Descriptive Study of a Cohort of 488 Patients with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies

Bergen A, Klaver CCW, Meester-Smoor MA, Thiadens AAHJ, Verhoeven VJM. Frequency and Genetic Spectrum of Inherited Retinal Dystrophies in a Large Dutch Pediatric Cohort: The RD5000 Consortium

Purpose

Gene-based therapies for inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are upcoming. Treatment before substantial vision loss will optimize outcomes. It is crucial to identify common phenotypes and causative genes in children. This study investigated the frequency of these in pediatric IRD with the aim of highlighting relevant groups for future therapy.

Methods

Diagnostic, genetic, and demographic data, collected from medical charts of patients with IRD aged up to 20 years (n = 624, 63% male), registered in the Dutch RD5000 database, were analyzed to determine frequencies of phenotypes and genetic causes. Phenotypes were categorized as nonsyndromic (progressive and stationary IRD) and syndromic IRD. Genetic causes, mostly determined by whole-exome sequencing (WES), were examined. Additionally, we investigated the utility of periodic reanalysis of WES data in genetically unresolved cases.

Results

Median age at registration was 13 years (interquartile range, 9-16). Retinitis pigmentosa (RP; n = 123, 20%), Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA; n = 97, 16%), X-linked retinoschisis (n = 64, 10%), and achromatopsia (n = 63, 10%) were the most frequent phenotypes. The genetic cause was identified in 76% of the genetically examined patients (n = 473). The most frequently disease-causing genes were RS1 (n = 32, 9%), CEP290 (n = 28, 8%), CNGB3 (n = 21, 6%), and CRB1 (n = 17, 5%). Diagnostic yield after reanalysis of genetic data increased by 7%.

Conclusions

As in most countries, RP and LCA are the most prominent pediatric IRDs in the Netherlands, and variants in RS1 and CEP290 were the most prominent IRD genotypes. Our findings can guide therapy development to target the diseases and genes with the greatest needs in young patients.

Clinical exome analysis and targeted gene repair of the c.1354dupT variant in iPSC lines from patients with PROM1-related retinopathies exhibiting diverse phenotypes

BACKGROUND

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) are one of the main causes of incurable blindness worldwide. IRD are caused by mutations in genes that encode essential proteins for the retina, leading to photoreceptor degeneration and loss of visual function. IRD generates an enormous global financial burden due to the lack of understanding of a significant part of its pathophysiology, molecular diagnosis, and the near absence of non-palliative treatment options. Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) for IRD seem to be an excellent option for addressing these questions, serving as exceptional tools for in-depth studies of IRD pathophysiology and testing new therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

From a cohort of 8 patients with PROM1-related IRD, we identified 3 patients carrying the same variant (c.1354dupT) but expressing three different IRD phenotypes: Cone and rod dystrophy (CORD), Retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and Stargardt disease type 4 (STGD4). These three target patients, along with one healthy relative from each, underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and their genetic panel study was expanded through clinical exome sequencing (CES). Subsequently, non-integrative patient-derived iPSC were generated and fully characterized. Correction of the c.1354dupT mutation was performed using CRISPR/Cas9, and the genetic restoration of the PROM1 gene was confirmed through flow cytometry and western blotting in the patient-derived iPSC lines.

RESULTS

CES revealed that 2 target patients with the c.1354dupT mutation presented monoallelic variants in genes associated with the complement system or photoreceptor differentiation and peroxisome biogenesis disorders, respectively. The pluripotency and functionality of the patient-derived iPSC lines were confirmed, and the correction of the target mutation fully restored the capability of encoding Prominin-1 (CD133) in the genetically repaired patient-derived iPSC lines.

CONCLUSIONS

The c.1354dupT mutation in the PROM1 gene is associated to three distinct AR phenotypes of IRD. This pleotropic effect might be related to the influence of monoallelic variants in other genes associated with retinal dystrophies. However, further evidence needs to be provided. Future experiments should include gene-edited patient-derived iPSC due to its potential as disease modelling tools to elucidate this matter in question.

