Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Inflammatory Responses in Mucosal Barrier Dysfunction of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract

Impact of Acid, Weakly Acid and Alkaline Laryngopharyngeal Reflux on Voice Quality

OBJECTIVES

To analyze pre to posttreatment voice changes regarding the type of reflux in patients with acid, weakly acid or alkaline laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

Patients with LPR, diagnosed using hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH-monitoring (HEMII-pH), were prospectively recruited from three University Hospitals. Patients were treated with a combination of diet, proton pump inhibitors, magaldrate and alginate for 3 months. The following clinical and voice quality outcomes were studied pre to posttreatment according to the type of reflux (acid, weakly acid, nonacid): HEMII-pH, gastrointestinal endoscopy features, reflux symptom score (RSS), reflux sign assessment (RSA), voice handicap index (VHI), perceptual voice assessment (grade of dysphonia and roughness), aerodynamic and acoustic measurements.

RESULTS

From December 2018 to March 2021, 160 patients completed the evaluations, accounting for 60 acid, 52 weakly acid, and 48 alkaline cases of LPR. There were no baseline differences in clinical and voice quality outcomes between groups. RSS and RSA significantly improved from pre to posttreatment in the entire cohort and in all patient groups. VHI, dysphonia and roughness, maximum phonation time, Jitter, Shimmer and noise to harmonic ratio significantly improved from pre to posttreatment. Individuals with alkaline reflux reported better voice quality improvements as compared to acid and weakly acid reflux patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with acid and alkaline reflux reported better posttreatment voice quality outcomes as compared to weakly acid reflux patients. Future basic science and clinical studies are needed to better understand the histological changes of the vocal folds due to reflux of varying pH types and gastroduodenal enzyme content.

Efficacy of an oral suspension containing xyloglucan and pea proteins on a murine model of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common foregut disease, affecting about 20% of the adult population. Esophageal epithelial barrier plays a fundamental role in the pathophysiology of GERD; however, pharmacological therapies mainly aim to reduce the acidity of the gastroesophageal environment rather than to protect esophageal tissue integrity. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an oral solution containing xyloglucan and pea proteins (XP) in reestablishing gastroesophageal tissue integrity and biochemical markers. To induce GERD, C57BL/6 mice were alternatively overfed and fasted for 56 days and then treated with XP, sodium alginate, omeprazole, or omeprazole+XP twice daily for 7 days. Gastric pain and inflammatory markers were evaluated after 3 and 7 days of treatment. After sacrifice, the esophagi and stomachs were surgically removed for macroscopic and histological examination. Gastric pain was significantly reduced at days 3 and 7 by XP, omeprazole, and omeprazole+XP, while alginates were ineffective at day 3. XP was able to diminish gastric macroscopic damage and demonstrated the same efficacy as omeprazole in reducing esophageal damage. XP significantly reduced histological damage, with an efficacy comparable to that of omeprazole, but superior to alginates. Inflammatory markers were significantly reduced by XP, with superior efficacy compared with alginates at day 7. Interestingly, XP was also able to significantly increase gastric pH. This study demonstrated that XP restored gastric homeostasis, improved esophageal integrity, and decreased inflammation and pain with a similar efficacy to omeprazole and greater than alginates.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Benign Vocal Fold Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

There is a link between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and the formation of benign vocal fold lesions (BVFLs). However, previous studies have mainly focused on LPR suggested by symptoms and signs, rather than objectively diagnosed LPR via pharyngeal pH monitoring. We, therefore, conducted a Meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pharyngeal pH monitoring diagnosed LPR and the odds of BVFLs.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant observational studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

We evaluated between-study heterogeneity using the Cochrane Q test and estimated the I2 statistic. Random-effects models were used when significant heterogeneity was observed; otherwise, fixed-effects models were used.

RESULTS

Thirteen datasets from 9 studies were included. Among them, 493 were diagnosed with LPR and 344 had BVFLs. LPR was related to a higher odds of BVFLs (odds ratio: 3.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.84-5.76, P < .001) with moderate heterogeneity (P for Cochrane Q test = .006, I2  = 57%). Subgroup analyses showed that the association was similar in studies with only pharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech), with double-probe or 3-site pH monitoring, and with 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (P for subgroup difference = .15). In addition, subgroup analysis showed consistent results in studies from Asia and Europe (P for subgroup analysis = .12), and the association seemed to be consistent for vocal Reinke's edema, nodules, and polyps (P for subgroup difference = .09).

