Clinical Utility Of Elagolix As An Oral Treatment For Women With Uterine Fibroids: A Short Report On The Emerging Efficacy Data

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Uterine Fibroids

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign neoplasm of the female reproductive tract in reproductive age women. Their prevalence is age dependent and can be detected in up to 80% of women by the age of 50 years. Patients affected by uterine fibroids may experience a significant physical, emotional, social, and financial toll as well as losses in their quality of life. Unfortunately, curative hysterectomy abolishes future pregnancy potential, while uterine-sparing surgical and radiologic alternatives are variously associated with reduced long-term reproductive function and/or high tumor recurrence rates. Recently, pharmacological treatment against uterine fibroids have been widely considered by patients to limit uterine fibroid-associated symptoms such as heavy menstrual bleeding. This hormonal therapy seemed effective through blocking the stimulatory effects of gonadal steroid hormones on uterine fibroid growth. However, they are contraindicated in women actively pursuing pregnancy and otherwise effective only during use, which is limited because of long-term safety and other concerns. Accordingly, there is an urgent unmet need for safe, durable, and fertility-compatible non-surgical treatment options for uterine fibroids. In this review article, we cover the current pharmacological treatments for uterine fibroids including their comparable efficacy and side effects as well as emerging safe natural compounds with promising anti-uterine fibroid effects.

An evaluation of relugolix/estradiol/norethindrone acetate for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women

INTRODUCTION

Uterine Fibroids (UFs) are the most predominant benign tumor in women who are coming of reproductive age, and causes intense economic load priced in billions of US dollars. Historically, surgery has been the main definitive treatment, albeit less attractive nowadays, especially for women with future fertility plans. Therefore, studies to explore the pharmacological treatment options are increasing especially as those that are currently available are limited for short-term use only.

AREAS COVERED

This drug evaluation features the clinical results from previous and ongoing studies of relugolix, in combination with the add back therapy of estradiol (E2) and norethindrone acetate (NETA), as a novel, orally administered, nonpeptide antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in premenopausal women with UFs.

EXPERT OPINION

The combination of relugolix/E2/NETA is an encouraging, well-tolerated and noninvasive pharmacological option for UFs patients. Relugolix induced a concentration-dependent decrease in HMB. However, it should be used with hormonal add-back therapy (E2+ NETA) to avoid induced hypoestrogenic side effects, importantly bone mineral density loss. Moreover, symptoms will likely resume shortly after the termination of the relugolix combination administration.

Effects of Elagolix on the Pharmacokinetics of Omeprazole and its Metabolites in Healthy Premenopausal Women

This study evaluated the effect of repeated doses of elagolix on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole and its metabolites in healthy premenopausal female subjects. Adult premenopausal female subjects (N = 20) received a single oral dose of omeprazole (40 mg) on Day 1 and Day 11 and oral doses of elagolix (300 mg) twice-daily on Days 3 to 11. Serial blood samples for assay of omeprazole and its metabolites were collected for 24 hours after dosing on Days 1 and 11. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for omeprazole, 5-hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulfone; and were compared between Day 1 and Day 11. Pharmacogenetic testing was performed for CYP2C19 variant alleles and the results were used to compare the magnitude of elagolix-omeprazole DDI between the different genotype subgroups. Administration of elagolix 300 mg twice-daily for 9 days increased omeprazole exposure by 1.8-fold and decreased the metabolite-to-parent ratio for 5-hydroxyomeprazole by ~60%. Conversely, there was an increase in the metabolite-to-parent ratio for omeprazole sulfone by 25%. Elagolix increased omeprazole exposures by 2- to 2.5-fold in CYP2C19 Extensive and Intermediate Metabolizer subjects, but decreased omeprazole exposures by 40% in Poor Metabolizer subjects. Exposures of 5-hydroxyomeprazole decreased by 20-30% in all genotype subgroups, and omeprazole sulfone exposures increased by ~3-fold in Extensive and Intermediate Metabolizer subjects. Elagolix is a weak inhibitor of CYP2C19 and exposure of CYP2C19 substrates may be increased upon coadministration with elagolix. Omeprazole may exhibit drug interactions due to multiple mechanisms other than CYP2C19-mediated metabolism; complicating the interpretation of results from omeprazole DDI studies.

Elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Elagolix is effective and safe for treating menorrhagia in women with uterine fibroid. However, it is reported to be associated with hypoestrogenism that can be alleviated by adding estradiol/norethindrone acetate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of elagolix treatment in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroid by comparing: elagolix versus placebo and elagolix versus estradiol/norethindrone acetate.