Clinical and genetic characterization of patients with eye diseases included in the Spanish Rare Diseases Patient Registry

BACKGROUND

The low prevalence of rare diseases poses a significant challenge in advancing their understanding. This study aims to delineate the clinical and genetic characteristics of patients with rare eye diseases (RED) enrolled in the Spanish Rare Diseases Patient Registry.

METHODS

A total of 864 patients from the registry database were included. Diseases were categorized into inherited retinal dystrophies (n=688); anterior segment diseases (n=48); congenital malformations (n=27); and syndromic diseases with ocular involvement including muscular (n=46), neurological (n=34), or metabolic (n=13); inflammatory diseases (n=4); and tumors (n=4). Data on visual acuity (VA) and/or visual field (VF), symptoms and signs, concurrent diseases in syndromic cases, age of onset and at diagnosis, affected genes, disability rating, inability to work and dependency grade recognition were collected.

RESULTS

A mean diagnostic delay of 7 years from symptom onset was observed. Commonly reported symptoms included photophobia, night blindness, and progressive vision loss (≥57% of patients). Cataract was the most prevalent secondary disease (46%), with pseudophakia being the most common ocular surgery (26%). Hearing loss and cardiovascular diseases were the most prevalent concurrent systemic diseases (≥13%). Certificates of disability, incapacity for work, and dependency were held by 87%, 42%, and 19% of patients, respectively. Among the 719 patients with available VA data, 193 (27%) were blind, and 188 (26%) had moderate to severe visual impairment. Over half of the patients (54%) exhibited VF defects, and 216 (25%) had concentric contraction ≤5° or abolished VF. Most had genetic diseases with autosomal recessive (55%), autosomal dominant (30%), X-linked (9%), and mitochondrial (6%) patterns. One patient had mutations in both recessive USH2A and dominant RHO genes simultaneously. Of the 656 patients (75.7%) who underwent genetic testing, only 461 (70.3%) received a positive result (pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations explaining the phenotype). We found 62 new gene variants related to RED not previously reported in databases of genetic variants related to specific phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study delineates the clinical and genotypic profiles of RED in Spain. Genetic diseases, particularly retinal disorders, predominate, but a significant proportion of affected patients remain genetically undiagnosed, hindering potential gene therapy endeavors. Despite notable improvements in reducing diagnosis delays, it is still remarkable. RED frequently lead to disability and blindness among young populations.

Retinal Imaging Findings in Inherited Retinal Diseases

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) represent one of the major causes of progressive and irreversible vision loss in the working-age population. Over the last few decades, advances in retinal imaging have allowed for an improvement in the phenotypic characterization of this group of diseases and have facilitated phenotype-to-genotype correlation studies. As a result, the number of clinical trials targeting IRDs has steadily increased, and commensurate to this, the need for novel reproducible outcome measures and endpoints has grown. This review aims to summarize and describe the clinical presentation, characteristic imaging findings, and imaging endpoint measures that are being used in clinical research on IRDs. For the purpose of this review, IRDs have been divided into four categories: (1) panretinal pigmentary retinopathies affecting rods or cones; (2) macular dystrophies; (3) stationary conditions; (4) hereditary vitreoretinopathies.

Genetic treatment for autosomal dominant inherited retinal dystrophies: approaches, challenges and targeted genotypes

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) have been in the front line of gene therapy development for the last decade, providing a useful platform to test novel therapeutic approaches. More than 40 clinical trials have been completed or are ongoing, tackling autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions, mostly through adeno-associated viral vector delivery of a normal copy of the disease-causing gene. However, only recently has autosomal dominant (ad) disease been targeted, with the commencement of a trial for rhodopsin (RHO)-associated retinitis pigmentosa (RP), implementing antisense oligonucleotide (AON) therapy, with promising preliminary results (NCT04123626).Autosomal dominant RP represents 15%-25% of all RP, with RHO accounting for 20%-30% of these cases. Autosomal dominant macular and cone-rod dystrophies (MD/CORD) correspond to approximately 7.5% of all IRDs, and approximately 35% of all MD/CORD cases, with the main causative gene being BEST1 Autosomal dominant IRDs are not only less frequent than recessive, but also tend to be less severe and have later onset; for example, an individual with RHO-adRP would typically become severely visually impaired at an age 2-3 times older than in X-linked RPGR-RP.Gain-of-function and dominant negative aetiologies are frequently seen in the prevalent adRP genes RHO, RP1 and PRPF31 among others, which would not be effectively addressed by gene supplementation alone and need creative, novel approaches. Zinc fingers, RNA interference, AON, translational read-through therapy, and gene editing by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/Cas are some of the strategies that are currently under investigation and will be discussed here.

