Drug Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: Out with the Old, in with the New?

Preferences for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder treatments: A conjoint analysis with neurologists in Spain

BACKGROUND

The treatment landscape for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has changed in recent years with the approval of therapies with different efficacy, safety and administration profiles.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess neurologists' preferences for different NMOSD treatment attributes using conjoint analysis (CA).

METHODS

We conducted an online, non-interventional, cross-sectional study in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Neurology. Our CA assessed five drugs' attributes: prevention of relapse, prevention of disability accumulation, safety risk, management during pregnancy, and route and frequency of administration. Participants were presented with eight hypothetical treatment scenarios to rank based on their preferences from the most preferred to the least. An ordinary least squares method was selected to estimate weighted preferences.

RESULTS

A total of 104 neurologists were included. Mean age (standard deviation-SD) was 37.7 (10.3) years, 52.9 % were male, and median time (interquartile range) of experience managing NMOSD was 5.0 (2.9, 10.8) years. Neurologists placed the greatest importance on efficacy attributes, time to relapse (44.1 %) being the most important, followed by preventing disability accumulation (36.8 %). In contrast, route and frequency of administration (4.6 %) was the least important characteristic. Participants who prioritised efficacy attributes felt more comfortable in decision-making, had fewer past experiences of care-related regret and a lower attitude to risk taking than their counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Neurologists' treatment preferences in NMOSD were mainly driven by efficacy attributes. These results may be useful to design policy decisions and treatment guidelines for this condition.

Therapeutic inertia in the management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Introduction and objective

Limited information is available on how neurologists make therapeutic decisions in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), especially when new treatments with different mechanisms of action, administration, and safety profile are being approved. Decision-making can be complex under this uncertainty and may lead to therapeutic inertia (TI), which refers to lack of treatment initiation or intensification when therapeutic goals are not met. The study aim was to assess neurologists' TI in NMOSD.

Methods

An online, cross-sectional study was conducted in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Neurology. Neurologists answered a survey composed of demographic characteristics, professional background, and behavioral traits. TI was defined as the lack of initiation or intensification with high-efficacy treatments when there is evidence of disease activity and was assessed through five NMOSD aquaporin-4 positive (AQP4+) simulated case scenarios. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between neurologists' characteristics and TI.

Results

A total of 78 neurologists were included (median interquartile range [IQR] age: 36.0 [29.0-46.0] years, 55.1% male, median [IQR] experience managing demyelinating conditions was 5.2 [3.0-11.1] years). The majority of participants were general neurologists (59.0%) attending a median (IQR) of 5.0 NMOSD patients (3.0-12.0) annually. Thirty participants (38.5%) were classified as having TI. Working in a low complexity hospital and giving high importance to patient's tolerability/safety when choosing a treatment were predictors of TI.

Conclusion

TI is a common phenomenon among neurologists managing NMOSD AQP4+. Identifying TI and implementing specific intervention strategies may be critical to improving therapeutic decisions and patient care.

Review of Satralizumab for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A New Biologic Agent Targeting the Interleukin-6 Receptor

Currently, three monoclonal antibodies (MABs) have received regulatory approval from the federal agency, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), for the medical management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Satralizumab was the third approved therapy after MABs like eculizumab and inebilizumab for NMOSD, an uncommon but severe enfeebling autoimmune neurological disease. Satralizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, exerts its action in NMOSD by acting against cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), a foremost mediator in the pathological process of NMOSD. Two pivotal clinical trials carried out in NMOSD patients had established that satralizumab significantly decreased the rate of relapse in patients suffering from NMOSD as opposed to placebo. The trials also demonstrated that satralizumab is relatively safe. Thus, satralizumab provides an efficacious and safe treatment option for this rare, disabling central nervous system (CNS) disease. Our review aimed to elucidate the pharmacological characteristics of satralizumab and illustrate the available evidence regarding its safety and efficacy in patients with NMOSD.

Clinical and epidemiological correlates of treatment change in patients with NMOSD: insights from the CIRCLES cohort

OBJECTIVE

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) represent rare autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system largely targeting optic nerve(s) and spinal cord. The present analysis used real-world data to identify clinical and epidemiological correlates of treatment change in patients with NMOSD.

METHODS

CIRCLES is a longitudinal, observational study of NMOSD conducted at 15 centers across North America. Patients with ≥ 60 days of follow-up and receiving on-study maintenance treatment were evaluated. The mean annual relapse rate (ARR) was estimated using negative binomial models; the likelihood of treatment change was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Relapses were included as time-varying covariates to estimate the relationship to treatment change.

