A review of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: improving outcomes with a multidisciplinary approach

Oral lupus erythematosus: Immunohistochemical evaluation of CD1a, CD21, CD123, and langerin expression in dendritic cells

BACKGROUND

Dendritic cells participate in the pathophysiology of lupus erythematosus (LE), which are studied in systemic and cutaneous forms; however, little is known about their oral manifestations.

METHODS

The expressions of dendritic cell markers (including CD1a, CD21, CD123, and langerin) were investigated by immunohistochemistry technique. Sixty intraoral and lower lip LE lesions, and additional 10 control samples were collected from 2003 to 2019. They were topographically analyzed in the epithelium (EP), lamina propria (LP), epithelial junction (JUN), and deep perivascular (PV) areas.

RESULTS

The expression of CD1a was decreased in the EP (p = 0.003) and increased in the deep PV area (p = 0.002). Langerin immunostaining showed no significant decrease in EP (p = 0.944); however, it increased in LP (p = 0.012) and JUN (p = 0.006). CD21 was expressed in only two specimens (EP, p = 0.012; LP, p < 0.001; deep PV area, p = 0.018). CD123 expression increased in all topographies (EP, p < 0.005; LP, p < 0.001, JUN, p < 0.001; deep PV, p < 0.001). The comparison between vermilion and intraoral mucosa LE lesions suggested that sun-exposed sites showed higher expression of CD123 (EP, p = 0.024; LP, p = 0.047; JUN, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CD1a, langerin, and CD123 expressions were detected coincidently surrounding the inflammatory infiltrate in oral LE, suggesting that these cells may play an important role in immune response. Interestingly, plasmacytoid dendritic cells showed increased CD123 expression in sun-exposed site lesions, which point out a possible function in their pathogenesis. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Comparison of patients with isolated cutaneous lupus erythematosus versus systemic lupus erythematosus with cutaneous lupus erythematosus as the sole clinical feature: A monocentric study of 149 patients

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) may present as an isolated entity or be classified as Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by the presence of laboratory abnormalities, including cytopenia, low complement levels, and/or autoantibodies (CLE with laboratory SLE).

OBJECTIVE

To compare isolated CLE and CLE with laboratory SLE and to validate an existing 3-item score with age < 25 years (1 point), phototypes V to VI (1 point), antinuclear antibodies ≥ 1:320 (5 points) to predict the risk of progression from CLE to severe SLE (sSLE).

METHODS

Monocentric cohort study including consecutive patients with CLE. CLE with laboratory SLE was defined by 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SLE score of ≥10 points at baseline with CLE as the sole clinical feature.

RESULTS

Of the 149 patients with CLE, 20 had CLE with laboratory SLE. The median follow-up duration was 11.3 years (IQR: 5.1-20.5). Ten patients (7%) had sSLE developed. In survival analysis, the risk of progression to sSLE was higher among CLE with laboratory SLE (hazard ratio = 6.69; 95% CI: 1.93-23.14, P < .001) compared to isolated CLE. In both groups, none of the patients with a risk score ≤ 2 had sSLE developed.

LIMITATIONS

Monocentric study with a limited number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CLE with laboratory patients with SLE have a higher risk of progression to sSLE than isolated CLE.

Autoimmune Responses and Therapeutic Interventions for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Comprehensive Review

