Practice Advisory on the Appropriate Use of NSAIDs in Primary Care

Consumer awareness and knowledge regarding use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in a metropolitan area

Background

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have well-known adverse effects, and numerous studies have shown inappropriate behaviors regarding their use. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding the use of NSAIDs simultaneously in one of the largest and most populated areas of Italy, Naples.

Methods

From 2021 December 14th to 2022 January 4th, a cross-sectional survey study was conducted among community centers, working places, and universities using a snowball sampling method. For inclusion in the study, the participants were required to be at least 18 years old and residents in the metropolitan area of Naples. Three multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) models were developed by including variables that could potentially be associated with the following outcomes of interest: knowledge (Model I), attitudes (Model II), and behavior (Model III) regarding the use of NSAIDs.

Results

Data were acquired from 1,012 questionnaires administered to subjects evenly divided by gender with an average age of 36.8 years and revealed that only 7.9% of the participants self-admittedly did not take NSAIDs, while approximately half the participants (50%) admitted to occasionally using them. The results showed a statistically significant correlation between attitudes regarding the appropriate use of NSAIDs and less knowledge. The regression analyses indicated that behaviors regarding the appropriate use of NSAIDs were statistically significant in younger respondents, non-smokers, and those without children. These interesting results showed that behaviors regarding the appropriate use of NSAIDs were significantly higher among respondents with less knowledge and more positive attitudes.

Conclusion

According to the collected data and statistical analysis results, it is possible to identify factors that can greatly affect inappropriate behaviors regarding the use of NSAIDs and establish targeted prevention programs.

UiO-66(Zr) as drug delivery system for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The toxicity for the human body of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) overdoses is a consequence of their low water solubility, high doses, and facile accessibility to the population. New drug delivery systems (DDS) are necessary to overcome the bioavailability and toxicity related to NSAIDs. In this context, UiO-66(Zr) metal-organic framework (MOF) shows high porosity, stability, and load capacity, thus being a promising DDS. However, the adsorption and release capability for different NSAIDs is scarcely described. In this work, the biocompatible UiO-66(Zr) MOF was used to study the adsorption and release conditions of ibuprofen, naproxen, and diclofenac using a theoretical and experimental approximation. DFT results showed that the MOF-drug interaction was due to an intermolecular hydrogen bond between protons of the groups in the defect sites, (μ3 - OH, and - OH2) and a lone pair of oxygen carboxyl functional group of the NSAIDs. Also, the experimental results suggest that the solvent where the drug is dissolved affects the adsorption process. The adsorption kinetics are similar between the drugs, but the maximum load capacity differs for each drug. The release kinetics assay showed a solvent dependence kinetics whose maximum liberation capacity is affected by the interaction between the drug and the material. Finally, the biological assays show that none of the systems studied are cytotoxic for HMVEC. Additionally, the wound healing assay suggests that the UiO-66(Zr) material has potential application on the wound healing process. However, further studies should be done.

Induction of mitochondrial toxicity by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): The ultimate trade-off governing the therapeutic merits and demerits of these wonder drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are most extensively used over-the-counter FDA-approved analgesic medicines for treating inflammation, musculoskeletal pain, arthritis, pyrexia and menstrual cramps. Moreover, aspirin is widely used against cardiovascular complications. Owing to their non-addictive nature, NSAIDs are also commissioned as safer opioid-sparing alternatives in acute trauma and post-surgical treatments. In fact, therapeutic spectrum of NSAIDs is expanding. These "wonder-drugs" are now repurposed against lung diseases, diabetes, neurodegenerative disorders, fungal infections and most notably cancer, due to their efficacy against chemoresistance, radio-resistance and cancer stem cells. However, prolonged NSAID treatment accompany several adverse effects. Mechanistically, apart from cyclooxygenase inhibition, NSAIDs directly target mitochondria to induce cell death. Interestingly, there are also incidences of dose-dependent effects where NSAIDs are found to improve mitochondrial health thereby suggesting plausible mitohormesis. While mitochondria-targeted effects of NSAIDs are discretely studied, a comprehensive account emphasizing the multiple dimensions in which NSAIDs affect mitochondrial structure-function integrity, leading to cell death, is lacking. This review discusses the current understanding of NSAID-mitochondria interactions in the pathophysiological background. This is essential for assessing the risk-benefit trade-offs of NSAIDs for judiciously strategizing NSAID-based approaches to manage pain and inflammation as well as formulating effective anti-cancer strategies. We also discuss recent developments constituting selective mitochondria-targeted NSAIDs including theranostics, mitocans, chimeric small molecules, prodrugs and nanomedicines that rationally optimize safer application of NSAIDs. Thus, we present a comprehensive understanding of therapeutic merits and demerits of NSAIDs with mitochondria at its cross roads. This would help in NSAID-based disease management research and drug development.

