Tezepelumab Efficacy in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma with Comorbid Nasal Polyps in NAVIGATOR

Tezepelumab treatment in severe asthma with recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Case series

Background

Tezepelumab is a human IgG2 mAb that inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and is approved for treatment of severe asthma. Bronchial asthma, usually a type 2 inflammatory disease, often co-occurs with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, tezepelumab has unknown effects on severe asthma with CRSwNP. Patients with CRSwNP are frequently candidates for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). CRSwNP is a crucial factor influencing asthma symptoms. However, some patients experience recurrent CRSwNP.

Objective

Tezepelumab was approved for use with CRSwNP, and TSLP is involved in the pathogenesis of CRSwNP. This study presents the cases of 2 patients with severe asthma complicated with recurrent CRSwNP after ESS in whom tezepelumab rapidly improved asthma and sinusitis symptoms.

Methods

We evaluated tezepelumab treatment in patients with severe asthma with recurrent CRSwNP based on symptoms, asthma exacerbation, level of type 2 cytokines, and lung function.

Results

After they had received a high-dose inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β2-agonist, the patients' asthma remained uncontrolled, as defined by a low Asthma Control Test score. However, tezepelumab reduced severe asthma exacerbation, improved lung function, and controlled asthma symptoms. It improved CRSwNP, asthma-related symptoms, and exercise tolerance, and it inhibited type 2 cytokines extensively, indicating its effectiveness in treating CRSwNP. Tezepelumab was efficacious in these patients and improved their symptoms in terms of comorbidities of the upper and lower airways.

Conclusion

Tezepelumab was effective in treating asthma complicated with CRSwNP recurrence after ESS. However, further studies are required to identify the general and specific roles of tezepelumab in treating severe asthma and recurrent CRSwNP.

Biological therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous disease. High proportions of patients with CRSwNP characterized by type 2 inflammation fail to gain adequate control with conventional treatment. The application of biologics in clinics and assessments of novel biologics in clinical trials are blooming in expectations to fulfill the unmet medical needs of patients with CRSwNP with type 2 inflammation.

AREAS COVERED

After an extensive search of PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE for the most recent evidence, we thoroughly summarize current advances in biological therapies for treating patients with CRSwNP.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, biological therapy has been in the spotlight in clinical studies on CRSwNP. Biologics have proven to be efficacious in reducing nasal polyp size, alleviating CRSwNP-related symptoms, improving quality of life, and reducing the need for systemic corticosteroids or endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps. The considerable efficacy and safety profile of biologics has offered patients with refractory CRSwNP another treatment option. However, some concerns remain to be addressed. Aspects such as the position of biological therapy in the management of CRSwNP, traits of patients suitable for certain biologics, etc. necessitate efforts to elucidate these unknowns in order to provide patients with tailored therapy.

Effect of Tezepelumab on Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 Domain and Symptom-Specific Scores in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma and a History of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

INTRODUCTION

Tezepelumab blocks the activity of thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). In a previous analysis, tezepelumab improved asthma and rhinosinusitis symptoms compared with placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and a history of CRSwNP in the 2 years before randomization in the NAVIGATOR study. This post hoc analysis of patients with a CRSwNP diagnosis at any time before randomization in NAVIGATOR enabled domain and symptom-specific analyses of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 outcomes.

METHODS

Patients (aged 12-80 years) with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomized to tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. SNOT-22 total, domain, and item scores were assessed in patients with a history of CRSwNP. Annualized asthma exacerbation rate (primary efficacy outcome), pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (standardized) for patients 12 years and older, and Asthma Symptom Diary scores were also assessed in patients with and without a history of CRSwNP.

