Patient-reported depression severity and cognitive symptoms as determinants of functioning in patients with major depressive disorder: a secondary analysis of the 2-year prospective PERFORM study

The dose-response relationship of vortioxetine on major depressive disorder: an umbrella review

Vortioxetine is a novel multimodal antidepressant, but its precise efficacy and dose-response relationship for treating different symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) is still unclear. This umbrella review aims to assess the effectiveness, tolerability, and dose-response relationship of vortioxetine across a comprehensive range of clinical features in adults with MDD, including cognition, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and side effects. We meticulously searched eight electronic databases and included systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) of vortioxetine. The methodological quality of each included SR was independently assessed using the AMSTAR2 tool. To evaluate the credibility of the evidence, we utilized the GRADE framework and the Ioannidis criteria. In total, 35 SRs with 278 MAs met the inclusion criteria and based on these studies we performed 56 MAs of interest. While vortioxetine has been consistently shown to have positive effects on various domains, the evidence regarding cognitive performance and depression symptoms is notably robust compared to placebo, despite of relatively overall low quality of evidence. Finally, a dose-response relationship was observed across all categories within the treatment range of 5-20 mg/d and a dosage of vortioxetine 20 mg/d is recommended for adult MDD patients to achieve full functional recovery.

Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Working Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in China: A Subgroup Analysis of the RELIEVE China Study

Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) causes significant functional impairments that impact on all aspects of patients' daily lives, including their ability to work, work productivity, and social life.

Purpose

To assess the real-world effectiveness of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine in working patients with MDD in China.

Patients and methods

RELIEVE China was an observational, prospective cohort study. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with MDD initiating treatment with vortioxetine in routine clinical practice settings were followed for 24 weeks. In this subgroup analysis, functioning was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in patients in full- or part-time work or education at baseline who remained on treatment at all follow-up visits (n=424). Depressive, cognitive, and anxiety symptoms were also assessed. For all endpoints, mean change from baseline at weeks 8 and 24 was analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures.

Results

Clinically relevant and sustained improvements in patient functioning and measures of work productivity were observed over the 24 weeks of vortioxetine treatment. The adjusted mean (standard error) reduction in SDS total score from baseline was 5.4 (0.3) points at week 8 and 8.7 (0.3) points at week 24 (both P<0.001 vs baseline). Significant improvements were observed across all SDS domains and in levels of absenteeism and presenteeism (P<0.001 vs baseline for all endpoints at both time points). Significant improvements in depressive, cognitive, and anxiety symptoms were also observed over the study period (all P<0.001 vs baseline). The proportion of patients in remission (ie, 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≤7) after 24 weeks of vortioxetine treatment was 65.4%. Vortioxetine was well tolerated; nausea was the most common adverse event, reported by 18.6% of patients.

Conclusion

These findings support the effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine in working patients with MDD receiving treatment in routine clinical practice settings in China.

Discrepancy between objective and subjective cognition and its association with the trajectory of symptoms and functioning in depressive patients

BACKGROUND

Discrepancy between objective and subjective cognitive deficit is common among patients with major depressive disorders (MDDs) and may play a key role in the mechanism linking cognition with recovery of symptom and psychosocial function. This study, therefore, explores the cognitive discrepancy, and its association with the trajectory of symptoms and functioning over a 6-month period.

METHODS

We used data from the Prospective Research Observation to Assess Cognition in Treated patients with MDD (PROACT) study, from which 598 patients were included. Cognitive discrepancy scores were computed using a novel methodology, with positive values indicating more subjective than objective deficit (i.e. 'underestimation') and negative values indicating more objective than subjective difficulties (i.e. 'overestimation'). Linear growth curve models were employed to examine the association of the cognitive discrepancy with the trajectory of depressive symptoms, psychosocial function, and quality of life.

