Calciphylaxis: An Analysis of Concomitant Factors, Treatment Effectiveness and Prognosis in 30 Patients

Refractory wounds induced by normal-renal calciphylaxis: An under-recognised calcific arteriolopathy

BACKGROUND

Normal-renal calciphylaxis (NRC) is a devastating calcific vasculopathy characterised by refractory wounds. It is more likely to be misdiagnosed because of the absence of renal insufficiency. Failure to effectively control may lead to rapid deterioration and ultimately death. However, current knowledge of it is still inadequate.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a relatively comprehensive review of NRC.

METHODS

Nine electronic medical databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library and so on were searched from inception to April 1, 2022. Articles in which calciphylaxis was diagnosed in patients with normal renal function were included.

RESULTS

Totally 140 articles were retrieved with 187 patients (median age, 62 years [IQR, 49.63 ~ 75.70 years]; 83.42% female; 84.5% Caucasian). Vitamin K antagonism (43.32%) and diabetes (39.57%) accounted for most of the concomitant factors. Cutaneous presentations were the most common. Pathological confirmation was made in 97.86% of patients with an accuracy of 99.45%. Multidisciplinary therapeutic strategies were usually implemented while the final prognosis was not ideal, with a 6-month mortality rate of 21.10% and a 1-year mortality rate of 27.52%.

CONCLUSION

NRC is an under-recognised disease caused by a variety of factors; meanwhile, multidisciplinary efforts are required to inform diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.

Calciphylaxis in a Patient With Lupus Nephritis and Acute Kidney Injury: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review

Calciphylaxis is a rare and severe disease characterized by calcification, fibrosis, and thrombosis of small blood vessels. Although it primarily affects patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis, limited cases have been reported of calciphylaxis in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and lupus. This case report describes the occurrence of calciphylaxis in a 35-year-old female recently diagnosed with lupus nephritis class IV and AKI requiring dialysis.

Successful Treatment Using Apixaban in a Patient on Hemodialysis with Uremic Calciphylaxis

Calciphylaxis is a rare but serious condition in which microvessel occlusion occurs within the subcutaneous adipose tissue and dermis, leading to painful lesions. End-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis and warfarin therapy can increase the risk of calciphylaxis. In this report, we describe the evaluation and treatment of a 75-year-old female patient with warfarin-induced calciphylaxis who presented unique symptoms. The patient required intensive care unit admission due to hemodynamic instability, which was treated with inotropes and broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. This description of the patient's unusual symptoms has the potential to provide insights needed to improve the diagnosis of future patients. Due to the unavailability of FDA-approved treatment for calciphylaxis, its management is based on data from observational studies and clinical experience.

The Role of Iron in Calciphylaxis—A Current Review

Calcific uraemic arteriolopathy (CUA), also known as calciphylaxis, is a rare and often fatal condition, frequently diagnosed in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Although exact pathogenesis remains unclear, iron supplementation is suggested as a potential risk factor. Iron and erythropoietin are the main stay of treatment for anaemia in ESRD patients. Few observational studies support the role of iron in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis although data from the pivotal trial was not strongly supportive of this argument, i.e., no difference in incidence of calciphylaxis between the low-dose and high-dose iron treatment arms. Elevated levels of vascular cell adhesion molecules in association with iron excess were postulated to the pathogenesis of CUA by causing inflammation and calcification within the microvasculature. In-addition, oxidative stress generated because of iron deposition in cases of systemic inflammation, such as those seen in ESRD, may play a role in vascular calcification. Despite these arguments, a direct correlation between cumulative iron exposure with CUA incidence is not clearly demonstrated in the literature. Consequently, we do not have evidence to recommend iron reduction or cessation in ESRD patients that develop CUA.

Differentiation of Lower Extremity Skin Changes in the Intensive Care Setting

Digital and lower extremity skin changes often signify critical underlying disorders. Patients in the intensive care unit also frequently have hemodynamic instability requiring the use of vasoactive medications, which may lead to various presentations of limb ischemia; preexisting conditions increase these patients' risk for arterial embolization. Most arterial emboli are clots that originate in the heart and travel to distant vascular beds, where they cause arterial occlusion, ischemia, and, potentially, infarction; the 2 most common sequelae are stroke and lower limb ischemia. Emboli also arise from atherosclerotic plaques. Other conditions can also cause skin color changes in this vulnerable population. Prompt recognition and differentiation of lower extremity skin changes can result in improved patient outcomes. A thorough literature search was conducted to differentiate the primary causes of lower extremity and digital skin changes in the critically ill patient and outline diagnostic and management techniques.