RESULTS

Of 1059 patients with severe asthma, 165 (15.6%) had a history of CRSwNP. Tezepelumab treatment resulted in sustained improvements versus placebo in SNOT-22 total score throughout the 52-week study period [least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval) - 11.08 (- 17.80, - 4.35)]. Tezepelumab improved all five SNOT-22 domain scores (sleep, nasal, function, ear/facial, and emotion) and the five SNOT-22 item scores of most clinical interest (decreased sense of smell/taste, nasal blockage, reduced productivity, waking up tired, and cough). Tezepelumab improved asthma-related clinical outcomes in patients with and without a history of CRSwNP.

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and a history of CRSwNP, tezepelumab improved rhinosinusitis symptoms across multiple domains, as well as asthma exacerbations, lung function, asthma control, and health-related quality of life.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03347279 ( https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT03347279 ).

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease's eosinophilic phenotype: Clinical characteristics, biomarkers and biotherapy

COPD is a chronic, heterogeneous inflammatory disorder of the airways with persistent and poorly reversible airflow limitation, causing symptoms such as cough, shortness of breath, and sputum production. Despite optimal treatment, some patients remain symptomatic due to the disease's heterogeneity, manifesting in various phenotypes. One notable phenotype involves eosinophilic inflammation, with a variable prevalence. Identifying eosinophilic phenotypes is crucial for tailored therapeutic strategies, as they respond favorably to corticosteroids and potentially biologics. Recent advances in both clinical trials and spontaneous research have helped understand the biological and clinical characteristics of this phenotype, although no universal consensus has been reached yet on the definition of the cut-off values of the eosinophil peripheral blood count. Moreover, there is evidence of novel emerging biomarkers which might go beyond the sole eosinophil count, while significant advancements in terms of pharmacological treatment have been made, with dupilumab being the first biological drug being licensed for COPD patients with elevated circulating eosinophils in the stable phase. In light of the above, although several papers have been written on the relationship between eosinophils and COPD, in the present work we endeavored to summarize and discuss the pivotal literature findings regarding the eosinophilic COPD in order to help define the biological and clinical features of this peculiar phenotype, with particular attention to the use of established and emerging biomarkers, as well as current and future therapeutic perspectives.

Biologics treatment for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis complicated by bronchial asthma: Narrative review

There are 4 subtypes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS): eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (ECRSwNP), ECRS without NPs (ECRSsNP), non-ECRSwNP, and non-ECRSsNP. Most ECRS cases are categorized as ECRSwNP, and the number of patients with ECRSwNP has recently increased. ECRS is associated mainly with helper T-cell type 2 inflammation and eosinophils. Recently, Interleukin-25, -33, or TSLP, helper T-cell type 17, and Group 2 innate lymphoid cells have also been shown to be involved in the molecular mechanism of ECRS. ECRS can lead to several complications including bronchial asthma and/or aspirin intolerance. Conventionally, surgery and corticosteroids have been used to treat ECRS, but biologics have since been applied. Mepolizumab, benralizumab, and tezepelumab have been reported to improve asthma complicated by NPs more than asthma uncomplicated by NPs. Omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab have been reported to significantly improve Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 scores, nasal polyp scores, and nasal congestion severity in phase III trials. Benralizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab have been reported to improve both ECRS and complicated bronchial asthma.

European biologic training course for type 2 inflammation by EUFOREA in 2024: key facts and lessons learned

The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airways diseases (EUFOREA) organized the first European Biologic Training Course (EBTC) in Brussels on 1st March 2024. The aim of this hybrid EBTC including both face-to-face and web-based participation was to address the educational needs of physicians dealing with asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) on the clinically relevant aspects of diagnosing and treatment with biologics. EUFOREA is an international non-for-profit organization forming an alliance of all stakeholders dedicated to reducing the prevalence and burden of chronic respiratory diseases through the implementation of optimal patient care via educational, research, and advocacy activities. The inclusive and multidisciplinary approach of EUFOREA was reflected in faculty coming from the paediatric, allergology, pulmonology, and Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) speciality and from different continents, with more than 250 participants from over 30 countries in the first EBTC. The current report provides a comprehensive overview of key statements made by the faculty of the EBTC 2024, especially focusing on patient selection for a biologic drug, the communication with patients, the onset of biological treatment and the follow-up in routine clinical practice.

Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP): Evidence in Respiratory Epithelial-driven Diseases Including Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is increasingly recognized for its pivotal role in the pathogenesis of various epithelial-driven chronic inflammatory diseases. This review navigates the existing evidence on TSLP, with a particular focus on asthma, before delving into the current understanding of its role in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). We explore the role of TSLP in the pathogenesis of asthma and CRSwNP, two conditions often interconnected and collectively referred to as"Global Airway Disease". Additionally, this review assesses the therapeutic potential of TSLP inhibition as a treatment option for both CRSwNP and asthma. A systematic literature search was conducted; selected publications were used to describe the biology of TSLP, including its expression and diverse effects on inflammation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of TSLP in asthma is well established and supported by the efficacy of tezepelumab, the first anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody approved for both type 2 (T2)-high and T2-low severe asthma. TSLP may be a key contributor to CRSwNP pathogenesis as evidenced by genetic and mechanistic studies in which TSLP has been shown to regulate T2 inflammation and influence non-T2 responses. Preliminary data from the NAVIGATOR trial indicate that tezepelumab may reduce CRSwNP symptoms in patients with comorbid asthma. While further research is required to clarify the extent of TSLP contribution in CRSwNP, this review highlights the potential of anti-TSLP therapies as a novel approach for managing severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP. If these preliminary findings are confirmed, targeting TSLP could become a promising strategy to treat CRSwNP with or without comorbid asthma.

Update on the Biological and Clinical Relevance of Mast Cells in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a common inflammatory disorder whose complex immunopathogenesis has yet to be fully elucidated. Endotype-2 CRSwNP is the most common form of disease where eosinophils are the main drivers of inflammation. Traditional treatments for CRSwNP have centered around intranasal or systemic corticosteroids and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). However, recent advancements in targeted therapies have introduced novel biological agents that specifically target key inflammatory mediators such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. These biologics offer promising options for patients with CRSwNP, particularly those who do not respond adequately to conventional treatments. Nonetheless, some patients do not satisfactorily respond to these drugs because of an insufficient blockade of the inflammatory process. The mast cell (MC) is another important (and somehow neglected) actor in the pathogenesis of CRSwNP, and the latest clinical and translational evidence in this field has been reviewed in the present paper.

Positioning tezepelumab for patients with severe asthma: from evidence to unmet needs

Several endotypes of severe asthma with predominantly type 2 inflammation can be distinguished by the immune pathways driving the inflammatory processes. However, in the absence of type 2 inflammation, asthma is less clearly defined and is generally associated with poor responses to conventional anti-asthmatic therapies. Studies have shown that disruption of the epithelial barrier triggers inflammatory responses and increases epithelial permeability. A key aspect of this process is that epithelial cells release alarmin cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), in response to allergens and infections. Among these cytokines, TSLP has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for severe asthma, leading to the development of a new biologic, tezepelumab (TZP). By blocking TSLP, TZP may produce wide-ranging effects. Based on positive clinical trial results, TZP appears to offer a promising, safe, and effective treatment approach. This narrative review examines the evidence for treating severe asthma with TZP, analyses clinical trial findings, and provides clinicians with practical insights into identifying patients who may respond best to this novel biologic therapy.

Biologics in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease and Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

Biologic medications have dramatically altered the landscape for treatment of allergic conditions including aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). Biologics should be considered for patients who are refractory to first line therapies for ABPA. Biologics should be discussed with patients with AERD. Variable responses to different biologics indicate that there may be various endotypes of AERD and ABPA, similar to asthma. Alternative biologics may be considered in patients who fail to respond to initial treatment.

Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Current and Emerging

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is categorized phenotypically into CRS with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP, CRSsNP). Endotyping categorizes the disease based on immune cell activity and inflammatory mechanisms into Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3. The Type 2 endotype is the most researched and associated with asthma, atopic disease, and severe CRSwNP. For patients with poorly controlled CRSwNP, there are 3 approved biologic treatments: omalizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab. Many other biologics are being tested in Type 2, non-Type 2, and mixed endotypes in CRSwNP and CRSsNP. These studies will play a significant role in shaping the future of CRS management.

