Long-term results of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy using S-1 in the treatment of geriatric patients with esophageal cancer

Complete remission after concurrent single-agent S-1 chemoradiotherapy for stage IIIB esophageal cancer: an autopsy case report

Chemoradiotherapy regimens for patients with esophageal cancer intolerant to standard therapies remain to be established. The standard therapy for patients with stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, who are not surgical candidates, is definitive chemoradiotherapy with concomitant use of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin; however, cisplatin can cause serious adverse events. An 83-year-old Japanese man developed a 2-month history of nausea and vomiting. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed concentric wall thickening in the mid-to-lower esophagus with surrounding regional lymph node swelling. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed an ulcerated tumor with raised margins in the middle esophagus. He was diagnosed with stage IIIB (T3N2M0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, pathologically exhibiting squamous epithelium-like invasive abnormal structure with atypical cells. He underwent chemoradiotherapy involving four-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and single-agent S-1 rather than the standard chemoradiotherapy, and achieved clinical remission 2 months later on endoscopy and computed tomography. The patient died 1 year later due to pneumonia, and the autopsy did not reveal any evidence of squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus, surrounding lymph nodes, or other organs, suggesting pathologically complete remission. Concurrent single-agent S-1 chemoradiotherapy may induce complete remission of stage IIIB esophageal cancer and is a possible alternative for older patients or those with multiple comorbidities.

Long-Term Results of a Phase 2 Study of Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy Using S-1 for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Were Elderly or With Serious Comorbidities

Background

The optimal evidence-based management for the subsets of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to old age or serious comorbidities is currently lacking. This study aimed to assess the safety and local control rate (LCR) of S-1 (tegafur–gimeracil–oteracil potassium) combined with radiotherapy in these subsets of ESCC patients.

Methods

Locally advanced ESCC patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to age >75 years or serious comorbidities were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial. The patients were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1, which was administered orally twice daily for 28 days. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions. The primary end-point was the 3-year LCR.

Results

One hundred five ESCC patients were recruited between March 2013 and October 2015. At the median follow-up of 73.1 months (IQR 65.5–81.4 months), 3-year LCR was 61.1%, and 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival was 77.9, 42.3, and 24.8% respectively. For safety analysis, ≥grade 3 acute adverse events included thrombocytopenia (6.7%), leukopenia (2.9%), anemia (1.0%), anorexia (1.0%), fatigue (10.5%), hiccup (1.0%), pneumonitis (4.8%), and esophagitis (3.8%). Two patients (1.9%) died of late esophageal hemorrhage, and one patient (1.0%) died of late radiation-induced pneumonitis.

Conclusion

S-1 is a promising regimen in concurrent chemoradiotherapy with low toxicity and a favorable LCR in ESCC patients who rejected or were intolerant to intravenous chemotherapy due to old age or serious comorbidities.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01831531.

Efficacy of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With S-1 vs Radiotherapy Alone for Older Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Importance

Most older patients with esophageal cancer cannot complete the standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). An effective and tolerable chemoradiotherapy regimen for older patients is needed.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and toxic effects of CCRT with S-1 vs radiotherapy (RT) alone in older patients with esophageal cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial was conducted at 23 Chinese centers between June 1, 2016, and August 31, 2018. The study enrolled 298 patients aged 70 to 85 years. Eligible participants had histologically confirmed esophageal cancer, stage IB to IVB disease based on the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (stage IVB: only metastasis to the supraclavicular/celiac lymph nodes) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Data analysis was performed from August 1, 2020, to March 10, 2021.

Interventions

Patients were stratified according to age (<80 vs ≥80 years) and tumor length (<5 vs ≥5 cm) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either CCRT with S-1 or RT alone.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the 2-year overall survival rate using intention-to-treat analysis.

Results

Of the 298 patients enrolled, 180 (60.4%) were men. The median age was 77 (interquartile range, 74-79) years in the CCRT group and 77 (interquartile range, 74-80) years in the RT alone group. A total of 151 patients (50.7%) had stage III or IV disease. The CCRT group had a significantly higher complete response rate than the RT group (41.6% vs 26.8%; P = .007). Surviving patients had a median follow-up of 33.9 months (interquartile range: 28.5-38.2 months), and the CCRT group had a significantly higher 2-year overall survival rate (53.2% vs 35.8%; hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85; P = .002). There were no significant differences in the incidence of grade 3 or higher toxic effects between the CCRT and RT groups except that grade 3 or higher leukopenia occurred in more patients in the CCRT group (9.5% vs 2.7%; P = .01). Treatment-related deaths were observed in 3 patients (2.0%) in the CCRT group and 4 patients (2.7%) in the RT group.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, CCRT with S-1 was tolerable and provided significant benefits over RT alone in older patients with esophageal cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02813967.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m²) and cisplatin (25 mg/m²) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275).

Conclusion

CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01821-6.

Prognostic Value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients Exceeding 70 Years Old with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

To investigate the prognostic value of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) or definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Fifty-two ESCC patients were included from July 2014 to December 2018. RT was delivered at a dose of 1.8-2.0 Gy per day to a total dose of 50-60 Gy. Tumor response was assessed using the RECIST 1.1 system. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and compared with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis of predictive factors of response and survival was performed using a logistic regression and a Cox model, respectively. In multivariate analysis, GNRI score (HR 0.278, P = 0.036) was the only independent prognostic factor for tumor response. As for survival outcomes, GNRI score (OS: HR 0.505, P = 0.028; PFS: HR 0.583, P = 0.045) and treatment modality (OS: HR 0.356, P = 0.015; PFS: HR 0.392, P = 0.0014) were both independent prognostic factors for better OS and PFS. Additionally, there was no correlation between GNRI score and treatment modality (Spearman's ρ = 0.200; P = 0.154). In conclusion, routine use of the GNRI criteria may help in the risk stratification of elderly patients undergoing RT/dCRT. The dCRT treatment could provide survival benefits for elderly ESCC patients.