Methodology

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2021, Issue 3 of 12), MEDLINE databases (1980 to December week 1, 2020), and trial registries for relevant randomized clinical trials were used. All randomized clinical trials were reviewed and evaluated. Random effects models were used to estimate the dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Data for risk of bias, heterogeneity, sensitivity, reporting bias and quality of evidence were assessed.

Results

Four randomized controlled trials with 1949 premenopausal women from 323 locations were included. Elagolix improved menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml (RR 4.81, 95% CI 2.45 to 9.45; four trials, 869 participants; moderate quality evidence) or more than 50% reduction from baseline (RR 4.87, 95% CI 2.55 to 9.31; four trials, 869 participants; moderate quality evidence) compared to placebo. There was no difference in menstrual blood loss of less than 80 ml (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.16; five trials, 1365 participants; moderate quality evidence) or more than 50% reduction from baseline between the elagolix (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15; five trials, 1365 participants; high quality evidence) and elagolix with estradiol/norethindrone acetate. In both comparisons, elagolix has reduced the mean percentage change in uterine and fibroid volume, improved symptoms, and health-related quality of life. More patients had hot flush, and bone mineral density loss in the elagolix treatment compared to both placebo and elagolix with estradiol/norethindrone acetate.

Conclusions

Elagolix appeared to be effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding caused by uterine fibroid and combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate was able to alleviate the hypoestrogenism side effects in premenopausal women.

Review registration

PROSPERO CDR 42021233898.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01596-2.

Current approaches to overcome the side effects of GnRH analogs in the treatment of patients with uterine fibroids

Introduction: Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most prevalent benign neoplastic threat originating from myometria of reproductive age women, with a profound financial load valued in hundreds of billions of dollars. Unfortunately, there is no curative treatment so far except surgery and available pharmacological treatments are restricted for short-term treatment options. Thus, there is a large unmet need in the UF space for noninvasive therapeutics.Areas covered: The authors reviewed the literature available for the utility of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs in women with UFs. We also focused on clinical studies exploring the therapeutic benefits of novel oral non-peptide GnRH antagonists that were recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with UFs in premenopausal women.Expert opinion: The results regarding the efficacy of new-generation oral GnRH-antagonists, such as elagolix, relugolix and linzagolix, are promising and offer potential prospect for the future therapy of UFs. However, these antagonists must be combined with hormonal add-back therapy to minimize the resultant hypoestrogenic side effects such as bone loss.

Elagolix in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in premenopausal women

INTRODUCTION

Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common benign tumor arising from myometrium of reproductive age women, with significant financial burden estimated in hundreds of billions of dollars. Unfortunately, there are limitations in available long-term treatment options. Thus, there is a large unmet need in the UF space for noninvasive therapeutics.

AREAS COVERED

Authors reviewed the literature available for elagolix; an orally bioavailable, second-generation, non-peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with UFs in premenopausal women.

EXPERT OPINION

The utility of new-generation oral GnRH-antagonists, such as elagolix, relugolix and linzagolix, is offering a new potential opportunity for the future therapy of UFs: elagolix has been the most studied drug of this class for treating benign gynecological diseases, including endometriosis and UFs, for which it has been US FDA-approved in 2018 and 2020, respectively.

MiR-182 inhibits proliferation, migration, invasion and inflammation of endometrial stromal cells through deactivation of NF-κB signaling pathway in endometriosis

Endometriosis affects about 10-15% women for reproductive age, but it is not currently curable and the underlying etiology for this disease is still not clear. In the present study, functions and mechanisms of miR-182 and RELA in endometriosis were investigated. BAY 11-7082 was used to block NF-κB pathway. qRT-PCR, ELISA and western blot assays were employed to evaluate the expressions of miR-182 and RELA, inflammatory factors and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related markers, and activation of NF-κB pathway. MTT, wound healing or Transwell assays were used to evaluate the cell proliferation, migration and invasion capacities. Bioinformatic and dual-luciferase reporter assays were carried out to analyze the interaction between miR-182 and RELA. MiR-182 expression was decreased, while RELA was increased as developed from normal to eutopic and ectopic status, which was accompanied by upregulated inflammatory factors and EMT-related proteins. RELA was directly targeted by miR-182 in human endometrial stromal cells. Overexpression of RELA increased inflammation-associated and EMT-related markers expression, while miR-182 upregulation decreased the expression of these genes in a dose-dependent manner, which finally attenuated the proliferation, migration and invasion capacities of endometrial stromal cells through deactivation of NF-κB signaling pathway. Moreover, co-overexpression of RELA reversed the above effects induced by miR-182. In a word, miR-182 directly targeted RELA and inhibited proliferation, migration, invasion, EMT and inflammation of endometrial stromal cells through deactivation of NF-κB signaling pathway in endometriosis. These results provide new insights into the interaction between miR-182 and NF-κB pathway and their potential as therapeutic targets for treatment of endometriosis.