RESULTS

Of 542 patients included, 171 (31.5%) experienced ≥ 1 relapse on the study and 133 patients (24.5%) had ≥ 1 change in the treatment regimen. Two categories of variables significantly correlated with the likelihood of treatment change: (1) relapse: any on-study relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.91; p < 0.001), relapse phenotypes (HR range = 2.15-5.49; p < 0.001), and pre-study ARR > 0.75 (HR 2.28; p < 0.001); 2) disease phenotype: brain syndrome only vs transverse myelitis involvement at onset (HR 2.44; p = 0.008), disease duration < 1 vs > 5 years (HR 1.66; p = 0.028), or autoimmune comorbidity (HR 1.55; p = 0.015). A subset of these factors significantly correlated with shorter time to first rituximab discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In CIRCLES, relapse patterns and disease phenotype significantly correlated with changes in the maintenance treatment regimen. Such findings may facilitate the identification of patients with NMOSD who are likely to benefit from treatment change to reduce relapse risk or disease burden and enhance the quality of life.

A case report on recurrent area postrema syndrome in AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory condition of the central nervous system caused by severe immune-mediated demyelination and axonal destruction, mainly affecting optic nerves and the spinal cord. We describe a 26-year-old Nepalese woman with recent onset of headache, nausea, vomiting and hiccups indicative of Area Postrema Syndrome (APS). The antibody test for aquaporin-4 was strongly positive. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a bilateral hyperintense signal in the area postrema (AP). The patient started on methylprednisolone, and then azathioprine was added. However, the patient was readmitted because of tingling in her right upper extremity and sudden onset of tremors. An MRI scan showed an enlarged lesion in AP. Rituximab was started on top of the previous treatment, and a second dose was given after 2 weeks. The patient had been monitored regularly and symptom-free for 5 months. Hence, we emphasize the immediate need for a diagnostic approach for NMOSD management.

Treatment and Relapse Prevention of Typical and Atypical Optic Neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory condition involving the optic nerve. Several important typical and atypical ON variants are now recognized. Typical ON has a more favorable prognosis; it can be idiopathic or represent an early manifestation of demyelinating diseases, mostly multiple sclerosis (MS). The atypical spectrum includes entities such as antibody-driven ON associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD), chronic/relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION), and sarcoidosis-associated ON. Appropriate and timely diagnosis is essential to rapidly decide on the appropriate treatment, maximize visual recovery, and minimize recurrences. This review paper aims at presenting the currently available state-of-the-art treatment strategies for typical and atypical ON, both in the acute phase and in the long-term. Moreover, emerging therapeutic approaches and novel steps in the direction of achieving remyelination are discussed.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the cardinal clinical features, distinct immunopathology, current diagnostic criteria, relapse-related risk factors, emerging biomarkers, and evolving treatment strategies pertaining to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The discovery of the pathogenic aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG autoantibody and characterization of NMOSD as an autoimmune astrocytopathy have spearheaded the identification of key immunologic therapeutic targets in this disease, including but not limited to the complement system, the interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor, and B cells. Accordingly, four recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of three new NMOSD therapies, namely eculizumab, satralizumab, and inebilizumab.

SUMMARY

Currently, NMOSD poses both diagnostic and treatment challenges. It is debated whether individuals who are seropositive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG belong within the neuromyelitis optica spectrum. This discussion is fueled by disparities in treatment responses between patients who are AQP4-IgG seropositive and seronegative, suggesting different immunopathologic mechanisms may govern these conditions. As our understanding regarding the immune pathophysiology of NMOSD expands, emerging biomarkers, including serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), may facilitate earlier relapse detection and inform long-term treatment decisions. Future research focal points should include strategies to optimize relapse management, restorative treatments that augment neurologic recovery, and practical solutions that promote equitable access to approved therapies for all patients with NMOSD.

NMOSD—Diagnostic Dilemmas Leading towards Final Diagnosis

(1) Background: The emergence of white matter lesions in the central nervous system (CNS) can lead to diagnostic dilemmas. They are a common radiological symptom and their patterns may overlap CNS or systemic diseases and provoke underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis. The aim of the study was to assess factors influencing the underdiagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) as well as to estimate NMOSD epidemiology in Lubelskie voivodeship, Poland. (2) Methods: This retrospective study included 1112 patients, who were made a tentative or an established diagnosis of acute or subacute onset of neurological deficits. The evaluation was based on medical history, neurological examination, laboratory and radiographic results and fulfilment of diagnosis criteria. (3) Results: Up to 1.62 percent of patients diagnosed with white matter lesions and up to 2.2% of the patients previously diagnosed with MS may suffer from NMOSD. The duration of delayed diagnosis is longer for males, despite the earlier age of onset. Seropositive cases for antibodies against aquaporin-4 have worse prognosis for degree of disability. (4) Conclusions: Underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis in NMOSD still remains a problem in clinical practice and has important implications for patients. The incorrect diagnosis is caused by atypical presentation or NMOSD-mimics; however, covariates such as gender, onset and diagnosis age may also have an influence.