CONCLUSION

Pharyngeal pH monitoring diagnosed LPR is associated with the formation of BVFLs.

Chitosan Nanoparticles for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Treatment

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a chronic ailment that results from the backward flow of stomach acid into the esophagus, causing heartburn and acid regurgitation. This review explores nanotechnology as a novel treatment approach for GERD. Chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) offer several advantages, including biocompatibility, biodegradability, and targeted drug delivery capabilities. CSNPs have been extensively studied due to their ability to encapsulate and release medications in a controlled manner. Different nanoparticle (NP) delivery systems, including gels, microspheres, and coatings, have been developed to enhance drug retention, drug targeting, and controlled release in the esophagus. These nanoparticles can target specific molecular pathways associated with acid regulation, esophageal tissue protection, and inflammation modulation. However, the optimization of nanoparticle formulations faces challenges, including ensuring stability, scalability, and regulatory compliance. The future may see CSNPs combined with other treatments like proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or mucosal protectants for a synergistic therapeutic approach. Thus, CSNPs provide exciting opportunities for novel GERD treatment strategies.

Inflammation and Dry Eye-like Symptoms as Concomitant Manifestations of Laryngo-Pharyngeal Reflux

PURPOSE

Laryngo-pharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common worldwide disease. LPR symptoms may involve distant organs and tissues including the ocular surface with manifestations of a Dry Eye-like disease. We evaluated the concomitant involvement of the ocular surface in patients with LPR. We also defined the clinical signs and the roles of chemical and neuro-inflammatory mediators in the tears of LPR patients.

METHODS

Seventy-seven patients with LPR (mean age 65.8 ± 16.8 SD) and 25 healthy controls (mean age 56.5 ± 16.3 SD) were recruited from the otorhinolaryngology unit. Each subject was evaluated for the presence of concomitant ocular surface disease through clinical examination, including the measurement of tear break-up time (TBUT) and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Tears and conjunctival imprints were collected. The presence of pepsin in tears was detected by ELISA. HLA-DR in conjunctival imprints were imaged by immunofluorescence microscopy. RT-PCR quantified conjunctival mRNA transcripts of HLA-DR, IL-8, MUC5AC, NADPH, VIP, and NPY.

RESULTS

Patients with LPR had significantly increased OSDI and reduced TBUT scores compared to control subjects (p < 0.05 each). Pepsin was detected in 51% of patient tears while it was not measurable in the controls (p < 0.01). Immunoreactivity for HLA-DR in the conjunctival impressions was greater than for the controls with an increased mRNA expression (p < 0.05). mRNA transcripts for IL-8, NADPH, and VIP were significantly increased in LPR patients (p < 0.05 each), but neither MUC5AC nor NPY were different from controls.

CONCLUSIONS

LPR can adversely affect the ocular surface, leading to moderate signs and symptoms of dry eye. This study provides evidence that the presence of pepsin, HLA-DR immunoreactivity, and increased mRNA expression of neuro-inflammatory markers in the tears and conjunctival imprints of LPR patients suggests a potential link between LPR inflammation and ocular surface disease.

SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE ORAL MICROBIOME IN YOUNG CHILDREN WITH ARYNGOPHARYNGEAL REFLUX AND ITS ROLE THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECURRENT RESPIRATORY DISEASES

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To examine the composition of the oral microbiome in young children with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and its role the development of recurrent respiratory diseases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: There were examined 38 children with physiological gastroesophageal reflux (GER), 18 children with LPR who had a medical history of recurrent bronchitis and 17 healthy children (control group). The study included the collection of anamnesis, objective examination. The qualitative and quantitative microbial composition of the upper respiratory tract was performed obtained by oropharyngeal deep swab. Salivary pepsin level and IL-8 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Results: This research showed significant alterations in the oral microbiome of patients with GER and LPR as compared to healthy control. We found that gram-negative microbiota such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, Proteus spp. and Candida albicans were identified in children with GER and LPR compared to the healthy control. At the same time, the amount of such a representative of the normal microbiome as Streptococcus viridans in children with LPR was sharply reduced. There were established a much higher mean salivary pepsin level of the patients with LPR than in the GER and control group. We found the association between high pepsin levels, saliva IL-8 levels and frequency of respiratory pathology in children with LPR.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Our study confirms that increased levels of pepsin in saliva are a risk factor for recurrent respiratory diseases in children with LPR.