RESULTS

About 68% of patients displayed disproportionately more objective than subjective cognitive deficit at baseline, and the mean cognitive discrepancy score was -1.4 (2.7). Overestimation was associated with a faster decrease of HDRS-17 (β = -0.46, p = 0.002) and a faster decrease of psychosocial function in social life (β = -0.13, p = 0.013) and family life (β = -0.12, p = 0.026), and a greater improvement of EQ-5D utility score (β = 0.01, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found a lower sensitivity of cognitive deficit at baseline and its decrease was associated with better health outcomes. Our findings have clinical implications of the necessity to assess both subjective and objective cognition for identification and categorization and to incorporate cognitive and psychological therapies for optimized treatment outcomes.

Practical pathway for the management of depression in the workplace: a Canadian perspective

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and other mental health issues pose a substantial burden on the workforce. Approximately half a million Canadians will not be at work in any week because of a mental health disorder, and more than twice that number will work at a reduced level of productivity (presenteeism). Although it is important to determine whether work plays a role in a mental health condition, at initial presentation, patients should be diagnosed and treated per appropriate clinical guidelines. However, it is also important for patient care to determine the various causes or triggers including work-related factors. Clearly identifying the stressors associated with the mental health disorder can help clinicians to assess functional limitations, develop an appropriate care plan, and interact more effectively with worker's compensation and disability programs, as well as employers. There is currently no widely accepted tool to definitively identify MDD as work-related, but the presence of certain patient and work characteristics may help. This paper seeks to review the evidence specific to depression in the workplace, and provide practical tips to help clinicians to identify and treat work-related MDD, as well as navigate disability issues.

Assessing Clinically Significant Cognitive Impairment Using the NIH Toolbox in Individuals with Co-occurring Serious Mental Illness and Alcohol Use Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Serious mental illnesses (SMI) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) co-occurrence (SMI-AUD) is common, yet little is known about the prevalence and risk factors of cognitive impairment for this population. We used the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox to identify clinically significant cognitive impairment (CSCI), describe the cognitive profile, and investigate whether psychiatric and AUD severity measures are associated with CSCI in individuals with SMI-AUD.

METHODS

CSCI was defined as 2 or more fully corrected fluid subtest T scores below a set threshold based on an individual's crystalized composite score. Psychiatric severity measures included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V (SCID-5) for SMI diagnosis and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. AUD severity measures included the SCID-5 for AUD symptom severity score, years of alcohol use, and urine ethyl glucuronide levels. A multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the adjusted effects of each variable on the probability of CSCI.

RESULTS

Forty-one percent (N = 55/135) of our sample had CSCI compared with the base rate of 15% from the NIH Toolbox normative sample. Subtests measuring executive function most frequently contributed to meeting criteria for CSCI (Flanker and Dimensional Change Card Sort). A history of head injury ( P = 0.033), increased AUD symptom severity score ( P = 0.007) and increased negative symptom severity score ( P = 0.027) were associated with CSCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognition should be considered in the treatment of people with SMI-AUD, particularly in those with history of brain injury, higher AUD symptom severity, and/or negative symptom severity.

Considerations when selecting an antidepressant: a narrative review for primary care providers treating adults with depression

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating mental disorder that can be treated with a number of different antidepressant therapies, each with its own unique prescribing considerations. Complicating the selection of an appropriate antidepressant for adults with MDD is the heterogeneity of clinical profiles and depression subtypes. Additionally, patient comorbidities, preferences, and likelihood of adhering to treatment must all be considered when selecting an appropriate therapy. With the majority of prescriptions being written by primary care practitioners, it is appropriate to review the unique characteristics of all available antidepressants, including safety considerations. Prior to initiating antidepressant treatment and when patients do not respond adequately to initial therapy and/or exhibit any hypomanic or manic symptoms, bipolar disorder must be ruled out, and evaluation for psychiatric comorbidities must be considered as well. Patients with an inadequate response may then require a treatment switch to another drug with a different mechanism of action, combination, or augmentation strategy. In this narrative review, we propose that careful selection of the most appropriate antidepressant for adult patients with MDD based on their clinical profile and comorbidities is vital for initial treatment selection.Strategies must be considered for addressing partial and inadequate responses as well to help patients achieve full remission and sustained functional recovery. This review also highlights data for MDD clinical outcomes for which gaps in the literature have been identified, including the effects of antidepressants on functional outcomes, sleep disturbances, emotional and cognitive blunting, anxiety, and residual symptoms of depression.

Effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and co-morbid generalized anxiety disorder in routine clinical practice: A subgroup analysis of the RELIEVE study

BACKGROUND

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is commonly co-morbid with major depressive disorder (MDD) and is associated with greater functional impairment and poorer treatment outcomes than MDD alone. However, studies on treatment with drugs for depression in patients with MDD and co-morbid GAD are limited.

AIMS

To examine the effectiveness of vortioxetine treatment in patients with MDD and co-morbid GAD in a subgroup analysis of the real-world RELIEVE study.

METHODS

The analysis included outpatients diagnosed with MDD and co-morbid GAD who initiated vortioxetine treatment at their physician's discretion in the 24-week, observational RELIEVE study. Primary outcome was patient functioning (Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)) after 12 and 24 weeks of vortioxetine treatment; secondary outcomes included depression severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)), cognitive symptoms (5-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D-5)) and cognitive performance (Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)).

RESULTS

Overall, 180 patients with MDD and co-morbid GAD were included in the analysis. Following vortioxetine initiation, clinically significant improvements in patient functioning (SDS total score) were observed at week 12 (least-squares (LS) mean reduction from baseline, 7.5 points), sustained through week 24 (9.2 points) (both p < 0.0001). LS mean PHQ-9, PDQ-D-5 and DSST scores improved by 7.9, 4.8 and 7.4 points at week 24, respectively (all p < 0.0001 vs baseline). Adverse events were reported by 33.9% of patients (most commonly nausea, 13.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

In routine clinical practice, vortioxetine was associated with clinically meaningful, sustained improvements in functioning, and depressive and cognitive symptoms, in patients with MDD and co-morbid GAD.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY NAME AND IDENTIFIER

Real-life Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Depression (RELIEVE) (NCT03555136) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03555136.

Validation and Functional Relevance of the Short Form of the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression for Japanese Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Purpose

To validate the five-item version of the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression (PDQ-D-5) for assessing subjective cognitive function in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) using data from the PERFORM-J study.

Patients and Methods

A total of 518 Japanese outpatients diagnosed with MDD were assessed on severity of depressive symptoms, cognitive function, social and work function, and quality of life (QoL) over 6 months following initiation of antidepressant therapy. This post hoc analysis evaluated the internal consistency and convergent validity of the PDQ-D-5 in relation to the original PDQ-D-20. Correlations of scores on these measures were examined at each time point and over time. The same set of analyses was explored between PDQ-D-5 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-nine-item (PHQ-9), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire.

Results

PDQ-D-5 scores showed good internal consistency. Strong positive correlations were observed between PDQ-D-5 and PDQ-D-20 at each time point (correlation coefficient: baseline, 0.94; month 1, 0.94; month 2, 0.96; month 6, 0.96) and over time (0.92) (all p < 0.0001). Longitudinally, there were positive correlations between PDQ-D-5 scores versus those on the PHQ-9, MADRS, and SDS. Similarly, negative correlations were noted between PDQ-D-5 scores and EQ-5D-5L and DSST scores to a variable degree. There were moderate positive correlations over time between PDQ-D-5 and all WPAI subscale scores except those on absenteeism.

Conclusion

PDQ-D-5 scores rated in Japanese patients with MDD were found to adequately represent scores on the PDQ-D-20. The short version also showed associations with several measures of functional outcome, depression severity and QoL. This validates the PDQ-D-5 as a feasible and clinically reliable tool to assess subjective experience on cognition, which is applicable to time-limited consultations.

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry for Primary Study

UMIN000024320.