Concurrent chemoradiation therapy tailored to the older adults with esophageal cancer: state of the art and the future

Purpose

The aim of this study was to review the published literature addressing the question of whether geriatric assessment (GA) should be routinely applied in the treatment of older adults with esophageal cancer (EC) who have received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT).

Materials and methods

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed. Studies that contained original data outlining the inclusion and exclusion criteria, treatment compliance rate, and severe toxicity reports were reviewed. Additionally, criteria from ongoing clinical trials in the World Health Organization and National Institutes of Health registries were reviewed to evaluate the utilization of GA-related domains in elderly EC patients who received dCRT.

Results

Twenty-nine studies were identified based on the selection criteria: five were single-arm prospective studies, and the other studies were retrospective studies. All studies used chronological age and performance status as basic descriptors for this subpopulation. The comorbidity index and the malnutrition level were mentioned in several studies. However, factors such as “Demographic data and social support,” “Psychology,” “Polypharmacy,” and “Geriatric syndromes” were not described in any of the included studies. Unfortunately, the results were similar for the registered clinical trials. Finally, treatment compliance and toxicity profile were found to be acceptable in selected elderly EC patients.

Conclusion

The current experience for older adults with EC receiving dCRT is mainly based on the results of a series of retrospective studies. Ongoing clinical trials should routinely consider GA-related domains to select appropriate treatments for patients in the future.

Effects of nutritional support on short-term clinical outcomes and immune response in unresectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

This retrospective study investigated the efficiency of nutritional support in unresectable locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAOSCC) patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) based on 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. In the routine care group, 63 patients served as historical controls and received nutrition support in a reactive manner. In addition, 57 patients in the nutritional support group received timely diet counselling, oral nutritional supplements, enteral nutrition and/or parenteral nutrition during CCRT. This support was based on scores from nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS-2002) after June 2014. The nutritional support group had significant advantages over the routine care group with respect to the incidence of neutropenia, the objective response rate, the change in serum albumin and the lengths of hospital stay. In addition, the nutritional support group had significantly higher levels of IgG and IL-2, higher proportions of NK, CD3⁺ and CD4⁺ cells as well as a higher ratio of CD4⁺ /CD8⁺ cells than the routine care group (p < .05). In contrast, the nutritional support group had a significantly lower level of IL-6. In conclusion, the current nutritional care programme could bring benefits of improving treatment compliance, reducing toxicity and lengths of hospital stay and enhancing the immune response.

Pretreatment nutritional risk scores and performance status are prognostic factors in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

This study evaluated the prognostic effects of nutritional risk scores and performance status (PS) on unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) patients who were treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). A total of 202 LAEC patients from four different cancer centers were retrospectively reviewed. Nutritional risk and PS were measured using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) scores and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scales. Outcomes were clinical response rate, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis of predictive factors of response to dCRT and survival were performed using a logistic regression and a Cox model, respectively. The majority of patients (71.8%) had an ECOG PS score of 0-1, and 52.5% (n=106) of patients were identified as having nutritional risk (NRS-2002 ≥3) upon treatment initiation. There was no correlation between NRS-2002 scores and ECOG PS (Spearman's ρ=0.046; P=0.516). In multivariate analysis, NRS-2002 scores (P=0.002, HR 2.805, 95%CI: 1.445-5.446) and ECOG PS (P=0.015, HR 2.719, 95%CI: 1.218-6.067) were independent prognostic factors for the response to dCRT. NRS-2002 scores (OS: HR 1.530, 95%CI 1.059-2.209; P=0.023; PFS: HR 1.517, 95%CI 1.105-2.082; P=0.010) and ECOG PS (OS: HR 1.729, 95%CI 1.185-2.522; P=0.005; PFS: HR 1.678, 95%CI 1.179-2.387; P=0.004) were both independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In conclusions, NRS-2002 scores and ECOG PS scales both have prognostic effects on clinical response and survival in LAEC, but a significant association of NRS-2002 scores and ECOG PS were not observed.

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin in elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with S-1 and cisplatin for elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

METHODS

Fifty-six elderly patients were included from January 2012 to December 2014. Patients received S-1 (tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil) and cisplatin at doses of 70 mg/m²/day for two weeks and 75 mg/m² on day 1, respectively, every 3 weeks. Radiotherapy was delivered at a dose of 180-200 cGy per day to a total dose of 54 Gy. After dCRT, additional chemotherapy was administered for two cycles.

RESULTS

The median age was 74 years (range: 70-87 years) and 38 (67.9%) patients were staged with III-IVa. Totally, 38 patients completed dCRT as planned. An objective response rate (ORR) was seen in 47 (84.0%) patients. The median OS and PFS time were 18.2 and 13.9 months and the 3-year OS and PFS rates were 30.1% and 14.2%, respectively. The most frequent hematological toxicities were leucocytopenia and neutropenia with the incidence of 55.4% and 53.6%, respectively. A significantly higher incidence of severe leucocytopenia was observed between patients aged ≥75 and 70≤ age <75 years. The most common non-hematologic toxicity was esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

dCRT with S-1 and cisplatin yielded satisfactory survival outcomes but treatment-related toxicities were relatively high, especially for patients aged over 75 years.