Alginates for Protection Against Pepsin-Acid Induced Aerodigestive Epithelial Barrier Disruption

OBJECTIVE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are chronic conditions caused by backflow of gastric and duodenal contents into the esophagus and proximal aerodigestive tract, respectively. Mucosal barrier dysfunction resultant from the synergistic actions of chemical injury and the mucosal inflammatory response during reflux contributes to symptom perception. Alginates effectively treat symptoms of mild to moderate GERD and have recently shown benefit for LPR. In addition to forming a "raft" over gastric contents to reduce acidic reflux episodes, alginates have been found to bind the esophageal mucosa thereby preserving functional barrier integrity measured by transepithelial electrical resistance. The aim of this study was to further examine the topical protective capacity of alginate-based Gaviscon Advance (GA) and Double Action (GDA) against pepsin-acid mediated aerodigestive epithelial barrier dysfunction in vitro.

STUDY DESIGN

Translational.

METHODS

Immortalized human esophageal and vocal cord epithelial cells cultured in transwells were pretreated with liquid formula GA, GDA, matched viscous placebo solution, or saline (control), then treated for 1 h with saline, acid (pH 3-6) or pepsin (0.1-1 mg/ml) at pH 3-6. Endpoint measure was taken of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) allowed to diffuse across monolayers for 2 h.

RESULTS

Pepsin (0.1-1 mg/ml) at pH 3-6 increased HRP flux through cultures pretreated with saline or placebo (p < 0.05); acid alone did not. GA and GDA prevented barrier dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

GA and GDA preserved epithelial barrier function during pepsin-acid insult better than placebo suggesting that protection was due to alginate. These data support topical protection as a therapeutic approach to GERD and LPR. Laryngoscope, 132:2327-2334, 2022.

Correlation Between Detection Results of Pepsin in Vocal Fold Polyp Tissues and the Postoperative Efficacy

PURPOSE

To explore the correlation between detection results of pepsin in vocal fold polyp tissues and the postoperative efficacy.

METHODS

The clinical data of 112 patients with vocal fold polyp who received surgical procedures in our hospital from June 2019 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The vocal fold morphology and vocal acoustic function were assessed at postoperative week 12. Using binary logistic regression, we explored whether the factors, ie, detection result of pepsin in vocal fold polyp tissue, microscopic suturing, the use of CO2 laser, and the history of smoking, affected the postoperative morphological repair of vocal fold polyps. Then, to observe and compare the influence of the detection results of pepsin on the recovery of vocal acoustic function, we divided the enrolled patients into the pepsin group and the pepsin-free group based on the postoperative detection results of pepsin in the polyp tissues by immunohistochemistry, RESULTS: In the 112 patients with vocal fold polyps, positive staining of pepsin in the postoperative samples was found in 76 patients (67.86%) and negative in 36 (32.14%). Totally 80 patients returned to normal in vocal fold morphology, among whom 32 (88.89%) were in pepsin-free group and 48 (63.16%) in pepsin group. Binary logistic regression showed that pepsin was a clinically significant indicator that affected the postoperative morphological recovery of the vocal fold (P = 0.003). Although hoarse voice was improved in all patients at postoperative week 12, the differences were statistically significant in the proportion of patients with grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain class G, voice handicap index, maximum phonation time, Jitter, Shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio between the pepsin group and the pepsin-free group (P < 0.05), with the pepsin-free group being superior to the pepsin group in the improvement of vocal acoustic function.