Association between baseline cognitive symptoms and the subsequent presenteeism and global function in patients with major depressive disorder

Cognitive symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) contribute to impaired functional abilities and work productivity, particularly presenteeism. We investigated the association between baseline cognitive symptoms and subsequent presenteeism, and global functional impairment in Japanese patients with MDD from PERFORM-J (Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major Depressive Disorder in Japan) - a 6-month, multicenter, epidemiological study data. A total of 518 patients initiating antidepressant monotherapy (first-line or switched from another drug) were enrolled. Assessments include Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D) for cognitive complaints, Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) for global function (analysed n = 318), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for presenteeism (analysed n = 122). A strong association between changes in presenteeism and changes in SDS scores (r: total = 0.636; work/school = 0.686) was observed. After adjusting for sociodemographic and MDD-related factors, patients without cognitive complaints at baseline showed lower odds of impaired presenteeism at 6 months versus patients with cognitive complaints (0.243, 95% CI: 0.079 to 0.747, p = 0.014) and also in patients with first episode of MDD against with recurrent MDD (0.327 (95% CI: 0.136 to 0.787). Similarly, patients without cognitive complaints had healthier global functioning (lower mean SDS total score) than patients with cognitive complaints (8.3 vs 11.2; 95% CI, -5.189 to -0.578; p = 0.014). First depressive episode (lower risk of presenteeism), being male, and low baseline SDS total score (better global functioning) were also associated with improved outcomes. These results highlight the potential value of baseline PDQ-D scores in predicting subsequent workplace and global functioning in patients undergoing treatment for MDD.

Real-world effectiveness of vortioxetine in outpatients with major depressive disorder: functioning and dose effects

BACKGROUND

Functional recovery is an important treatment goal in major depressive disorder (MDD). This study assessed the real-world effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with MDD, with particular focus on functioning; dose-response was also assessed.

METHODS

This was a non-interventional, prospective, multicenter study conducted in Greece. Adult outpatients with MDD (n = 336) initiating vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day flexible dosing) as treatment for a current major depressive episode were followed for 3 months. Analyses were stratified according to vortioxetine dosage at 3 months: 5-10 mg/day versus 15-20 mg/day. Functioning was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).

RESULTS

Mean ± standard error SDS total score decreased (improved) from 18.7 ± 0.3 at baseline to 12.9 ± 0.3 after 1 month of vortioxetine treatment and 7.8 ± 0.4 after 3 months (p < 0.001 vs. baseline for all comparisons). Functional recovery (SDS score ≤ 6) was achieved in 14.6% of patients after 1 month of treatment and 48.4% of patients after 3 months. Improvement from baseline in SDS total and domain scores at 3 months was more pronounced in patients receiving vortioxetine 15-20 mg/day than in those receiving vortioxetine 5-10 mg/day. The mean ± standard error change in SDS total score from baseline was 9.2 ± 0.8 in the 5-10 mg/day group and 12.1 ± 0.4 in the 15-20 mg/day group (p < 0.001). Limitations of this study include its non-interventional study design and lack of a control group or active comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in functioning were seen in patients with MDD treated with vortioxetine in a real-world setting. Higher doses of vortioxetine were associated with significantly greater improvements in functioning.

Real-World Functioning in Psychiatric Outpatients: Predictive Factors

Introduction: Investigations on predictors of real-world functioning were mainly performed in patients with schizophrenia, while fewer studies have been conducted in other psychiatric disorders. Objective: Our objective was to identify clinical, socio-demographic, and illness-related predictors of real-world functioning during 12 months of standard treatments in outpatients with different diagnoses. Methods: Outpatients (n = 1019) with schizophrenia (SZ), major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), and borderline personality disorder (BPD) were evaluated with the following tools: SCID-5-CV and SCID-5-PD, CGI-S, SAT-P, DAI-10, and PSP. Change of PSP (ΔPSP) between baseline and 12 months was used as the dependent variable in multiple regression analysis. Results: Higher PSP score at baseline and the achievement of main milestones predicted better functioning after follow-up in all subgroups of patients, with the exception of BD. In the total sample, ΔPSP was related to age of onset, treatments, and quality of life, and inversely related to psychiatric anamnesis, antidepressants, and global symptoms. In SZ, ΔPSP was related to adherence and quality of life. In MDD, ΔPSP was related to psychotherapy and quality of life, and inversely related to antidepressants and global symptoms. In BD, ΔPSP was related to age of onset, antipsychotics, and quality of life, while it was inversely related to psychiatric anamnesis. In BPD, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, psychotherapy, and quality of life were directly related to ΔPSP, while suicidal attempts and global symptoms had an inverse relation. Conclusions: Several socio-demographic and illness-related variables predicted improvement of real-world functioning, besides psychopathology and severity of the disease.