Calciphylaxis: Part I. Diagnosis and pathology

Calciphylaxis is an uncommon but devastating disorder characterized by vascular calcification and subsequent cutaneous tissue necrosis. This results in exquisitely painful and slow healing wounds that portend exceptionally high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of this condition can be complicated because there are no conclusive serologic, radiographic or visual signs that this disease is manifesting. The differential of tissue necrosis is broad, and identifying calciphylaxis requires an adroit understanding of the risk factors and physical signs that should raise suspicion of this condition. Reviews on this subject are uncommon and lack directed commentary from disease experts on the best diagnostic approach for patients suffering from this disease. The goal of this article is to update practicing dermatologists on the current standard of care for calciphylaxis.

Therapeutic effect of intravenous sodium thiosulfate for uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous sodium thiosulfate (IV STS) with that of loratadine in the treatment of uremic pruritus in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included 44 HD patients with pruritus aged over 18 years between June 2018 and January 2020 at the Aerospace Center Hospital of China. Twenty-four HD patients received 3.2 g IV STS treatment three times per week at the end of each HD session for 8 weeks. Twenty HD patients received loratadine (10 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Pruritus intensity was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the detailed pruritus score (DPS) at three time points. The safety of STS was evaluated according to adverse event symptoms and biological variable changes.

Results

There was no significant difference between the STS and loratadine groups in age, sex, characteristics of pruritus, or other clinical variables before treatment. After 8 weeks of treatment, the VAS score (7.07 ± 2.56 and 2.67 ± 2.01) and DPS (30.72 ± 4.81 and 8.04 ± 2.86) decreased significantly in the STS group (p < 0.05). The mean decrease in VAS score (6.89 ± 1.98 and 6.34 ± 2.35) and DPS (28.90 ± 3.24 and 26.92 ± 2.41) in the loratadine group was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There were no morbidities or mortalities associated with the use of either drug. All biological variables remained stable after therapy.

Conclusions

STS can improve uremic pruritus in HD patients. However, literature on the subject remains lacking. Close monitoring for adverse effects is advised.

Assessment of outcomes of calciphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Calciphylaxis is a rare thrombotic vasculopathy characterized by high morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of studies examining longitudinal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess mortality, days spent in the hospital, and amputations in patients with calciphylaxis.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was conducted in 145 patients diagnosed with calciphylaxis at an urban tertiary care hospital from January 2006 to December 2018.

RESULTS

Six-month mortality was 37.2%, and 1-year mortality was 44.1%. Patients with nephrogenic calciphylaxis had worse survival than those with nonnephrogenic calciphylaxis (P = .007). This difference in survival disappeared when limiting mortality to deaths due to calciphylaxis. Age (P = .003) and end-stage renal disease (P = .01) were risk factors associated with 1-year mortality. Diabetes mellitus was associated with greater total hospitalization days (coefficient, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.4); bedside debridement was associated with fewer hospitalization days (coefficient, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-0.9). Amputations were not associated with any of the examined risk factors. The use of warfarin followed by a transition to nonwarfarin anticoagulation was associated with decreased hazard of death (P = .01).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Calciphylaxis remains a complex, heterogeneous disease. Mortality is lower in patients with nonnephrogenic disease. These findings may be incorporated during discussions regarding the goals of care to facilitate informed shared decision making.

Penile calciphylaxis: A retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Calciphylaxis is a rare disorder characterized by skin necrosis caused by calcium deposition within vessels, thrombosis, and subsequent tissue ischemia. Penile involvement may rarely occur.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors, diagnosis, management, and mortality of patients with penile calciphylaxis.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was conducted of 16 patients with penile calciphylaxis treated at 2 large urban tertiary care centers between January 2001 and December 2019. A control group of 44 male patients with nonpenile calciphylaxis at the same institution was included.

RESULTS

The median survival of patients with penile calciphylaxis was 3.8 months (interquartile range, 27.0 months). Mortality was 50% at 3 months and 62.5% at 6 months for penile calciphylaxis, and 13.6% at 3 months and 29.5% at 6 months for controls (P = .008). Patients with penile calciphylaxis were less likely to be obese (P = .04) but more likely to have hyperparathyroidism (P = .0003) and end-stage renal disease (P = .049).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study design and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study further defines the disease course of penile calciphylaxis, which has high mortality. Imaging may be used to aid diagnosis. Risk factors include end-stage renal disease, hyperparathyroidism, and normal body mass index.