CONCLUSION

Pepsin in vocal fold polyps is a clinically significant indicator affecting the postoperative morphological recovery and acoustic efficacy, and patients with negative pepsin are superior to those with positive pepsin in the postoperative recovery of vocal fold morphology and function.

[The effect of expression of pepsin in vocal polyps on postoperative curative effect]

Objective:To investigate the effect of tissue pepsin expression of vocal polyps on the postoperative curative effect. Methods:Retrospectively analyze the data of 112 patients diagnosed with vocal cord polyps and undergone surgery from June 2019 to March 2021. The cases were divided into positive group and negative group according to the immunohistochemical pepsin expression. The preoperative reflux symptom index （RSI） and the reflux finding score （RFS） were compared, and the recovery of the voice acoustic function and postoperative vocal cord morphology were analyzed. Results:Among the postoperative specimens of 112 patients,76 cases were positive for pepsin staining, accounting for 67.9%, and 36 cases were negative, accounting for 32.1%. In the pepsin-positive group, 48 cases of vocal cord morphology returned to normal, and 20 cases remained scar or edema in the operation area, 8 cases of polyps relapsed; in the pepsin-negative group, a total of 32 cases of vocal cord morphology returned to normal, 4 cases of remained scar or edema in the operation area, no relapsed cases, the difference in vocal cord morphology recovery was significant （χ²=8.689, P=0.013）. The symptoms of hoarseness improved after 12 weeks. The differences between pre and post operative of G grade, VHI, MPT, fundamental frequency perturbation and amplitude perturbation assessed by GRBAS were significant （P<0.05）; postoperative G grade, VHI, MPT, fundamental frequency perturbation and amplitude perturbation were compared between the pepsin-positive group and the pepsin-negative group, and the differences were significant （all P<0.05）. Conclusion:The expression of pepsin in vocal polyps is a significant clinical indicator that affects the acoustic effect and morphological recovery of vocal cords after surgery. For patients with positive expression, acid suppression treatment should be strengthened after surgery.

[Effect of proton pump inhibitort on salivary pepsin concentration in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux]

Objective:To investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitor（PPI） treatment on salivary pepsin concentration in laryngopharyngeal reflux（LPR）. Methods:152 patients with suspected LPR complaining non-specific symptoms such as foreign body sensation, dry throat, phlegm and other non-specific symptoms were enrolled， in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from August 2019 to December 2020. According to the scores of reflux symptom index（RSI） and reflux finding score（RFS）, all the patients were divided into LPR （+） group and LPR （-） group, RSI （+） group and RSI （-） group, RFS （+） group and RFS （-） group . Patients in the LPR （+） group were reassessed after 1 month of PPI treatment. Saliva samples were collected from all the patients at initial diagnosis and follow-up diagnosis after treatment. The salivary pepsin concentration was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay （ELISA）. The differences of RSI, RFS scores and salivary pepsin concentrations before and after treatment were compared. Results:The median concentration of salivary pepsin in LPR （+） group was significantly higher than that in LPR （-） group, and （73.01 ng/mL vs 25.66 ng/mL, P<0.01）, the median concentration of salivary pepsin in RFS （+） group were significantly higher than that in RFS （-） group（78.00 ng/mL vs 35.79 ng/mL, P<0.01） Furthermore, the median scores of RSI （11.00 vs 7.00, P<0.05） and RFS （9.00 vs 7.00, P<0.01） of LPR （+） patients notably decreased after PPI treatment for 1 month, and the salivary pepsin median concentration was memorably lower than that before treatment（53.60 ng/mL vs 46.49 ng/mL, P<0.05）. Meanwhile, the scores of symptoms such as pharyngeal paraesthesia, heartburn, chest pain, stomachache, and the scores of signs such as false vocal fold, erythema or congestion, vocal fold edema, posterior commissure hypertrophy and thick endolaryngeal mucus were conspicuously lower after treatment than those before treatment（P<0.05）. Conclusion:After 1 month of PPI treatment, the scores of partial symptoms and signs, and the salivary pepsin concentrations of LPR patients decreased significantly, suggesting that pepsin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of LPR, and pepsin may be closely related to the symptoms and signs such as pharyngeal paraesthesia and vocal fold edema.