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or Lupus is a multifactorial autoimmune disease of multiorgan malfunctioning of extremely heterogeneous and unclear etiology that affects multiple organs and physiological systems. Some racial groups and women of childbearing age are more susceptible to SLE pathogenesis. Impressive progress has been made towards a better understanding of different immune components contributing to SLE pathogenesis. Recent investigations have uncovered the detailed mechanisms of inflammatory responses and organ damage. Various environmental factors, pathogens, and toxicants, including ultraviolet light, drugs, viral pathogens, gut microbiome metabolites, and sex hormones trigger the onset of SLE pathogenesis in genetically susceptible individuals and result in the disruption of immune homeostasis of cytokines, macrophages, T cells, and B cells. Diagnosis and clinical investigations of SLE remain challenging due to its clinical heterogeneity and hitherto only a few approved antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are available for treatment. However, the adverse effects of renal and neuropsychiatric lupus and late diagnosis make therapy challenging. Additionally, SLE is also linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases due to inflammatory responses and the risk of infection from immunosuppressive treatment. Due to the diversity of symptoms and treatment-resistant diseases, SLE management remains a challenging issue. Nevertheless, the use of next-generation therapeutics with stem cell and gene therapy may bring better outcomes to SLE treatment in the future. This review highlights the autoimmune responses as well as potential therapeutic interventions for SLE particularly focusing on the recent therapeutic advancements and challenges.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Review and Considerations for Older Populations

Though more common earlier in life, increasing attention is being focused on the development of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in patients with advancing age. Studies show that CLE is more common in older populations than previously thought, and all CLE subtypes are possible in this group. Just like patients in the third or fourth decade of life, CLE may appear alongside or independent of systemic lupus erythematosus. Older populations manifesting CLE for the first time seem to have a lower risk of progression to systemic disease than younger peers, and are more commonly White. CLE must be carefully distinguished from other skin conditions that have a predilection for presentation in older populations, including rosacea, lichen planus, and other autoimmune conditions such as dermatomyositis or pemphigus/pemphigoid. It is thought that most CLE in older populations is drug-induced, with drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus being the most common subtype. Management of CLE in older patients focuses on eliminating unnecessary medications known to induce CLE, and otherwise treatment proceeds similarly to that in younger patients, with a few special considerations.

Urticaria: A Narrative Overview of Differential Diagnosis

Urticaria is an inflammatory skin disorder that may occur in isolation or associated with angioedema and/or anaphylaxis. Clinically, it is characterized by the presence of smooth, erythematous or blanching, itchy swelling, called wheals or hives, which greatly vary in size and shape and last less than 24 h before fading to leave normal skin. Urticaria is the consequence of mast-cell degranulation that can be caused by immunological or non-immunological mechanisms. From a clinical point of view, many skin conditions can mimic urticaria and their recognition is mandatory for a correct management and therapeutic approach. We have reviewed all of the main relevant studies which addressed differential diagnosis of urticarial, published until December 2022. The National Library of Medicine PubMed database was used for the electronic research. The present review offers a clinical narrative overview, based on the available literature, of the principal skin disorders that can be misdiagnosed as urticaria (mainly autoinflammatory or autoimmune disorders, drug-induced reactions, and hyperproliferative diseases). The aim of this review is to provide clinicians a useful tool for correctly suspecting and identifying all of these conditions.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a review of etiopathogenic, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease of varied clinical expression, which may present as an exclusively cutaneous disease or be one of the multiple manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Its classification includes acute, subacute, intermittent, chronic and bullous subtypes, which are usually identified based on clinical features and histopathological and laboratory findings. Other non-specific cutaneous manifestations may be associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and are usually related to disease activity. Environmental, genetic and immunological factors play a role in the pathogenesis of skin lesions in lupus erythematosus. Recently, considerable progress has been made in elucidating the mechanisms involved in their development, which allows for foreseeing future targets for more effective treatments. This review proposes to discuss the main etiopathogenic, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, aiming to update internists and specialists from different areas.

Where Microneedle Meets Biomarkers: Futuristic Application for Diagnosing and Monitoring Localized External Organ Diseases

