Chromatic pupilloperimetry for objective diagnosis of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy

Machine learning for comprehensive prediction of high risk for Alzheimer's disease based on chromatic pupilloperimetry

Currently there are no reliable biomarkers for early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) at the preclinical stage. This study assessed the pupil light reflex (PLR) for focal red and blue light stimuli in central and peripheral retina in 125 cognitively normal middle age subjects (45–71 years old) at high risk for AD due to a family history of the disease (FH+), and 61 age-similar subjects with no family history of AD (FH−) using Chromatic Pupilloperimetry coupled with Machine Learning (ML). All subjects had normal ophthalmic assessment, and normal retinal and optic nerve thickness by optical coherence tomography. No significant differences were observed between groups in cognitive function and volumetric brain MRI. Chromatic pupilloperimetry-based ML models were highly discriminative in differentiating subjects with and without AD family history, using transient PLR for focal red (primarily cone-mediated), and dim blue (primarily rod-mediated) light stimuli. Features associated with transient pupil response latency (PRL) achieved Area Under the Curve Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC) of 0.90 ± 0.051 (left-eye) and 0.87 ± 0.048 (right-eye). Parameters associated with the contraction arm of the rod and cone-mediated PLR were more discriminative compared to parameters associated with the relaxation arm and melanopsin-mediated PLR. Significantly shorter PRL for dim blue light was measured in the FH+ group in two test targets in the temporal visual field in right eye that had highest relative weight in the ML algorithm (mean ± standard error, SE 0.449 s ± 0.007 s vs. 0.478 s ± 0.010 s, p = 0.038). Taken together our study suggests that subtle focal changes in pupil contraction latency may be detected in subjects at high risk to develop AD, decades before the onset of AD clinical symptoms. The dendrites of melanopsin containing retinal ganglion cells may be affected very early at the preclinical stages of AD.

Disease expression caused by different variants in the BEST1 gene: genotype and phenotype findings in bestrophinopathies

Purpose:

To analyse the spectrum of clinical features and molecular genetic data in a series of patients carrying likely disease-associated variants in the BEST1 gene.

Methods:

Retrospective observational analysis of clinical data extracted from the medical records of visual function, multimodal imaging and electrophysiology of 62 eyes of 31 patients. Molecular genetic analysis was performed by means of panel-based NGS or Sanger sequencing.

Results:

The spectrum of variants in the BEST1 gene comprised 19 different variants and three of which are novel. Fundus photographs and OCT images allowed categorization of 52 eyes as Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) with stages 1 to 5 and 10 eyes with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), with more severe phenotype. One patient was shown to be heterozygous for a variant, which has so far been described only in ARB, but this patient had the BVMD phenotype. There was no significant progression of the visual acuity during the follow-up period of 5 years both in BVMD and ARB. The most prevalent pattern of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in BVMD was ‘patchy’. There were diverse visual field defects in static automated perimetry (SAP) depending on the stage. The Arden ratio was significantly lower in ARB patients and in eyes with stage 5 of BVMD.

Conclusions:

The genotype does not always predict the phenotype in patients with BVMD and ARB; however, having two mutations in the BEST1 gene causes a more severephenotype. FAFhelped to distinguish ARB from BVMD. Most of the observed eyesdidnotprogressfunctionallyduringthefollow-up.ARBandtheatrophicstageof BVMD as the disease end-stage had the worst visual functions and EOG results.

Cone pathway dysfunction in Jalili syndrome due to a novel familial variant of CNNM4 revealed by pupillometry and electrophysiologic investigations

PURPOSE

To evaluate retinal function in a family presenting with Jalili syndrome due to a previously unreported variant in CNNM4.

METHODS

A family of three sisters with a novel CNNM4 variant, c.482 T > C p.(Leu161Pro), and ten visually normal, age-similar controls participated in this study. The subjects underwent detailed dental examinations and comprehensive ophthalmological examinations that included color vision testing, retinal imaging, and electroretinography. Full-field light- and dark-adapted luminance thresholds were obtained, in addition to light- and dark-adapted measures of the pupillary light reflex (PLR; pupil constriction elicited by a flash of light) across a range of stimulus luminance.

RESULTS

Clinical findings of cone dysfunction and amelogenesis imperfecta were observed, consistent with Jalili syndrome. Light-adapted ERGs were non-detectable in CNNM4 subjects, whereas dark-adapted ERGs were generally normal. Full-field luminance thresholds were normal under dark-adapted conditions and were elevated, but measurable, under light-adapted conditions. The CNNM4 subjects had large PLRs under dark-adapted conditions and responses near the lower limit of normal, or slightly subnormal, under light-adapted conditions.

CONCLUSION

CNNM4 variants can result in Jalili syndrome with cone dystrophy and generally preserved rod function. The PLR may be a useful measure for evaluating cone function in these individuals, as robust cone-mediated PLRs were recordable despite non-detectable light-adapted ERGs.

Electrophysiological and Pupillometric Abnormalities in PROM1 Cone-Rod Dystrophy

Purpose

To compare electrophysiological and pupillometric responses in subjects with cone–rod dystrophy due to autosomal recessive (AR) PROM1 mutations.

