Current and Emerging DMARDs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Therapeutic potential of antibody-drug conjugates possessing bifunctional anti-inflammatory action in the pathogenies of rheumatoid arthritis

In an age where there is a remarkable upsurge in developing precision medicines, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a progressive therapeutic strategy. ADCs typically consist of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) conjugated to the cytotoxic payloads by utilizing a linker, combining the benefits of definitive target specificity of mAbs and potent killing impact of payload to achieve precise and efficient elimination of target cells. In addition to their well-established role in oncology, ADCs are currently demonstrating encouraging potential in addressing the unmet requirements in the treatment of autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Prevalent long-term autoimmune disease RA costs billions of dollars annually but still, there is a lack of precision-targeted therapeutics with minimal side effects. This review provides an overview of the RA pathogenesis, pre-existing therapies, and their limitations, the introduction of ADCs in RA treatment, the mechanism of ADCs, and a summary of ADCs in preclinical and clinical trials. Based on the literature we also propose a strategy in ADC synthesis, which may increase the efficiency in targeting multifactorial diseases like RA. We propose to utilize DMARDs (Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs), the first-line treatment for RA, as a payload for ADC synthesis. DMARDs are the only class of medication that limits the disease progression, but their efficacy is limited due to off-target toxicities. Hence, utilizing them as payload will help to deliver them directly at the targeted site, reducing their off-target toxicity, which in turn will increase their efficiency in targeting disease. Also, as mAbs are not sufficient to achieve remission, they are given in combinations with DMARDs. Hence, synthesizing ADCs may reduce the multiple and higher dosages given to patients, which in turn may enhance patient compliance.

Optimizing withdrawal strategies for anti-TNF-α therapies in rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. While treatment options have expanded over the years, including the introduction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors (TNFi), optimizing withdrawal strategies for these agents remains a challenge.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the current evidence on TNFi withdrawal strategies in RA, focusing on factors influencing withdrawal decisions such as disease activity monitoring, treatment response, patient characteristics, and biomarkers. A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and expert guidelines. The pathophysiology of RA, current pharmacological agents, and the treat-to-target strategy are discussed to provide a holistic understanding of RA management.

EXPERT OPINION

Withdrawal strategies could be suitable for certain patients, keeping in mind that several factors influence withdrawal decisions, including treatment response, disease activity and monitoring, and patient characteristics. The decision to withdraw TNFi must balance the benefits against the potential risks of disease flare and long-term treatment-related adverse effects. Combining DMARDs and TNFi early improves outcomes, supporting tapering strategies for cost-effectiveness and flare prevention. Future directions, including precision medicine approaches, patient-centered care models, and health economics analyses, are proposed to further optimize RA management and improve patient outcomes.

Barriers and Enablers in the Use of Parenteral Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Methotrexate (MTX) is effective in controlling disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Parenteral MTX may have benefits over oral MTX, but it is rarely used in practice. To better understand this low usage rate, it is necessary to explore the barriers and enablers of therapy from the perspective of RA patients. The objectives of this scoping review were to describe RA patients' perspectives on the barriers and enablers in the use of parenteral MTX and to identify the research gaps in this field.

METHODS

The search was performed in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from inception to May 2021. Data synthesis was conducted using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. This scoping review included any type of study that explored the use of parenteral MTX by adult RA patients from the patients' perspective, written in English.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included; findings related to the constructs "affective attitude," "burden," "intervention coherence," and "self-efficacy" were explored the most, while some were rarely ("opportunity cost" and "perceived effectiveness") or not ("ethicality") reported. RA patients were generally satisfied with MTX injections ("affective attitude"). From the burden construct, the requirement for dexterity for administering MTX by injection was considered a barrier, whereas the lack of significant pain from MTX injection was considered an enabler.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggested that patients generally preferred parenteral MTX formulations with attributes that facilitate self-administration. However, much of the identified research focused on prefilled pen devices, and significant gaps were identified, such as a lack of qualitative research.

DNA Methylation Signatures of Response to Conventional Synthetic and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex condition that displays heterogeneity in disease severity and response to standard treatments between patients. Failure rates for conventional, target synthetic, and biologic disease-modifying rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are significant. Although there are models for predicting patient response, they have limited accuracy, require replication/validation, or for samples to be obtained through a synovial biopsy. Thus, currently, there are no prediction methods approved for routine clinical use. Previous research has shown that genetics and environmental factors alone cannot explain the differences in response between patients. Recent studies have demonstrated that deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation plays an important role in the pathogenesis and disease progression of RA. Importantly, specific DNA methylation profiles associated with response to conventional, target synthetic, and biologic DMARDs have been found in the blood of RA patients and could potentially function as predictive biomarkers. This review will summarize and evaluate the evidence for DNA methylation signatures in treatment response mainly in blood but also learn from the progress made in the diseased tissue in cancer in comparison to RA and autoimmune diseases. We will discuss the benefits and challenges of using DNA methylation signatures as predictive markers and the potential for future progress in this area.