Extracellular tissue fluids are interesting biomatrices that have recently attracted scientists' interest. Many significant biomarkers for localized external organ diseases have been isolated from this biofluid. In the diagnostic and disease monitoring context, measuring biochemical entities from the fluids surrounding the diseased tissues may give more important clinical value than measuring them at a systemic level. Despite all these facts, pushing tissue fluid-based diagnosis and monitoring forward to clinical settings faces one major problem: its accessibility. Most extracellular tissue fluid, such as interstitial fluid (ISF), is abundant but hard to collect, and the currently available technologies are invasive and expensive. This is where novel microneedle technology can help tackle this significant obstacle. The ability of microneedle technology to minimally invasively access tissue fluid-containing biomarkers will enable ISF and other tissue fluid utilization in the clinical diagnosis and monitoring of localized diseases. This review attempts to present the current pursuit of the application of microneedle systems as a diagnostic and monitoring platform, along with the recent progress of biomarker detection in diagnosing and monitoring localized external organ diseases. Then, the potential use of various microneedles in future clinical diagnostics and monitoring of localized diseases is discussed by presenting the currently studied cases.

An Indonesian female with Stevens-Johnson syndrome mimicking cutaneous lupus: A case report

Background

Case presentation

Discussion

Conclusion

•

Skin biopsy helps validate the diagnosis of SJS/TEN.

•

The accuracy of the diagnosis of SJS/TEN minimizes mortality.

•

SJS/TEN can occur in SLE patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics of cutaneous lupus erythematosus patients in Bangladesh

Introduction

Nearly all epidemiologic studies have involved patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Few authors have investigated the characteristics of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

Aim

To describe the clinical and pathologic characteristics of a series of patients diagnosed with CLE.

Material and methods

This is a descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study carried out using the consecutive registered records of 218 patients attending the 'Lupus Clinic' in Chittagong Medical College Hospital during the period between 2010 and 2020. The activity and damage of CLE were assessed according to the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI).

Results

There were 187 (85.8%) females and 31 (14.2%) males, with the female:male ratio being 6 : 1. The mean age was 30.0 ±11.7 years. The chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE) patients numbered 154 (70.6%), followed by acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE) n = 46 (21.1%), and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) n = 18 (8.3%). In LE-specific skin lesions, the most common manifestation was photosensitivity, 198 (90.8%), followed by discoid rash, 155 (71.1%) and maculo-papular lupus rash, 55 (25.2%). Among LE-nonspecific skin lesions, the most common manifestation was non-scarring alopecia, 123 (56.4%), followed by livedo reticularis, 18 (8.3%), Raynaud's phenomenon, 17 (7.8%), vasculitis, 15 (6.9%), periungual telangiectasia, 7 (3.2%), erythema multiforme, 6 (2.7%) and leg ulcers, 5 (2.3%). Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were the most common type of autoantibody (n = 132, 60.5%) followed by anti-ds DNA (n = 91, 41.7%) and anti-phospholipid antibodies (n = 9, 4.1%).

Conclusions

CCLE was the most common subtypes of CLE. Photosensitivity was the most common clinical manifestation, whereas ANA were the most frequent autoantibodies of the LE patients of this region. Patients with different subtypes of CLE have distinct clinical and pathological characteristics.

Unmet Medical Needs in Chronic, Non-communicable Inflammatory Skin Diseases

An estimated 20-25% of the population is affected by chronic, non-communicable inflammatory skin diseases. Chronic skin inflammation has many causes. Among the most frequent chronic inflammatory skin diseases are atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, urticaria, lichen planus, and hidradenitis suppurativa, driven by a complex interplay of genetics and environmental factors. Autoimmunity is another important cause of chronic skin inflammation. The autoimmune response may be mainly T cell driven, such as in alopecia areata or vitiligo, or B cell driven in chronic spontaneous urticaria, pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases. Rare causes of chronic skin inflammation are autoinflammatory diseases, or rheumatic diseases, such as cutaneous lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis. Whilst we have seen a significant improvement in diagnosis and treatment, several challenges remain. Especially for rarer causes of chronic skin inflammation, early diagnosis is often missed because of low awareness and lack of diagnostics. Systemic immunosuppression is the treatment of choice for almost all of these diseases. Adverse events due to immunosuppression, insufficient therapeutic responses and relapses remain a challenge. For atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, a broad spectrum of innovative treatments has been developed. However, treatment responses cannot be predicted so far. Hence, development of (bio)markers allowing selection of specific medications for individual patients is needed. Given the encouraging developments during the past years, we envision that many of these challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory skin diseases will be thoroughly addressed in the future.