Inappropriate prescribing in patients with kidney disease: A rapid review of prevalence, associated clinical outcomes and impact of interventions

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and polypharmacy is increasing and has amplified the importance of examining inappropriate prescribing (IP) in CKD. This review focuses on the latest research regarding the prevalence of IP in CKD and the related adverse clinical effects and explores new interventions against IP.

METHOD

A literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library searching articles published between June 2016 and March 2022.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were included. An IP prevalence of 12.6% to 96% and 0.3% to 66% was reported in hospital and outpatient settings, respectively. In nonhospital settings, the prevalence of IP varied between 3.9% and 60%. IP was associated with higher risk of hospitalisation (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17-1.81), higher bleeding rate (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.37) and higher risk of all-cause mortality (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.13). Three studies reported the impact of interventions on IP.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights widespread IP in CKD patients across healthcare settings, with varying prevalence rates. IP is substantially linked to adverse outcomes in patients. While limited interventions show promise, urgent research is needed to develop effective strategies addressing IP and improving CKD patient care.

Identifying Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Events Among Active-Duty Service Members and Veterans Prescribed Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

Background

Oral NSAIDs are widely used analgesic medications for the treatment of musculoskeletal and inflammatory conditions. NSAIDs are associated with adverse effects that arise from COX enzyme inhibition including cardiovascular events. The combined role of patient and prescription factors associated with NSAID use on cardiovascular risk is not well characterized.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to identify the risk factors with cardiovascular events among NSAID users.

Methods

This study is a retrospective, nested case-control study, within the DAVINCI database, among active-duty service members and veterans with at least one NSAID pharmacy claim between fiscal year (FY) 2015-FY2020. Inclusion criteria individuals ≥18 years of age received a prescription NSAID for ≥7-day supply and a duration ≥1 month overall. Cases experienced nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or new onset heart failure. Ten controls were selected per case. Risk factors were identified through logistic regression modeling.

Results

The risk factors with strongest association to the primary outcome included age starting at 45 up to 75 and older, the first 90 days of NSAID exposure, cerebrovascular disease, cardiomyopathy, and history of myocardial infarction. Cox-selectivity and dose did not appear to be clinically significant in their association with cardiovascular events.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that age, initial NSAID exposure, and comorbidities are more predictive than NSAID-specific factors such as COX-selectivity and dose. The results provide the framework for development of a risk score to improve prediction of NSAID-associated cardiovascular events.

Recent advances in the therapeutic management of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease is a form of crystal-induced arthropathy that arises from the accumulation of calcium pyrophosphate crystals within joints and soft tissues. This process leads to inflammation and damage to the affected joints. It can present asymptomatically or as acute or chronic inflammatory arthritis. Risk factors and comorbidities, including prior joint injury, osteoarthritis, hereditary or familial predisposition, and metabolic diseases, should be evaluated in CPPD cases. The management of CPPD remains a challenge in the sparsity of randomized controlled trials. The lack of such trials makes it difficult to establish evidence-based treatment protocols for CPPD. This review provides an overview of the current pharmacological management of CPPD, focusing on reducing inflammation, alleviating symptoms, and preventing acute flares. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and colchicine are effective in managing acute CPP arthritis. Colchicine may also be used prophylactically to prevent recurrent flares. In cases where other treatments have failed, anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, can be administered to alleviate acute flares. The management of chronic CPP inflammatory arthritis includes NSAIDs and/or colchicine, followed by hydroxychloroquine, low-dose glucocorticoids, and methotrexate, with limited data on efficacy. Tocilizumab can be used in refractory cases. In small studies, synovial destruction using intra-articular injection of yttrium 90 can decrease pain. To date, no disease-modifying therapies exist that reduce articular calcification in CPPD.

