cause mortality at 90-days was 39.5% (17/43). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that concomitant with bloodstream infection was independent risk factors for 90-day mortality and that the time to initiation of C-A and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score was independent predictors of 14-day clinical response. Five CRRT patients who received high-dose C-A therapy (>3.75 g/d) had prolonged survival compared with 5 who received low-dose C-A (<3.75 g/d, p = 0.03).

Conclusion

C-A was an effective therapy for severe CR-GNB infections and clinical response correlated with the time of C-A initiation. A dosage >3.75g/d C-A was associated with prolonged survival of CRRT patients. Randomized controlled trials or multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Bloodstream Infection with Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Objective

To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Methods

Medical records and drug susceptibility data of patients with hematologic malignancies complicated by CRPA bloodstream infections admitted to the Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 64 patients were included in the study, with a mortality rate of 37.5% (24/64) at 28 days after the occurrence of CRPA bloodstream infection. In Cox regression analysis, an absolute neutrophil count <0.5×109/L at discharge (HR 0.039, 95% CI 0.006 ~ 0.258, p=0.001), admission to the intensive care unit (HR 7.546, 95% CI 1.345 ~ 42.338, p= 0.022), and a higher Pitt bacteremia score (HR 0.207, 95% CI 0.046 ~ 0.939, p = 0.041) were independent risk factors associated with 28-day mortality. Survival analysis showed that patients receiving ceftazidime-avibactam-based (HR 0.368, 95% CI 0.107~ 1.268, p = 0.023) or polymyxin B (HR 2.561, 95% CI 0.721 ~ 9.101, p = 0.015) therapy had a higher survival rate.

Conclusion

Patients with hematologic neoplasms had high mortality from CRPA bloodstream infections, and admission to the intensive care unit, higher Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) scores, granulocyte deficiency, and granulocyte deficiency at discharge were independently associated with higher mortality. Early anti-infective treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam or polymyxin B may improve the clinical prognosis of patients.

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

Assessment of mortality-related risk factors and effective antimicrobial regimens for treatment of bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with hematological diseases

Background

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) are related to higher mortality. The objective of this study was to explore clinical outcomes of CRPA bacteremia, identify risk factors and also, compare the efficacy of traditional and novel antibiotic regimens.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at a blood diseases hospital in China. The study included hematological patients who were diagnosed with CRPA bacteremia between January 2014 and August 2022. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at day 30. Secondary endpoints included 7-day and 30-day clinical cure. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was employed to identify mortality-related risk factors.

Results

100 patients infected with CRPA bacteremia were included and 29 patients accepted allogenic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 24 received ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based therapy and 76 received other traditional antibiotics. 30-day mortality was 21.0%. Multivariable cox regression analysis showed neutropenia >7 days after bloodstream infections (BSI) (P=0.030, HR: 4.068, 95%CI: 1.146~14.434), higher Pitt bacteremia score (P<0.001, HR:1.824, 95%CI: 1.322~2.517), higher Charlson comorbidity index (P=0.01, HR: 1.613, 95%CI: 1.124~2.315) and bacteremia due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) (P=0.024, HR:3.086, 95%CI: 1.163~8.197) were identified as independent risk factors of 30-day mortality. After controlling for confounders, an additional multivariable cox regression analysis revealed definitive regimens containing CAZ-AVI were associated with lower mortality in CRPA bacteremia (P=0.016, HR: 0.150, 95%CI: 0.032~0.702), as well as in MDR-PA bacteremia (P=0.019, HR: 0.119, 95%CI: 0.020~0.709).

Conclusions

For patients with hematological diseases and CRPA bacteremia, 30-day mortality rate was 21.0% (21/100). Neutropenia >7 days after BSI, higher Pitt bacteremia score, higher Charlson comorbidity index and bacteremia due to MDR-PA increased 30-day mortality. CAZ-AVI-based regimens were effective alternatives for bacteremia due to CRPA or MDR-PA.

Efficacy and mortality of ceftazidime/avibactam-based regimens in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections: A retrospective multicenter observational study

OBJECTIVES

Limited data on clinical and microbiological efficacy, patient mortality, and other associated factors are available for ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI)-based regimens for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). This study aimed to assess these issues retrospectively using multicenter data.

METHODS

This multicenter study included CR-GNB infected patients treated with CAZ/AVI-based regimens for more than three days. Patient characteristics, bacterial culture reports, drug-sensitivity test results, and antibiotic use, including CAZ/AVI use, were extracted from the patient's clinical records. The clinical and microbiological efficacy of the combined drug regimen and patient mortality were evaluated according to corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to explore the efficacy and mortality-related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients with CR-GNB infection were considered for the analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the treatment of CAZ/AVI-based regimens, the clinical efficacy was 75.4 %. The 7-day microbial efficacy and clearance rate after treatment were 43.7 % and 66.0 %, respectively. Moreover, 30-day all-cause and in-hospital mortality were 11.5 % and 14.2 %, respectively. Harboring renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance rate (CCR) of<20 mL/min), cardiovascular diseases, and digestive system diseases were independent risk factors for poor clinical efficacy of CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Bloodstream infection (BSI), patients with the adjusted doses of CAZ/AVI, and CAZ/AVI co-administration with carbapenem were independently associated factors of bacterial clearance by CAZ/AVI-based regimens. Age, total hospital stays, use of mechanical ventilation, and cumulative CAZ/AVI dose were independent factors associated with all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

CAZ/AVI was an effective drug in treating CR-GNB infection. CAZ/AVI that is mostly excreted by the kidney and is accumulated in renal impairment should be renally adjusted. Renal dysfunction and the adjusted dose of CAZ/AVI were associated with efficacy. Clinicians should individualize CAZ/AVI regimen and dose by the level of renal function to achieve optimal efficacy and survival. The efficacy of CAZ/AVI in the treatment of CR-GNB infection, as well as the implementation of individualized precision drug administration of CAZ/AVI according to patients' different infection sites, renal function, bacterial types, bacterial resistance mechanisms, blood concentration monitoring and other conditions need to be further studied in multicenter.