Prediction of residual cognitive disturbances by early response of depressive symptoms to antidepressant treatments in patients with major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) frequently retain cognitive disturbances after recovery from mood symptoms. We investigated the relationship between early response of mood symptoms and/or remission, and residual cognitive disturbances after 6 months of antidepressant treatment.

METHODS

518 patients with MDD were followed up for 6 months after antidepressant treatment initiation (first-line or switch from a previous drug). Subjective and objective cognitive disturbances were assessed by the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D) and digit symbol substitution test (DSST), respectively. Depressive symptoms, as well as remission and early response to treatment, were assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

Early response of depressive mood (≥50% reduction in MADRS score at month 1) was related with fewer residual subjective cognitive symptoms, as evaluated by the PDQ-D at month 6 (p<0.001). Likewise, early remission status at month 2 was inversely associated with PDQ-D scores at month 6 (p<0.001). Among patients with baseline DSST scores of ≥1 standard deviation below the norm, early response/remission was associated with better performance on the DSST at month 6 (p<0.05).

LIMITATIONS

The cohort may not be representative of the general MDD patient population, and the possible influence of concomitant medications was not evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that early improvements in depressive symptoms predict better cognitive outcomes in patients with MDD. Grouping of patients by mood and cognition status in early stages of antidepressant treatments may facilitate efforts to improve long-term functional outcomes.

Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice: Results of the RELIEVE Study

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled clinical trials have shown vortioxetine to be efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The Real-Life Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Depression (RELIEVE) study was undertaken to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of vortioxetine for the treatment of MDD in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

RELIEVE was a 24-week, observational, prospective cohort study in outpatients with MDD initiating treatment with vortioxetine at their physician's discretion in routine care settings in Canada, France, Italy, and the USA (NCT03555136). The primary study outcome was patient functioning assessed by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Secondary outcomes included depression severity [9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)], cognitive symptoms [5-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D-5)], and cognitive performance [Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)]. Mixed models of repeated measures were used to assess change from baseline at week 24, adjusted for relevant confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 737 patients were eligible for inclusion in the full analysis set. Most patients (73.7%) reported at least one comorbid medical condition, 56.0% had comorbid anxiety and 24.4% had comorbid generalized anxiety disorder. Improvement in least-squares (LS) mean SDS score from baseline to week 24 was 8.7 points. LS mean PHQ-9, PDQ-D-5 and DSST scores improved by 7.4, 4.6, and 6.2 points, respectively. Adverse events were observed in 21.2% of patients [most commonly, nausea (8.2% of patients)].

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine for the treatment of MDD in a large and heterogeneous patient population representative of that encountered in routine clinical practice.

Association between discrepancy in objective and subjective cognitive abilities and treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder: A CAN-BIND-1 study report

BACKGROUND

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is characterized by objective and subjective cognitive deficits. Discrepancies between objective and subjective cognitive performance can reflect under- to over-estimations of cognitive abilities, and these discrepancies are referred to as cognitive self-appraisals. Despite evidence that low self-appraisals are associated with depression, the modifiability of self-appraisals and their association with treatment outcome remains unclear. The current study examined whether self-appraisals change following antidepressant treatment. Furthermore, we investigated the association of self-appraisals with treatment outcome.