Tezepelumab for severe asthma: elevating current practice to recognize epithelial driven profiles

BACKGROUND

An increasing amount of evidence supports the relevance of epithelium across the wide spectrum of asthma pathobiology. On a clinical ground tezepelumab, selectively binding TSLP, a major epithelial cytokine, has demonstrated to be effective in asthma patients regardless their specific phenotype. In order to avoid the risk of considering tezepelumab as a not-specific option, the present perspective aims to sketch the tezepelumab best eligible patient profile and to propose some hallmarks of epithelial-driven disease by reviewing the published evidence on the drug mechanism of action and efficacy data.

MAIN BODY

Although it cannot rely on standardised or exclusive "markers", the relationship between environment and poor asthma control might suggest a major relevance of the epithelial barrier dysfunction. In that light, allergy and asthma exacerbations concomitant with specific exposures (pathogens, pollutants, chemicals), as well as increased susceptibility to infections can be considered as the hallmark of an impaired epithelial immune response. Tezepelumab is effective in allergic patients, being able to reduce asthma exacerbations precipitated by the exposure to seasonal or perennial aeroallergens, including fungi. In addition, tezepelumab reduced the incidence of co-occurring respiratory illness and asthma exacerbations. In terms of inflammation, epithelial immune response has been related to an impaired mucus hypersecretion and plugging. A placebo-controlled trial demonstrated a significant reduction of mucus plugging in treated patient. Airways hyperreactivity (AHR), airways obstruction and remodelling have been described as an expression of epithelial orchestrated immunological activation. Of note, a significantly higher incidence of mannitol negative test in patients treated with tezepelumab when compared to placebo group has been observed. In addition, A 130 mL improvement in pre-BD FEV1 has been described in patients assuming Tezepelumab. The above-mentioned data suggest that bronchial reversibility and AHR can be considered "functional biomarkers" supporting patients' phenotyping and the identification of tezepelumab best responders.

CONCLUSION

Integrating "functional biomarkers" to the inflammatory ones and a better characterization of asthma exacerbations might pave the way to a different and more transversal phenotyping, which overcomes the "restrictive" labels including T2 high, allergic/atopic or T2 low asthma. Precisely defining the disease characteristics and potential targets for a better control even in tezepelumab eligible subjects is essential to avoid the block buster temptation and optimize the personalized medicine approach according to each patient's individuality.

Real-world unified airway benefits of mepolizumab: Effectiveness in patients with asthma and comorbid nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Nasal polyps (NPs) are commonly associated with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In keeping with the unified airway hypothesis, asthma and CRS with NP (CRSwNP) frequently co-occur, share a similar pathophysiology, and are often treated with oral corticosteroids (OCS); however, a need for alternative treatment options for patients with comorbid asthma and CRSwNP remains.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the short- and long-term dual airway effectiveness of the anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, mepolizumab, in real-world patients with asthma and comorbid NP.

METHODS

Adult patients with CRSwNP who initiated mepolizumab from November 1, 2014, to September 30, 2021, were identified from 2 Merative MarketScan Research Databases. Outcomes were compared for the 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab initiation and a variable follow-up period. Primary outcomes included the following: annual rate and proportion of patients with NP- and asthma-related exacerbations; NP surgery occurrences; all-cause OCS claims, number of OCS bursts, and daily OCS dose; all-cause and NP-related health care resource utilization.

RESULTS

During the 12 months post-index, patients experienced fewer NP- and asthma-related exacerbations, required fewer sinus surgeries, and reduced use of OCS, with fewer all-cause OCS claims and OCS bursts. Significant reductions in asthma exacerbation-related and NP-related health care resource utilization were also observed.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrated the near- and long-term real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab treatment, with a focus on dual lower and upper airway benefit from single-agent add-on therapy. These results may aid physicians in clinical decision-making for patients with asthma and comorbid CRSwNP with complex care needs.

