Filamentous fungal endophthalmitis: results of combination therapy with intravitreal amphotericin B and voriconazole

Infection prevention and control factors associated with post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis - a review of the literature from 2010 - 2023

Patients undergoing cataract surgery are at risk of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis (PCSE), a sight-threatening complication. Cataract surgery is a relatively straightforward and quick procedure often performed under local anaesthetic. It is therefore simple to scale up to reduce the currently long waiting times, but it is important to maintain patient safety when considering high throughput surgery. This literature review aimed to identify appropriate infection prevention and control (IPC) measures to support increased throughput of cataract surgery in Scotland. Database searches were conducted using Medline and Embase from 2010 to 2023. Further hand-searching was also performed. The organisms associated with PCSE and IPC factors relevant to PCSE were analyzed. A range of microorganisms was associated with PCSE, where outbreak reports were most associated with Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, whereas retrospective chart reviews were most associated with Gram-positive bacteria. IPC risk factors identified were related to the built environment and issues with sterilization. Specifically, the sources of outbreaks included failures in the ventilation system, as well as contaminated ophthalmic solutions, surgical instruments, and medications. The factors identified in this review should be considered when implementing high throughput cataract surgery to ensure that patient safety is maintained.

Primary Vitrectomy versus Tap and Inject for Fungal Endophthalmitis: Meta-Analysis and Comparison with Data from a Reference Centre

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the visual outcomes after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus tap and inject (T&I) in fungal endophthalmitis (FE) reported in the literature and to compare the findings from the literature with data from a reference centre.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the use of PPV versus T&I in FE. We also performed a retrospective review of the clinical records of patients with endophthalmitis from a reference centre in Colombia.

RESULTS

We included 13 studies with 334 eyes; 53.59% received PPV and 46.4% received T&I. The overall relative risk of improving ≥ 2 lines in PPV versus T&I was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.22; p = 0.88) with a mean difference of final visual acuity of 0.26 (95% CI 0.12-0.63; p = 0.18). There were no significant differences in subgroup analysis. Data from the reference centre included 32 endophthalmitis cases, 15.6% of which had a fungal aetiology (80% received PPV and 20% T&I). There were no significant differences in the subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings from the literature and the reference centre, T&I is noninferior to PPV. This is the first meta-analysis in the literature evaluating these effects in FE. It is necessary to execute new prospective randomised controlled studies in patients with endophthalmitis.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Intravitreal Injections of Voriconazole in the Treatment of Fungal Endophthalmitis: A Systematic Review

Background: Fungus endophthalmitis is a rare and serious infection that is treated with systemic and topical antifungal drugs. There is no clear consensus on the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis with intravitreal injections (IVIs) of voriconazole. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature on IVIs of voriconazole for fungal endophthalmitis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the effectiveness and safety of IVIs of voriconazole in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis. We searched databases such as PubMed and Embase using the following search terms "Endophthalmitis" AND "Intravitreal Injections" AND "Voriconazole" with date limits of January 1, 1900, to December 31, 2022. We included all reports on humans, which described clinical outcomes of IVIs of voriconazole in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case series. A descriptive synthesis of the data was conducted with a pooling of data for interventions. Results: One RCT and 21 retrospective studies were analyzed in this review. In these reports, a wide range of heterogeneous treatment regimens was used, including IVI in combination with other drugs, systemic therapy in combination with other agents, and surgery. Combined with other treatments, intravitreal voriconazole results in a favorable anatomical and clinical cure that was well tolerated. Conclusions: Reports on IVIs of voriconazole for fungal endophthalmitis demonstrate a heterogeneous approach to treatment. Of these, IVIs of voriconazole in anatomical and clinical outcomes appeared to be highly effective, although more data on its safety are needed.

Spectrum of signs, symptoms, and treatment in amphotericin B-resistant Trichosporon endophthalmitis: A series of ten cases of post-cataract surgery cluster endophthalmitis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to present the signs, symptoms, management, and outcome of a series of cases of cluster endophthalmitis caused by a multi-drug resistant fungus, Trichosporon.

Methods

This was a retrospective, non-randomized, consecutive interventional case series. Ten cases of postoperative endophthalmitis operated by a surgeon on three consecutive operation theater (OT) days presented 3-5 months after their surgery. All cases were microbiologically confirmed. The pathogen was found to be resistant to most antifungals, including amphotericin B. The cases had a latent period of around 45 days. Management of endophthalmitis included intravitreal injections, anterior chamber (AC) lavage, Pars Plana vitrectomy (PPV), posterior capsulotomy, IOL, and capsular bag removal. Multiple intravitreal injections were required due to recurrence of infections after initial improvement with voriconazole injections.

Results

Structural integrity was maintained and infection-free status was achieved in all the eyes. The presenting vision ranged from 6/60 to PL (perception of light). Seven out of 10 had improvement in their final vision over the presenting vision. Final outcome of four patients had vision of 6/24 or better, 4 patients had vision in the range of 2/60 to 6/36 and 2 patients had PL.

