Apatinib-treated advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma: a case report

Efficacy and Safety of Multikinase Inhibitors for Patients With Refractory Thyroid Cancer: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

CONTEXT

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) improve the treatment of refractory thyroid cancer, including radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) and advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (aMTC).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy of MKIs in improving survival outcomes and safety.

DATA SOURCES

Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were performed from inception to December 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Three independent authors selected these studies. Randomized controlled trials that compared the use of a MKI to other MKIs or placebo were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were grouped into common nodes based on the type of MKI.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Cabozantinib 60 mg/day (CAB60) was associated with the highest prolonged PFS in RAIR-DTC patients, followed by lentivatinib 18 or 24 mg/day (LEN18 or LEN24), and apatinib. PFS was also improved in aMTC patients who received CAB 140 mg/day (CAB140), CAB60, or anlotinib. A significantly greater improvement on the performance of OS was seen in CAB60, LEN24, anlotinib, and sorafenib in RAIR-DTC patients, but in aMTC patients there were lack of statistical differences. Compared with the low-dose MKIs, high-dose MKIs such as CAB, LEN, and vandetanib increased the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

CAB60, LEN, and apatinib are promising topical MKIs with statistically significant primary outcomes in RAIR-DTC patients, while CAB and anlotinib are effective in prolonging PFS in aMTC patients.

Editorial: Apatinib and Anlotinib in the Treatment of Radioactive Iodine Refractory and Highly Invasive Thyroid Carcinoma

Thyroid cancer (TC) is the most prevalent endocrine malignancy, with a rising incidence in the past decade [...].

A single-arm, prospective study of apatinib mesylate plus pemetrexed in patients of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after failure of previous chemotherapy

Background

The outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after first- or second-line therapy are still discouraging due to a lack of effective treatment strategies. As a novel oral anti-angiogenesis drug, apatinib, approved by the National Medical Products Administration of China only for advanced gastric cancer, has been increasingly used in off-label treatment across various cancer types in recent years, especially advanced NSCLC. It has shown strong anti-tumor efficacy and acceptable safety.

Methods

This prospective study (NCT02974933) was conducted in patients with advanced NSCLC, who had suffered disease progression from the first- or second-line treatment, in Hubei Cancer Hospital. Eligible patients were enrolled and administrated with apatinib mesylate (500 mg qd) in combination with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

From September 2016 to September 2019, a total of 21 advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled in Hubei Cancer Hospital. As of January 2021, treatment was discontinued in all patients, with 1 still in follow-up. There were 7/21 (33.3%) patients who achieved objective response. The median PFS and median overall survival (OS) were 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.15-7.85 months) and 13.0 months (95% CI: 7.39-18.6 months), respectively. Toxicities were tolerable or could be clinically managed. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (14.3%, 3/21), hand-foot syndrome (4.7%, 1/21), and proteinuria (4.7%, 1/21). Hematological toxicities were moderate, with rare occurrences of grade 3/4 toxicities. During the period of treatment, there was no occurrence of treatment-related death.

Conclusions

Apatinib plus pemetrexed demonstrated promising efficacy and a high level of safety profile in previously heavily-treated NSCLC patients. More definitive studies on the combination of apatinib and pemetrexed are warranted.

Updates on the Management of Thyroid Cancer

The diagnostic modalities, stratification tools, and treatment options for patients with thyroid cancer have rapidly evolved since the development of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in 2015. This review compiles newer concepts in diagnosis, stratification tools and treatment options for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). Newer developments apply precision medicine in thyroid cancer patients to avoid over-treatment in low risk disease and under-treatment in high risk disease. Among novel patient-tailored therapies are selective RET inhibitors that have shown efficacy in the treatment of MTC with limited systemic toxicity compared with non-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors have revolutionized management of BRAF V600E mutant ATC. Several immunotherapeutic agents are being actively investigated in the treatment of all forms of thyroid cancer. In this review, we describe the recent advances in the diagnosis and management of DTC, MTC, and ATC, with an emphasis on novel treatment modalities.

Clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background Esophageal cancer is a very common malignant tumor in China, especially esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but there is currently no effective treatment for patients after first-line chemotherapy failure. Apatinib has shown promising outcomes in treatment with various solid tumors. Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 in the treatment of advanced ESCC patients after first-line chemotherapy failure. Methods In this prospective study, fifteen patients with advanced ESCC who failed first-line chemotherapy were enrolled from Nov 2016 to Apr 2019. Patients received the combination therapy with apatinib (250-500 mg, once daily) plus S-1 (40–60 mg based on body surface area, twice daily). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate the safety. Results A total of 12 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The median PFS was 6.23 months, and the median OS was 8.83 months. Two (16.67%) patients achieved partial remission, 9 patients (75.00%) achieved stable disease and 1 (8.33%) patient achieved progressive disease. DCR and ORR was 91.67%and 16.67%, respectively. Most frequent AEs were hypertension, myelosuppression, weakness, hemorrhage, hand-foot syndrome, total bilirubin elevation, sick, proteinuria, oral ulcer, loss of appetite, and transaminase elevation. The most AEs were in grade I~II. Conclusion The combination therapy of apatinib plus S-1 was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced ESCC patients after first-line chemotherapy failure. The combination therapy has the potential to be a potent therapeutic option for advanced ESCC patients after first-line chemotherapy failure.

The efficacy and safety of apatinib for refractory malignancies: a review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Apatinib is a novel, oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR-2. Recent clinical trials have revealed its broad-spectrum anticancer effect. However, most recent studies of apatinib have involved single-arm studies with insufficient cases, different doses of drugs, and different incidences of adverse events (AEs), which has resulted in a lack of accurate measurement of the efficacy and safety of apatinib. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib.

METHODS

In total, 21 studies from five databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], and Cochrane Library) were included in this meta-analysis. All statistical analyses in this meta-analysis were performed using Stata 14.0 software. We used objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) to evaluate the efficacy of apatinib for five major types of solid tumors. Additionally, we used the total incidence of AEs and the incidence of the three most common grade 3-4 AEs to evaluate the safety of apatinib.

RESULTS

The pooled results for the efficacy of apatinib in the treatment of different types of solid tumors revealed that patients treated with apatinib exhibited good disease control. In addition, it was likely that an increased dose of apatinib resulted in an increased ORR in lung and breast cancer and an increased DCR in liver and gastric cancer. Although AEs appeared in 84% of patients included in this meta-analysis, most of these AEs were of grades 1-2 and were well tolerated and controlled. The most common grade 3-4 AEs included hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and proteinuria. Importantly, there were no significant differences in these grade 3-4 AEs with higher doses of apatinib.

CONCLUSION

Apatinib is a novel VEGFR-2 inhibitor with proven efficacy and safety for solid tumors. The meta-analysis reveals the broad-spectrum anticancer effect of apatinib.