Genetic causes of inherited retinal diseases among Israeli Jews of Ethiopian ancestry

Purpose

This study sought to describe the phenotype frequency and genetic basis of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) among a nationwide cohort of Israeli Jewish patients of Ethiopian ancestry.

Methods

Patients' data-including demographic, clinical, and genetic information-were obtained through members of the Israeli Inherited Retinal Disease Consortium (IIRDC). Genetic analysis was performed by either Sanger sequencing for founder mutations or next-generation sequencing (targeted next-generation sequencing or whole-exome sequencing).

Results

Forty-two patients (58% female) from 36 families were included, and their ages ranged from one year to 82 years. Their most common phenotypes were Stargardt disease (36%) and nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa (33%), while their most common mode of inheritance was autosomal recessive inheritance. Genetic diagnoses were ascertained for 72% of genetically analyzed patients. The most frequent gene involved was ABCA4. Overall, 16 distinct IRD mutations were identified, nine of which are novel. One of them, ABCA4-c.6077delT, is likely a founder mutation among the studied population.

Conclusions

This study is the first to describe IRDs' phenotypic and molecular characteristics in the Ethiopian Jewish community. Most of the identified variants are rare. Our findings can help caregivers with clinical and molecular diagnosis and, we hope, enable adequate therapy in the near future.

Characterising the diagnosis of genetic maculopathies in a real-world private tertiary retinal practice in Australia: protocol for a retrospective clinical audit

PURPOSE

Accurate diagnosis of macular atrophy is paramount to enable appropriate treatment when novel treatments for geographic atrophy and macular dystrophies become available. Genetic testing is useful in distinguishing between the two conditions but is not feasible for the majority of patients in real-world clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the potential misdiagnosis of inherited macular dystrophy as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in real-world ophthalmic practice to assist in the development of guidelines to improve diagnostic accuracy while minimizing genetic testing for targeted patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the medical records of patients diagnosed with AMD, which included imaging, between 1995 and 2023 from a large multidisciplinary private ophthalmic practice in Australia. We will use a stepwise method to screen for probable cases of macular dystrophy, followed by a consensus review by an expert panel. The outcomes are (1) to determine the potential misdiagnosis rate of macular dystrophy as atrophic AMD by retinal specialists and general ophthalmologists; (2) to identify clinical imaging modalities that are most useful for differentiating macular dystrophy from atrophic AMD; and (3) to establish preliminary guidance for clinicians to improve the diagnosis of macular atrophy from AMD in practice, and thereby target cost-efficient genetic testing.

DISCUSSION

Improving the diagnostic accuracy of both AMD and macular dystrophy, while ensuring cost-efficient genetic testing, will improve the targeted treatment of macular diseases when emerging treatments become available.

Intravitreal antisense oligonucleotide sepofarsen in Leber congenital amaurosis type 10: a phase 1b/2 trial

CEP290-associated Leber congenital amaurosis type 10 (LCA10) is a retinal disease resulting in childhood blindness. Sepofarsen is an RNA antisense oligonucleotide targeting the c.2991+1655A>G variant in the CEP290 gene to treat LCA10. In this open-label, phase 1b/2 ( NCT03140969 ), 12-month, multicenter, multiple-dose, dose-escalation trial, six adult patients and five pediatric patients received ≤4 doses of intravitreal sepofarsen into the worse-seeing eye. The primary objective was to evaluate sepofarsen safety and tolerability via the frequency and severity of ocular adverse events (AEs); secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetics and efficacy via changes in functional outcomes. Six patients received sepofarsen 160 µg/80 µg, and five patients received sepofarsen 320 µg/160 µg. Ten of 11 (90.9%) patients developed ocular AEs in the treated eye (5/6 with 160 µg/80 µg; 5/5 with 320 µg/160 µg) versus one of 11 (9.1%) in the untreated eye; most were mild in severity and dose dependent. Eight patients developed cataracts, of which six (75.0%) were categorized as serious (2/3 with 160 µg/80 µg; 4/5 with 320 µg/160 µg), as lens replacement was required. As the 160-µg/80-µg group showed a better benefit-risk profile, higher doses were discontinued or not initiated. Statistically significant improvements in visual acuity and retinal sensitivity were reported (post hoc analysis). The manageable safety profile and improvements reported in this trial support the continuation of sepofarsen development.

