1
|
Wickrama KAS. Later-Life Functionality in Married Women: The Mediating Role of Self-Perpetuating BMI and Pain Trajectories. J Aging Health 2024; 36:56-66. [PMID: 37114837 DOI: 10.1177/08982643231171739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
The current study investigated how pain and BMI trajectories mediate the influence of family stress (1991-1994) on later-life impaired functionality (2017) in women. The study used prospective data from 244 mid-older rural Midwest Caucasian women who were in long-term marriages over a span of 27 years. Within the structural equation framework, the analytical model used latent constructs of family stress and trajectories of pain and BMI to predict later-life functionality. BMI and pain trajectories mutually influenced each other in forming a self-perpetuating cycle over time in mid-older women. Further, midlife family stress shaped BMI and pain trajectories, and these trajectories had consequences for later-life functionality, as defined by three kinds of impairments: physical, cognitive (subjective memory), and social (loneliness). The findings emphasize the need for policies and interventions that focus on reducing women's stressful family circumstances in middle years to weaken and redirect their association with BMI and pain trajectories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kandauda A S Wickrama
- Department of Human Development and Family Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jansen N, ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, van den Berg B, Buitenweg JR. Further evaluation of inflammatory and non-inflammatory aspects of pain in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2023; 7:rkad076. [PMID: 37814655 PMCID: PMC10560383 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkad076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective A high discrepancy between the number of tender and swollen joints (e.g. ΔTSJ ≥ 7) has previously been used as an indication for the presence of changes in central mechanisms in patients with moderate-to-high disease activity. In this study, we explored whether the ΔTSJ can also be used to obtain insights into the underlying pain mechanisms in patients with on average well-controlled disease activity. Methods A 2 year retrospective analysis of routinely obtained 28-joint DAS (DAS28) components was performed on 45 patients with low inflammatory activity at the group level. All patients underwent pressure pain threshold (PPT) and electrical pain threshold (EPT) measurements and completed four self-report questionnaires [short-form 36 (SF-36v2); central sensitization inventory (CSI); generalized pain questionnaire (GPQ); and the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)]. Results Patients with a ΔTSJ ≥ 3 at least once in the past 2 years showed significantly lower EPT and PPT values and higher levels of pain and disability on the SF-36v2 compared with the ΔTSJ < 3 group. Furthermore, GPQ scores were significantly higher in those with ΔTSJ ≥ 3, while CSI and PCS scores were similar. Conclusion These findings suggest that in patients in the ΔTSJ ≥ 3 group, mechanisms other than inflammation (only) underlie the pain. Moreover, our findings suggest that among the multiple potential underlying psychological mechanisms, pain catastrophizing (as measured by the PCS) and psychological hypervigilance (as measured by the CSI) do not play an important role. These findings could be useful in the clinical management of the patient. Depending on the dominant mechanism underlying the (persistent) pain, patients might respond differently to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Jansen
- Biomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M ten Klooster
- Psychology, Health & Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Psychology, Health & Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van den Berg
- Biomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jan R Buitenweg
- Biomedical Signals and Systems, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang D, Casares S, Eilers K, Hitchcock S, Iverson R, Lahn E, Loux M, Schnetzer C, Frey-Law LA. Assessing Multisensory Sensitivity Across Scales: Using the Resulting Core Factors to Create the Multisensory Amplification Scale. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:276-288. [PMID: 34461307 PMCID: PMC11065416 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Multisensory sensitivity (MSS), observed in some chronic pain patients, may reflect a generalized central nervous system sensitivity. While several surveys measure aspects of MSS, there remains no gold standard. We explored the underlying constructs of 4 MSS-related surveys (80 items in total) using factor analyses using REDCap surveys (N = 614, 58.7% with pain). Four core- and 6 associated-MSS factors were identified from the items assessed. None of these surveys addressed all major sensory systems and most included additional related constructs. A revised version of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale was developed, encompassing 5 core MSS systems: vision, hearing, smell, tactile, and internal bodily sensations: the 12-item Multisensory Amplification Scale (MSAS). The MSAS demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.82), test-retest reliability (ICC3,1 = 0.90), and construct validity in the original and in a new, separate cohort (R = 0.54-0.79, P < .0001). Further, the odds of having pain were 2-3.5 times higher in the highest sex-specific MSAS quartile relative to the lowest MSAS quartile, after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and pain schema (P < .03). The MSAS provides a psychometrically comprehensive, brief, and promising tool for measuring the core-dimensions of MSS. PERSPECTIVE: Multiple multisensory sensitivity (MSS) tools are used, but without exploration of their underlying domains. We found several measures lacking core MSS domains, thus we modified an existing scale to encompass 5 core MSS domains: light, smell, sound, tactile, and internal bodily sensations using only 12 items, with good psychometric properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Wang
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Sabrina Casares
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Karen Eilers