Development and Assessment of a Novel Predictive Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Secondary CR-GNB Bloodstream Infections among CR-GNB Carriers in the Gastroenterology Department: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

With the number of critically ill patients increasing in gastroenterology departments (GEDs), infections associated with Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) are of great concern in GED. However, no CR-GNB bloodstream infection (BSI) risk prediction model has been established for GED patients. Almost universally, CR-GNB colonization precedes or occurs concurrently with CR-GNB BSI. The objective of this study was to develop a nomogram that could predict the risk of acquiring secondary CR-GNB BSI in GED patients who are carriers of CR-GNB.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective case-control study from January 2020 to March 2022. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors of secondary CR-GNB bloodstream infections among CR-GNB carriers in the gastroenterology department. A nomogram was constructed according to a multivariable regression model. Various aspects of the established predicting nomogram were evaluated, including discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. We assessed internal validation using bootstrapping.

RESULTS

The prediction nomogram includes the following predictors: high ECOG PS, severe acute pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, neutropenia, a long stay in hospital, and parenteral nutrition. The model demonstrated good discrimination and good calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

With an estimate of individual risk using the nomogram developed in this study, clinicians and nurses can identify patients with a high risk of secondary CR-GNB BSI early.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients

Background

Experience of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection in recipients after lung transplantation (LT) is relatively limited.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted on lung transplant recipients receiving CAZ/AVI therapy for CRPA infection. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were clinical cure and microbiological cure.

Results

Among 183 LT recipients, a total of 15 recipients with CRPA infection who received CAZ/AVI therapy were enrolled in this study. The mean age of recipients was 54 years and 73.3% of recipients were male. The median time from infection onset to initiation of CAZ/AVI treatment was 4 days (IQR, 3-7) and the mean duration of CAZ/AVI therapy was 10 days. CAZ/AVI was mainly administered as monotherapy in LT recipients (80%). Among these eligible recipients, 14-day and 30-day mortality were 6.7% and 13.3%, respectively. The clinical cure and microbiological cure rates of CAZ/AVI therapy were 53.3% and 60%, respectively. Three recipients (20%) experienced recurrent infection. In addition, the mean lengths of ICU stay and hospital stay were 24 days and 35 days, respectively, among LT recipients.

Conclusion

CAZ/AVI may be an alternative and promising regimen for CRPA eradiation in lung transplant recipients.

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Multidrug Resistant Escherichia coli Urosepsis: A Review

Escherichia coli is a versatile commensal and pathogenic member of the human microflora. As the primary causative pathogen in urosepsis, E. coli places an immense burden on healthcare systems worldwide. To further exacerbate the issue, multi drug resistance (MDR) has spread rapidly through E. coli populations, making infections more troublesome and costlier to treat. This paper aimed to review the literature concerning the development of MDR in uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and explore the existing evidence of current and emerging treatment strategies. While some MDR strains maybe treated with β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations as well as cephalosporins, cephamycin, temocillin and fosfomycin, current treatment strategies for many MDR UPEC strains are reliant on carbapenems. Carbapenem overreliance may contribute to the alarming dissemination of carbapenem-resistance amongst some UPEC communities, which has ushered in a new age of difficult to treat infections. Alternative treatment options for carbapenem resistant UPEC may include novel β-lactam-β-lactamase or carbapenemase inhibitor combinations, cefiderocol, polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides or fosfomycin. For metallo-β-lactamase producing strains (e.g., NDM, IMP-4), combinations of cefazidime-avibacam with aztreonam have been used. Additionally, the emergence of new antimicrobials brings new hope to the treatment of such infections. However, continued research is required to successfully bring these into the clinic for the treatment of MDR E. coli urosepsis.

Update of clinical application in ceftazidime-avibactam for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections

PURPOSE

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) have become a major global public health threat. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a newer combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The aim of this review is to describe the recent real-world experience of CAZ-AVI for the infections due to MDR-GNB.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for clinical application in CAZ-AVI for MDR-GNB infections. Reference lists were reviewed and synthesized for narrative review.

RESULTS

MDRGNB infections are associated with higher mortality significantly comparing to drug-susceptible bacterial infections. Fortunately, CAZ-AVI shows significant benefits for infections due to KPC or OXA-48 CRE, comparing to colistin, carbapenem, aminoglycoside and other older agents, even in those with immunocompromised status. The efficacy of CAZ-AVI varies in different infection sites due to CRE, which is lower in pneumonia. Early use is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Noteworthy, when adopted as salvage therapy, CAZ-AVI is still superior to other GNB active antibiotics. CAZ-AVI plus aztreonam is recommended as the first line of MBL-CRE infections. However, for infections caused by KPC- and OXA-48-producing isolates, further investigations are needed to demonstrate the benefit of combination therapy. Besides CRE, CAZ-AVI is also active to MDR-PA. However, the development of resistance in CRE and MDR-PA against CAZ-AVI is alarming, and more investigations and studies are needed to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections due to CAZ-AVI-resistant pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI appears to be a valuable therapeutic option in MDR-GNB infections. Using CAZ-AVI appropriately to improve efficacy and decrease the emergence of resistance is important.