Efficacy of Tezepelumab in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma Across Multiple Clinically Relevant Subgroups in the NAVIGATOR Study

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with severe asthma continue to experience symptoms and exacerbations despite treatment with standard-of-care therapy. In the phase 3 NAVIGATOR study, tezepelumab significantly reduced exacerbations over 52 weeks compared with placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. This analysis assessed the efficacy of tezepelumab in reducing asthma exacerbations in various clinically relevant subgroups of patients in NAVIGATOR.

METHODS

NAVIGATOR was a phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants (12-80 years old) with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomized 1:1 to receive tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Pre-specified and post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) over 52 weeks in clinically relevant subgroups of patients defined by baseline patient characteristics, medical history, exacerbation triggers, medication eligibility and medication use before and during the study.

RESULTS

Tezepelumab reduced the AAER over 52 weeks compared with placebo across a wide range of patient subgroups assessed. Reductions in exacerbations were similar across subgroups defined by baseline patient characteristics, ranging from 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21, 65) to 60% (95% CI: 44, 71) in subgroups analysed by sex, smoking history and body mass index. Among the asthma-related comorbidity subgroups investigated, patients with aspirin or NSAID sensitivity had the greatest reductions in AAER with tezepelumab compared with placebo (83%; 95% CI: 66, 91). In patients eligible to receive dupilumab, tezepelumab reduced exacerbations compared with placebo by 64% (95% CI: 54, 71). Reductions in the AAER with tezepelumab compared with placebo were also observed irrespective of exacerbation trigger category and the number of asthma controller medications patients were receiving at baseline.

CONCLUSION

These findings further support the benefits of tezepelumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and can help to inform healthcare providers' treatment decisions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279).

Antibody-based therapeutics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a prevalent inflammatory condition with heterogenous underlying endotypes, the most common being type 2 mediated inflammation. Several biologics have been developed to target specific pro-inflammatory cytokines and their receptors with proven efficacy in both quantitative and qualitative outcomes in patients with severe uncontrolled disease. However, there is an ongoing debate on the role of biologics relative to conventional therapies for CRSwNP and their efficacy in patient subgroups with non-polyp type 2 disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the evidence on the efficacy and safety of biologics in CRSwNP, recommendations for their use, and discusses the broader economic factors influencing their application in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging real-life data demonstrating the variable efficacy of the available biologics for patients with CRSwNP, coupled with the high cost compared to conventional therapies such as surgery, renders biologics to be considered as an add-on therapy in the majority of cases. However, ongoing research into increasing biologic dose intervals and novel therapies targeting alternative pathways may offer a more cost-effective and sustainable option in future.

Tezepelumab improved chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a Patient with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

Introduction

Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) have more severe sinus disease than those without AERD. CRSwNP associated with type 2 inflammation and AERD can be difficult to control with standard medical therapy and sinus surgery.

Case study

74-year-old Japanese woman with chronic sinusitis since age 50 and asthma since age 60. At age 64, she began to experience asthma exacerbations and was started on short-term corticosteroid therapy with prednisolone. At age 70, she experienced urticaria, nasal congestion, and wheezing after taking an NSAID; based on an NSAID provocation test, we diagnosed the patient with AERD and CRSwNP. A diagnosis of severe eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis was also made based on the scoring system and algorithm used in the Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Results

Treatment with benralizumab (30 mg), formoterol-fluticasone combination via pressurized metered inhaler (1000 μg), and leukotriene receptor antagonist improved the asthma symptoms and exacerbations so the short-term prednisolone was stopped; however, nasal congestion and olfactory dysfunction (hyposmia) persisted, and peripheral blood eosinophil count (peak, 1500 cells/μL) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (peak, 42 ppb) became elevated. Swapping the benralizumab for monthly tezepelumab (210 mg) improved not only the asthma symptoms but also the nasal congestion, olfactory dysfunction, eosinophil count (<300 cells/μL), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide level [8ppb].