Conclusion

Trichosporon can cause devasting infections even in the immunocompetent, especially in association with implants and catheters. Triazoles form the mainstay of treatment of Trichosporon infection due to the high susceptibility of the organism in vitro. A regimen including voriconazole and amphotericin B may prove to be the most effective. This is the first report of an outbreak of cluster endophthalmitis caused by Trichosporon.

Aspergillus Endophthalmitis: Epidemiology, Pathobiology, and Current Treatments

Fungal endophthalmitis is one of the leading causes of vision loss worldwide. Post-operative and traumatic injuries are major contributing factors resulting in ocular fungal infections in healthy and, more importantly, immunocompromised individuals. Among the fungal pathogens, the Aspergillus species, Aspergillus fumigatus, continues to be more prevalent in fungal endophthalmitis patients. However, due to overlapping clinical symptoms with other endophthalmitis etiology, fungal endophthalmitis pose a challenge in its diagnosis and treatment. Hence, it is critical to understand its pathobiology to develop and deploy proper therapeutic interventions for combating Aspergillus infections. This review highlights the different modes of Aspergillus transmission and the host immune response during endophthalmitis. Additionally, we discuss recent advancements in the diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis. Finally, we comprehensively summarize various antifungal regimens and surgical options for the treatment of Aspergillus endophthalmitis.

Clinical presentations, microbiology and management outcomes of culture-proven endogenous endophthalmitis in India

Purpose:

To report the clinical presentation, microbiology, and management outcome of endogenous endophthalmitis in Indian patients.

Methods:

Retrospective chart review of culture-positive (vitreous/urine/blood) endogenous endophthalmitis cases treated in tertiary eye care facility in India was done.

Results:

The study included 173 eyes of 117 patients. Mean patient age was 25.41 ± 20.46 years (median 24 years). Pre-disposing systemic illness could not be elicited in 79 (67.63%) patients. Commonest predisposing systemic condition in patients where it could be detected (n = 79) was pyrexia of unknown origin (25/79 = 32.0%). Following treatment, 45 out of 173 (26.0%) eyes regained vision of ≥20/400. Commonest isolated organism from vitreous was Streptococcus pneumoniae (36 eyes, 20.8%) and fungi were isolated in 24 (13.8%) eyes, the commonest being Candida spp. (8/24, 33.33%). Favorable functional outcome was seen in 26% eyes and favorable anatomic outcome in 43% eyes. Those with an underlying systemic illness were older (P = 0.02), had greater urine culture positivity (P = 0.003), lesser vitreous culture positivity (0.001), greater gram negative etiology (P = 0.0006), and greater fungal etiology (P = 0.01) as compared to those cases without underlying systemic illness.

Conclusion:

Endogenous endophthalmitis in India often presents in young immunocompetent individuals without any underlying systemic illness and with negative blood or urine microbiologic work up. Underlying systemic illness leads to greater gram-negative and fungal etiology. Overall visual outcome is poor inspite of prompt management.

A Case of Bilateral Endogenous Candida dubliniensis Endophthalmitis Treated with Aggressive Local and Systemic Therapy

Candida dubliniensis is an emerging pathogen implicated in a variety of infections in immunocompromised hosts. A 79-year-old male with autoimmune pancytopenia on chronic oral steroid therapy was admitted for suspected sepsis and started on empirical antibiotics and micafungin. He developed floaters and decreased vision while on this regimen and was diagnosed with bilateral candida endophthalmitis. Blood cultures grew C. dubliniensis.Intravenous therapy was switched to voriconazole and amphotericin B. He also received aggressive intravitreal antifungal therapy consisting of 100 μg/0.1 mL voriconazole (4 OD, 3 OS) and 5 μg/0.1 mL amphotericin B (3 OD, 1 OS) over 2 weeks that resulted in local control of infection. The right eye developed a retinal detachment 1 month after initial presentation that was repaired by 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckle, laser and silicone oil. At the 15-month follow-up exam, subsequent to silicone oil removal, membrane peel and cataract surgery, OD visual acuity had improved to 20/80. OS was phakic and 20/25. Aggressive intravitreal antifungal therapy combined with intravenous therapy may control endophthalmitis and avoid the risks associated with pars plana vitrectomy during acute infection.