Mimics of Dermatitis

Dermatitis is a common condition frequently encountered by dermatologists. The diagnosis of dermatitis can be challenging because this condition is often multifactorial, and many skin diseases that can mimic dermatitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis. It is important to recognize and be familiar with these conditions because some of them can represent signs of systemic disease or malignancies and misdiagnosis can lead to mismanagement and adverse outcomes for the patient.

RNA tape sampling in cutaneous lupus erythematosus discriminates affected from unaffected and healthy volunteer skin

Objective

Punch biopsy, a standard diagnostic procedure for patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) carries an infection risk, is invasive, uncomfortable and potentially scarring, and impedes patient recruitment in clinical trials. Non-invasive tape sampling is an alternative that could enable serial evaluation of specific lesions. This cross-sectional pilot research study evaluated the use of a non-invasive adhesive tape device to collect messenger RNA (mRNA) from the skin surface of participants with CLE and healthy volunteers (HVs) and investigated its feasibility to detect biologically meaningful differences between samples collected from participants with CLE and samples from HVs.

Methods

Affected and unaffected skin tape samples and simultaneous punch biopsies were collected from 10 participants with CLE. Unaffected skin tape and punch biopsies were collected from 10 HVs. Paired samples were tested using quantitative PCR for a candidate immune gene panel and semi-quantitative immunohistochemistry for hallmark CLE proteins.

Results

mRNA collected using the tape device was of sufficient quality for amplification of 94 candidate immune genes. Among these, we found an interferon (IFN)-dominant gene cluster that differentiated CLE-affected from HV (23-fold change; p<0.001) and CLE-unaffected skin (sevenfold change; p=0.002), respectively. We found a CLE-associated gene cluster that differentiated CLE-affected from HV (fourfold change; p=0.005) and CLE-unaffected skin (fourfold change; p=0.012), respectively. Spearman’s correlation between per cent area myxovirus 1 protein immunoreactivity and IFN-dominant mRNA gene cluster expression was highly significant (dermis, rho=0.86, p<0.001). In total, skin tape-derived RNA expression comprising both IFN-dominant and CLE-associated gene clusters correlated with per cent area immunoreactivity of some hallmark CLE-associated proteins in punch biopsies from the same lesions.

Conclusions

A non-invasive tape RNA collection technique is a potential tool for repeated skin biomarker measures throughout a clinical trial.

Evaluating safety and compatibility of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with connective tissue disorders

Inhibition of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) has been utilized as a treatment strategy for a variety of immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMID), including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and psoriasis. A wide array of biologic therapies targeting the TNFα molecule, including etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab and adalimumab, are routinely used in the care of patients with these conditions. In addition to their therapeutic potential, anti-TNFα agents commonly induce the formation of autoantibodies such as anti-nuclear antibodies and anti-double stranded DNA antibodies; however, the vast majority of these are of IgM isotype and of unclear clinical significance, uncommonly leading to drug-induced autoimmune disease. For these reasons, TNFα inhibition has been a controversial strategy in the treatment of primary connective tissue disorders (CTDs). However, as new therapeutics continue to be developed for the management of CTDs, the potential utility for anti-TNFα agents has become of great interest, demonstrated in several recent case series and small open-label trials. We review the safety and compatibility of anti-TNFα therapy in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), two well-studied example CTDs, as well as summarize the risks of autoantibody generation, infection, malignancy, and iatrogenic lupus flares as side effects of blocking TNFα in patients with these conditions.

