1
|
Balasubramanian I, Chaudhry I, Poco LC, Malhotra C. 'I secretly wish. . .' Caregivers' expression of wish for death of persons with severe dementia. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae103. [PMID: 38798114 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Qualitative evidence suggests that caregivers may express a wish for death of persons with severe dementia (PwSD). No study has assessed the extent to which it happens, stability of this wish over time and the factors associated with it. OBJECTIVES We examined caregivers' wish for death of PwSDs overtime and the factors associated with this wish. METHODS 215 caregivers of community dwelling PwSDs were surveyed every 4 months for 2 years. Using the mixed-effects multinomial regression model, we assessed the PwSD and caregiver factors associated with caregivers' wish for PwSDs' death. RESULTS At baseline, 27% caregivers expressed a wish for PwSDs' life to end sooner. Overall, 43% of the caregivers expressed a wish for PwSDs' death at least once during the study period and 11% expressed it consistently. Caregivers' perception of PwSDs' lower quality of life (RRR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.10), higher functional dependency (RRR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.21), eating difficulty (RRR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.26, 4.04) and suffering (RRR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.52) were associated with this wish. Caregivers who were emotionally close to PwSDs were less likely (RRR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.55) while those who understood that dementia is a terminal illness were more likely (RRR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.92) to express this wish. CONCLUSION Caregivers' wish for PwSDs' death changed over time and was primarily driven by their perception of PwSDs' poor well-being and awareness of their illness being terminal, indicating a need for increased support in this challenging caregiving context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8, College Road, 169857, Singapore
| | - Louisa Camille Poco
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8, College Road, 169857, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8, College Road, 169857, Singapore
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8, College Road, 169857, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leong CA, Summers A, Grote V, Jackson K, Dowling G, Snowberg K, Cotten P, Cheung E, Yang D, Addington EL, Moskowitz JT. Randomized controlled trial of a positive emotion regulation intervention to reduce stress in family caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease: protocol and design for the LEAF 2.0 study. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:289. [PMID: 38539083 PMCID: PMC10976670 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04817-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caring for a loved one with Alzheimer's disease can be stressful, resulting in poorer emotional and physical health among family caregivers. Although supportive resources for caregivers are available, distance, caregiver health, and the daily demands of caregiving are barriers to access. Based on research demonstrating the importance of positive emotions in coping with stress, our previous trial showed that dementia caregivers who participated in facilitated, web-based delivery of a positive emotion regulation intervention called LEAF (Life Enhancing Activities for Family caregivers) experienced increased positive emotion and decreased depression and anxiety. Building on this evidence, the LEAF 2.0 study aims to test whether web-based, self-guided delivery can confer similar benefits for caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease. METHODS This paper presents the design and methods for LEAF 2.0, a 3-arm web-based randomized controlled trial (N = 500) in which family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are randomized to (1) the LEAF intervention facilitated remotely via the web (N = 200), (2) the LEAF intervention self-guided online (N = 200), or (3) an emotion reporting control (N = 100), which then crosses over to the intervention after approximately 6 months, half to the facilitated arm and half to the self-guided arm. We aim to (1) compare the effect of the facilitated and self-guided LEAF positive emotion interventions to an emotion reporting control condition on AD caregiver well-being (positive emotion, depression, anxiety, and perceived stress) and secondary outcomes (caregiving burden, caregiving self-efficacy, positive aspects of caregiving, quality of care, and AD patient quality of life); (2) assess whether effects are mediated by improvements in positive emotion or other aspects of caregiver well-being; and (3) test whether caregiver age or gender or the care recipient's dementia severity moderates the effects of the intervention. DISCUSSION If demonstrated to be effective, LEAF can be widely disseminated and ultimately have a significant impact on the stress experienced by AD caregivers and the well-being of people living with Alzheimer's disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03610698.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Leong
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois USA, USA.
