Altered status of programmed death-ligand 1 after recurrence in resected lung adenocarcinoma patients

EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and its correlation with PD-L1 expression: a meta-analysis

Meta-analysis was performed on the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to evaluate the effect of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status on programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the association between EGFR mutation status and PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Pooled effect (hazard ratio/odds ratio, HR/OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated, and the source of heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression using Stata/SE 15.0. Meta-analysis of the association between EGFR mutation status and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC with immunotherapy was calculated from four randomized controlled trials. We found that immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged OS over docetaxel overall (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.79) and in the EGFR wild type (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.60-0.75), but not in the EGFR mutant subgroup (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.80-1.52). Meta-analysis of the association between EGFR mutation status and PD-L1 expression in NSCLC included 32 studies. The pooled OR and 95% CI were 0.60 (0.46-0.80), calculated by random effects model. No source of heterogeneity was found in subgroup analysis. Sensitivity analysis was carried out with a fixed model, and the influence of a single study on the pooled results showed no significant change with robust meta-analysis methods. Harbord's weighted linear regression test (P = 0.956) and Peters regression test (P = 0.489) indicated no significant publication bias. The limited benefit of single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the second-line or later setting for EGFR-mutated NSCLC may be partly due to the lower expression of PD-L1.

Membrane-Associated RING-CH 8 Functions as a Novel PD-L1 E3 Ligase to Mediate PD-L1 Degradation Induced by EGFR Inhibitors

Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on cancer cells is a critical mechanism contributing to immunosuppression and immune escape. PD-L1 expression may also affect therapeutic outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy (e.g., with osimertinib/AZD9291) against EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and can even be altered during the treatment albeit with largely undefined mechanisms. This study primarily focuses on elucidating the mechanism by which osimertinib induces PD-L1 degradation in addition to validating osimertinib's effect on decreasing PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells and tumors. Osimertinib and other EGFR inhibitors effectively decreased PD-L1 levels primarily in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs and xenografted tumors. Osimertinib not only decreased PD-L1 mRNA expression, but also prompted proteasomal degradation of PD-L1 protein, indicating both transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms accounting for osimertinib-induced reduction of PD-L1. Knockdown of β-TrCP or inhibition of GSK3 failed to prevent PD-L1 reduction induced by osimertinib. Rather, knockdown of membrane-associated RING-CH 8 (MARCH8) that encodes a membrane-bound E3 ubiquitin ligase rescued osimertinib-induced PD-L1 reduction. Furthermore, manipulation of MARCH8 expression accordingly altered PD-L1 degradation rate. Critically, MARCH8 interacted with PD-L1 through its N-terminal region and also ubiquitinated PD-L1 in cells. Collectively, these results strongly suggest that MARCH8 is a previously undiscovered E3 ubiquitin ligase responsible for PD-L1 degradation including osimertinib-induced PD-L1 degradation, establishing a novel connection between MARCH8 and PD-L1 regulation. IMPLICATIONS: This study has demonstrated a previously undiscovered function of MARCH8 in mediating PD-L1 degradation induced by EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells, establishing a novel connection between MARCH8 and PD-L1 regulation.

Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 increase in consecutive biopsies in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

High expression of programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) by leukocytes in primary classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is associated with inferior outcome. However, it is unclear how expression varies during disease progression, and in the event of relapse. Our aim was to study PD-1 and PD-L1 in consecutive biopsies from untreated and treated cHL patients. We screened pathology registries from 3500 cHL patients. Eleven patients had a diagnostic cHL biopsy and a previous benign lymph node biopsy reclassified as cHL when reviewed and designated as the untreated. Thirty patients had a primary and a relapse biopsy, designated as the treated. Biopsies were immunostained to detect PD-1+ and PD-L1+ leukocytes, and PD-L1+ tumor cells. In the untreated, none of the markers were statistically significantly different when biopsies 1 and 2 were compared. In the treated, 19, 22, and 18 of 30 cases had increased proportions of PD-1+ leukocytes, PD-L1+ leukocytes and PD-L1+ tumor cells, respectively, and were all statistically significantly increased when primary and relapse biopsies were compared. PD-1 and PD-L1 most likely increase due to primary treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which could have implications regarding treatment with PD-1 inhibitors.

Clinical and Molecular Predictors of PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) associated with a strong expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1⁺ in > 5% of cells) have not been well elucidated. Expression of PD-L1 is a poor prognostic factor, but NSCLCs with higher levels of PD-L1 have greater benefit when treated with immunotherapy. We have performed a systematic review to synthesize the available evidence regarding clinicopathologic and molecular variables associated with PD-L1 expression in NSCLC. PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles assessing predictors of PD-L1 expression in > 5% cells. Data were reported as odds ratio (OR) of events. Fifty-two studies (for a total of 5066 PD-L1⁺ out of 13,279 NSCLC patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Factors associated with PD-L1 expression were: smoking status (OR 5.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-10.4; P < .001), male gender (OR 4.8; 95% CI 3.2-7.2; P < .001), adenocarcinoma histology (OR 2.75; 95% CI, 1.5-4.8; P < .001), Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type (OR 4.83; 95% CI, 2.1-11.1; P < .001), ALK mutation negative (OR 388.6; 95% CI, 222.5-678.7; P < .001), ROS mutation negative (OR 1904.8; 95% CI, 630-5757; P < .001), and KRAS wild type (OR 19.8; 95% CI, 7.6-51.6; P < .001). Conversely higher pT stages (OR 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.7; P = .01), pN+ stages (OR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.17-0.5; P < .001) are inversely associated with PD-L1 expression in > 5% cells. Expression of PD-L1 is more common in male smokers, with adenocarcinoma histology and not carriers of EGFR/ALK/ROS/KRAS mutations. These data could be useful to screening of PD-L1 expression and to select patients for immunotherapy.

Association between PD-L1 expression and driver gene status in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between PD-L1 expression and driver gene mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

We performed a meta-analysis of 26 studies (7541 patients) which were published from 2015 to 2017. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to describe the correlation. Subgroup analysis was performed based on population characteristics, types of PD-L1 antibodies and quality of individual studies.

RESULTS

A lower frequency of PD-L1 positivity was observed in NSCLCs harboring EGFR mutation (OR: 0.64, 95% CI, 0.45-0.91, p = 0.014). A negative correlation was also found at 1% (OR: 0.35, 95% CI, 0.22-0.55, p = 0.000) and 50% (OR: 0.33, 95% CI, 0.14-0.81, p = 0.015) cutoff for PD-L1 positive, elderly age group (OR: 0.56, 95% CI, 0.35-0.89, p = 0.013), female dominant group (OR: 0.55, 95% CI, 0.29-0.94, p = 0.030) and smoker dominant group (OR: 0.52, 95% CI, 0.29-0.96, p = 0.035). No significant differences in PD-L1 expression were observed among patients with different ALK, BRAF, HER2, PIK3CA status and MET expression level. Higher level of PD-L1 was found in tumors with KRAS mutation (OR: 1.45, 95% CI, 1.18-1.80, p = 0.001). PD-L1 expression level was not significantly different between triple (EGFR/ALK/KRAS) wild type NSCLCs and those with EGFR/ALK/KRAS mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression in EGFR mutated NSCLCs were lower than those in EGFR wild type NSCLCs, while tumors with KRAS mutation showed higher levels of PD-L1.