Discoid Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-Sectional Study From the Sindh Institute of Skin Diseases, Karachi, Pakistan

Introduction

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is the most common form of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is a chronic, scar-forming, photosensitive autoimmune dermatosis presenting with erythematous and scaly lesions. Predisposed areas include sun-exposed areas like the nose, forehead, and cheeks, as well as the upper body and extremities. The histological findings are typical, with interface dermatitis. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) are the most common deposits in the dermoepidermal junction of the involved skin. The most common treatments used are sunscreens, topical corticosteroids, and antimalarials. Immunosuppressive agents, thalidomide, dapsone, and retinoids can be used in refractory cases. The aim of this study was to study the clinicopathologic patterns of DLE in patients presenting to the Institute of Skin Diseases in Sindh, Karachi.

Methods

A total of 53 consecutive patients with DLE meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated between February 18, 2018 to March 2, 2019 at the Institute of Skin Diseases. Patients with clinical suspicion of DLE were evaluated and studied prospectively after written informed consent was obtained. Information was then collected from their medical histories, physical examination records, and laboratory investigation reports.

Results

A total of 53 consecutive patients with clinical and/or histological diagnosis of DLE was included in this study, out of which 75.5% (40) were females with a male to female ratio of 1:3.1. The mean age of the patients at the time of presentation was 36.02 ± 10.04 years, ranging from 14 to 65 years. More than half of the patients (35, 66.0%) were under 40 years of age and 20.8% (11) had a positive family history of DLE. DLE was localized in 36 patients (67.9%) and exposure to the ultraviolet radiation (UVR) was found to be the most frequent induced factor in 46 patients (86.8%), followed by stress which was observed in 14 patients (26.4%). The distribution of commonly affected sites were the face (81.1%), the limbs (71.7%), and the scalp (48.4%) of the patients. Serology antinuclear antibody (ANA) was positive in 56.6% and serology anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid antibodies (anti-dsDNA) were positive in 45.3% of patients. Smoking, as an induced factor, was more commonly observed among male patients as compared to the female patients with a proportion of 53.8% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001, while stress was more common among female patients with a proportion of 35% vs. 0%, p = 0.013, respectively. Histopathology with direct immunofluorescence was done in 33 cases which included cases with negative serology or where the diagnosis was in doubt clinically. The main histopathological features observed were periadnexal and perivascular dermal infiltrates, basal cells vacuolization, epidermal atrophy, hyperkeratosis, and follicular plugging. The commonest morphological form observed was the classic discoid plaque form.

Conclusion

Clinical patterns of DLE in our population comprises of female dominance. Exposure to UVR was the leading inducing factor. The face and limbs were the most commonly involved sites, and the majority of the patients had localized DLE with positive ANA in more than half of those patients. The importance of limiting ultraviolet radiation exposure and toxins (drugs and smoking) should be emphasized in our population.

Management and prevention of laser complications in aesthetic medicine: An analysis of the etiological factors

Growing popularity of laser treatment has understandably resulted in increased incidence of potential complications. The analysis of complications, taking into account the causes of their occurrence, is of particular interest. The identification of etiological factors and the development of a step-by-step prophylactic algorithm with their consideration is the way to reduce the number of possible complications in future practice. In this article, we present a classification of the causes of complications associated with various types of laser procedures. This classification was developed on the basis of a review of last 20 years' literature and our own experience in a network of clinics "Linline" in Russia. We identified six groups of the etiological classification of laser complications: errors of patient selection, errors of treatment tactics, wrong choice of device and technology, neglect of treatment protocol, inadequate post-procedural care, individual response of the patient. The causes of all specified groups of complication, except the last one, are preventable causes.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus induced by drugs - novel insights

Introduction: There is a growing list of drugs implicated in inducing both subacute and chronic forms of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is important to recognize these drugs in order to quickly treat patients with drug induced disease.Areas covered: This paper reviews the current literature describing drugs implicated in causing cutaneous lupus erythematosus. A Pubmed search was used to compile a list of medications implicated up to August 2019. It reviews new classes of drugs identified as causing cutaneous lupus erythematosus, the pathophysiology of the disease process, and current recommendations for treatment of the disease.Expert opinion: Many drugs have been identified as inducing lupus, and many more continue to be described in new reports. Further research is needed to understand this phenomenon, which will aid in the diagnosis and treatment of affected patients.