Comparison on the effect of seven drugs to prevent relapses of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A modeling analysis of literature aggregate data

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive comparison of the effect of seven drugs to prevent relapses of NMOSD.

METHOD

A literature search was conducted using public databases. Clinical studies on the seven drugs (eculizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, rituximab, tocilizumab, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil) to prevent relapses of NMOSD were identified. A time-course model was established using the time to first relapse as the primary endpoint, in order to evaluate the long-term effect of each drug in preventing relapse.

RESULTS

Twenty-four trials, including 2207 patients, were included in the model analysis. The results showed that monoclonal antibody therapy could significantly prolong the time to first relapse. Among all seven drugs, eculizumab can most significantly prevent patient from relapse. The estimated proportion of relapse-free patients treated with eculizumab was 98.9% at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Based on the construction of a time-course pharmacodynamic model, this study made a comprehensive quantitative comparison of seven drugs for the treatment of NMOSD for the first time. These results can not only serve as a quantitative supplement for the rational use of drugs in clinical practice but also provide a pharmacodynamic reference for clinical trial design and decision making in the future.

Clinical profile, imaging features and short term visual outcomes of Indian optic neuritis patients with and without seromarkers for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and neuromyelitis optica

Purpose:

To analyze clinical profile, imaging features, and short-term visual outcomes of optic neuritis patients in Indian population with and without seromarkers for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)/neuromyelitis optica (NMO).

Methods:

Electronic medical records of 203 optic neuritis patients who presented between June 2018 and December 2019 to the Neuro-ophthalmology services of a tertiary care center in India were retrospectively analyzed.

Results:

Of 203 patients, 57 patients (28.08%) were positive for MOG-antibody and 20 patients (9.85%) were positive for NMO antibody. 114 patients (56.16%) were double-negative (negative for both antibodies) and 12 patients (5.91%) were diagnosed as multiple sclerosis (MS). None of the patients had both antibodies. Mean age of presentation was 31.29 ± 1.035 years. There was female preponderance in NMO-optic neuritis (NMO-ON) and MS-optic neuritis (MS-ON) groups (1:5). Mean vision on presentation was worse (logMAR 1.570 ± 0.863) in NMO-ON group. The mean visual acuity showed statistically significant recovery (logMAR 0.338 ± 0.639) in the final follow-up in MOG-optic neuritis (MOG-ON) group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed poor visual outcome in patients presenting with retrobulbar neuritis, optic disc pallor, bilateral sequential optic nerve involvement, and with positive NMO antibody. Optic neuritis patients presenting with disc edema associated with pain and positive for MOG antibody were found to have a better visual outcome.

Conclusion:

In this Indian optic neuritis cohort, the prevalence of MOG-ON was higher than NMO-ON. MOG-ON had a better visual outcome than NMO-ON. The incidence of MS-ON was less compared to the western literature. A significant number of patients (114 patients, 56.16%) were double negative for both seromarkers and yet had presented with optic neuritis with no clinical or imaging features suggestive of MS/MOG associated disease (MOG AD)/NMO spectrum disorder (NMO SD).

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Case Report

Background

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder is an autoimmune, astrocytopathic CNS disease, mainly involving the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brain stem regions. The “International Panel for NMOSD Diagnosis (IPND) Diagnostic Criteria” was implemented to define the disorder.

Case Presentation

A 38-year-old patient presented with visual loss of eight months' duration and weakness of the lower extremities of one week's duration. The patient had bilateral optic atrophy on fundoscopic examination, and flaccid paraplegia with sensory loss below T4 level. Serological tests for syphilis, HIV infection, and SLE were negative. Aquaporin-4 antibody test was not done due to limited clinical setup. T2-spine MRI revealed long central thoracic segment (T3 to T6) hyperintense lesion with mild cord expansion. Long segment central canal dilation (syrinx) was noted in the cord proximal to the lesion. Diagnosis of opticospinal variant, NMOSD was made using IPND diagnostic criteria. The patient was started on dexamethasone 50 mg, IV, four times daily (QID) for one week, and changed to prednisolone 1 mg/kg (40 mg) PO daily for one month, to be tapered over three-to-six months. The patient was scheduled to initiate azathioprine 50 mg PO twice daily.

Conclusion

The case emphasizes the existence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in clinical settings of the developing world. High index of suspicion of this rare disease is required to avoid delayed diagnosis and treatment.