Long-Term Indomethacin Treatment in a Chinese Child with Gitelman Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review on its Efficacy and Tolerance

BACKGROUND Gitelman syndrome (GS) is a rare inherited autosomal recessive salt-losing renal tubulopathy. Early-onset GS is difficult to differentiate from Bartter syndrome (BS). It has been reported in some cases that cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, which pharmacologically reduce prostaglandin E2(PGE2) synthesis, are helpful for GS patients, especially in children, but the long-term therapeutic effect has not yet been revealed. CASE REPORT A 4-year-old boy was first brought to our hospital for the chief concern of short stature and growth retardation. Biochemical tests demonstrated severe hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis. The patient's serum magnesium was normal. He was diagnosed with BS and treated with potassium supplementation and indomethacin and achieved stable serum potassium levels and slow catch-up growth. At 11.8 years of age, the patient showed hypomagnesemia and a genetic test confirmed that he had GS with compound heterozygous mutations in the SLC12A3 gene. At the age of 14.8 years, when indomethacin had been taken for nearly 10 years, the boy reported having chronic stomachache, while his renal function remained normal. After proton pump inhibitor and acid inhibitor therapy, the patient's symptoms were ameliorated, and he continued to take a low dose of indomethacin (37.5 mg/d divided tid) with good tolerance. CONCLUSIONS Early-onset GS in childhood can be initially misdiagnosed as BS, and gene detection can confirm the final diagnosis. COX inhibitors, such as indomethacin, might be tolerated by pediatric patients, and long-term therapy can improve the hypokalemia and growth retardation without significant adverse effects.

Ibuprofen in the Management of Viral Infections: The Lesson of COVID-19 for Its Use in a Clinical Setting

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for the management of fever, pain, and inflammation. However, they have always been considered to have a double-faced role, according to their capacity to manage inflammation but also their possible reduction of immune system response and diagnosis delay. This last point could favor a dramatic increase of viral infection diffusion, possibly leading to a more severe outcome. The advent of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 excluded the use of NSAIDs, particularly ibuprofen, and then indicated this drug as the better NSAID to manage infected outpatients and prevent complications. Several authors described the role of NSAIDs and ibuprofen in preventing cytokine storm and modulating the immune system. However, the development of both adverse drug reactions (i.e., gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, and cardiovascular) and drug interaction recalled the necessity of prescribing the better NSAID for each patient. In this narrative review, we describe the role of NSAIDs, particularly of ibuprofen, in the management of viral symptoms, suggesting that the NSAID may be chosen considering the characteristics of the patient, the comorbidity, and the polytherapy.

Current and emerging COX inhibitors for treating postoperative pain following oral surgery

INTRODUCTION

The numerous drugs in the NSAID class are often used to treat acute postoperative pain associated with oral surgery such as impacted third-molar extractions. These drugs are effective in this setting and dental pain studies often serve as models for acute pain relief and for registration of analgesics. With numerous cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors available as monotherapy, for use in combination with analgesic regimens, and in different doses and formulations, it was our aim to determine if there were clear-cut distinctions among these products and dosing regimens.

AREAS COVERED

This is a literature review of recent randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating NSAIDs for use in postoperative pain management following oral surgery. Of particular interest were head-to-head studies, which might offer some insight into comparative effectiveness.