Conclusion

Changing from benralizumab to tezepelumab improved asthma symptoms, nasal obstruction, and olfactory dysfunction in elderly, female, Japanese patient with AERD and CRSwNP.

The mucosal concept in chronic rhinosinusitis: Focus on the epithelial barrier

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common chronic nasal cavity and sinus disease affecting a growing number of individuals worldwide. Recent advances have shifted our understanding of CRS pathophysiology from a physical obstruction model of ventilation and drainage to a mucosal concept that recognizes the complexities of mucosal immunologic variations and cellular aberrations. A growing number of studies have demonstrated the alteration of the epithelial barrier during inflammatory states. Therefore, the current review has focused on the crucial role of epithelial cells within this mucosal framework in CRS, detailing the perturbed epithelial homeostasis, impaired epithelial cell barrier, dysregulated epithelial cell repair processes, and enhanced interactions between epithelial cells and immune cells. Notably, the utilization of novel technologies, such as single-cell transcriptomics, has revealed the novel functions of epithelial barriers, such as inflammatory memory and neuroendocrine functions. Therefore, this review also emphasizes the importance of epithelial inflammatory memory and the necessity of further investigations into neuroendocrine epithelial cells and neurogenic inflammation in CRS. We conclude by contemplating the prospective benefits of epithelial cell-oriented biological treatments, which are currently under investigation in rigorous randomized, double-blind clinical trials in patients with CRS with nasal polyps.

Brazilian guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ‒ 2024 update

INTRODUCTION

Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have revolutionized the way we treat patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Particularly in severe and difficult-to-control cases, these drugs have provided a new reality for these patients, allowing for the effective and safe treatment of extensive diseases that were not completely managed with the typical strategy of surgery and topical medications.

OBJECTIVES

The experience achieved with the approval of these medications by ANVISA for use in CRSwNP and the knowledge obtained regarding outcomes, adverse effects, and the ideal patient profile prompted the update of the previously published guideline, with a detailed review of the most recent scientific literature, the personal experiences of experts, and the adaptation to the reality of the Brazilian healthcare system, both public and private.

RESULTS

We proposed a new eligibility criterion for biologics in patients with CRSwNP based on four pillars of indication: the impact of the disease on the patient's life, whether in the presence of specific symptoms or in overall quality of life; the extent of sinonasal disease; the presence of type 2 comorbidities, considering other associated diseases that may also benefit from anti-T2 biologics, and the presence of biomarkers to define type 2 inflammation, especially those associated with worse disease prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative and pioneering method has two major advantages. First, it ensures a comprehensive evaluation of patients; second, it is flexible, as advancements in our understanding of the disease and changes in cost-effectiveness can be addressed by simply adjusting the required score for indication, without the need to modify the entire evaluation scheme.

Advancements in biologic therapy in eosinophilic asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma encompasses a spectrum of phenotypes often categorized into two groups- type 2 high (T2 high) and type 2 low (T2 low). T2 high includes atopic and eosinophilic presentations whereas T2 low is non-atopic, non-eosinophilic, and oft associated with neutrophilic inflammation. Eosinophilic asthma is often driven by IgE, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and TSLP. This can lead to eosinophilic inflammatory response in the airways which in turn can be used as target for treatment.

AREAS COVERED

The article will focus on biologic therapy that is currently being used in eosinophilic asthma management in mainly the adult population including clinical trials and co-morbidities that can be treated using the same biologics. A review on asthma biologics for pediatric population has been reviewed elsewhere.

EXPERT OPINION

Biological therapy for asthma targeting the IgE, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and TSLP pathways are shown to have benefit for the treatment of eosinophilic asthma, as exemplified in real-world studies. When choosing the right biological agent factors such as phenotype, comorbidities, and cost-effectiveness of the biologic agent must be taken into consideration.