METHODS

As part of the CAN-BIND-1 clinical trial, 154 patients with MDD completed measures of objective and subjective cognitive abilities, depressive symptoms, and functional outcomes (work productivity, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life) at baseline and post-escitalopram treatment. Self-appraisals were calculated based on discrepancies between objective and subjective cognitive abilities, with higher scores indicating overestimation of cognitive abilities.

RESULTS

Baseline self-appraisals were not predictive of treatment outcomes. However, self-appraisals increased from pre- to post-treatment. Moreover, pre-post treatment increases in self-appraisals were associated with positive treatment response and remission, decreases in depressive symptoms, and improvements in work productivity, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life.

LIMITATIONS

The pre-post intervention design precluded examining the temporal precedence of change in self-appraisals versus depressive symptoms and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings are the first to demonstrate that self-appraisals are treatment-sensitive and are associated with treatment outcomes and recovery from MDD. Cognitive self-appraisals may represent a key marker of treatment response and a valuable target for assessment and intervention, as well as a potential mechanism underlying risk and recovery.

Inflammatory phenotype of depression symptom structure: A network perspective

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing interest in classifying inflammatory phenotypes of depression. Most investigations into inflammatory phenotypes only have tested whether elevated inflammation is associated with elevated levels of depression symptoms, or risk for a diagnosis. This study expanded the definition of phenotype to include the structure of depression symptoms as a function of inflammation.

METHODS

Network models of depression symptoms were estimated in a sample of 4157 adults (mean age = 47.6, 51% female) from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Analyses included comparisons of networks between those with elevated (C-reactive protein (CRP) values ≥ 3.0 mg/L; N = 1696) and non-elevated CRP (N = 2841) as well as moderated network models with CRP group status and raw CRP values moderating the associations between depression symptoms.

RESULTS

Differences emerged at all levels of analysis (global, symptom-specific, symptom-symptom associations). Specifically, the elevated CRP group had greater symptom connectivity (stronger total associations between symptoms). Further, difficulty concentrating and psychomotor difficulties had higher expected influence (concordance with other symptoms) in the elevated CRP group. Finally, there was evidence that several symptom-symptom associations were moderated by CRP.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides consistent evidence that the structure of depression symptoms varies as a function of CRP levels. Greater symptom connectivity might contribute to why elevated CRP is associated with treatment-resistant depression. Additionally, differences in symptom structure might highlight different maintenance mechanisms and treatment targets for individuals with compared to those without elevated CRP. Finally, differences in symptom structure as a function of CRP highlight a potential misalignment of standard depression measures (the structure of which are evaluated on groups unselected for CRP levels) and the presentation of depression symptoms in those with elevated CRP.

Patient Expectations and Experiences of Antidepressant Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

This qualitative study explored patient perceptions of the most burdensome symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD), the impact of symptoms on patients' daily lives, and patient expectations and experiences regarding the timing of onset of antidepressant pharmacotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected through facilitated, patient focus-group sessions in the USA between May and June 2019. Participants were adults with confirmed MDD who reported a major depressive episode within the past 2 years, for which they had received pharmacologic treatment for ≥6 weeks. The semi-structured discussion focused on the key topics of bothersome symptoms of MDD, the impact of symptoms on quality of life, and the effects of antidepressant treatment. Interviews were audio-recorded; findings were summarized using a content-analysis approach.

RESULTS

Five focus-group sessions were undertaken, involving a total of 29 patients (each attended one session; mean age, 43.4 years; 72.4% female). Mean time since confirmed diagnosis of MDD was 13.1 years. The most commonly prescribed antidepressants received were bupropion (41.4% of participants), escitalopram (34.5%), and sertraline (34.5%). The most frequently reported bothersome MDD symptoms were fatigue (mentioned by 58.6% of participants), lack of motivation/loss of interest (51.7%), anxiety/panic (44.8%), sadness (41.4%), and lack of concentration/brain fog (41.4%). Socialization, family life, and work were the areas in which quality of life was most impacted. Participants expressed dissatisfaction with their antidepressant treatment. Fast symptom resolution was mentioned as a priority (defined as <1 week by 38.5% of participants and ≤1 month by 65.4%). Most participants had not experienced fast relief from their symptoms with current or previous antidepressant medications.