Genetic Testing of Inherited Retinal Disease in Australian Private Tertiary Ophthalmology Practice

Background

To assess the prevalence of genetic testing for inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) in a tertiary practice setting.

Methods

Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients with diagnosed or suspected IRD.

Results

Four hundred and sixty-four patient records were analysed. Patients had received care for different IRDs grouped as follows: panretinal pigmentary retinopathies (283, 61%), macular dystrophies (136, 29.3%), stationary diseases (23, 5%), hereditary vitreoretinopathies (14, 3%), and other IRDs (8, 1.7%). The suspected pattern of inheritance of patients’ IRD was predominantly autosomal recessive (205, 44.2%). Genetic testing was performed with the corresponding results available for 44 patients (9.5%). Diagnostic yield was 65.9% for the results received. Genetic test results were available mostly for younger patients (13.1% for <45 years vs 6.2% ≥45 years of age, p = 0.01) and those who received greater than 12 months of care (16% for ≥12 months vs 4% for <12 months, p < 0.01). For patients without genetic testing results, reasons include awaiting a geneticist consultation (17.9%), awaiting test results (4.5%), or patient refusal (8.4%). Most clinical records (69.2%) did not document genetic testing status.

Conclusion

Genetic testing is increasingly being utilised in the work-up for patients with IRD worldwide. This large Australian private practice IRD cohort shows a low uptake of testing (around 10%), reflecting historical management patterns and accessibility of genetic counselling and testing. The results show that younger patients and those with a longer duration of care were more likely to have received genetic testing. As the importance of IRD genetic testing continues to increase, we expect to see a change in patient management within the Australian private ophthalmology system and testing rates to increase. Further research is required to identify and address clinician and patient barriers to improving genetic testing rates for IRD.

Victorian evolution of inherited retinal diseases natural history registry (VENTURE study): Rationale, methodology and initial participant characteristics

BACKGROUND

Emerging treatments are being developed for inherited retinal diseases, requiring a clear understanding of natural progression and a database of potential participants for clinical trials. This article describes the rationale, study design and methodology of the Victorian Evolution of inherited retinal diseases NaTUral history REgistry (VENTURE), including data from the first 150 participants enrolled.

METHODS

VENTURE collects retrospective and prospective data from people with inherited retinal diseases. Following registration, participants are asked to attend a baseline examination using a standardised protocol to confirm their inherited retinal disease diagnosis. Examination procedures include (i) retinal function, using visual acuity and perimetry; (ii) retinal structure, using multimodal imaging and (iii) patient-reported outcomes. Participants' molecular diagnoses are obtained from their clinical records or through targeted-panel genetic testing by an independent laboratory. Phenotype and genotype data are used to enrol participants into disease-specific longitudinal cohort sub-studies.

RESULTS

From 7 July 2020 to 30 December 2021, VENTURE enrolled 150 registrants (138 families) and most (63%) have a rod-cone dystrophy phenotype. From 93 participants who have received a probable molecular diagnosis, the most common affected genes are RPGR (13% of all registrants), USH2A (10%), CYP4V2 (7%), ABCA4 (5%), and CHM (5%). Most participants have early to moderate vision impairment, with over half (55%) having visual acuities of better than 6/60 (20/200) at registration.

CONCLUSIONS

The VENTURE study will complement existing patient registries and help drive inherited retinal disease research in Australia, facilitating access to research opportunities for individuals with inherited retinal diseases.