EXPERT OPINION

Postoperative oral surgery pain is largely managed in real-world clinical practice using NSAIDs, either alone or in combination, and there is good evidence supporting their use especially in multimodal therapy. Head-to-head and comparative studies do not show a clear-cut 'optimal NSAID' in this setting, although ibuprofen, ketoprofen, dexketoprofen, and naproxen have gained most acceptance. Combination therapy with other analgesics or adjuvants is largely accepted.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): A current insight into its molecular mechanism eliciting organ toxicities

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a class of medications that are routinely been used across the world. Their analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic effects have all been well-documented. Moreover, they are been deliberated to have a protective role against various critical diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases. However, the data presented by numerous studies in past have signified the adverse effects of NSAIDs due to overdosing on various systems such as cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neural, etc. Despite substantial studies representing the mechanism behind the clinical risk of NSAIDs, there are very few reviews that have collated comprehensive records of various toxicities caused by overdosing on NSAIDs. As a result, we have presented a comprehensive overview of existing information on NSAIDs in this review. In addition to that, we have concentrated on presenting our understanding of various organ-based toxicities caused due to NSAID's prolonged use/overdosage.

Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased gut permeability and bacterial translocation which are reversed by inflammation control

OBJECTIVE

to assess how rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) affect gut permeability.

METHODS

to explore colonic mucosa integrity, tight junction proteins ZO-1, occludin and claudin 2 were quantified by immunohistochemistry on colonic biopsies in 20 RA patients and 20 age- and sex-matched controls. Staining intensity was assessed by two blinded independent readers. To explore intestinal permeability, serum concentrations of LPS-binding protein (LBP), sCD14 and zonulin-related proteins (ZRP) were evaluated by ELISA in another cohort of 59 RA: 21 patients naive of DMARDs (17 before and after introduction of a conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs), 38 patients with severe RA (before and after introduction of a biological (b) DMARDs), and 33 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Z0-1 protein was less expressed in colon of RA patients than controls (mean score ± SEM of 1.6 ± 0.56 vs 2.0 ± 0.43; p= 0.01), while no significant difference was detected for occludin and claudin-2. RA patients had higher serum LBP and sCD14 concentrations than controls. LBP and sCD14 levels were significantly correlated with DAS28 (r = 0.61, p= 0.005 and r = 0.57, p= 0.01, respectively) while ZRP did not. bDMARD responders had significantly reduced LBP and sCD14 concentrations unlike bDMARDs non-responders and patients treated with csDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

RA patients have altered colonic tight junction proteins and increased serum biomarkers of intestinal permeability. There was a correlation between serological markers of intestinal permeability and disease activity as well as bDMARD response. These results suggest a link between impaired gut integrity and systemic inflammation in RA.

Drug Safety in Episodic Migraine Management in Adults Part 1: Acute Treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to aid in choosing safe options when assessing potential risks of acute migraine treatments based on known mechanisms of action and anticipated safety concerns.

RECENT FINDINGS

Part 1 highlights safety issues associated with commonly used medications to treat acute migraine attacks. Strategies to mitigate cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, evaluation of cardiovascular risks of triptan and ergot alkaloids, and precautions with use of antiemetics and the novel drugs gepants and ditans are discussed to help practitioners in clinical decision-making. When available, we included recommendations from professional societies and data from pharmacovigilance systems. While guidelines on efficacy are available, one must also consider the possible risks and adverse effects of a drug when creating treatment plans.

Orally Administered NSAIDs-General Characteristics and Usage in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis-A Narrative Review

Background: Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ OA) is a degenerative joint disease. The aim of this review was to present the general characteristics of orally administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to present the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA. Methods: PubMed database was analyzed with the keywords: "(temporomandibular joint) AND ((disorders) OR (osteoarthritis) AND (treatment)) AND (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug)". After screening of 180 results, 6 studies have been included in this narrative review. Results and Conclusions: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are one of the most commonly used drugs for alleviation of pain localized in the orofacial area. The majority of articles predominantly examined and described diclofenac sodium in the treatment of pain in the course of TMJ OA. Because of the limited number of randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA, as well as high heterogeneity of published researches, it seems impossible to draw up unequivocal recommendations for the usage of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA. However, it is highly recommended to use the lowest effective dose of NSAIDs for the shortest possible time. Moreover, in patients with increased risk of gastrointestinal complications, supplementary gastroprotective agents should be prescribed.