CONCLUSION

Results of this qualitative study suggest that fatigue, anhedonia, cognitive symptoms, and anxiety are some of the most bothersome symptoms for patients with MDD and highlight the importance of obtaining rapid relief from these symptoms in order to improve outcomes and patient satisfaction with antidepressant medication.

The Relationship Between Cognitive Dysfunction Through THINC-Integrated Tool (THINC-it) and Psychosocial Function in Chinese Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Background: Herein, we validate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the THINC-integrated tool (THINC-it) as a screening tool for cognitive deficits in patients with major depressive disorder. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether cognitive deficits as detected by the THINC-it tool in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) are associated with workplace productivity and/or psychosocial function. Methods: Subjects aged 18-65 (n = 91) with MDD were evaluated and compared to age-, sex- and education- matched healthy controls (n = 95). Symptoms of cognitive dysfunction, workplace productivity, and psychosocial function were measured using the THINC-it tool, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire- Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP). Results: There were significant differences in THINC-it scores (p < 0.01), the average of HAMD total score (p < 0.01) and all aspects of SDS (p < 0.01) between two groups. There were significant differences in the four aspects of WPAI between the two groups in the employed status (p <0.01). THINC-it subjective cognition and SDS total score, SDS work/school, SDS social, SDS family showed significantly correlation (r ranging from 0.255 to 0.386, p <0.01). SDS and THINC-it Objective cognition, THINC-it comprehensive cognition were no correlation between two groups. HAMD total score and SDS total score, SDS social, SDS family showed significantly correlation (r ranging.

Improvements in Workplace Productivity in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: Results From the AtWoRC Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in workplace productivity and functioning in an open-label study in working patients receiving vortioxetine (10 to 20 mg/d) for major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

Associations between items in the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire were assessed at 12 and 52 weeks by Pearson correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were observed across all domains of workplace productivity and functioning after 12 and 52 weeks' vortioxetine treatment. Strong correlations were seen between improvements in WLQ mental domains and WPAI presenteeism and SDS work/school items. Presenteeism showed stronger correlations with other workplace productivity measures than absenteeism.

CONCLUSIONS

Presenteeism and absenteeism impact productivity in working patients with MDD. Vortioxetine confers long-term benefits across all workplace functioning domains.

Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder and Their Impact on Psychosocial Functioning in the Different Phases of the Disease: Do the Perspectives of Patients and Healthcare Providers Differ?

This analysis was undertaken to examine the relationship between different symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) and psychosocial functioning from the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) across the different phases of the disease (acute, post-acute, and remission). Data regarding symptoms of MDD and psychosocial functioning, assessed by an adapted version of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) scale, were elicited via an online survey from 2,008 patients diagnosed with MDD (based on their personal experience of the disease) and 3,138 patients observed by 1,046 HCPs (based on individual patient records). Correlations between patient-reported and HCP-reported MDD symptoms and impairment of psychosocial functioning were assessed by multivariate regression analysis. The population comprised 1,946 patient respondents and 3,042 HCP-reported patients. Patients reported experiencing a wider range of symptoms and greater impairment of functioning than reported by HCPs across all phases of the disease. At the domain level, only cognitive symptoms were found to be significantly associated with functioning during the acute phase from the perspective of patients, while from the HCPs' perspective both mood and cognitive symptoms significantly impacted functioning in this phase. Significant associations were seen between mood, physical, and cognitive symptom domains and functioning in both cohorts during the post-acute and remission phases. Differences in associations between individual MDD symptoms and functioning were also observed between the two cohorts across all disease phases; in particular, HCPs found that more physical symptoms impacted functioning during remission than did patients. In summary, the results suggest that perceptions of MDD symptoms and the associations between these symptoms and functioning differ significantly between patients and HCPs across all phases of the disease. These findings further highlight the need for improved communication between patients and HCPs in order to set appropriate treatment goals and promote symptomatic and functional recovery in MDD.