Utility of Intraocular Fluid β-D-glucan Testing in Fungal Endophthalmitis: A Series of 5 Cases

BACKGROUND In clinical practice, the presentation of fungal endophthalmitis is often occult and confusing, so it is difficult to make an early diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of ß-d-glucan (BDG) testing in diagnosis, management, and prognosis of fungal endophthalmitis. CASE REPORT We present a retrospective, observational case series of 5 fungal endophthalmitis cases, 3 of which were endogenous and 2 exogenous. There were significantly elevated BDG levels in all cases, which was consistent with the pathological diagnosis. Four cases were diagnosed as fungal endophthalmitis through smear or culture and gene chip analysis of intraocular fluid. CONCLUSIONS Fungal endophthalmitis is rare, and its diagnosis is difficult because of its occult nature. Therefore, BDG testing may be required as an auxiliary examination for the early diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis. Compared to cultures and smears, intraocular fluid BDG testing has a higher sensitivity for detecting fungal endophthalmitis.

Diagnostic and Management Strategies of Aspergillus Endophthalmitis: Current Insights

Fungal endophthalmitis is subsequent to endogenous or exogenous infection and represents an important complication of ocular surgery which may lead to significant visual loss and blindness. The prognosis is poor because of delayed diagnosis and limited availability of effective antifungal drugs with good ocular penetration. Furthermore, the critical issue in diagnosing fungal infection of the eye is microbiological identification of the etiologic agent in clinical samples. Aspergillus is among the most frequent isolated organisms in fungal endophthalmitis. Early diagnosis is essential to prevent severe complications and blindness. Treatments include local, systemic and surgical therapeutic strategies. The purpose of the present review is the analysis of the current procedures adopted to promptly diagnose and treat Aspergillus endophthalmitis.

A Review of Antimicrobial Therapy for Infectious Uveitis of the Posterior Segment

Treatment of infectious posterior uveitis represents a therapeutic challenge for ophthalmologists. The eye is a privileged site, maintained by blood ocular barriers, which limits penetration of systemic antimicrobials into the posterior segment. In addition, topical and subconjunctival therapies are incapable of producing sufficient drug concentrations, intraocularly. Posterior infectious uveitis can be caused by bacteria, virus, fungi, or protozoa. Mode of treatment varies greatly based on the infectious etiology. Certain drugs have advantages over others in the treatment of infectious uveitis. Topical and systemic therapies are often employed in the treatment of ocular infection, yet the route of treatment can have limitations based on penetration, concentration, and duration. The introduction of intravitreal antimicrobial therapy has advanced the management of intraocular infections. Being able to bypass blood-ocular barriers allows high drug concentrations to be delivered directly to the posterior segment with minimal systemic absorption. However, because the difference between the therapeutic and the toxic doses of some antimicrobial drugs falls within a narrow concentration range, intravitreal therapy could be associated with ocular toxicity risks. In many cases of infectious uveitis, combination of intravitreal and systemic therapies are necessary. In this comprehensive review, the authors aimed at reviewing clinically relevant data regarding intraocular and systemic antimicrobial therapy for posterior segment infectious uveitis. The review also discussed the evolving trends in intraocular treatment, and elaborated on antibiotic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and adverse effects.

Persistently Vitreous Culture-Positive Exogenous Fungal Endophthalmitis

PURPOSE

To report the clinical settings, microbiological isolates, and best-corrected visual acuities (BCVA) of patients with persistently culture-positive exogenous fungal endophthlamitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive case series.

METHODS

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

PATIENT POPULATION

Sixteen eyes of 16 patients with at least 2 consecutive positive vitreous cultures between 1981 and 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

Intravitreal antifungal injection, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Clinical settings, microbiologic isolates, BCVA.

RESULTS

The most common clinical settings were after cataract surgery (9/16, 56%), glaucoma surgery (4/16, 25%), and trauma (2/16, 13%). The most common single fungal isolate was Candida (4/16, 25%), but 75% of all isolates were molds. Treatment for presumed bacterial endophthalmitis was given initially in 14 patients (88%). All patients underwent a vitrectomy during the course of their treatment, and all received intravitreal or systemic antifungal therapy. The mean initial BCVA was 1.76 ± 0.9 logMAR (Snellen equivalent ≈20/1200), and the mean final BCVA was 1.84 ± 1.2 logMAR (≈20/1400, P = .83). The 9 patients (56%) who had intraocular lens (IOL) and capsular bag removals had better final BCVAs than those who did not (P = .011). The BCVAs were similar in eyes with yeast and mold (P = .37). The visual acuity at the last follow-up was ≥20/40 in 13% (2/16), ≥20/400 in 50% (8/16), and no light perception in 25% (4/16).

CONCLUSIONS

Candida was the single most common isolate, but the majority of isolates were molds. Eyes managed with PPV and removal of the IOL and capsular bag had better visual outcomes. Persistently culture-positive fungal endophthalmitis was associated with poor final visual acuities.

Review of clinical and basic approaches of fungal keratitis

Fungal keratitis (FK) is a serious disease which can cause blindness. This review has current information about the pathogenesis, limitations of traditional diagnosis and therapeutic strategies, immune recognition and the diagnosis and therapy of FK. The information of this summary was reviewed regularly and updated as what we need in the diagnosis and therapy of FK nowadays.