Assessment of Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions of Elagolix, a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonist

Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist indicated for the management of endometriosis-associated pain and in combination with estradiol/norethindrone acetate indicated for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) in premenopausal women. Elagolix coadministered with estradiol/norethindrone acetate is in late-stage development for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Based on the in vitro profile of elagolix metabolism and disposition, 9 drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies evaluating the victim and perpetrator characteristics of elagolix were conducted in 144 healthy volunteers. As a victim of cytochrome P450 (CYPs) and transporter-mediated DDIs, elagolix area under the curve (AUC) increased by ∼2-fold following coadministration with ketoconazole and by ∼5- and ∼2-fold with single and multiple doses of rifampin, respectively. As a perpetrator, elagolix decreased midazolam AUC (90% confidence interval) by 54% (50%-59%) and increased digoxin AUC by 32% (23%-41%). Elagolix decreased rosuvastatin AUC by 40% (29%-50%). No clinically significant changes in exposure on coadministration with sertraline or fluconazole occurred. A elagolix 150-mg once-daily regimen should be limited to 6 months with strong CYP3A inhibitors and rifampin because of the potential increase in bone mineral density loss, as described in the drug label. A 200-mg twice-daily regimen is recommended for no more than 1 month with strong CYP3A inhibitors and not recommended with rifampin. Elagolix is contraindicated with strong organic anion transporter polypeptide B1 inhibitors (eg, cyclosporine and gemfibrozil). Consider increasing the doses of midazolam and rosuvastatin when coadministered with elagolix, and individualize therapy based on patient response. Clinical monitoring is recommended for P-glycoprotein substrates with a narrow therapeutic window (eg, digoxin). Dose adjustments are not required for sertraline, fluconazole, bupropion (or any CYP2B6 substrate), or elagolix when coadministered.

Non-hormonal mediators of uterine fibroid growth

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign neoplasms of the female reproductive tract and one of the major public health concerns. Although most women with uterine fibroids are asymptomatic, over 30% of them will present with varying symptoms. This review focuses on the role of non-hormonal mediators and pathways in uterine fibroid biology. Furthermore, it provides data regarding the most recent findings in the field of compounds, which use those non-hormonal pathways in the medical therapy of uterine fibroids.

RECENT FINDINGS

Complex signaling pathway alterations are crucial for uterine fibroid development. The topic of the pathophysiology of uterine fibroids focuses mostly on steroids and other hormones. However, other very important pathways exist, and some of them are independent of hormones. Some of the most important pathways, which are non-hormonal, but in some cases still hormone-depended, include growth factors, cytokines and inflammation, Smad proteins, wingless type/β-catenin and others.

SUMMARY

Much more is known about hormonal than about non-hormonal signaling in uterine fibroids. Growth factors, early life exposure and inflammation are key factors in uterine fibroid biology. Numerous agents depend on those pathways and may find their place in the current and future therapy of uterine fibroids.

Role of DNA damage and repair mechanisms in uterine fibroid/leiomyomas: a review

There has been a significant annual increase in the number of cases of uterine leiomyomas or fibroids (UF) among women of all races and ages across the world. A fortune is usually spent by the healthcare sector for fibroid-related treatments and management. Molecular studies have established the higher mutational heterogeneity in UF as compared to normal myometrial cells. The contribution of DNA damage and defects in repair responses further increases the mutational burden on the cells. This in turn leads to genetic instability, associated with cancer risk and other adverse reproductive health outcomes. Such and many more growing bodies of literature have highlighted the genetic/molecular, biochemical and clinical aspects of UF; none the less there appear to be a lacuna bridging the bench to bed gap in addressing and preventing this disease. Presented here is an exhaustive review of not only the molecular mechanisms underlying the predisposition to the disease but also possible strategies to effectively diagnose, prevent, manage, and treat this disease.