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Shannon Hitchcock
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Ryan Iverson
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Ethan Lahn
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Megan Loux
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Colton Schnetzer
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Laura A Frey-Law
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ten Klooster PM, Kraiss JT, Munters R, Vonkeman HE. Generalized pain hypersensitivity and associated factors in gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:3640-3646. [PMID: 34919669 PMCID: PMC9434280 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous studies have indicated that a sizeable proportion of patients with inflammatory arthritis present with features characteristic of central pain sensitization. However, this has not yet been examined in patients with gout. The objective of this study was to explore the presence of generalized pain hypersensitivity and associated factors in patients with diagnosed gout. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was performed in outpatients with crystal proven gout using the generalized pain questionnaire (GPQ) to screen for the presence of generalized pain hypersensitivity. Additional self-reported socio-demographic and medical information was collected and several patient-reported outcome measures were completed. Univariable logistic regressions and multivariable LASSO regression analysis with 10-fold cross-validation was used to explore relationships with patient characteristics, clinical features and PROMs. RESULTS Of the 97 included patients (84.5% male; mean ± standard deviation age: 68.9 ± 11.9 years), 20 patients (20.6%, 95% CI: 13.0-30.0) reported possible generalized pain hypersensitivity defined as a GPQ score ≥11 (range: 0-28; mean ± standard deviation GPQ: 6.3 ± 5.3). Lower age, concomitant fibromyalgia, and more experienced difficulties in performing their social role were independently associated with generalized pain hypersensitivity. Notably, use of urate lowering therapy was significantly lower in those with generalized pain hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS Generalized pain hypersensitivity appears to be quite common in gout, despite its more intermittent nature compared with other inflammatory arthritides. As this kind of pain does not respond well to regular treatment, screening for non-inflammatory pain may be important for improving pain management in gout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M Ten Klooster
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jannis T Kraiss
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Munters
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akin-Akinyosoye K, James RJE, McWilliams DF, Millar B, das Nair R, Ferguson E, Walsh DA. The Central Aspects of Pain in the Knee (CAP-Knee) questionnaire; a mixed-methods study of a self-report instrument for assessing central mechanisms in people with knee pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2021; 29:802-814. [PMID: 33621705 PMCID: PMC8177001 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.02.562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pain is the prevailing symptom of knee osteoarthritis. Central sensitisation creates discordance between pain and joint pathology. We previously reported a Central Pain Mechanisms trait derived from eight discrete characteristics: Neuropathic-like pain, Fatigue, Cognitive-impact, Catastrophising, Anxiety, Sleep disturbance, Depression, and Pain distribution. We here validate and show that an 8-item questionnaire, Central Aspects of Pain in the Knee (CAP-Knee) is associated both with sensory- and affective- components of knee pain severity. METHODS Participants with knee pain were recruited from the Investigating Musculoskeletal Health and Wellbeing study in the East Midlands, UK. CAP-Knee items were refined following cognitive interviews. Psychometric properties were assessed in 250 participants using Rasch-, and factor-analysis, and Cronbach's alpha. Intra-class correlation coefficients tested repeatability. Associations between CAP-Knee and McGill Pain questionnaire pain severity scores were assessed using linear regression. RESULTS CAP-Knee targeted the knee pain sample well. Cognitive interviews indicated that participants interpreted CAP-Knee items in diverse ways, which aligned to their intended meanings. Fit to the Rasch model was optimised by rescoring each item, producing a summated score from 0 to 16. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha = 0.74) and test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC2,1 = 0.91). Each CAP-Knee item contributed uniquely to one discrete 'Central Mechanisms trait' factor. High CAP-Knee scores associated with worse overall knee pain intensity, and with each of sensory- and affective- McGill Pain Questionnaire scores. CONCLUSION CAP-Knee is a simple and valid self-report questionnaire, which measures a single 'Central Mechanisms' trait, and may help identify and target centrally-acting treatments aiming to reduce the burden of knee pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Akin-Akinyosoye
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, UK; Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
| | - R J E James
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, UK; School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK.
| | - D F McWilliams
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, UK; Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
| | - B Millar
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, UK; Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
| | - R das Nair
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, UK; Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, UK; Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK.
| | - E Ferguson
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, UK; School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
| | - D A Walsh
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, UK; Division of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; Rheumatology, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, UK.
| |
Collapse
|