| | - Amanda Summers
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois USA, USA
| | - Veronika Grote
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois USA, USA
| | - Kathryn Jackson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois USA, USA
| | | | | | - Paul Cotten
- Unversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth L Addington
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois USA, USA
| | - Judith T Moskowitz
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois USA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kwok I, Lattie EG, Yang D, Summers A, Grote V, Cotten P, Moskowitz JT. Acceptability and Feasibility of a Socially Enhanced, Self-Guided, Positive Emotion Regulation Intervention for Caregivers of Individuals With Dementia: Pilot Intervention Study. JMIR Aging 2023; 6:e46269. [PMID: 37672311 PMCID: PMC10512116 DOI: 10.2196/46269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The responsibilities of being a primary caregiver for a loved one with dementia can produce significant stress for the caregiver, leading to deleterious outcomes for the caregiver's physical and psychological health. Hence, researchers are developing eHealth interventions to provide support for caregivers. Members of our research team previously developed and tested a positive emotion regulation intervention that we delivered through videoconferencing, in which caregiver participants would meet one-on-one with a trained facilitator. Although proven effective, such delivery methods have limited scalability because they require significant resources in terms of cost and direct contact hours. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to conduct a pilot test of a socially enhanced, self-guided version of the positive emotion regulation intervention, Social Augmentation of Self-Guided Electronic Delivery of the Life Enhancing Activities for Family Caregivers (SAGE LEAF). Studies have shown that social presence or the perception of others in a virtual space is associated with enhanced learning and user satisfaction. Hence, the intervention leverages various social features (eg, discussion boards, podcasts, videos, user profiles, and social notifications) to foster a sense of social presence among participants and study team members. METHODS Usability, usefulness, feasibility, and acceptability data were collected from a pilot test in which participants (N=15) were given full access to the SAGE LEAF intervention over 6 weeks and completed preintervention and postintervention assessments (10/15, 67%). Preliminary outcome measures were also collected, with an understanding that no conclusions about efficacy could be made, because our pilot study did not have a control group and was not sufficiently powered. RESULTS The results suggest that SAGE LEAF is feasible, with participants viewing an average of 72% (SD 42%) of the total available intervention web pages. In addition, acceptability was found to be good, as demonstrated by participants' willingness to recommend the SAGE LEAF program to a friend or other caregiver. Applying Pearson correlational analyses, we found moderate, positive correlation between social presence scores and participants' willingness to recommend the program to others (r9=0.672; P=.03). We also found positive correlation between social presence scores and participants' perceptions about the overall usefulness of the intervention (r9=0.773; P=.009). This suggests that participants' sense of social presence may be important for the feasibility and acceptability of the program. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, the SAGE LEAF intervention demonstrates potential for broad dissemination for dementia caregivers. We aim to incorporate participant feedback about how the social features may be improved in future iterations to enhance usability and to further bolster a sense of social connection among participants and study staff members. Next steps include partnering with dementia clinics and other caregiver-serving organizations across the United States to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Kwok
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Dershung Yang
- BrightOutcome Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, United States
| | - Amanda Summers
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Veronika Grote
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Paul Cotten
- University of California San Francisco, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Waters L, Algoe SB, Dutton J, Emmons R, Fredrickson BL, Heaphy E, Moskowitz JT, Neff K, Niemiec R, Pury C, Steger M. Positive psychology in a pandemic: buffering, bolstering, and building mental health. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2021.1871945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Waters
- Centre for Positive Psychology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Jane Dutton
- Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Robert Emmons
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis
| | | | - Emily Heaphy
- Isenberg School of Management, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA
| | - Judith T. Moskowitz
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Kristin Neff
- Educational Psychology Department, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | | | - Cynthia Pury
- Clemson University Department of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Michael Steger
- Center for Meaning and Purpose, Department of Psychology, Optentia Research Programme, Colorado State University, North-West University, Fort Collins, Vanderbijlpark, CO, USA, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
González-Fraile E, Ballesteros J, Rueda JR, Santos-Zorrozúa B, Solà I, McCleery J. Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1:CD006440. [PMID: 33417236 PMCID: PMC8094510 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006440.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people with dementia are cared for at home by unpaid informal caregivers, usually family members. Caregivers may experience a range of physical, emotional, financial and social harms, which are often described collectively as caregiver burden. The degree of burden experienced is associated with characteristics of the caregiver, such as gender, and characteristics of the person with dementia, such as dementia stage, and the presence of behavioural problems or neuropsychiatric disturbances. It is a strong predictor of admission to residential care for people with dementia. Psychoeducational interventions might prevent or reduce caregiver burden. Overall, they are intended to improve caregivers' knowledge about the disease and its care; to increase caregivers' sense of competence and their ability to cope with difficult situations; to relieve feelings of isolation and allow caregivers to attend to their own emotional and physical needs. These interventions are heterogeneous, varying in their theoretical framework, components, and delivery formats. Interventions that are delivered remotely, using printed materials, telephone or video technologies, may be particularly suitable for caregivers who have difficulty accessing face-to-face services because of their own health problems, poor access to transport, or absence of substitute care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, containment measures in many countries required people to be isolated in their homes, including people with dementia and their family carers. In such circumstances, there is no alternative to remote delivery of interventions. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and acceptability of remotely delivered interventions aiming to reduce burden and improve mood and quality of life of informal caregivers of people with dementia. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, MEDLINE, Embase and four other databases, as well as two international trials registries, on 10 April 2020. We also examined the bibliographies of relevant review papers and published trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included only randomised controlled trials that assessed the remote delivery of structured interventions for informal caregivers who were providing care for people with dementia living at home. Caregivers had to be unpaid adults (relatives or members of the person's community). The interventions could be delivered using printed materials, the telephone, the Internet or a mixture of these, but could not involve any face-to-face contact with professionals. We categorised intervention components as information, training or support. Information interventions included two key elements: (i) they provided standardised information, and (ii) the caregiver played a passive role. Support interventions promoted interaction with other people (professionals or peers). Training interventions trained caregivers in practical skills to manage care. We excluded interventions that were primarily individual psychotherapy. Our primary outcomes were caregiver burden, mood, health-related quality of life and dropout for any reason. Secondary outcomes were caregiver knowledge and skills, use of health and social care resources, admission of the person with dementia to institutional care, and quality of life of the person with dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Study selection, data extraction and assessment of the risk of bias in included studies were done independently by two review authors. We used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) to describe the interventions. We conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model to derive estimates of effect size. We used GRADE methods to describe our degree of certainty about effect estimates. MAIN RESULTS We included 26 studies in this review (2367 participants). We compared (1) interventions involving training, support or both, with or without information (experimental interventions) with usual treatment, waiting list or attention control (12 studies, 944 participants); and (2) the same experimental interventions with provision of information alone (14 studies, 1423 participants). We downgraded evidence for study limitations and, for some outcomes, for inconsistency between studies. There was a frequent risk of bias from self-rating of subjective outcomes by participants who were not blind to the intervention. Randomisation methods were not always well-reported and there was potential for attrition bias in some studies. Therefore, all evidence was of moderate or low certainty. In the comparison of experimental interventions with usual treatment, waiting list or attention control, we found that the experimental interventions probably have little or no effect on caregiver burden (nine studies, 597 participants; standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.35 to 0.23); depressive symptoms (eight studies, 638 participants; SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.12); or health-related quality of life (two studies, 311 participants; SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.32). The experimental interventions probably result in little or no difference in dropout for any reason (eight studies, 661 participants; risk ratio (RR) 1.15, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.53). In the comparison of experimental interventions with a control condition of information alone, we found that experimental interventions may result in a slight reduction in caregiver burden (nine studies, 650 participants; SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.04); probably result in a slight improvement in depressive symptoms (11 studies, 1100 participants; SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.06); may result in little or no difference in caregiver health-related quality of life (two studies, 257 participants; SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.21); and probably result in an increase in dropouts for any reason (12 studies, 1266 participants; RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.20). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Remotely delivered interventions including support, training or both, with or without information, may slightly reduce caregiver burden and improve caregiver depressive symptoms when compared with provision of information alone, but not when compared with usual treatment, waiting list or attention control. They seem to make little or no difference to health-related quality of life. Caregivers receiving training or support were more likely than those receiving information alone to drop out of the studies, which might limit applicability. The efficacy of these interventions may depend on the nature and availability of usual services in the study settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Javier Ballesteros
- Department of Neuroscience, University of the Basque Country, CIBER Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Leioa, Spain
| | - José-Ramón Rueda
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain
| | - Borja Santos-Zorrozúa
- Scientific coordination Unit, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Ivan Solà
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Painter JM, Mote J, Peckham AD, Lee EH, Campellone TR, Pearlstein JG, Morgan S, Kring AM, Johnson SL, Moskowitz JT. A positive emotion regulation intervention for bipolar I disorder: Treatment development and initial outcomes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2019; 61:96-103. [PMID: 31439286 PMCID: PMC6861691 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2019.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dysfunction in positive affect is a defining symptom of bipolar I disorder (BD), both during and between mood episodes. We hypothesize that helping people with BD learn skills to create balance in their affective experiences by engaging in strategies that increase low activation positive emotion (LAP; e.g., relaxation) could help to improve well-being during periods of symptom remission. We discuss the development and preliminary outcomes of a positive emotion regulation (PER) group treatment for people with BD, designed as a supplement to pharmacological treatment. METHOD The Learning Affective Understanding for a Rich Emotional Life (LAUREL) intervention is a group-based intervention covering 10 empirically supported skills designed to increase LAP. Sixteen people with BD enrolled in the LAUREL intervention and twelve completed baseline and post-intervention assessments. RESULTS Participants who completed the study (n = 12) attended the majority of groups (87.96%) and reported practicing skills, on average, 16 times a week. We were unable to detect significant differences in mania symptoms following engagement in this PER intervention. Finally, participants reported increases in several areas associated with well-being post-intervention, including mindfulness, reappraisal, and self-compassion. CONCLUSION This study provides a theoretical framework and preliminary support for a PER intervention for BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janelle M Painter
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Jasmine Mote
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Andrew D Peckham
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Erica H Lee
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Timothy R Campellone
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Jennifer G Pearlstein
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Stefana Morgan
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry, United States of America.
| | - Ann M Kring
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Sheri L Johnson
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, United States of America.
| | - Judith T Moskowitz
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|