Methods

Four subjects with AR PROM1 dystrophy and 10 visually normal, age-similar controls participated in this study. Full-field, light- and dark-adapted electroretinograms (ERGs) were obtained using conventional techniques. Full-field, light- and dark-adapted measures of the pupillary light reflex (PLR; pupil constriction elicited by a flash of light) were obtained across a range of stimulus luminance using long- and short-wavelength light. Pupil size as a function of stimulus luminance was described using Naka–Rushton functions to derive P_max (maximum response) and s (pupil response sensitivity).

Results

Light-adapted ERGs were non-detectable in all four PROM1 subjects, whereas dark-adapted ERGs were non-detectable in three subjects and markedly attenuated in the fourth. By contrast, each PROM1 subject had light- and dark-adapted PLRs. P_max ranged from normal to slightly attenuated under all conditions. Light-adapted s was generally normal, with the exception of two subjects who had abnormal s for the long-wavelength stimulus. Dark adapted s was abnormal for each PROM1 subject for the long-wavelength stimulus and ranged from the upper limit of normal to substantially abnormal for the short-wavelength stimulus.

Conclusions

ERG and PLR comparison showed an unanticipated dichotomy: ERGs were generally non-detectable, whereas PLRs were normal for all PROM1 subjects under select conditions. Differences between the measures may be attributed to distinct spatiotemporal summation/gain characteristics.

Translational Relevance

These data highlight the potential usefulness of pupillometry in cases where the ERG is non-detectable.

Chromatic Pupilloperimetry Measures Correlate With Visual Acuity and Visual Field Defects in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients

Purpose

To evaluate the ability of chromatic pupilloperimetry to identify visual field (VF) defects in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and to test the correlation between pupilloperimetry impairment and retinal structural and functional measures.

Methods

The pupil responses of 10 patients with RP (mean age, 41.3 ± 16.2 years) and 32 healthy age-similar controls (mean age, 50.7 ± 15.5 years) for 54 focal blue and red stimuli presented in a 24-2 VF were recorded. The pupilloperimetry measures were correlated with Humphrey VF mean deviation, best-corrected visual acuity, and ellipsoid zone area.

Results

Substantially lower percentage of pupil contraction and maximal pupil contraction velocity (MCV) were recorded in patients with RP throughout the VF in response to blue and red stimuli. The mean absolute deviation (MADEV) in the latency of MCV (LMCV) was significantly larger in patients compared with controls for blue and red stimuli (P = 1.0 × 10⁻⁷ and P = 1.0 × 10⁻⁶, respectively). The LMCV MADEV differentiated between patients and controls with high specificity and sensitivity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.987 and 0.973 for blue and red, respectively). The MADEV of LMCV for blue stimuli correlated with best-corrected visual acuity (ρ = 0.938, P = 5.9 × 10⁻⁵) and ellipsoid zone area (ρ = −0.857; P = 0.002). The MADEV of LMCV for red stimuli correlated with Humphrey VF mean deviation (ρ = −0.709; P = 0.022). Minimizing the test to 15 targets maintained a diagnosis of retinal damage in patients with RP with high sensitivity and specificity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.927).

Conclusions

The chromatic pupilloperimetry measures significantly correlated with retinal function and structure in patients with RP at various disease stages.

Translational Relevance

Chromatic pupilloperimetry may enable objective assessment of visual field defects and visual acuity in RP.

Chromatic Pupil Campimetry Reveals Functional Defects in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Differences Related to Disease Activity

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to use chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) for an objective evaluation of local retinal function in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to assess disease activity.

Methods

Gaze-controlled CPC was performed in 19 subjects with optical coherence tomography–confirmed exudative AMD (75 ± 4 years; 11 women) and the results compared with those of an age-matched control group (n = 11; 72 ± 6 years; 8 women). Local retinal function was evaluated by measuring pupil responses to 3° red stimuli (60 cd/m², 1 second) at 41 positions covering 30° of the central visual field on a dim blue background (test duration 6 minutes). Primary outcome parameters were relative maximal pupil constriction amplitude (% from baseline) and latency to constriction onset.

Results

Pupil constriction amplitudes were significantly reduced in the macular region, and especially in the fovea in AMD (16% ± 4.7%; mean ± standard deviation), compared with the control group (24% ± 6%; P = 0.00036). Receiver operating characteristic values were 0.84 for the constriction amplitude in the fovea, and 0.9 for the steepness angle between periphery and center. Mean latency to constriction onset in the fovea in AMD was significantly longer (333 ± 53 ms; normals 273 ± 59 ms, P = 0.0072), and particularly in the active compared with the inactive status of exudative AMD (P = 0.01).

Conclusions

CPC detected functional changes in exudative AMD with high sensitivity. Time dynamics of active exudative AMD differed from disease inactivity.

Translational Relevance

With the combination of short recording time, objectiveness of the measurement and gaze-correction for fixation problems, this method presents a suitable complement to the currently used clinical functional tests of the macula.