3D Cell Culture as Tools to Characterize Rheumatoid Arthritis Signaling and Development of New Treatments

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common autoimmune disorders affecting 0.5-1% of the population worldwide. As a disease of multifactorial etiology, its constant study has made it possible to unravel the pathophysiological processes that cause the illness. However, efficient and validated disease models are necessary to continue the search for new disease-modulating drugs. Technologies, such as 3D cell culture and organ-on-a-chip, have contributed to accelerating the prospecting of new therapeutic molecules and even helping to elucidate hitherto unknown aspects of the pathogenesis of multiple diseases. These technologies, where medicine and biotechnology converge, can be applied to understand RA. This review discusses the critical elements of RA pathophysiology and current treatment strategies. Next, we discuss 3D cell culture and apply these methodologies for rheumatological diseases and selected models for RA. Finally, we summarize the application of 3D cell culture for RA treatment.

Targeting chronic inflammation as a potential adjuvant therapy for osteoporosis

Systemic, chronic, low-grade inflammation (SCLGI) underlies the pathogenesis of various widespread diseases. It is often associated with bone loss, thus connecting chronic inflammation to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. In postmenopausal women, osteoporosis is accompanied by SCLGI development, likely owing to estrogen deficiency. We propose that SCGLI persistence in osteoporosis results from failed inflammation resolution, which is mainly mediated by specialized, pro-resolving mediators (SPMs). In corroboration, SPMs demonstrate encouraging therapeutic effects in various preclinical models of inflammatory disorders, including bone pathology. Since numerous data implicate gut dysbiosis in osteoporosis-associated chronic inflammation, restoring balanced microbiota by supplementing probiotics and prebiotics could contribute to the efficient resolution of SCGLI. In the present review, we provide evidence for this hypothesis and argue that efficient SCGLI resolution may serve as a novel approach for treating osteoporosis, complementary to traditional anti-osteoporotic medications.

LncRNAs and Rheumatoid Arthritis: From Identifying Mechanisms to Clinical Investigation

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic chronic autoinflammatory disease, and the synovial hyperplasia, pannus formation, articular cartilage damage and bone matrix destruction caused by immune system abnormalities are the main features of RA. The use of Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) has achieved great advances in the therapy of RA. Yet there are still patients facing the problem of poor response to drug therapy or drug intolerance. Current therapy methods can only moderate RA progress, but cannot stop or reverse the damage it has caused. Recent studies have reported that there are a variety of long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) that have been implicated in mediating many aspects of RA. Understanding the mechanism of LncRNAs in RA is therefore critical for the development of new therapy strategies and prevention strategies. In this review, we systematically elucidate the biological roles and mechanisms of action of LncRNAs and their mechanisms of action in RA. Additionally, we also highlight the potential value of LncRNAs in the clinical diagnosis and therapy of RA.

Exploring Factors Influencing Medication Compliance in Saudi Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey - Results from the COPARA Study

PURPOSE

Compliance is essential to achieve treatment goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The current study evaluated compliance and related factors in a large and diverse population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with RA who received active treatment were invited to participate in an online survey. The Arabic versions of the 5-Item Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology (ACQR-5) and the RA Impact of Disease (RAID) were used to measure compliance and disability, respectively. The patients were sub-grouped based on background disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Variables associated with high compliance were selected for the logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1241 patients completed the survey and were included in the final analysis. Of those, 1055 (85%) were females with a mean (±SD) age and disease duration of 47.14 ± 13.71 and 8.77 ± 7.43 years, respectively. The mean RAID was 4.4±2.58, with 980 (79%) having an unacceptable level state. Patients with an unacceptable RAID level had a lower compliance rate (78.8% vs 85.8%, p = 0.001). Demographics associated with high compliance were female sex and increased age, with reported odds ratios of 1.018 (95% CI: 1.007-1.028) and 1.464 (95% CI: 1.016-2.108), respectively. Compliance was similar between patients on Janus kinase inhibitors or biological DMARDs (88.14% vs 80.83%, p = 0.17), between monotherapy, double therapy, or triple therapy recipients (80% vs 82.23% vs 81.32%, p = 0.665), and between patients receiving injectable and oral therapy (77.32% vs 81.14%, p = 0.246).

CONCLUSION

A high compliance level was observed in this population, with patient demographics influencing compliance rather than the medication type or route of administration. Interventional studies should focus on the of high-risk patients identified in this study.